Trinity Debate Zechariah 12:10

Subject:  Zechariah 12:10 proves the Trinity Doctrine
Date: April 22 2007
Debaters:  Is 1: 18 & t8

 


Is 1:18

Okay short and sweet this time….

In the below passage Zechariah records a quite amazing prophecy:

Zechariah 12:10
“I will pour out on the house of David and on the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the Spirit of grace and of supplication, so that they will look on Me whom they have pierced; and they will mourn for Him, as one mourns for an only son, and they will weep bitterly over Him like the bitter weeping over a firstborn.

What’s significant (in the context of this debate submission) about the highlighted statement above is that the preceding verses (1, 4, 6 and 9) unmistakably bear out that it was a prophecy made by YHWH, and would be fulfilled by YHWH. YHWH foretold that they (the inhabitants of Jerusalem) will look upon “Me” whom they (the inhabitants of Jerusalem) pierced.

Zechariah 12:1-9
1The burden of the word of the LORD [YHWH] concerning Israel. Thus declares the LORD [YHWH] who stretches out the heavens, lays the foundation of the earth, and forms the spirit of man within him, 2″Behold, I am going to make Jerusalem a cup that causes reeling to all the peoples around; and when the siege is against Jerusalem, it will also be against Judah. 3″It will come about in that day that I will make Jerusalem a heavy stone for all the peoples; all who lift it will be severely injured And all the nations of the earth will be gathered against it. 4″In that day,” declares the LORD [YHWH], “I will strike every horse with bewilderment and his rider with madness. But I will watch over the house of Judah, while I strike every horse of the peoples with blindness. 5″Then the clans of Judah will say in their hearts, ‘A strong support for us are the inhabitants of Jerusalem through the LORD of hosts, their God.’ 6″In that day I [YHWH] will make the clans of Judah like a firepot among pieces of wood and a flaming torch among sheaves, so they will consume on the right hand and on the left all the surrounding peoples, while the inhabitants of Jerusalem again dwell on their own sites in Jerusalem. 7″The LORD also will save the tents of Judah first, so that the glory of the house of David and the glory of the inhabitants of Jerusalem will not be magnified above Judah. 8″In that day the LORD will defend the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and the one who is feeble among them in that day will be like David, and the house of David will be like God, like the angel of the LORD before them. 9″And in that day I [YHWH] will set about to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem.

There is no mention of a secondary identity in the Zechariah’s predictive prophecy. The “me” in “they will look on Me whom they have pierced” is YHWH. In the immediately-preceding verse YHWH affirmed “I will set about to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem”, which of course only the Almighty could accomplish. With that in mind, please consider Who it was that John taught fulfilled this prophecy:

John 19:33-37
33but coming to Jesus, when they saw that He was already dead, they did not break His legs. 34But one of the soldiers pierced His side with a spear, and immediately blood and water came out. 35And he who has seen has testified, and his testimony is true; and he knows that he is telling the truth, so that you also may believe. 36For these things came to pass to fulfill the Scripture, “NOT A BONE OF HIM SHALL BE BROKEN.” 37And again another Scripture says, “THEY SHALL LOOK ON HIM WHOM THEY PIERCED.

According to John, Zechariah 10:12 is a predictive reference to the piercing (vs 34) incurred by Yeshua during His crucifixion (“For these things came to pass to fulfill the Scripture” – v 36). Let me be as clear as I can here t8: Only YHWH could fulfill this prophecy, because it was made specifically by YHWH (through Zechariah) and of YHWH. It cannot be fulfilled by proxy, the piercing was to be incurred by YHWH and it is YHWH that would be looked upon. No one else, the language in the Zechariah text is unambiguous and does not allow for it. John unequivocally tells us that Yeshua literally fulfilled the Zech 12:10 prophecy at Calvary, but crucially He fulfilled it after His body had expired (v 33). The Roman soldiers and other bystanders (the inhabitants of Jerusalem) looked upon His lifeless body, but John and Zechariah tell us that this was the body of YHWH. So, the obvious implication here is: even His dead body was considered utterly divine, it was the body of YHWH. So any argument linking Yeshua’s deity with His indwelling by the Holy Spirit is vaporised in this verse.

