Ridiculous

[bodhitharta]

This is not fair once again you take liberties with me and why?

I cannot post on the thread about Nick whom I would like to defend but anyone can say what they want about me in the other section and there is nothing I can do.

I am starting to realize that alot of these chages here have come from me posting and While I love you all so much how much should I endure?

T8, I trust your judgement so, it's cool.

[Admin]

You can start one up about Nick from here.

I think that believers and skeptics would judge people differently anyway.

What would be the point of an atheist commenting on a believers faith in God or a Moslem protesting against a believers belief that Jesus is the son of God in the Believers category.
I am trying to curb that so that any feedback is constructive and contextual.

It would be fine to ask such things here as it would be contextual.

[Admin]

Actually hold that thought.
Am trying to figure out if it is best to let this forum be for those who want to create their own page with background info about themselves. If so, then they could be free to open or close that page to other posts.

Some early feedback indicates that some don't want a place where you can pick someone out and talk about them.

What are your thoughts?

[SimplyForgiven]

Quote (bodhitharta @ May 25 2010,13:33)

This is not fair once again you take liberties with me and why? I cannot post on the thread about Nick whom I would like to defend but anyone can say what they want about me in the other section and there is nothing I can do. I am starting to realize that alot of these chages here have come from me posting and While I love you all so much how much should I endure? T8, I trust your judgement so, it's cool.

i already started one on nick by the way in the believers page lol….

I did the work for you a long time ago

[bodhitharta]

Quote (SimplyForgiven @ May 25 2010,19:59)

Quote (bodhitharta @ May 25 2010,13:33) This is not fair once again you take liberties with me and why? I cannot post on the thread about Nick whom I would like to defend but anyone can say what they want about me in the other section and there is nothing I can do. I am starting to realize that alot of these chages here have come from me posting and While I love you all so much how much should I endure? T8, I trust your judgement so, it's cool. i already started one on nick by the way in the believers page lol…. I did the work for you a long time ago

Nick is simply a person who has decided that he has come to the end of his search.

[SimplyForgiven]

Quote (heaven @ May 25 2010,19:50)

Actually hold that thought. Am trying to figure out if it is best to let this forum be for those who want to create their own page with background info about themselves. If so, then they could be free to open or close that page to other posts. Some early feedback indicates that some don't want a place where you can pick someone out and talk about them. What are your thoughts?

Its the extremes of both good and bad results.

there is always a rotten apple, it wuold be good to quickly through it into the trash before it infects the others.

heavy moderation would solve this problem.
Quick responses to problems concenign this.

If iron wants to be sharpened with iron, the let him be sharpened, if not let iron go.

[KangarooJack]

Quote (bodhitharta @ May 27 2010,11:20)

Quote (SimplyForgiven @ May 25 2010,19:59) Quote (bodhitharta @ May 25 2010,13:33) This is not fair once again you take liberties with me and why? I cannot post on the thread about Nick whom I would like to defend but anyone can say what they want about me in the other section and there is nothing I can do. I am starting to realize that alot of these chages here have come from me posting and While I love you all so much how much should I endure? T8, I trust your judgement so, it's cool. i already started one on nick by the way in the believers page lol…. I did the work for you a long time ago Nick is simply a person who has decided that he has come to the end of his search.

At the end of Nick's search he has decided that Matthew 28:19 has been corrupted. He should be received with welcoming Muslim arms.

the Roo

[Proclaimer]

There are many kings, lords, gods, spirits.

But for us there is one supreme (most high) God, one Spirit, one Lord, one faith, one body.

So as you can see, there is one at the top and he delegates his authority. Jesus said “ye are gods”. Sorry to inform you, but Jesus said that, and in the same breath, “You are all sons of the Most High”.

At the moment God is putting all things under Christ, except for himself (God) of course.

For US, there is one God the Father, and one Lord, the Lord Jesus Christ.
For a Trinitarian, there is NOT one God the Father, and there is NOT one Lord, the Lord Jesus Christ.

This is the reality and gravity of the situation isn't it.

[bodhitharta]

Quote (Kangaroo Jack @ May 29 2010,05:20)

Quote (bodhitharta @ May 27 2010,11:20) Quote (SimplyForgiven @ May 25 2010,19:59) Quote (bodhitharta @ May 25 2010,13:33) This is not fair once again you take liberties with me and why? I cannot post on the thread about Nick whom I would like to defend but anyone can say what they want about me in the other section and there is nothing I can do. I am starting to realize that alot of these chages here have come from me posting and While I love you all so much how much should I endure? T8, I trust your judgement so, it's cool. i already started one on nick by the way in the believers page lol…. I did the work for you a long time ago Nick is simply a person who has decided that he has come to the end of his search. At the end of Nick's search he has decided that Matthew 28:19 has been corrupted. He should be received with welcoming Muslim arms. the Roo

Would you say the same about Mar 16 9-20 which is completely a corruption about the same thing?

