And as I have told you before that I have already explained three of the six points.
I have also explained what is wrong with your rudimentary logic – citing different Scripture.
You are not really interested in my explanations anyways, because you obviously ignored them.
If you are interested in what I have to say, go back and read my explanations, they are on that thread.
You answered ONE point. And the only reason I am interested in your explanation in full and in order and NOT using scripture is to show that you twist what is actually written. But we are dealing with that on the thread ‘EdJs Unanswered Posts’.