Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #54141
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi AP,
    Mt1
    1The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.

    2Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas and his brethren;

    3And Judas begat Phares and Zara of Thamar; and Phares begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram;

    4And Aram begat Aminadab; and Aminadab begat Naasson; and Naasson begat Salmon;

    5And Salmon begat Booz of Rachab; and Booz begat Obed of Ruth; and Obed begat Jesse;

    So is established the Son of man.
    Christ is son of man
    Outer Man is flesh.
    But man is more than flesh.
    Inner man is soul\spirit.
    Christ is son of God, become son of man.

    #54142
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi AP,
    Where is the genesis of the highest heaven shown in the book of Genesis?

    #54143
    Adam Pastor
    Participant

    (Gen 1:1)  In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

    OK Nick!
    You weren't meant to read anything into the extra 's'

    #54147
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Adam Pastor @ May 31 2007,07:44)
    Oh! My Avatar is exactly my mirror-image!!


    I thought so! Ha!

    To be perfectly honest, I'm not sure if I am a Biblical Unitarian? I'm not sure if I am a plain Unitarian? I know I'm not a Trinitarian. Maybe I'm a Librarian? Ha! I kill me. I just know I want more of God; I want more of Jesus. I want John 17:3. Whatever “label” that comes with – I'll take it. :)

    I will check out the book recommeded and thanks so much for everything, Adam. I always appreciate your posts.

    #54150

    Quote
    If any time you fancy some heavy reading concerning things which back up these claims; I recommend

    1) James Dunn, Christology in the Making, the Second edition
    Dunn shows many quotes from Jewish writings/Pseudepigrapha which have the word (logos) and the wisdom of GOD being personified as if they were actual persons in the presence of GOD; yet he goes on to show that this was not the intent of the Jewish writers! He shows that the pre-NT Jews did NOT believe that the word/logos or wisdom/sophia were literal pre-existing intermediary beings; but rather were ways of describing these attributes of the One GOD; and therefore used these literary devices such as personification to describe how GOD's spoken word & wisdom interact in the created world.

    This is the same kind of personification as seen in John 1:1-14

    2) I also recommend (again, quite heavy theologically)
    BORN BEFORE ALL TIME? The Dispute over Christ's Origin by Karl-Josef Kuschel

    Yes AP.

    So lets all just throw our Bibles away and go after the writtings and works of a few Unitarians!

    Heck! Lets just throw away millions of hours of work of over 600+ Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic Scholars, many of whom gave their lives litterally to bring us the purist form of scripture possible.

    I dont think so!!!

    Tell me AP, what purpose would John say…

    1 Jn 4:
    1 Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: *because many false prophets are gone out into the world*.
    2 Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that *Jesus Christ is come in the **flesh** is of God*:
    3 And every spirit that *confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the **flesh** is not of God*: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.

    Why didnt he say…

    Every spirit that confesseth that *Jesus Christ is come in the **world** is of God*

    Why all the confusion about him comming in the flesh!

    Why not just say he was born in the world?

    What is the “Mystery of Godliness” if he was a simple man born in sin like you and I?

    It is a waste of words and so confusing!

    If he meant “The thought or plan came in the flesh”

    Why did he not say…

    Every spirit that confesseth that *the logos (thought or plan) is come in the **flesh** is of God*

    Why did he use “Jesus Christ” personal name!

    Are we to assume the translators are all wrong?

    Lies from the Spirit of anti-christ!

    You say…

    Quote

    PS
    Oh! My Avatar is exactly my mirror-image!!:laugh:  

    You should add a couple of horns to it…. :D :D :D

    I still love you though!  :)

    #54152

    Quote (Adam Pastor @ May 31 2007,03:22)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ May 30 2007,00:29)
    Hi AP,
    Number 1083
    Transliteration:
    gennesis {ghen'-nay-sis}
    Word Origin:
    from 1080
    Part of Speech:
    adjective
    Usage in the KJV:
    birth 2

    Total: 2
    Definition:
    begat, engendering
    nativity, birth


    Genesis means beginning as in e.g.
    “In the Beginning
    And of course, Genesis deals with the beginning of the heavens & the earth, mankind, etc.

    (Mat 1:1)  The book of the generation (genesis i.e. beginning) of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.

    (Mat 1:18)  Now the birth (genesis i.e. beginning) of Jesus Christ was on this wise: When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Ghost.

    BTW FYI
    Because of
    (a) the obvious meaning of the word genesis; and
    (b) the fact that Matthew uses this word twice to describe
    the genesis i.e. beginning of Jesus the Christ [Matthew 1:1,18]
    which of course contradicts trinitarian (as well as arian) preexistence/theology …

    Catholic scribes therefore added an extra 'n' to genesis in verse 18 in order to change
    the context from beginning/origination to birth
    Source: The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture, Bart Ehrman, (1993), p. 75-76;

    Like I said, FYI


    Ap

    You say…

    Quote
    BTW FYI
    Because of
    (a) the obvious meaning of the word genesis; and
    (b) the fact that Matthew uses this word twice to describe
    the genesis i.e. beginning of Jesus the Christ [Matthew 1:1,18]
    which of course contradicts trinitarian (as well as arian) preexistence/theology …

    This is a classic example of mis-representation!

    The beginnings of Jesus Christ is not a contradiction to Trinitarians, for Jesus was born in the flesh and had beginnings as a man.

    This is how you mislead your followers is that right?

