Trinity Debate Zechariah 12:10

Subject:  Zechariah 12:10 proves the Trinity Doctrine
Date: April 22 2007
Debaters:  Is 1: 18 & t8

 


Is 1:18

Okay short and sweet this time….

In the below passage Zechariah records a quite amazing prophecy:

Zechariah 12:10
“I will pour out on the house of David and on the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the Spirit of grace and of supplication, so that they will look on Me whom they have pierced; and they will mourn for Him, as one mourns for an only son, and they will weep bitterly over Him like the bitter weeping over a firstborn.

What’s significant (in the context of this debate submission) about the highlighted statement above is that the preceding verses (1, 4, 6 and 9) unmistakably bear out that it was a prophecy made by YHWH, and would be fulfilled by YHWH. YHWH foretold that they (the inhabitants of Jerusalem) will look upon “Me” whom they (the inhabitants of Jerusalem) pierced.

Zechariah 12:1-9
1The burden of the word of the LORD [YHWH] concerning Israel. Thus declares the LORD [YHWH] who stretches out the heavens, lays the foundation of the earth, and forms the spirit of man within him, 2″Behold, I am going to make Jerusalem a cup that causes reeling to all the peoples around; and when the siege is against Jerusalem, it will also be against Judah. 3″It will come about in that day that I will make Jerusalem a heavy stone for all the peoples; all who lift it will be severely injured And all the nations of the earth will be gathered against it. 4″In that day,” declares the LORD [YHWH], “I will strike every horse with bewilderment and his rider with madness. But I will watch over the house of Judah, while I strike every horse of the peoples with blindness. 5″Then the clans of Judah will say in their hearts, ‘A strong support for us are the inhabitants of Jerusalem through the LORD of hosts, their God.’ 6″In that day I [YHWH] will make the clans of Judah like a firepot among pieces of wood and a flaming torch among sheaves, so they will consume on the right hand and on the left all the surrounding peoples, while the inhabitants of Jerusalem again dwell on their own sites in Jerusalem. 7″The LORD also will save the tents of Judah first, so that the glory of the house of David and the glory of the inhabitants of Jerusalem will not be magnified above Judah. 8″In that day the LORD will defend the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and the one who is feeble among them in that day will be like David, and the house of David will be like God, like the angel of the LORD before them. 9″And in that day I [YHWH] will set about to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem.

There is no mention of a secondary identity in the Zechariah’s predictive prophecy. The “me” in “they will look on Me whom they have pierced” is YHWH. In the immediately-preceding verse YHWH affirmed “I will set about to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem”, which of course only the Almighty could accomplish. With that in mind, please consider Who it was that John taught fulfilled this prophecy:

John 19:33-37
33but coming to Jesus, when they saw that He was already dead, they did not break His legs. 34But one of the soldiers pierced His side with a spear, and immediately blood and water came out. 35And he who has seen has testified, and his testimony is true; and he knows that he is telling the truth, so that you also may believe. 36For these things came to pass to fulfill the Scripture, “NOT A BONE OF HIM SHALL BE BROKEN.” 37And again another Scripture says, “THEY SHALL LOOK ON HIM WHOM THEY PIERCED.

According to John, Zechariah 10:12 is a predictive reference to the piercing (vs 34) incurred by Yeshua during His crucifixion (“For these things came to pass to fulfill the Scripture” – v 36). Let me be as clear as I can here t8: Only YHWH could fulfill this prophecy, because it was made specifically by YHWH (through Zechariah) and of YHWH. It cannot be fulfilled by proxy, the piercing was to be incurred by YHWH and it is YHWH that would be looked upon. No one else, the language in the Zechariah text is unambiguous and does not allow for it. John unequivocally tells us that Yeshua literally fulfilled the Zech 12:10 prophecy at Calvary, but crucially He fulfilled it after His body had expired (v 33). The Roman soldiers and other bystanders (the inhabitants of Jerusalem) looked upon His lifeless body, but John and Zechariah tell us that this was the body of YHWH. So, the obvious implication here is: even His dead body was considered utterly divine, it was the body of YHWH. So any argument linking Yeshua’s deity with His indwelling by the Holy Spirit is vaporised in this verse.

