- This topic is empty.
- AuthorPosts
- February 26, 2011 at 7:58 pm#237512Ed JParticipant
Quote (mikeboll64 @ Feb. 27 2011,05:42) Who are you? King Midas?
Hi Mike,Are you referring to this color?
God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgFebruary 26, 2011 at 8:09 pm#237514mikeboll64BlockedIt's gold, isn't it?
February 27, 2011 at 2:28 am#237539Ed JParticipantQuote (mikeboll64 @ Feb. 27 2011,06:09) It's gold, isn't it?
Hi Mike,The other color was a darker yellow.
Yellow is hard to see, and
the darker you go the less it looks like yellow.God bless
Ed J
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgFebruary 27, 2011 at 5:52 pm#237591mikeboll64BlockedYeah, I've had the same trouble with orange and cyan. It really limits our choices. Maybe t8 should make the pages black, and then we could use all the more subtle colors.
mike
February 28, 2011 at 4:16 am#237623Ed JParticipantQuote (mikeboll64 @ Feb. 28 2011,03:52) Yeah, I've had the same trouble with orange and cyan. It really limits our choices. Maybe t8 should make the pages black, and then we could use all the more subtle colors. mike
Hi Mike,A black background is harder on the eyes, click on this link… (Click Here)
The color yellow does “POP” on a black background: Look at my last Post on the link.Your brother
in Christ, Jesus!
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgMarch 1, 2011 at 2:21 am#237680mikeboll64BlockedYeah, you're right. I read the whole page and my eyes do hurt. It is a big strain for some reason.
mike
March 3, 2011 at 5:22 am#237884ProclaimerParticipantQuote (mikeboll64 @ Feb. 28 2011,03:52) Yeah, I've had the same trouble with orange and cyan. It really limits our choices. Maybe t8 should make the pages black, and then we could use all the more subtle colors. mike
But black text everywhere would disappear. Might not be a bad thing.March 3, 2011 at 5:35 am#237885ProclaimerParticipantQuote (WorshippingJesus @ Feb. 26 2011,05:12) In what sense is Jesus not God right now? Please answer the question.
WJ
He is not God in identity.
He is not the one identified as the one true God.
He is not the person who is the Almighty God.March 5, 2011 at 11:40 pm#238129mikeboll64BlockedEd is right. After reading those white letters on a black background for a few minutes, the eyes become strained.
mike
March 7, 2011 at 3:42 pm#238302KangarooJackParticipantQuote (Ed J @ Feb. 16 2011,10:37) Quote (Kangaroo Jack @ Feb. 16 2011,09:19)
Satan did what he wanted only under Christ's permission.Roo
Hi Jack,Did Jesus give satan permission to tempt him? (James 1:13 / Luke 4:2-13)
I would say yes. The narrative says that Jesus was driven in the spirit to be tempted of the devil. Our translations say “Spirit” (capital “S”). This is not possible because the Spirit is God and cannot tempt anyone. Therefore, Jesus did not resist the promptings of His spirit to be tempted. In this way He gave satan “permission” to tempt Him.KJ
March 7, 2011 at 3:48 pm#238305Ed JParticipantHi Jack,
Do you have “Editing” back?
Your brother
in Christ, Jesus!
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgMarch 7, 2011 at 3:51 pm#238308KangarooJackParticipantQuote (t8 @ Mar. 03 2011,15:35) Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Feb. 26 2011,05:12) In what sense is Jesus not God right now? Please answer the question.
WJ
He is not God in identity.
He is not the one identified as the one true God.
He is not the person who is the Almighty God.
t8,You have answered your own question a thousand times. You have said that Jesus is God qualitatively. This means that he is God in His very being.
being 1. Existence (Webster's)
being 2. The QUALITIES or CONSTITUTION of an existent thing (Webster's)
Therefore, when you say that jesus is God “qualitatively” you affirm that He is God according to Webster's second definition of the word “being.” You affirm that Jesus is God in His qualities and His constitution, that is, IN HIS VERY BEING.
This is why you have already defeated yourself in your debates with WJ. Get with God's word!
KJ
March 7, 2011 at 3:52 pm#238309KangarooJackParticipantQuote (Ed J @ Mar. 08 2011,01:48) Hi Jack, Do you have “Editing” back?
Your brother
in Christ, Jesus!
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
Why?KJ
March 7, 2011 at 3:55 pm#238310Worshipping JesusParticipantQuote (t8 @ Mar. 02 2011,23:35) Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Feb. 26 2011,05:12) In what sense is Jesus not God right now? Please answer the question.
WJ
He is not God in identity.
He is not the one identified as the one true God.
He is not the person who is the Almighty God.
t8No t8? We know he is not the Father. That is not the question. I will refine the question. What sense is he not God in his respective nature?
What kind of creature is he?
