- This topic is empty.
- Posts
Quote (Kangaroo Jack @ Aug. 16 2010,09:32) Mike, It's not that I am against the early church fathers. It's that you want to hide behind them when you are losing an argument scripturally.
I have said many times here and everyone knows where I stand. I don't give a hoot about anything but “What saith the scriptures.”
But you and Kathi when you are losing the argument scripturally invoke the fathers saying, “See, we're not alone.”
Nobody cares Mike!
the Roo
Hi Jack,What argument was I losing? That Jesus is Wisdom in a part of Proverbs?
And you say “Nobody cares Mike!”. Well I sure do. If I'm getting the same thing out of the scriptures as Eusebius – the most learned theologian of his day, and Ignatius who learned directly from the Apostle John, then I DO care. That tells me I'm on the right track.
mike
Quote (shimmer @ Aug. 16 2010,10:01) Mike, I havent read everything here today, only briefly because I'm not supposed to be here, I'm supposed to be cleaning the house lol, but if you are getting confused, take some time out, refocus, calm your mind down, pray, I know what it's like.
Hi Shimmer,I'm not confused at all. What makes you think that?
mike
Quote (Kangaroo Jack @ Aug. 16 2010,10:03) Kathi, Hooey! When you and Mike lose an argument scripturally you hide behind the fathers saying, “See, we're not alone.” That's what it's all about. It's all about you and Mike saving face when you can't win the argument scripturally.
Jack,I agree it feels good to have confirmation of what you thought in the first place. But did you ever ask yourself this question:
WHY do the church fathers always agree with Kathi and Mike, not me and WJ?
You should do it.
mike
Quote (shimmer @ Aug. 16 2010,10:11) KangarooJack, We all have day's like that, my problem is I'm on the other side of the world than most people, so I miss out on all the conversations and only catch up later, when everyones gone. I think Mike need's some time out.
You know Shimmer,I've have given you the benefit of the doubt so far. But your “opinions” without any substance to back them are wearing thin.
Did you not read the post where it was very clear I was talking about things that Jack has claimed that turned out to be false? Did you see where he took one of the things that HE claimed that I had just proven false and attributed it to me?
What you seem to do is to go through and read the “juicy” posts where Jack is all yelling and bolding and capitalizing words, and you don't actually check whether what he was yelling about even happened.
And then you make a snap judgement against ME?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
