- This topic is empty.
- AuthorPosts
- May 25, 2010 at 1:04 am#192077
SimplyForgiven
ParticipantPerfect I totally think your idea was better than mine.
May 25, 2010 at 1:21 am#192080Admin
KeymasterOh cool.
May 25, 2010 at 2:55 am#192090Lightenup
ParticipantHeaven,
You've gone and done it nowJust thinking here but, personally, I would just want to die if someone started a topic with my name on it and how frustrated they are with me. I don't mind if someone speaks about their frustration with me but I wouldn't want a thread begun just to talk about how frustrating that person is towards me. That just seems wrong.
Maybe each member could have one topic on their beliefs and be able to copy some of their more important posts to their own personal thread and it would only be open to that member to post on if that is possible. Also, that same person could have a challenge topic to which people can challenge what the member posted on their personal belief's thread. I think the two threads would be right next to each other so they were easier to find. Would that be possible? These threads could be linked to the profile page.
Just suggestions
May 25, 2010 at 3:06 am#192092Admin
KeymasterMaybe there could be a rule where members could opt out of a discussion about them?
It could be mentioned in their member page. So that people could check their member page to see if it is OK to start a topic about them.The board doesn't support 2 topics being listed together. They are listed in date order with other sort options available if a person selects them.
May 25, 2010 at 3:18 am#192093Lightenup
ParticipantMaybe in the member's profile page there could be a link to their personal belief's thread within the member profiles section which they alone post on and also a link to a challenge page to challenge that member on. Also, maybe only the member's could start these two threads. If the member doesn't start a challenge thread to their beliefs then another member shouldn't start one about them…and make it a rule. Can we put two links in our profile page?
May 25, 2010 at 3:55 am#192095Arnold
ParticipantQuote (Lightenup @ May 25 2010,13:55) Heaven,
You've gone and done it nowJust thinking here but, personally, I would just want to die if someone started a topic with my name on it and how frustrated they are with me. I don't mind if someone speaks about their frustration with me but I wouldn't want a thread begun just to talk about how frustrating that person is towards me. That just seems wrong.
Maybe each member could have one topic on their beliefs and be able to copy some of their more important posts to their own personal thread and it would only be open to that member to post on if that is possible. Also, that same person could have a challenge topic to which people can challenge what the member posted on their personal belief's thread. I think the two threads would be right next to each other so they were easier to find. Would that be possible? These threads could be linked to the profile page.
Just suggestions
t8 I agree with Kathi, to go and talk about someones frustration because of another member, in the open is not beneficial to anyone. It will only cause more friction, I think. We have a Chat Room already and we really don't need anything else….You even have some nice pictures on there….
IreneMay 25, 2010 at 4:12 am#192097Admin
KeymasterQuote (Lightenup @ May 25 2010,14:18) If the member doesn't start a challenge thread to their beliefs then another member shouldn't start one about them…and make it a rule.
That seems like a good idea and is doable.What about a Topic that a member can only start in order to give some background info on themselves, then the member can request that the Admin either closes the topic in which case there is no debate, and if they keep it open, then people can reply which allows for debate.
May 25, 2010 at 5:36 am#192110Lightenup
ParticipantQuote What about a Topic that a member can only start in order to give some background info on themselves, then the member can request that the Admin either closes the topic in which case there is no debate, and if they keep it open, then people can reply which allows for debate. That is ok to close the topic but I think it would be better for the member to be able to add their important posts as they go along. Maybe in the topic of the thread it could say “t8 only posts here,” and in the subtitle, “no other member allowed to post.” And if someone accidentally posts on that topic, the member that owns that topic could ask for the posts to be moved to the challenge t8 topic by the admin. The challenge topic could be titled, “Challenge t8 here.”
Just thinking…May 25, 2010 at 5:42 am#192114Proclaimer
ParticipantThe only problem I can see with that is there is no feature that allows one member to exclusively edit a topic. The most that can be done is a group being able to post in a forum. e.g., believers in Believers Place. I can't drill down the permissions any narrower than that.
