- This topic is empty.
- Posts
Hi Ed.
I would also like to take you to task over your view about the KJV.
My first question is:
What is the most compelling reason to you that proves the KJV is the only true translation of the Bible.
After your answer, you can ask me a question. If you don't want to, I will ask another question.
I would like to open this to anyone who has a good question to ask Ed J on this topic. So long as he has one open question at a time. Don't want to give him too much work.
Quote (t8 @ Feb. 07 2013,14:08) Hi Ed. I would also like to take you to task over your view about the KJV.
My first question is:
What is the most compelling reason to you that proves the KJV is the only true translation of the Bible.
After your answer, you can ask me a question. If you don't want to, I will ask another question.
I would like to open this to anyone who has a good question to ask Ed J on this topic. So long as he has one open question at a time. Don't want to give him too much work.
Hi T8,Are you going to attempt to limit my answers?
God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgI am going to attempt to get you to answer the questions.
As long as I get a simple answer (let your yes be yes and no be no) you can expand it as much as you like in the next post or under the simple answer.My first question is not a yes or no question. I would like to get an answer in this fashion.
Bible Gematria is the single most compelling reason to me that the KJV is the true Bible.
Or
The Johannine Comma is the single biggest reason the KJV is the only true translation of the English Bible.
Then you can expand on that as much as you like. Perhaps bold the simple answer so it stands out.
That way readers can follow easily. Often people get away with too much false teaching because it is hidden away and too hard to find it. Thus it doesn't get challenged.
Remember, that God knows your heart and if you are telling me the truth. Please do not answer with the best answer that refutes my questions. Just the real answers. It is good when we are honest in our dealings with one another. We should both throw any pride away and get to the real issues.
Hi T8,
Will you agree not to threaten to tile me in this thread?
God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgQuote (Ed J @ Feb. 07 2013,10:10) Hi T8, Will you agree not to threaten to tile me in this thread?
God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
Are you going to become violent.???
Quote (terraricca @ Feb. 07 2013,17:54) Quote (Ed J @ Feb. 07 2013,10:10) Hi T8, Will you agree not to threaten to tile me in this thread?
God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org Are you going to become violent.???
“No”Quote (Ed J @ Feb. 07 2013,18:10) Hi T8, Will you agree not to threaten to tile me in this thread?
God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
As a moderator, it is my job to tile people who do not answer reasonable questions in the Hot Seat.So no I cannot agree to that.
This is the whole point of the Hot Seat, to stop the practice of dodgery.
Hi T8,
I've answered every question that you asked in the other threads, no dodges. Since I
thought you were seeking information, I give it. But that doesn't seem to be the case,
because you completely ignored my informative answers. Then you asked almost the
exact same question, only worded slightly different, claiming that your question was not answered.
You did this each of the “three times” that I customized each answer to each different question. So
what you must really mean then is: that my answer was unsatisfactory to 'your preconceived ideas'.Now it seems that starting these threads is geared toward crafty constructed questions designed
to steer all the gained information (during innocent sounding inquires) to later be repackaged
and then witched to questions limiting my flexibility and waving the mod punishment tile stick
(Stu's wording) in an attempt to make your view appear to be correct? You of course have the
right of denial, but refusing to exercise your right to deny – is seen as proof this is indeed true.My goal, as is in all my discourses here, is to show where we can agree and let the chaff just fall away.
I have seen this happen to a number of people here (no names) as “The Word” begins to take root.In the last “Hot Seat” thread you started, you ignored both: my questions “AND” my answers;
and then you once more re-asked the same question again, and claimed I didn't answer it;
You obviously did this out of ignorance, because you believed it to be the wrong answer.So if you demand that I play by your “Fake rules”,
then my participation in this thread will be just like
my currently reduced participation in the last thread.You can ask ALL the questions, and the “ONLY”
responses you will get will be one of these three:- “Yes”
- “No”
- “I don't know”
Is that what you really want?
Isn't that a waste of your time? Will that
be your choice once again in this thread as well?Sorry if you don't like my bluntness with you, but that's the way it's going to be.
If you pretend that you have not read my response and ask another question first,
like you did on the last thread, I will take it to mean that you answer has been made
in this thread as well. And so you will get no usable information from this point forward.Your brother
in Christ, Jesus.
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgEd,
The main question I think we'd all like answered is:
What exactly makes you believe the AKJV is the only true translation of scripture?
(You don't have to answer these others)
Do you believe that people who existed BEFORE the AKJV did NOT have the “real truth” of God?
Do you believe that people who speak languages other than English do not have the “real truth” of God?
How can you say the AKJV is the the only true translation, when it is evident from history that it was translated from mss that had been altered by scribes in certain places?
Did you know that a portion of the AKJV wasn't even translated from Greek mss, but “back-translated” from the Vulgate?
Quote (t8 @ Feb. 09 2013,00:07) Stop dodging the question. No amount of “I am a victim” will change the rules of the Hot Seat.
Hi T8,I guess you made up your mind then, my answers to YOUR
questions (in this thread too) will only be the following:- Yes
- No
- I don't know
As you see: I do follow rules.
I will get to “Mike's” questions when I decide.Your brother
in Christ, Jesus.
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgQuote (t8 @ Feb. 09 2013,00:07) Thanks Mike.
Yes, thanks “Mike”, looks like we will be needing a “Mod” here
as T8's Judiciary skills appear to be impaired.Quote (t8 @ Feb. 09 2013,00:07) Stop dodging the question. No amount of “I am a victim” will change the rules of the Hot Seat.
