- This topic is empty.
- Posts
Mr. Bob, I never said that you said that I spammed, however, I did say that T8 or Heaven accused me of spamming, in which I only did what he asked me to do, and that was to post a link to the article and not use up valuable forum server space, and that is exactly all that I have done is what he asked me to do himself.
That is why I asked him the question of why tell me to do that, and I did what he requested, but then he turns arround and accuses me of spamming, that would look and seem like a ” set up of the person being accused ” NO ?
Quote (Eliyah @ Feb. 15 2006,09:37) You would do well to look into the original scriptures, for the English word ” god ” is in the Hebrew texts too, however, it is not referring to YHWH either. Read this blog first…My Webpage
Modern mankind has only re-defined in their own meaning the title name ' god or God ' of an idol deity, the same as they have re-defined the word ” easter and christmas ” into modern terms of meaning that people merely think they are now acceptable and right to YHWH, however, they are clearly not according to scriptures.
In reply to Eliyah's post above, (not the quote above).In the Trinity discussion, I was referring to this post (quoted above). Of course this post alone wasn't the problem. It was the other posts in other discussions combined with this one. The net effect and your reaction to me when I asked you to stop.
I rightly asked for this to end as it is a clear redirection of the discussion to your favourite topic, as you already had discussion(s) for this.
In the “Who is Jesus” forum, here are some examples where you have changed the subject to your favourite teaching, even though you had discussions for this already.
Quote < http://www.freewebs.com/elyah/whoreallywasyahshua.htm > However, to combine a Babylonian deity of “” GOD= GAWD=GUWD, Strongs 1409, 1413, 1464 “” to Him is unthinkable to Him.
Quote you are correct for ALL THE PROPHETS IN SCRIPTURES GIVES WITNESS ONLY TO THE NAME OF YHWH=YAH of Messiah as Peter( Kepha) said in ( Acts 10:43). However, He is not the English pagan idol deity of “” GOD=GAWD=GUWD( Isa.65:11), Strongs Hebrew Numbers 1409, 1413,1464, that people have forsaken YAHWEH-SHUA for in the LATTER DAYS( Jer.23:20, 26-27) either, as it is Idolatry to combine a pagan title name deity to Him( Exod.20:2-7; Exod.23:13; Deut.5:7; Joshua 23:7).
Read the posts at this address on this forum.Quote hose who don't answer to the responce posts can't answer, because they can't refute them. Isn't that true? Then why have none done so?
In the Ball Gaad discussion itself you engaged in some pretty nasty name calling too.
The NET affect for me was a warning to you, and your reaction was not a good one.
What does anyone expect will happen, when an Admin asks for a member to respect the rules and instead of hearing an apology, he gets a negative response. That would be taken by many to be a NO, or at least the beginnings of a great time waster of a discussion with a kind of court case to follow.
If I was invited to speak at a meeting, and they said to me to not smoke inside, then I wouldn't smoke inside. If I wanted to smoke inside the building, then I shouldn't go to that meeting if they banned smoking and I wanted to smoke.
NOTE: This is an example. I actually do not smoke, incase someone wants to have a shot about me smoking.
Yes because all these posts tell aboutWHO the one you call FATHER ' god ' and ' je'sus ” really was and is related to this topic, however I never said or mentioned the baal topic in my posts, that is in your own imagination, and as I said before, I posted the link as you asked me to do inorder to conserve valuable forum space.
And you would not even let the last 3 links even work proving who the one you call je'sus really was and is, or was that done on purpose too ?
If that is spam then why did you tell me to leave a link especially if I had already replied to the subject, and done as you asked me to do,?Was it inorder to set me up for your accusations? There's no other reason for telling me to do such a thing, then turn arround and accuse me of doing what you asked me to do!
Quote In the Ball Gaad discussion itself you engaged in some pretty nasty name calling too Only the devil digs back up past forgiven offences between brethren to use them against a person, as i said before as Messiah also said, ye are of your father the devil and lust of your father you will do, when he speaks a lie, he speaks of his own, for he is a liar and the father of it,and because i tell you the truth you accept or believe me not.
True people of Messiah do not do such things as digging up past forgiven offences between brethren to use it against a person, let alone using them to sway others minds, and do such things to people, however satan's ministers will though( 2 Cor. 11).
Put that one under your black hat and wear it.
Quote (Eliyah @ Feb. 19 2006,14:25) Only the devil digs back up past forgiven offences between brethren to use them against a person, as i said before as Messiah also said, ye are of your father the devil and lust of your father you will do, when he speaks a lie, he speaks of his own, for he is a liar and the father of it,and because i tell you the truth you accept or believe me not.
Are you saying you are the devil?
You were the one who asked for reasons why you were banned. I complied, even unwillingly because I have better things to do with my time.Come on, I think you should just be mature about it and realise that you need to show some respect when you come here. It's really simple to understand, but I suspect that you will just complain from here till eternity and no one will get any peace in the forum as you try to consume peoples time with useless arguments.
I may go back to not reading your posts again as I have better things to do.
You very well read what I wrote, and it means what it says as Messiah said.
PS for anyone wanting to discuss any scriptural topic without being banned or hassarased for their belief, try coming here, discuss all the scriptural topics you want.
Yes even T8 or heaven is invited too.
Or even this one…
Another new scriptural discussion fourm.
http://freeforums.bizhat.com/index.php?mforum=Eliyah&showforum=1
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