If YHWH makes a prophecy that only YHWH can fulfill, and Yahshua fulfills it, then He is YHWH. There is no other acceptable conclusion.

Now some questions for you t8:

Q1) Was the “me” that was foretold to be pierced and looked upon by the inhabitant of Jerusalem in Zech 12:10 a refererence to YHWH? If not, please provide lexical evidence to the contrary.

Q2) According to John’s inspired-understanding, was Yeshua in fact the “me” in the Zech 12:10 prophecy (John 19:37)? If not, please explain.

Q3) If YHWH makes a prophecy that only YHWH can fulfill, and Yeshua fulfills it, is it reasonable to conclude that Yeshua is YHWH? If not why not?

Blessings



t8

Q1) Was the “me” that was foretold to be pierced and looked upon by the inhabitant of Jerusalem in Zech 12:10 a refererence to YHWH? If not, please provide lexical evidence to the contrary.

I think the ME is YHWH. The one who is to be pierced (HIM) is Yeshua.

It says “…They will look on me, the one they have pierced, and they will mourn for him as one mourns for an only child,…”

Grammatically, the “Me” and the “him” cannot refer to the same individual can it.

It is clearly talking about 2, not 1. Otherwise it would say: “They will look on me, the one they have pierced, and they will mourn for ME as one mourns for an only child,”. Of course it doesn’t say that, so the “him” is obviously different to the “me”.

Q2) According to John’s inspired-understanding, was Yeshua in fact the “me” in the Zech 12:10 prophecy (John 19:37)? If not, please explain.

Is Yeshua the ME or the HIM? I say he is the HIM. If Yeshua was both, then the language would use ME or HIM, but not both.

Q3) If YHWH makes a prophecy that only YHWH can fulfill, and Yeshua fulfills it, is it reasonable to conclude that Yeshua is YHWH? If not why not?

YHWH didn’t make this prophecy about himself from what I can see. We know that YHWH is not a man and he doesn’t have bones and blood. It is rediculous to believe that God whom the universe cannot contain squeezed himself into a human body. Rather, it was the Word that became flesh and the apostles beheld his glory as the son of God. Even if YHWH did make the prophecy about himself, we know that YHWH sent his son and it was YHWH’s will that his son drink the cup that was prepared for him. So if YHWH was in Christ, then to that degree was YHWH the one being punished. But Christ did say “My God My God, why hast thou forsaken me”.

But the way it appears to me on the outset is that they would look to YHWH, because of the HIM who was pierced.

NOTE: My rebuttal is based on the English version of these verses. It is possible that the English version may not be that clear or even accurate. If this is the case, then a more accurate version of the Zechariah verse could change what I have written.

Anyway, it is interesting to note that John 19:33-37 also refers to another prophecy i.e., NOT A BONE OF HIM SHALL BE BROKEN.”
When we look at that prophecy, we see clearly that the YHWH (LORD) is one and the one whom not a bone shall be broken is another.

It is obvious to all that the bolded verses below are either or both Yeshua and YHWH. But the interesting part is that we cannot confuse Yeshua with actually being YHWH.

Psalm 22:1-19
My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?
Why are you so far from saving me,
so far from the words of my groaning?

2 O my God, I cry out by day, but you do not answer,
by night, and am not silent.

3 Yet you are enthroned as the Holy One;
you are the praise of Israel.

4 In you our fathers put their trust;
they trusted and you delivered them.

5 They cried to you and were saved;
in you they trusted and were not disappointed.

6 But I am a worm and not a man,
scorned by men and despised by the people.

7 All who see me mock me;
they hurl insults, shaking their heads:

“He trusts in the LORD;
let the LORD rescue him.
Let him deliver him,
since he delights in him.”

9 Yet you brought me out of the womb;
you made me trust in you
even at my mother’s breast.

10 From birth I was cast upon you;
from my mother’s womb you have been my God.

11 Do not be far from me,
for trouble is near
and there is no one to help.

12 Many bulls surround me;
strong bulls of Bashan encircle me.

13 Roaring lions tearing their prey
open their mouths wide against me.

14 I am poured out like water,
and all my bones are out of joint.
My heart has turned to wax;
it has melted away within me.