Unless a member requests for their topic to be open again for the purposes of an update and any one else's post being deleted if that happens during that time before being closed again. Could be a bit of a mission though.
May 25, 2010 at 9:49 am#192144JustAskin
ParticipantT8,
I agree with those who say option 4 is just plain wrong.It was wrong from my first reading before even I saw other opposers. Having a gossip thread is wrong. Sure people will do it occassionally, but an explicit place to do it, nah!
Like companies providing Smoking (Drug taking) rooms, and even smoke breaks for drugtaking staff (but nonedruggies can't take time out.) even worse that the managers are in the druggy room, what an advantage for druggystaff to mingle in free talktime with managers…!Other topics:
When a thread is started up, it is the responsibility of that person to control what is posted in it. How many analogies apply: A man has a rock music party and it is invaded by soul fans. Does he just run to a backroom and say to humself, 'oh dear, this isn't the long expected party… That i was hoping for', or does he go out and tells,…i mean, ask the soul fans to leave or, enjoy the rockness. That man may be surprised to see the soul guys some headbanging, some leaving…but why is he surprised? Because he didn't believe in himself and his authority in his own house.
And, if noone listened to him, where are the 'policemen' in his town, where are the moderaters in this forum to appeal to?What did I say to David?. What did WJ say to someone who posted in a debate thread not of theirs. Simply, they never posted again in there AND it also served to enlighten others as to proper protocol, respect. It also showed others that one simple polite request works wonders, empower them. David obviously didn't get it!
May 25, 2010 at 11:12 am#192154Proclaimer
ParticipantYes there is always the risk that this could get ugly. But there is also the risk that iron sharpens iron. I myself am not afraid to be scrutinized by others. I prefer to have my judgement now rather than later, so I am not afraid of what others might say about me. I want to hear what they have to say. I just need the wisdom to know which voices are true and that is true in life anyway, because Jesus said “My sheep hear my voice”.
But I also that think after all the input so far, that it may be best to offer members a page that they can post about themselves and leave it open for others to comment or to close it with no comments. Or even to no have one at all. (I can always open a topic for posting again if a member wants to update their page.)
This way, when a person goes to a person Profile Page, they can link to a page that they can say what they want about themselves and in turn provide links and even video from inside their page.
It could save a lot of questions and diversions in the topics and could help people understand where we are all coming from.
May 25, 2010 at 11:30 am#192156karmarie
ParticipantHi t8, yeah I see both sides I agree I dont mind being scrutinized (better than being ignored) sometimes pm is easier to sort out issues away from everyone else..I dont know. As long as no-one gets hurt cause some people could be more sensitive than others. I think a good idea is a place to state somethings about you photos maybe testimony, I dont know, just my opinion?
May 25, 2010 at 11:37 am#192158Proclaimer
ParticipantYes, I am tending to think that it would be best to offer it as a sort of home page for members that can be linked to from their profile.
It would be up to each member that wanted to participate to have feedback from others or to close their page from replies.May 26, 2010 at 2:34 am#192257malysc
ParticipantCan you tell me who put together the Bibical research on the article “Which Church is the Right Church?”
It is so comprehensive and imperative to all of us. My Bible study group will discuss that very article thursday night. thank you so much. Puts all in to perspective and simply. Great use for Seekers…..Thanks again.:)May 27, 2010 at 1:44 am#192413Proclaimer
ParticipantWelcome malysc.
I put that article together.
I hope it is a blessing.July 2, 2010 at 2:49 am#201304Ed J
ParticipantQuote (t8 @ May 27 2010,12:44) Welcome malysc. I put that article together.
I hope it is a blessing.
Hi T8,Where is the article located that he is referring to?
God bless
Ed J
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgJuly 2, 2010 at 9:47 am#201333princess of the king
ParticipantJuly 8, 2010 at 3:30 pm#202546Proclaimer
ParticipantJuly 11, 2010 at 3:24 am#202993Ed J
ParticipantThanks POK and T8.
July 11, 2010 at 4:31 am#202997terraricca
Participantverry good,well done t8 i like it
Pierre
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.