If YHWH makes a prophecy that only YHWH can fulfill, and Yahshua fulfills it, then He is YHWH. There is no other acceptable conclusion.

Now some questions for you t8:

Q1) Was the “me” that was foretold to be pierced and looked upon by the inhabitant of Jerusalem in Zech 12:10 a refererence to YHWH? If not, please provide lexical evidence to the contrary.

Q2) According to John’s inspired-understanding, was Yeshua in fact the “me” in the Zech 12:10 prophecy (John 19:37)? If not, please explain.

Q3) If YHWH makes a prophecy that only YHWH can fulfill, and Yeshua fulfills it, is it reasonable to conclude that Yeshua is YHWH? If not why not?

Blessings



t8

Q1) Was the “me” that was foretold to be pierced and looked upon by the inhabitant of Jerusalem in Zech 12:10 a refererence to YHWH? If not, please provide lexical evidence to the contrary.

I think the ME is YHWH. The one who is to be pierced (HIM) is Yeshua.

It says “…They will look on me, the one they have pierced, and they will mourn for him as one mourns for an only child,…”

Grammatically, the “Me” and the “him” cannot refer to the same individual can it.

It is clearly talking about 2, not 1. Otherwise it would say: “They will look on me, the one they have pierced, and they will mourn for ME as one mourns for an only child,”. Of course it doesn’t say that, so the “him” is obviously different to the “me”.

Q2) According to John’s inspired-understanding, was Yeshua in fact the “me” in the Zech 12:10 prophecy (John 19:37)? If not, please explain.

Is Yeshua the ME or the HIM? I say he is the HIM. If Yeshua was both, then the language would use ME or HIM, but not both.

Q3) If YHWH makes a prophecy that only YHWH can fulfill, and Yeshua fulfills it, is it reasonable to conclude that Yeshua is YHWH? If not why not?

YHWH didn’t make this prophecy about himself from what I can see. We know that YHWH is not a man and he doesn’t have bones and blood. It is rediculous to believe that God whom the universe cannot contain squeezed himself into a human body. Rather, it was the Word that became flesh and the apostles beheld his glory as the son of God. Even if YHWH did make the prophecy about himself, we know that YHWH sent his son and it was YHWH’s will that his son drink the cup that was prepared for him. So if YHWH was in Christ, then to that degree was YHWH the one being punished. But Christ did say “My God My God, why hast thou forsaken me”.

But the way it appears to me on the outset is that they would look to YHWH, because of the HIM who was pierced.

NOTE: My rebuttal is based on the English version of these verses. It is possible that the English version may not be that clear or even accurate. If this is the case, then a more accurate version of the Zechariah verse could change what I have written.

Anyway, it is interesting to note that John 19:33-37 also refers to another prophecy i.e., NOT A BONE OF HIM SHALL BE BROKEN.”
When we look at that prophecy, we see clearly that the YHWH (LORD) is one and the one whom not a bone shall be broken is another.

It is obvious to all that the bolded verses below are either or both Yeshua and YHWH. But the interesting part is that we cannot confuse Yeshua with actually being YHWH.

Psalm 22:1-19
My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?
Why are you so far from saving me,
so far from the words of my groaning?

2 O my God, I cry out by day, but you do not answer,
by night, and am not silent.

3 Yet you are enthroned as the Holy One;
you are the praise of Israel.

4 In you our fathers put their trust;
they trusted and you delivered them.

5 They cried to you and were saved;
in you they trusted and were not disappointed.

6 But I am a worm and not a man,
scorned by men and despised by the people.

7 All who see me mock me;
they hurl insults, shaking their heads:

“He trusts in the LORD;
let the LORD rescue him.
Let him deliver him,
since he delights in him.”

9 Yet you brought me out of the womb;
you made me trust in you
even at my mother’s breast.

10 From birth I was cast upon you;
from my mother’s womb you have been my God.

11 Do not be far from me,
for trouble is near
and there is no one to help.

12 Many bulls surround me;
strong bulls of Bashan encircle me.

13 Roaring lions tearing their prey
open their mouths wide against me.

14 I am poured out like water,
and all my bones are out of joint.
My heart has turned to wax;
it has melted away within me.