15 My strength is dried up like a potsherd,
and my tongue sticks to the roof of my mouth;
you lay me in the dust of death.

16 Dogs have surrounded me;
a band of evil men has encircled me,
they have pierced my hands and my feet.

17 I can count all my bones;
people stare and gloat over me.

18 They divide my garments among them
and cast lots for my clothing.

19 But you, O LORD, be not far off;
O my Strength, come quickly to help me.

So we have 3 reasons why YHWH cannot be Yeshua in Zech 12:10.

  1. Me and Him cannot be the same individual grammatically speaking.
  2. Psalm 22:1-19 the other quoted scripture by John, clearly indentifies Yeshua and YHWH as different identities.
  3. There is no contradiction in truth.
 

So an explanation that fits with John, Zechariah, and David (or Psalm writer) is that YHWH and Yeshua are 2 different identities and because of him who was pierced (Yeshua), people would look to YHWH (his God). This has come to pass as many now look to YHWH because of Yeshua’s sacrifice. See the below verse as an immediate example of fulfillment.

Acts 2:36-39
36 “Therefore let all Israel be assured of this: God has made this Jesus, whom you crucified, both Lord and Christ.”
37 When the people heard this, they were cut to the heart and said to Peter and the other apostles, “Brothers, what shall we do?”
38 Peter replied, “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
39 The promise is for you and your children and for all who are far off—for all whom the Lord our God will call.”


Discussion

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 18 posts - 501 through 518 (of 518 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #249681
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Cult Buster @ May 31 2007,18:53)
    Some of you folk need to think seriously before you continue to blaspheme the name of Christ Jehovah.


    :D  :laugh:  :D  This was way before my time on HN, but that is absolutely hilarious!   :D  :laugh:  :D

    Anyway David, I found this comment while looking through the past pages of this thread and seeing all the different things they discussed.  I see your point, and the rules do say to stick to the topic, but you need to lighten up.  You have been acting like a baby lately, IMO.  You started a thread to display trinity proofs that are easily refuted, and then complained when we started listing them.  ???

    How is John 1:1 NOT a trinity proof that is easily refuted?  ???

    Almost any scriptural discussion is going to involve OTHER supporting scriptures.  And once one person brings in the other scripture to support their understanding of the topical scripture, the other person is off and running with their take on that supporting scripture, and so posts ANOTHER scripture they think supports THEIR understanding of the first supporting scripture.  And so on and so on.

    Example:  The one pierced was our savior, so he MUST be God, because apart from God, there is no savior.

    Bam!  Now we're all off and running about how many saviors there are – WITHIN the topic of Zechariah 12:10.

    Judging from a comment he made on another thread, t8 apparently has a supply of “chill pills”.  Perhaps you could score a couple of them from him?  :)

    peace and love to you,
    mike

    #249683
    terraricca
    Participant

    Mike or David

    why is it says THEY and not HE because it was only one man who pierce Christ, Right?

    Pierre

    #249767

    David

    You are right. It has gotten off topic so I created a new thread and Moved it here…

    #249768
    #249791
    david
    Participant

    Quote (terraricca @ June 24 2011,14:54)
    Mike  or David

    why is it says THEY and not HE  because it was only one man who pierce Christ, Right?

    Pierre


    Hi pierre,
    I really don't quite understand what you are trying to ask.

    Could you explain.

    #249818
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 24 2011,15:37)
    David

    You are right. It has gotten off topic so I created a new thread and Moved it here…


    If David was right, then why didn't you take the rest of his advice and find a thread that already exists on saviors instead of starting yet another one?  ???

    #249827
    terraricca
    Participant

    Quote (david @ June 25 2011,21:40)

    Quote (terraricca @ June 24 2011,14:54)
    Mike  or David

    why is it says THEY and not HE  because it was only one man who pierce Christ, Right?

    Pierre


    Hi pierre,
    I really don't quite understand what you are trying to ask.

    Could you explain.