Footnotes:
a.Mark 16:18 NU-Text reads and in their hands they will.
b.Mark 16:20 Verses 9–20 are bracketed in NU-Text as not original. They are lacking in Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus, although nearly all other manuscripts of Mark contain them.

Mark 16:9-20 (New International Version)

((The most reliable early manuscripts and other ancient witnesses do not have Mark 16:9-20.))

Mark 16:9-20 (New American Standard Bible)

Footnotes:
a.Mark 16:9 Later mss add vv 9-20
b.Mark 16:20 A few late mss and versions contain this paragraph, usually after v 8; a few have it at the end of ch

Mark 16:9-20 (English Standard Version)

[Some of the earliest manuscripts do not include 16:9-20.][a]

Footnotes:
a.Mark 16:9 Some manuscripts end the book with 16:8; others include verses 9-20 immediately after verse 8. A few manuscripts insert additional material after verse 14; one Latin manuscript adds after verse 8 the following: But they reported briefly to Peter and those with him all that they had been told. And after this, Jesus himself sent out by means of them, from east to west, the sacred and imperishable proclamation of eternal salvation. Other manuscripts include this same wording after verse 8, then continue with verses 9-20

Nick is right

[bodhitharta]

It's all about disjointed activity and nothing else, a spirit that is not your spirit and is not Holy, does what you are not trying to do. If we have submitted ourselves to God we have become whole in mind body and soul for we have subjected those things to the devotion and love of God in peace and this is what is meant by Islam.

In witness the real this is expressed by saying Honesty in actions, speech, and thoughts. You have to do what you think you honestly ought to do. When the vow to God becomes disjointed we think one thing but do another, we say one thing and do another and this is the nature of demons who demonstrate your lack of control. In a movie about demonic possession what you will only see is how the person loses control over their mind and body with the ultimate loss of their soul as the aim of the demon. If you say you want to do a certain thing the demon will attempt to influence you to not do what you say. The demon is in constant effort to break the alignment of Honest action, thought and words as this instability is access to the soul and it's corruption.

cor·rupt·ed, cor·rupt·ing, cor·rupts
VERB:
tr.

To destroy or subvert the honesty or integrity of.
To ruin morally; pervert.
To taint; contaminate.
To cause to become rotten; spoil.
To change the original form of (a text, for example).
ETYMOLOGY:
Middle English, from Latin corruptus, past participle of corrumpere, to destroy : com-, intensive pref. ; see com- + rumpere, to break; see reup- in Indo-European roots
SYNONYMS:
corrupt, debase, debauch, deprave, pervert, vitiate

These verbs mean to ruin utterly in character or quality:
For a Man to have the Character or attributes of God he must become perfect in his form or content
This is easily achieved by follow through or actuality. you actually and absolutely keep true to form and not distort under pressure or excessive lax.
A demon cannot control a disciplined person because the true disciple has accepted and needs not demonstration to control the form, for he has been informed with power to execute accordingly to the will of God and acts with faith and purpose. Long story short demons cannot function in a unity hence they are legion, to destroy all demons one must have unity of purpose, poise and grace, You must not get lost in a double mind

[SimplyForgiven]

Quote (bodhitharta @ May 25 2010,13:33)

This is not fair once again you take liberties with me and why? I cannot post on the thread about Nick whom I would like to defend but anyone can say what they want about me in the other section and there is nothing I can do. I am starting to realize that alot of these chages here have come from me posting and While I love you all so much how much should I endure? T8, I trust your judgement so, it's cool.

Im sorry, this post still tickles me

[bodhitharta]

Lol:D

[davidbfun]

Quote (t8 @ May 29 2010,18:28)

There are many kings, lords, gods, spirits. But for us there is one supreme (most high) God, one Spirit, one Lord, one faith, one body. So as you can see, there is one at the top and he delegates his authority. Jesus said “ye are gods”. Sorry to inform you, but Jesus said that, and in the same breath, “You are all sons of the Most High”. At the moment God is putting all things under Christ, except for himself (God) of course. For US, there is one God the Father, and one Lord, the Lord Jesus Christ. For a Trinitarian, there is NOT one God the Father, and there is NOT one Lord, the Lord Jesus Christ. This is the reality and gravity of the situation isn't it.

Hi t8,

This part of your post is correct:

“But for us there is one supreme (most high) God, one Spirit, one Lord, one faith, one body.”

Most High God = Elohim
Spirit= Holy Spirit
LORD = YHVH
Faith = Lord, Jesus
Body = Believers

Then you change and say, “For US, there is one God the Father, and one Lord, the Lord Jesus Christ.”

Is God the Father not LORD?  And where is the Holy Spirit?

Grace, Mercy and Peace,

The Professor, “TP”

[Author]

Posts