1 Peter 2: 6-8

1 Peter 2
6 For in Scripture it says: “See, I lay a stone in Zion, a chosen and precious cornerstone, and the one who trusts in him will never be put to shame.”
7 Now to you who believe, this stone is precious. But to those who do not believe, The stone the builders rejected has become the cornerstone,”
8 and,“A stone that causes people to stumble and a rock that makes them fall.”

The argument made here is that this text read with Isaiah 8:12-15 shows that Jesus is God. So let’s look at that scripture:

Isaiah 8:12-15
11 For Jehovah spake thus to me with a strong hand, and instructed me not to walk in the way of this people, saying,
12 Say ye not, A conspiracy, concerning all whereof this people shall say, A conspiracy; neither fear ye their fear, nor be in dread thereof .
13 Jehovah of hosts, him shall ye sanctify; and let him be your fear, and let him be your dread.
14 And he shall be for a sanctuary; but for a stone of stumbling and for a rock of offence to both the houses of Israel, for a gin and for a snare to the inhabitants of Jerusalem.
15 And many shall stumble thereon, and fall, and be broken, and be snared, and be taken.

Okay so the argument is made that Jesus is called a stone and so is God.

The first obvious thing to point out is that when God decides to become something such as a rock of offense, he personally doesn’t turn up as that rock, but sends a messenger. We see in other scriptures that God is light, yet he sends Jesus into the world and Jesus proclaims that “he is the light of the world”. When Jesus is about to leave this world he passes on this mantle to us, (the Church) when he proclaimed, “You are the light of the world” in Matthew 5:14.

“You are the light of the world. A city set on a hill cannot be hidden; 15nor does anyone light a lamp and put it under a basket, but on the lampstand, and it gives light to all who are in the house.…

So when God sent light into this dark world, he sent a messenger. If we conclude that God is light and Jesus is the light means that Jesus is God, then you also have to believe that we (the Church) are God. Thus if God refers to himself as a stone and sends Jesus who is identified as the stone, then that is not a valid proof that the verse means that Jesusis God.

Further, there is another main point that needs to be understood here. When you look at Isaiah 8:12-15, it becomes very clear that YHWH is actually talking about another as the rock and not himself. Read closely.

“See, I lay a stone in Zion,
a chosen and precious cornerstone,
and the one who trusts in him
will never be put to shame.”

Notice the words, “I lay a stone”. I guess that Trinitarians just read it as “I am this stone”. But it does not say that or refer to that.
Now notice the words “a chosen and precious cornerstone”. If God is the stone, then ask yourself who is the one who CHOSE the stone?

Again this so-called Trinity proof verse is easily exposed when you decide to read the text carefully and without bias. Obviously, our brother Peter doesn’t support the view that Jesus is God when he talks about Jesus being the stone that causes people to stumble.

← Go back to ‘Supporting the Trinity Doctrine‘.


Discussion

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 20 posts - 361 through 380 (of 384 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #781282
    kerwin
    Participant

    T8,

    I am not sure of what your point is.

    As for the body, there is a physical body and there is a spiritual body

    That is an inventive translation of 1 Corinthians 15:44 as I have no idea how someone can get the word physical out of the adjective form of soul.

    Although, he existed in the form of God,

    I am not sure how you take this passage. Do you believe Jesus as well as angels are the same kind as God>

    #781336
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    The point of the body is a mystery, but let’s go with:  it is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body. If there is a natural body, there is also a spiritual body.

    • For we know that if the earthly tent we live in is destroyed, we have a building from God, an eternal house in heaven, not built by human hands.
    • who, by the power that enables him to bring everything under his control, will transform our lowly bodies so that they will be like his glorious body.
    • For those God foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brothers and sisters.

    In scripture we know that angels are ministering spirits, yet they look like men at times in scripture.

    The point I make is that we will be like Christ. This is what we know. Those who claim to have all the answers about the body that Christ has or the one’s we will have, need to agree with the 4 verses above for a start, but also realise that it is a mystery to some degree too.

    Dear friends, now we are children of God, and what we will be has not yet been made known. But we know that when Christ appears, we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is. 

    #781337
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Offspring are like kind. As they inherit from their parents.

    The son of God is of God and he existed in the form of God.

    He also existed in the form of man after he emptied himself. Remember he was made a little lower than the angels …, but certainly he is greater than all the angels.

    God is a Spirit and angels are spirits.

    First the natural, then the spiritual for us. It is even written that we will be like the angels and will not marry.

    #781339
    kerwin
    Participant

    T8,

    He also existed in the form of man after he emptied himself. Remember he was made a little lower than the angels …, but certainly he is greater than all the angels.

    The writer of Hebrews is quoting a passage of Scripture that is speaking of humanity being created a little lower that the angels. I assume you do not believe it was applied applied literally as you do not believe Jesus was created a little lower than the angels but instead you believe he was reduced to being a little lower than the angels.

    That seems to disagree with your interpretation of the words “emptied himself” as implies the Messiah lowered himself to become a servant. Have you come up with a solution to the mystery I just mentioned?

    #781366
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    My point was clear. He became a man and men are lower than the angels of God. Yet angels served him.