    David

    Za;12;10 And I will pour upon the house of David, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the spirit of grace and compassion: and they shall look upon me, because they have mocked me, and they shall make lamentation for him, as for a beloved friend, and they shall grieve intensely, as for a firstborn son. LXX

    Zec 12:10 “And I will pour out on the house of David and the inhabitants of Jerusalem a spirit of grace and supplication. They will look on me, the one they have pierced, and they will mourn for him as one mourns for an only child, and grieve bitterly for him as one grieves for a firstborn son.NIV1984

    Zec 12:10 And I will pour upon the house of David, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the spirit of grace and of supplications: and they shall look upon me whom they have pierced, and they shall mourn for him, as one mourneth for his only son, and shall be in bitterness for him, as one that is in bitterness for his firstborn.KJV

    If you look in the LXX it does not say ; the one they have pierced; ?????

    and where it says it it uses the plural ;THEY; and not the single ;HE: because there is only one soldier who pierce Christ on the stake/cross/tree.

    so my question is why ;THEY ?

    Pierre

    #249831
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Hi Pierre,

    The “THEY” refers to those who looked upon Jesus, not to the “HIM” who actually did the piercing.

    #249834
    terraricca
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ June 26 2011,11:26)
    Hi Pierre,

    The “THEY” refers to those who looked upon Jesus, not to the “HIM” who actually did the piercing.


    Mike

    if that is so then the ME is not Christ but God,Christ was the prophet of God and the anointed one and by looking upon him ,dead, they have looked at God not be able to intervene on his behalf ,and so mocked God ,

    this is how i see it and understand it ,

    Pierre

    #249837

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ June 25 2011,10:57)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 24 2011,15:37)
    David

    You are right. It has gotten off topic so I created a new thread and Moved it here…


    If David was right, then why didn't you take the rest of his advice and find a thread that already exists on saviors instead of starting yet another one?  ???


    Mike

    I searched and didn't find one that specifically dealt with Titus 2:13, 14. :)

    WJ

    #249849
    david
    Participant

    Quote (terraricca @ June 26 2011,04:40)

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ June 26 2011,11:26)
    Hi Pierre,

    The “THEY” refers to those who looked upon Jesus, not to the “HIM” who actually did the piercing.


    Mike

    if that is so then the ME is not Christ but God,Christ was the prophet of God and the anointed one and by looking upon him ,dead, they have looked at God not be able to intervene on his behalf ,and so mocked God ,

    this is how i see it and understand it ,

    Pierre


    Za;12;10 And I will pour upon the house of David, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the spirit of grace and compassion: and they shall look upon me, because they have mocked me, and they shall make lamentation for him, as for a beloved friend, and they shall grieve intensely, as for a firstborn son. LXX

    Right, if the LXX is correct, then the “me” would be God and the “him” would be Christ. And the LXX of course doesn't say that the “me” was pierced, but rather mocked.

    The LXX also points to the conclusion that it is ridiculous to assert that Zech 12:10 is any sort of good proof for the trinity.

    #249850
    terraricca
    Participant

    Quote (david @ June 26 2011,17:26)

    Quote (terraricca @ June 26 2011,04:40)

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ June 26 2011,11:26)
    Hi Pierre,

    The “THEY” refers to those who looked upon Jesus, not to the “HIM” who actually did the piercing.


    Mike

    if that is so then the ME is not Christ but God,Christ was the prophet of God and the anointed one and by looking upon him ,dead, they have looked at God not be able to intervene on his behalf ,and so mocked God ,

    this is how i see it and understand it ,

    Pierre


    Za;12;10 And I will pour upon the house of David, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the spirit of grace and compassion: and they shall look upon me, because they have mocked me, and they shall make lamentation for him, as for a beloved friend, and they shall grieve intensely, as for a firstborn son. LXX

    Right, if the LXX is correct, then the “me” would be God and the “him” would be Christ.  And the LXX of course doesn't say that the “me” was pierced, but rather mocked.

    The LXX also points to the conclusion that it is ridiculous to assert that Zech 12:10 is any sort of good proof for the trinity.


    David

    anyone that believe in the trinity as a ill faith and does not know God or the one he as send,

    it is not supported in scriptures anywhere only in the mind of those who are miss guided by there own corruption.

