The Ante-Nicene Fathers Proves Textus Receptus is Oldest

[DavidL]

In-depth yet easy to understand teaching on Biblical manuscripts by Jim Brown
“Most people don’t know that the Bible they have is from an incorrect text..”

[NickHassan]

hi davidl,

Yes they are smooth talkers who serve the whore.

[AndrewAD]

I haven’t watched the video and don’t care to,I studied it years ago and know all the KJV only and textus receptus is propaganda and lies. And no the church fathers don’t support that rubbish.

[NickHassan]

Hi davidl,

Ear ticklers are a dime a dozen

[kerwin]

DavidL,

Not a creditable witness and from what I see you are just posting things.

[NickHassan]

Hi davidl,

Why do you give any credence to the apostate leaders after the apostles?

[NickHassan]

Hi davidl,

You seem to constantly on the search for a shadow of someone else to hide in.

Grasp your own faith

[AndrewAD]

It’s okay for David to grasp Trinity but dear David you need not textus receptus.

[NickHassan]

Hi Andrew,

Do you approve of men advancing their own unscriptural ideas about the nature of God?

[AndrewAD]

Nick,what about Kerwin denying Jesus to be the Son of God? He says it’s polytheism.Do you approve of that?

[NickHassan]

Hi Andrew,

Sometimes Kerwin is not clear in his use of English.

suggest read with that in mind

[AndrewAD]

He’s certainly not clear and has gone to the extremes of antichrist. What a pity!

[AndrewAD]

Don’t worry Kerwin I and We forgive you and fully understand. It’s alright and We know you are a good guy just trying to understand like all of Us.

[kerwin]

AndrewAd,

I need no forgiveness from you as you choose to make the false accusation and my conscious is clear on that matter before God.

I assume it stems for your lack of understanding of the context of my message and so do not hold it against you.

It seems I will have to go out of my way to be more literal.

I am not sure I am skilled enough to do that.

[Proclaimer]

When the Trinity Doctrine fails all tests, then make arguments for the translation that supports it the most. That is the KJV and in particular the Comma Johanneum which has an added corruption of 1 John 5:7–8 which is found in no ancient manuscript and was debated not by any early Church Father. Even debates on the Trinity by Athanasius and others do not include this Trinitarian verse. If it existed, it would have been the primary verse by which to argue the doctrine.

Conclusion. If it is not true, then make it true using any means possible including additions if need be.

We read in Revelation the following:

I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues which are written in this book; and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his part from the tree of life and from the holy city, which are written in this book.

While this is about the Book of Revelation, we can draw from this that it is absolutely possible for men to add to the Word of God and thus a curse comes upon them for adding the words of men in the guise of the word of God.

[Author]

Posts