Hi T8, I will not be a victim!Ps.120:7 I for peace: but when I speak, they are for war.
Isaiah 27:4-5 Fury is not in me(Ed J): who would set the briers and thorns
against me in battle? I(Ed J) would go through them, I would burn them together. Or
let him take hold of my strength(YHVH), that he may make peace with me; and he shall make peace with me.God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgQuote (mikeboll64 @ Feb. 08 2013,10:44) Ed, The main question I think we'd all like answered is:
What exactly makes you believe the AKJV is the only true translation of scripture?
(You don't have to answer these others)
Do you believe that people who existed BEFORE the AKJV did NOT have the “real truth” of God?
Do you believe that people who speak languages other than English do not have the “real truth” of God?
How can you say the AKJV is the the only true translation, when it is evident from history that it was translated from mss that had been altered by scribes in certain places?
Did you know that a portion of the AKJV wasn't even translated from Greek mss, but “back-translated” from the Vulgate?
Hi Mike,I'll be answering your questions shortly (please bear with me).
Your brother
in Christ, Jesus.
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgHi T8,
I asked you: if you wanted me to post less. …you did NOT say “Yes”.
I also asked you: if you wanted me to leave. …you did NOT say “Yes”.Have you changed your mind – either? (ref. all of Psalm 15)
“He that sweareth to his own hurt, and changeth not.” (Psalms 15:4)
Your brother
in Christ, Jesus.
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgQuote (mikeboll64 @ Feb. 08 2013,10:44) Ed, The main question I think we'd all like answered is:
(1) What exactly makes you believe the AKJV is the only true translation of scripture?
(You don't have to answer these others)
(2) Do you believe that people who existed BEFORE the AKJV did NOT have the “real truth” of God?
(3) Do you believe that people who speak languages other than English do not have the “real truth” of God?
(4) How can you say the AKJV is the the only true translation, when it is evident from history that it was translated from mss that had been altered by scribes in certain places?
(5) Did you know that a portion of the AKJV wasn't even translated from Greek mss, but “back-translated” from the Vulgate?
Hi Mike,1) I never said that.
(I don't have to do anything
)2) This is really a dumb question, now isn't it?
3) “The Scriptures” have been translated into many languages.
4) I never said that either.
5) False
God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgTo All,
When Mike uses the term “AKJV”, what he is referencing
is known as the “AKJV Bible”; which actually stands for:Authorized King James Version of the Bible.
I will be using “AKJV Bible” and Mike
will likely continue to use just “AKJV”This great undertaking was agreed upon by both the “Catholic”
and “Protestant” Clergy, and was “Authorized” by King James 1,
the throne of which David sat, and is called the “United Kingdom”.A brief history
After the 10 Northern tribes separated from the 2 Southern tribes (Judah and Benjamin), by YHVH's orders.
The crown was taken over the Caucuses mountains, and was first settled in Europe in Scotland (Berkshire I think).Later the crown moved to England, where the “United Kingdom” has been ruling from ever since. Brittan is considered Ephraim,
and the “United States” is considered Manasseh. Ephraim and Manasseh were the two sons of Joesph, where Jacob's blessings went.“That in blessing I will bless thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed
as the stars of the heaven, and as the sand which is upon the sea shore;
and thy seed shall possess the gate of his enemies;” (Gen 22:17)God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgQuote (Ed J @ Feb. 07 2013,21:23) Hi T8, I've answered every question that you asked in the other threads, no dodges. Since I
thought you were seeking information, I give it. But that doesn't seem to be the case,
because you completely ignored my informative answers. Then you asked almost the
exact same question, only worded slightly different, claiming that your question was not answered.
You did this each of the “three times” that I customized each answer to each different question. So
what you must really mean then is: that my answer was unsatisfactory to 'your preconceived ideas'.Now it seems that starting these threads is geared toward crafty constructed questions designed
to steer all the gained information (during innocent sounding inquires) to later be repackaged
and then witched to questions limiting my flexibility and waving the mod punishment tile stick
(Stu's wording) in an attempt to make your view appear to be correct? You of course have the
right of denial, but refusing to exercise your right to deny – is seen as proof this is indeed true.My goal, as is in all my discourses here, is to show where we can agree and let the chaff just fall away.
I have seen this happen to a number of people here (no names) as “The Word” begins to take root.In the last “Hot Seat” thread you started, you ignored both: my questions “AND” my answers;
and then you once more re-asked the same question again, and claimed I didn't answer it;
You obviously did this out of ignorance, because you believed it to be the wrong answer.So if you demand that I play by your “Fake rules”,
then my participation in this thread will be just like
my currently reduced participation in the last thread.You can ask ALL the questions, and the “ONLY”
responses you will get will be one of these three:- “Yes”
- “No”
- “I don't know”
Is that what you really want?
Isn't that a waste of your time? Will that
be your choice once again in this thread as well?Sorry if you don't like my bluntness with you, but that's the way it's going to be.
If you pretend that you have not read my response and ask another question first,
like you did on the last thread, I will take it to mean that you answer has been made
in this thread as well. And so you will get no usable information from this point forward.Your brother
in Christ,
Ed J
Hi T8,Thank you for confirming that everything I said here is true and accurate.
Quote (t8 @ Feb. 09 2013,00:07) Stop dodging the question. No amount of “I am a victim” will change the rules of the Hot Seat. Defining my terms: “usable information”
I mean information that you can use against me.God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