    Pierre

    #249862
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 25 2011,12:06)

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ June 25 2011,10:57)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 24 2011,15:37)
    David

    You are right. It has gotten off topic so I created a new thread and Moved it here…


    If David was right, then why didn't you take the rest of his advice and find a thread that already exists on saviors instead of starting yet another one?  ???


    Mike

    I searched and didn't find one that specifically dealt with Titus 2:13, 14.  :)

    WJ


    How about the one I started a while ago?  I thought my OP was rather good. And judging from the responses, others did too. :)

    It is found here.

    #249864
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (terraricca @ June 25 2011,11:40)
    Mike

    if that is so then the ME is not Christ but God


    Hi Pierre,

    I think that's the point of this discussion. Some mss have the word “ME” while others have “look upon HIM they have pierced”.

    The trick is to figure out which is the correct translation, “ME” or “HIM”.

    It is only a problem for those who think mortal man could have pierced God Almighty in any way.

    #249872
    terraricca
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ June 26 2011,18:20)

    Quote (terraricca @ June 25 2011,11:40)
    Mike

    if that is so then the ME is not Christ but God


    Hi Pierre,

    I think that's the point of this discussion.  Some mss have the word “ME” while others have “look upon HIM they have pierced”.

    The trick is to figure out which is the correct translation, “ME” or “HIM”.  

    It is only a problem for those who think mortal man could have pierced God Almighty in any way.


    Mike

    Ps 74:10 How long will the enemy mock you, O God?
    Will the foe revile your name forever?
    Ps 74:22 Rise up, O God, and defend your cause;
    remember how fools mock you all day long.

    Ps 119:51 The arrogant mock me without restraint,
    but I do not turn from your law.(will)

    Isa 52:5 “And now what do I have here?” declares the LORD.
    “For my people have been taken away for nothing,
    and those who rule them mock,’”
    declares the LORD.
    “And all day long
    my name is constantly blasphemed.

    this will only stop at the end of this age.

    Pierre

    #249878
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Yes, men can and do “mock” God. But man cannot “pierce” God. So if you take the LXX translation, then God is the one mocked while Jesus is the one mourned.

    If you take the Hebrew, the one who is pierced is the one who is lamented. IMO

    #249881
    terraricca
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ June 26 2011,19:18)
    Yes, men can and do “mock” God.  But man cannot “pierce” God.  So if you take the LXX translation, then God is the one mocked while Jesus is the one mourned.

    If you take the Hebrew, the one who is pierced is the one who is lamented.  IMO


    Mike

    Pr 12:18 Reckless words pierce like a sword,
    but the tongue of the wise brings healing.

    Lk 2:35 so that the thoughts of many hearts will be revealed. And a sword will pierce your own soul too.”

    Ps 37:14 The wicked draw the sword
    and bend the bow
    to bring down the poor and needy,
    to slay those whose ways are upright.
    Ps 37:15 But their swords will pierce their own hearts,
    and their bows will be broken.

    Mt 24:51 He will cut him to pieces and assign him a place with the hypocrites, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.
    Mt 25:30 And throw that worthless servant outside, into the darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.’

    this will say what i believe it is,

    all my christian love

    Pierre

    #250096

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ June 25 2011,19:15)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 25 2011,12:06)

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ June 25 2011,10:57)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 24 2011,15:37)
    David

    You are right. It has gotten off topic so I created a new thread and Moved it here…


    If David was right, then why didn't you take the rest of his advice and find a thread that already exists on saviors instead of starting yet another one?  ???


    Mike

    I searched and didn't find one that specifically dealt with Titus 2:13, 14.  :)

    WJ


    How about the one I started a while ago?  I thought my OP was rather good.  And judging from the responses, others did too.  :)

    It is found here.


    Mike

    Because your thread deals with Titus 2:13 and Jesus being God.

    My thread is dealing with Jesus being “The Savior” and the source of all things to all of creation.

    Of course that also means he is God!  :D

    WJ

Viewing 18 posts - 501 through 518 (of 518 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2024 Heaven Net

Navigation

© 1999 - 2023 - Heaven Net
or

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

or

Create Account