- This topic is empty.
- First, everything that was made was made by and through Yeshua and for him. In fact by Yeshua all things consist. Col 1:17
All things are delivered unto me of my Father: and no man knoweth the Son, but the Father; neither knoweth any man the Father, save the Son, and he to whomsoever the Son will reveal him. Matt 11:27, Luke 10:22,
Not that any man hath seen the Father, save he which is of God, he hath seen the Father. John 6:46
Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. John 14:6
- Second, here we see that “no man” has seen or can know the Father apart from Yeshua. So david your logic is faulty because just as Yeshua chose not to do anything on his own initiative, so does the Father choose to not do anything apart from Yeshua! Does that mean the Father is not God?
David, if you believe that Yeshua existed before his incarnation and that the Father made all things through a “smaller god” or a lessor being than himself, then how do you explain scriptures that say that God “by himself”, “alone” and with “none other” created all things.
Thus saith the LORD, thy redeemer, and he that formed thee from the womb, I [am] the LORD that maketh all [things]; that stretcheth forth the heavens alone; that spreadeth abroad the earth by myself; Isa 44:24
Even your own translation, the NWT reads…
This is what Jehovah has said, your Repurchaser and the Former of you from the belly: “I, Jehovah, am doing everything, stretching out the heavens by myself, laying out the earth. Who was with me? Isa 44:24 NWT
How do you explain this contradiction?
Quote (david @ Aug. 23 2008,17:30)
As God’s spokesman, he could not act on his own initiative. I ask again: Can we imagine the almighty God of the universe saying that he could do nothing of his own initiative?
Obviously you cannot imagine that the Father doesn’t do anything without Yeshua.It is the false conclusions of the Arians like the Jews that cannot fathom that Yeshua is equal to the Father in everyway except position. No one on this board has given me “one” attribute of God that the Father has that Yeshua doesn't
It is the false conclusions of the Arians that Yeshua is not “the image” of the invisible God, for in making him less than God they have created a false image of the invisible God.
It is the false conclusions of the Arians that Yeshua having “ALL” authority and power in heaven and earth and sitting at the right hand of the Father (at his side not in his hand), not beneath him nor above him, that somehow this equates to him being less than God, and in so doing diminishes his position of having “all power and authority” in heaven and in earth.
It is the false conclusions of the Arians that Yeshua is not “the exact representation of his being”, thereby diminishing his nature to being less than God in which it would be impossible for him to be “all in all”, Col 3:11, and to sustain all things by his (Yeshua’s) powerful word. Heb 1:3
It is the false conclusions of the Arians that somehow Yeshua is to be given less honor than the Father when the Father gives him honor as God and commands the angels to worship him, and Yeshua’s own words say…
That all men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father. He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him. John 5:23
Notice david, Yeshua’s words are in the same context where the Jews were accusing him of claiming to be equal to God.
Paul also gives a glimpse of the mind of Yeshua before he came in the flesh.
who though he existed in the form of God11 did not regard equality with God as something to be grasped, 2:7 but emptied himself by taking on the form of a slave,12 by looking like other men,13 and by sharing in human nature.14 2:8 He humbled himself, Phil 2:6-8 NET
Again the NET explains, emphasis mine…
11sn The Greek term translated form indicates a correspondence with reality. Thus the meaning of this phrase is that Christ was truly God.
12tn See the note on the word “slaves” in 1:1. 13tn Grk “by coming in the likeness of people.”
sn The expression the likeness of men is similar to Paul’s wording in Rom 8:3 (“in the likeness of sinful flesh”). The same word “likeness” is used in both passages. It implies that there is a form that does not necessarily correspond to reality. In Rom 8:3, the meaning is that Christ looked like sinful humanity. Here the meaning is similar: Jesus looked like other men (note anqrwpoi), but was in fact different from them in that he did not have a sin nature.
14tn Grk “and by being found in form as a man.” The versification of vv. 7 and 8 (so also NRSV) is according to the versification in the NA27 and UBS4 editions of the Greek text. Some translations, however, break the verses in front of this phrase (NKJV, NASB, NIV, NLT). The same material has been translated in each case; the only difference is the versification of that material.
sn By sharing in human nature. This last line of v. 7 (line d) stands in tension with the previous line, line c (“by looking like other men”). Both lines have a word indicating form or likeness. Line c, as noted above, implies that Christ only appeared to be like other people. Line d, however, uses a different term that implies a correspondence between form and reality. Further, line c uses the plural “men” while line d uses the singular “man.” The theological point being made is that Christ looked just like other men, but he was not like other men (in that he was not sinful), though he was fully human. Source
Quote (david @ Aug. 23 2008,17:30)
Unless you answer “Yes” we can conclude that the Jews made a charge, and Jesus refuted it.
Maybe you can conclude that, but I do not see a single scripture where Yeshua or John refuted their claim that for Yeshua to claim that he was “The Son of God” is being equal to God. In fact context shows support for the
ir claim as well as statements like this…In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was fully God. 1:2 The Word was with God in the beginning. 1:3 All things were created by him, and apart from him not one thing was created that has been created.John 1:1-3 NET
No one has ever seen God. The only one, himself God, who is in closest fellowship with the Father, has made God known. John 1:18
So Jesus answered them, “I tell you the solemn truth, the Son can do nothing on his own initiative, but only what he sees the Father doing. For whatever the Father does, the Son does likewise. John 5:19
If ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also: and from henceforth ye know him, and have seen him. Philip saith unto him, Lord, shew us the Father, and it sufficeth us. Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father? John 14:7-9
Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up. Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear it up in three days? But he spake of the temple of his body. John 2:19-21
To them belong the patriarchs, and from them, by human descent, came the Christ, who is God over all, blessed forever!14 Amen. Rom 9:5 NET
who though he existed in the form of God did not regard equality with God as something to be grasped, but emptied himself by taking on the form of a slave, by looking like other men, and by sharing in human nature. He humbled himself, Phil 2:6-8 NET
From Simeon Peter, a slave and apostle of Jesus Christ, to those who through the righteousness of our God and Savior, Jesus Christ, have been granted a faith just as precious as ours. 2 Peter 1:1
Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ; Titus 2:13
And we know that the Son of God has come and has given us insight to know him who is true, and we are in him who is true, in his Son Jesus Christ. This one is the true God and eternal life. 1 John 5:20 NET
Just to mention a few.
Quote (david @ Aug. 23 2008,17:30) SECONDLY, it was those unbelieving Jews, too, who claimed that Jesus broke the Sabbath, but they were wrong also about that. Jesus kept the Law perfectly, and he declared: “It is lawful to do good on the sabbath.”—Matt. 12:10-12, RS. You're not suggesting it was John who believed Jesus broke the Sabbath, are you?
John was stating what the unbelieving Jews believed. He was not stating what he knew to be true.“The sabbath came into existence for the sake of man, and not man for the sake of the sabbath.” (Mark 2:27) Accordingly, Jesus Christ’s performing healings on the sabbath was in full harmony with the merciful spirit of the law.
It was the Pharisees’ unreasonable insistence on the letter of the law according to their traditional interpretation that led to a merciless attitude toward this law.—Matt. 23:23.
See above. Yeshua is Lord of the Sabbath. This also infuriated the unbelievers.In closing david, I have a couple of questions for you?
- 1. Can you give me one attribute of God that Yeshua does not have?
- 2. What does it mean to you to honour Yeshua “even as” you honour the Father?
- 3. Can you explain how you can have a true image of God if you see Yeshua who is the exact image of the invisible God as less than God?
WJ