15 My strength is dried up like a potsherd,
and my tongue sticks to the roof of my mouth;
you lay me in the dust of death.

16 Dogs have surrounded me;
a band of evil men has encircled me,
they have pierced my hands and my feet.

17 I can count all my bones;
people stare and gloat over me.

18 They divide my garments among them
and cast lots for my clothing.

19 But you, O LORD, be not far off;
O my Strength, come quickly to help me.

So we have 3 reasons why YHWH cannot be Yeshua in Zech 12:10.

  1. Me and Him cannot be the same individual grammatically speaking.
  2. Psalm 22:1-19 the other quoted scripture by John, clearly indentifies Yeshua and YHWH as different identities.
  3. There is no contradiction in truth.
 

So an explanation that fits with John, Zechariah, and David (or Psalm writer) is that YHWH and Yeshua are 2 different identities and because of him who was pierced (Yeshua), people would look to YHWH (his God). This has come to pass as many now look to YHWH because of Yeshua’s sacrifice. See the below verse as an immediate example of fulfillment.

Acts 2:36-39
36 “Therefore let all Israel be assured of this: God has made this Jesus, whom you crucified, both Lord and Christ.”
37 When the people heard this, they were cut to the heart and said to Peter and the other apostles, “Brothers, what shall we do?”
38 Peter replied, “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
39 The promise is for you and your children and for all who are far off—for all whom the Lord our God will call.”


Discussion

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 20 posts - 421 through 440 (of 518 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #241626
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Sorry WJ. But there are too many holes in your teaching and your rebuttals against myself and Mike are exceptionally weak that they do not stand.

    Here are 5 facts that you cannot accept.

    1) Others are called theos/elohim in a qualitative or representative sense.
    2) We are specifically taught that there is one God the Father.
    3) We are specifically taught that the one true God sent Jesus Christ.
    4) All Trinity proof verses are added in verses, or are taken out of context.
    5) There are hundreds of verses that teach clearly that God and Jesus are different persons/identities.

    Your doctrine fails all of the above.
    Even if it failed one, that would be a worry.

    Your stubbornness leads you to defending error and tradition even in the face of scriptural truth.

    When you oppose truth WJ, you lose.

    #248632
    david
    Participant
    #248655
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Nice one david.

    I will place that video here for convenience.

    #248679

    Hi All

    I suppose that they know more about the correct meaning of Zech 12:10 than the inspired Apostle John who aproximately 2000 years ago quoted the verse in John 19:37….

    and, as another scripture says, “They will look on the one they have pierced.” John 19:37

    So why doesn't he show us how the Greek Grammar of the verse means anything different?  :p

    WJ

    #248748
    david
    Participant

    WJ, could you perhaps explain how what John wrote (John 19:37) conflicts with anything the video said? I actually don't understand the point you are attempting to make.

    #248749
    david
    Participant

    The problem is, all these questions below, the whole argument in fact was based on bad translating.

    Quote
    Q1) Was the “me” that was foretold to be pierced and looked upon by the inhabitant of Jerusalem in Zech 12:10 a refererence to YHWH? If not, please provide lexical evidence to the contrary.

    Q2) According to John's inspired-understanding, was Yeshua in fact the “me” in the Zech 12:10 prophecy (John 19:37)? If not, please explain.

    Q3) If YHWH makes a prophecy that only YHW

    The obvious clue that it was translated wrong (without even getting into the Hebrew is this):

    Zechariah 12:10
    “I will pour out on the house of David and on the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the Spirit of grace and of supplication, so that they will look on Me whom they have pierced; and they will mourn for [/b]Him,[/b] as one mourns for an only son,

    If we were reading this without knowing who was being spoken of, it would be obvious that the “Him” is someone other than the “me.” It should obviously say “me” if it is still talking about the first person. Yet it doesn't. That should have been our first clue that we should have looked at the grammar.

    #248761
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Thanks david,

    If it is indeed a bad translation, then I am glad that I wrote in the beginning that I saw it this particular way as it was written, but was also open to the translation being bad and hence the confusion that Trinitarians had with this verse. The Trinitarians jumped all over me for saying it could be a bad translation. But in hindsight, they should admit that it was a wise thing to do because lets face it, we know that not all translations are perfect and that there are times when nearly all translations do a bad job at a verse.