    So will he remain lower than the angels forever. Or was humbled and lower state just temporary as he emptied himself and came in the flesh after existing in the form of God. Did he return to the glory that he had with God before the cosmos existed. I believe he did. So he like us took on the natural and then the spiritual.

    In the natural we are lower than angels. But what about the spiritual. Clearly there is a difference in bodies and there are different glories between the natural and the spiritual. Jesus has a spiritual body after he partook of the natural. We will follow him who trust in him. Our lowly bodies will be transformed into a body like his. This is one of the great promises that believers look forward to.

    Do you agree with the scriptures that teach this or not?

    #781369
    kerwin
    Participant

    T8,

    I must not have been clear.

    A spiritual body is a body led by the Spirit just like a spiritual nan is a man led by the Spirit.
    A natural body is not led by the Spirit just like a natural man is not led by Spirit.

    The word natural has a Scriptural meaning that is not found in the English dictionary I looked at. According to the Lexicon at Blue Letter Bible the definition is “the principal of animal life, which men have in common with the brutes” or “the sensuous nature with its subjection to appetite and passion”.

    I think angels have chosen to be natural or spiritual though they may not have natural bodies. If so they are certainly not of the nature of this world as the evidence is they are not bound to corruption.

    http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=G5591&t=NASB

    My question is based on the fact that the words “empty himself” is an action performed by Jesus while “made: is an action performed on Jesus. I was asked how you resolved your conclusion they are they are the same action when they appear to be two different actions?

    #781965
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    You make comments that seem to cast doubt over a spiritual body and then reply as if you accept it. Not sure whether you are coming or going. What sort of a body does a heavenly angel have in your view?

    #782007
    kerwin
    Participant

    T8.

    The bodies of angels are immortal which means they are not subject to corruption and in the nature of the present age the creations of the earth are subject to entropy.

    One key thing I know about the difference between the Spiritual body and the natural body is the earlier is not bound to either frustration or corruption while the later is bound to both.

    I know Scientist have relatively recently confirmed what Scripture already claimed.

    Romans 8:21New English Translation (NET Bible)

    21 that the creation itself will also be set free from the bondage of decay into the glorious freedom of God’s children.

    So when referring to the “the principal of animal life, which men have in common with the brutes” as applied to the body we can conclude that it means the body is subject to both frustration and corruption. We also know the bodies of angels, even the fallen ones, are not.

    #782436
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Okay. I thought you were denying that Jesus had a spiritual body.

    🙂

    #796963
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi t8

    “My point was clear. He became a man and men are lower than the angels of God. Yet angels served him.

    So will he remain lower than the angels forever. Or was humbled and lower state just temporary as he emptied himself and came in the flesh after existing in the form of God. Did he return to the glory that he had with God before the cosmos existed. I believe he did. So he like us took on the natural and then the spiritual.”

     

    Are you not saying the spiritual was first, then the natural, then the spiritual again??

    And so saying he is not like us?

     

    #797910
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Can we say the same about us or any man regarding the following scripture?

    Philippians 2:6
    NIV
    who, although He existed in the form of God, did not regard equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied Himself, taking the form of a bond-servant, and being made in the likeness of men.…

    NASB
    who, although He existed in the form of God, did not regard equality with God a thing to be grasped,

    Yes he is like us because he came in the flesh and lived among us.
    No he is not like us because he is the firstborn of all creation, the image of the invisible God.

    His history is not like ours. But he came into the world as one of us, so that part is the same. Like us he was born a baby and grew up and experienced this world. God sent him into the world after they largely ignored the prophets.

    #797911
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi t8,

    No you cannot say that about any natural flesh man.

    But it is true about CHRIST Jesus, the WORD made flesh.

    #798107
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    And so saying he is not like us?

    #798113
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    So Nick, your view is Jesus + Christ = Jesus Christ.

    Good so far.

    Then any reference before Jesus + Christ = Jesus for you, whereas others talk about Christ and you oppose their view.

    He existed in the form of God and emptying himself and came here right?

    Surely if the Word was God, then was WITH God and then came in the flesh or became flesh, then why not trace his ancestry back to the Word. Why do you always trace him back to the flesh? After all, you often say, “The flesh counts for nothing”. Does that mean your view counts for nothing then?

    #798122
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi t8,

    We are not the Word.

    We no longer speak of Christ according to the flesh.

     

    #798124
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi T*,

    Are you implying that Jesus was not a man?

    Was he a god who came to look like men but was never one?

     

    Was he not conceived in Mary?

    #798131
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi t8,

    Everything spiritually relevant happens by the Spirit and is for God.

    We are honoured to be used as vessels for God.

    #798137
    kerwin
    Participant

    T8,

    When I hear spiritual body I do not think of a body composed of spirit but rather I think of a body by the Spirit of God.

    #798433
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi KW,

    What does that mean?

    #798779
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    God and the Son are merged into one being along with a third member in the Trinity Doctrine.
    Your doctrine merges the Father and the Son into a being called God.

Viewing 20 posts - 361 through 380 (of 384 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2024 Heaven Net

Navigation

© 1999 - 2023 - Heaven Net
or

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

or

Create Account