Is he a half breed or demi-god or freak of nature?
“What kind of son is he t8?
A mere man? Half God and half man? An angel?
Everything has a “Kind”. What “kind” is he t8?
WJ
March 7, 2011 at 4:09 pm#238313Ed JParticipantQuote (Kangaroo Jack @ Mar. 08 2011,01:52) Quote (Ed J @ Mar. 08 2011,01:48) Hi Jack, Do you have “Editing” back?
Your brother
in Christ, Jesus!
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
Why?KJ
Hi Jack,Because your name “NOW” comes up in blue instead of gold
in the active users section on the bottom of the index Page.Now will you answer my question?
God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgMarch 7, 2011 at 4:26 pm#238316Worshipping JesusParticipantQuote (Kangaroo Jack @ Mar. 07 2011,09:51) Quote (t8 @ Mar. 03 2011,15:35) Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Feb. 26 2011,05:12) In what sense is Jesus not God right now? Please answer the question.
WJ
He is not God in identity.
He is not the one identified as the one true God.
He is not the person who is the Almighty God.
t8,You have answered your own question a thousand times. You have said that Jesus is God qualitatively. This means that he is God in His very being.
being 1. Existence (Webster's)
being 2. The QUALITIES or CONSTITUTION of an existent thing (Webster's)
Therefore, when you say that jesus is God “qualitatively” you affirm that He is God according to Webster's second definition of the word “being.” You affirm that Jesus is God in His qualities and His constitution, that is, IN HIS VERY BEING.
This is why you have already defeated yourself in your debates with WJ. Get with God's word!
KJ
True Jack!WJ
March 7, 2011 at 5:34 pm#238319KangarooJackParticipantQuote (Ed J @ Mar. 08 2011,02:09) Quote (Kangaroo Jack @ Mar. 08 2011,01:52) Quote (Ed J @ Mar. 08 2011,01:48) Hi Jack, Do you have “Editing” back?
Your brother
in Christ, Jesus!
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
Why?KJ
Hi Jack,Because your name “NOW” comes up in blue instead of gold
in the active users section on the bottom of the index Page.Now will you answer my question?
God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
Kangaroo Jack has always had editing rights except for one day when t8 done an investigation last August. It is KJ Jr. that does not have editing. Maybe you're confusing the two.KJ
March 8, 2011 at 10:32 pm#238467ProclaimerParticipantQuote (Kangaroo Jack @ Mar. 08 2011,01:51) t8, You have answered your own question a thousand times. You have said that Jesus is God qualitatively. This means that he is God in His very being.
being 1. Existence (Webster's)
being 2. The QUALITIES or CONSTITUTION of an existent thing (Webster's)
Therefore, when you say that jesus is God “qualitatively” you affirm that He is God according to Webster's second definition of the word “being.” You affirm that Jesus is God in His qualities and His constitution, that is, IN HIS VERY BEING.
This is why you have already defeated yourself in your debates with WJ. Get with God's word!
KJ
But KJ, the question you keep avoiding is that others are called “theos/elohim” for good reason and they are not even part of your Trinity.That shows that your understanding in this matter is wrong or incomplete. Because you fail to explain why men and angels are also called by the same title.
You also fail to explain why there is even the title “Most High God”.
If there was only one Adam, then why could you say, “Original Adam”? Maybe because all who shared his nature is called adam, and you could say original adam to avoid confusion with the same word being applied to all who have Adam's nature.
March 11, 2011 at 7:02 pm#238857Worshipping JesusParticipantQuote (t8 @ Mar. 08 2011,16:32) That shows that your understanding in this matter is wrong or incomplete. Because you fail to explain why men and angels are also called by the same title.
t8 But Jesus is unlike any other because he is the “Only Begotten (Monogenes) Son.The Father, and the Holy Spirit only are the Godkind!
You have yet to show us how in nature Jesus is not God.
He sits in the Throne of God with all things being subject to him having all authority and power and by him all things consist. He indwells every believer by his spirit.
In nature he is God, and we identify God by his name and nature not just his name!
WJ
March 11, 2011 at 8:03 pm#238863Kangaroo Jack Jr.ParticipantQuote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 12 2011,05:02) Quote (t8 @ Mar. 08 2011,16:32) That shows that your understanding in this matter is wrong or incomplete. Because you fail to explain why men and angels are also called by the same title.
t8 But Jesus is unlike any other because he is the “Only Begotten (Monogenes) Son.The Father, and the Holy Spirit only are the Godkind!
You have yet to show us how in nature Jesus is not God.
He sits in the Throne of God with all things being subject to him having all authority and power and by him all things consist. He indwells every believer by his spirit.
In nature he is God, and we identify God by his name and nature not just his name!
WJ
Thanks Keith. This has been said by the both of us a quadtrillion times.Jack
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.