    How about it Is, WJ, and CultB if you still read here. What about an admission that myself being open to the translation being wrong or imperfect was not a bad thing.

    I guess I will be waiting for a long time. I think they would rather clash their swords than honor my reasons for saying something that is certainly within the realms of possibility.

    I guess that shows their inability to reason sometimes.

    #248762
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ May 07 2007,08:38)

    Quote (Cult Buster @ May 07 2007,20:15)
    t8. Again your words which sounds like you are unsure


    I say it like this because I am not sure if the translation is completely accurate. If it is, then it appears to be YHWH.

    I am wisely compensating for this.

    Imagine if I said it is without any doubt and later found that the translation actually says …

    I would look a little foolish wouldn't I?

    Paul often spoke like this too.

    The Lord says… I say….

    There is nothing wrong with that.

    When I say.. it should be the wisdom that God has given me. When God says… It is what God says.

    I am not saying “thus says the LORD” in my post. I am reading it honestly and saying what it appears to say, while making sure that it doesn't violate other scripture.


    Bump to show that I compensated for the possibility of a bad translation.

    #248763
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ May 06 2007,20:58)
    Q1) Was the “me” that was foretold to be pierced and looked upon by the inhabitant of Jerusalem in Zech 12:10 a refererence to YHWH? If not, please provide lexical evidence to the contrary.

    I think the ME is YHWH. The one who is to be pierced (HIM) is Yeshua.

    It says “…They will look on me, the one they have pierced, and they will mourn for him as one mourns for an only child,…”

    Grammatically, the “Me” and the “him” cannot refer to the same individual can it.

    It is clearly talking about 2, not 1. Otherwise it would say: “They will look on me, the one they have pierced, and they will mourn for ME as one mourns for an only child,”. Of course it doesn't say that, so the “him” is obviously different to the “me”.


    Bump to show the me and him dilemma in this verse.

    #248776

    Quote (david @ June 16 2011,01:01)
    WJ, could you perhaps explain how what John wrote (John 19:37) conflicts with anything the video said?  I actually don't understand the point you are attempting to make.


    David

    The Apostle John is quoting the verse so we should let his rendering of the verse interpret Zech.

    John under inspiration gives us the correct translation of the verse.

    WJ

    #248777

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ May 07 2007,02:24)

    Quote (Cult Buster @ May 07 2007,01:15)
    t8. Don't play around with words. It is very clear that Jehovah ( Jesus) was the One who was pierced.

    Instead of fighting the truth, repent of your sin and accept Jesus Christ as your God and Saviour.


    Quite right CB,
    The His/me argument is a red herring. The point is YHWH prophesied that He would be peirced and Yeshua fulfilled it!

    Q) Did YHWH declare, using the first person singular pronoun “me”, in Zechariah 12:10 that He would be “pierced” and “looked upon”?

    A) Yes. (t8 has conceded to this)

    Q)If YHWH makes an unconditional prophecy, will it come to pass?

    A) Yes. YHWH cannot lie (Numbers 23:19, Titus 1:2, Hebrews 6:18).

    Q) Has this prophecy come to pass?

    A) Yes.

    Q) When?

    A) On the cross, at Calvary. Yeshua fulfilled it (John 19:37).

    Q) So….can this prophecy be fulfilled by proxy?

    A) No. That would impute a lie to YHWH. But YHWH cannot lie. Therefore Yeshua MUST BE YHWH.

    T8 has completely skirted around this dilemma. But it hasn't gone unnoticed.

    :)


    Bump to show that John 19:37 is the fulfilment of the prophesy in Zech 12:10.

    Simply put Jesus is YHWH! :p

    #248794
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    I think we can all agree that it is a fulfillment WJ.
    But as being YHWH. Absolutely not.

    There is one God the Father WJ and the verse quoted is not saying that YHWH will hang on a tree.
    How absurd. When does the madness end?

    #248812
    terraricca
    Participant

    WJ

    Quote
    Bump to show that John 19:37 is the fulfilment of the prophesy in Zech 12:10.

    Simply put Jesus is YHWH!

    Zec 12:10 And I will pour upon the house of David, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the spirit of grace and of supplications: and they shall look upon me whom they have pierced, and they shall mourn for him, as one mourneth for his only son, and shall be in bitterness for him, as one that is in bitterness for his firstborn.

    Jn 19:33 But when they came to Jesus, and saw that he was dead already, they brake not his legs:
    Jn 19:34 But one of the soldiers with a spear pierced his side, and forthwith came there out blood and water.
    Jn 19:35 And he that saw it bare record, and his record is true: and he knoweth that he saith true, that ye might believe.
    Jn 19:36 For these things were done, that the scripture should be fulfilled, A bone of him shall not be broken.
    Jn 19:37 And again another scripture saith, They shall look on him whom they pierced.

    how could that be Jehovah in either verse and prophecy?????

    Pierre

    #248855

    Quote (t8 @ June 16 2011,19:43)
    I think we can all agree that it is a fulfillment WJ.
    But as being YHWH. Absolutely not.

    There is one God the Father WJ and the verse quoted is not saying that YHWH will hang on a tree.
    How absurd. When does the madness end?


    t8

    There is no madness in the fact that when the OT scriptures speak of YHWH that it can be speaking of the Father or Jesus since Jesus is the “visible image of the invisible God”, and the patriots claimed to talk to YHWH face to face as to a man.

    The inspired writer John took a Hebrew scripture that says “YHWH will be pierced” and applied it to Jesus…

    And again another scripture saith, They shall look on him whom they pierced. John 19:37

    This same John in his prologue stated he was the Word that was with God and was God.

    As Paul has pointed out the scripture could not be fulfilled by anyone but YHWH himself. This is another one of those thorns in the crawl of the anti-Jesus is God crowd.

    WJ

    #248866
    Ed J
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ June 15 2011,17:40)
    Nice one david.

    I will place that video here for convenience.


    Hi Everyone,

    How many would consider “Google translations” to be biased?

    Zech.12:10 (Google) And I will pour upon the house of David and the inhabitants of Jerusalem the Spirit of grace and supplication
    and look on Me whom they pierced, and mourn his eulogy on the individual and Convert to gamble on older.

    God bless
    Ed J
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

    #248869
    Ed J
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 16 2011,00:30)
    Hi All

    I suppose that they know more about the correct meaning of Zech 12:10 than the inspired Apostle John who aproximately 2000 years ago quoted the verse in John 19:37….

    and, as another scripture says, “They will look on the one they have pierced.” John 19:37

    So why doesn't he show us how the Greek Grammar of the verse means anything different?  :p

    WJ


    Hi WJ,

    John 19:37 (Google) And again another scripture says · They shall look at whom they have pierced.

    God bless
    Ed J
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

    #248953
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Ed J @ June 17 2011,16:00)
    Hi Everyone,

    How many would consider “Google translations” to be biased?


    Hi Ed,

    Show everyone how accurate Google is in their translation of Psalm 2:7. :)

    And what is “and Convert to gamble on older” suppose to mean? ???

    #248954
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 17 2011,10:51)
    This is another one of those thorns in the crawl of the anti-Jesus is God crowd.


    Yes Keith,

    The fact that you claim mere mortal men could KILL Jehovah, the Maker of the heavens and the earth and everything in them IS a “thorn in my crawl”. :)

    (Btw, I think the saying is “thorn in my craw”.)

    #248964
    david
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 16 2011,00:30)
    Hi All

    I suppose that they know more about the correct meaning of Zech 12:10 than the inspired Apostle John who aproximately 2000 years ago quoted the verse in John 19:37….

    and, as another scripture says, “They will look on the one they have pierced.” John 19:37

    So why doesn't he show us how the Greek Grammar of the verse means anything different?  :p

    WJ


    You are right in that this does seem to point in the direction you believe, when referring to the argument from the video.

    However, something else I found interesting about Zech 12:10 is that some translation (even trinitarian ones) translate it like this:

    “… when they look upon him whom they have pierced” – RSV.

    See Also:
    NRSV; GNB; MLB; NAB (1970); NAB (1991); LB; Mo; AT; JB; NJB; NLV; BBE; and Byington. (The ASV says in a footnote for “me” in Zech. 12:10: “According to some MSS [manuscripts], `him'.” Also see Rotherham footnote.)
    http://defendingthenwt.blogspot.com/2010/11/zech-1210-john-1937.html

    So, WHICH TRANSLATION MATCHES THE CONTEXT?

    AFTER SAYING THAT THEY WILL LOOK UPON ME (OR HIM) God continues with “they shall mourn for HIM.”

    It seems many Bibles contradict themselves here.
    The “me” in the first half does not agree with the “him” of the second half.

    If we looked at all manuscripts and translated with CONTEXT in mind, the disputed word of the first half (which has manuscript evidence for both renderings) must be translated as “him” or “the one.”

    Ignatius, Irenaeus, and Tertullian (repeatedly) rendered Zech. 12:10 as “him whom they pierced”!

    The septuagint of course uses “me” in the existing copies. (4th cent. CE)

    BUT, the Hebrew is significantly different.

    “The [Hebrew] text of Zech. 12:10 is corrupt. The LXX [Greek Septuagint] text reads:… (`they shall look upon me whom they have treated spitefully') …. The text in [Jn 19:37] does not follow the LXX; but it has also avoided the impossible [`me'] of the Hebrew text.” – p. 195, John 2, Ernst Haenchen, Fortress Press, 1984.

    JOHN 19:37 (LET'S ASK AN INSPIRED BIBLE WRITER [JOHN] HOW IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN TRANSLATED: “ME” OR “HIM”??)

    But most important of all, closely examine John 19:37 (even in the KJV) where this scripture has been quoted by John! All translations show John here translating Zech. 12:10 as “They shall look upon him [or `the one'] whom they pierced.” So we have this Apostle and inspired Bible writer telling us plainly (and undisputed even by trinitarian scholars) that Zechariah 12:10 should read: “They shall look upon him” (not `me'). (Same source as above)

    SO, is it “me” or is it “him”?

    1. Later, in the same verse, we are told it is “him.”
    2. John clearly understood it to be “him.”
    3. Other manuscripts translate it as “him.”

    So, things that disagree with the most common translation are: (other manuscripts; the context of the rest of the verse; John's inspired writing)

    WJ, your argument is definitely a valid one as far as arguing against the video I presented. But, how would you address the above.

    #248970
    terraricca
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 18 2011,10:51)

    Quote (t8 @ June 16 2011,19:43)
    I think we can all agree that it is a fulfillment WJ.
    But as being YHWH. Absolutely not.

    There is one God the Father WJ and the verse quoted is not saying that YHWH will hang on a tree.
    How absurd. When does the madness end?


    t8

    There is no madness in the fact that when the OT scriptures speak of YHWH that it can be speaking of the Father or Jesus since Jesus is the “visible image of the invisible God”, and the patriots claimed to talk to YHWH face to face as to a man.

    The inspired writer John took a Hebrew scripture that says “YHWH will be pierced” and applied it to Jesus…

    And again another scripture saith, They shall look on him whom they pierced. John 19:37

    This same John in his prologue stated he was the Word that was with God and was God.

    As Paul has pointed out the scripture could not be fulfilled by  anyone but YHWH himself. This is another one of those thorns in the crawl of the anti-Jesus is God crowd.

    WJ


    WJ

    you have a low esteem for God the father ,and a higher esteem for you as men that believe that God almighty comes himself to serve his creation and die for it so that it could be or would be possible that they may take the time to understand him and so find the time in there busy live to listen and change to his proposal,this is insane thinking.

    God came to this planet ones when men where on it and that is at mount Sinai when Moses receive the tablets ,and the people say enough we will deal with Moses to scare to die ,

    That is were it says MEN CAN NOT SEE GOD AND LIVE

    you may not believe this but it is true,if you do not believe it you become irrelevant to the truth.

    Pierre

Viewing 20 posts - 421 through 440 (of 518 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2024 Heaven Net

Navigation

© 1999 - 2023 - Heaven Net
or

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

or

Create Account