    Because you full well know no Trinitarian believes that Jesus didnt have a natural birth and beginning in the flesh!

    :O

    #54193
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Because you full well know no Trinitarian believes that Jesus didnt have a natural birth and beginning in the flesh!
    *****************
    I think you are missing the point altogether, WJ.

    Trinitarians do believe that Jesus had birth – it just wasn't a “natural” one.  It was an incarnation, right?

    A natural birth, like Adam is representing, means that Jesus began to exist as a *new individual* like you and me at his birth.  

    According to Trinitarianism, this is not so.  Am I correct?

    #54200
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    To Adam.

    Quote (Adam Pastor @ June 01 2007,02:44)
    When I came to the knowledge of scriptural unitarian truth; it amazed me how much of the Bible I can plainly read and let it speak for itself!


    Except of course for the scriptures quoted in the following:
    https://heavennet.net/answers/answer31.htm

    But if you ignore them and some others, then yes Unitarianism pretty much fits together.

    But then if I was able to delete or ignore certain scriptures, I could say the same for Trinitarianism.

    I find that both Trinitarians and Unitarians use the same method.

    They start with the conclusion and work backwards, looking for scriptures that fit and ignoring the ones that don't.

    But in truth, it is better to start with scripture and ignore nothing. If there are contradictions in your understanding, then you need to seek deeper and be humble and teachable.

    The truth isn't meant to come easy, but it is the reward of those who seek it.

    #54204
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 01 2007,05:05)

    Quote (Adam Pastor @ May 31 2007,07:44)
    Oh! My Avatar is exactly my mirror-image!!


    I thought so! Ha!

    To be perfectly honest, I'm not sure if I am a Biblical Unitarian? I'm not sure if I am a plain Unitarian? I know I'm not a Trinitarian. Maybe I'm a Librarian? Ha! I kill me. I just know I want more of God; I want more of Jesus. I want John 17:3. Whatever “label” that comes with – I'll take it. :)

    I will check out the book recommeded and thanks so much for everything, Adam. I always appreciate your posts.


    I like your attitude.

    You are not a label, but you want to align yourself with the truth.

    I can appreciate that.

    BTW: Librarians are the ones with the truth.

    OK, that was a joke.

    :)

    #54241

    Quote (Not3in1 @ May 31 2007,15:32)
    Because you full well know no Trinitarian believes that Jesus didnt have a natural birth and beginning in the flesh!
    *****************
    I think you are missing the point altogether, WJ.

    Trinitarians do believe that Jesus had birth – it just wasn't a “natural” one.  It was an incarnation, right?

    A natural birth, like Adam is representing, means that Jesus began to exist as a *new individual* like you and me at his birth.  

    According to Trinitarianism, this is not so.  Am I correct?


    Not3

    You can play with the word “natural birth” and try to say it means Jesus came into existence like you and me if you want, but if what you say is true then Jesus still didnt have a natural birth because he had no natural Father!

    You cant take a term like natural birth and say it exclusively means what you want.

    We know Jesus took on the likeness of sinfull flesh, now that means he has to be natural as far as the flesh or he couldnt be our Saviour!

    But again scriptures clearly teach that Yeshua came from heaven as the Lord from heaven to be the second Adam so he could bring mankind back to him!

    Apparantly John was just wasting his words when he said…

    1 Jn 4
    1 Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.
    2 Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that *Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God*:
    3 And every spirit that confesseth not that *Jesus Christ is come in the flesh* is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.

    Why didnt he just say that Jesus was born in the world.

    What is all the emphasis about him coming in the flesh?

    This is very serious not3!

    AP denys he came in the flesh therefore he is of the Spirit of anti-christ!

    :)

    #54264
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 01 2007,03:34)
    Why didnt he just say that Jesus was born in the world.


    WJ, he did!

    Matthew 1:18
    “This is how the birth of Jesus Christ came about…..”

    vs. 21
    “She will give birth to a son….”

    vs. 23
    “The virgin will be with child and will give birth to a son….”

    The reason it is difficult for you to accept this simple truth is because it is too simple. Jesus was born into the world.

    #54267
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 01 2007,03:34)
    You can play with the word “natural birth” and try to say it means Jesus came into existence like you and me if you want, but if what you say is true then Jesus still didnt have a natural birth because he had no natural Father!


    And here is the mystery!

    Jesus did have a natural birth – Mary would slap your face if she heard you say otherwise! She endured the pregnancy that not only brought her physical pain but social pain as well. Mary endured the labor pains! She gave birth to her son in the most “natural” way possible these days. There were no labor drugs or epidurals in those days, mister. So don't deny Mary her due.

    Indeed, Jesus did not have a “natural” Father. But he did have a Father……this is the mystery…….God provided what was needed to have a son of his very own. A Son (so to speak) from his body. A son, that like Abraham, he could leave his inheritence to. Understanding this is to understand the who and what Jesus truly is.

    #54300
    942767
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ May 30 2007,15:56)

    Quote (942767 @ May 31 2007,10:05)
    Hi:

    If God wanted us to know that Jesus pre-existed his Virgin birth he would have told us that he did.  He is not the author of confusion.  Any way what matters, is that He loves us and gave his life for us as shown clearly in the scriptures so that we could be reconciled to God, and that he lives forever more to make intercession for us, and that by his shed blood we have forgiveness for sin.

    God Bless


    Hi 94.

    First off, we know that Christ is a hidden mystery that is revealed in the last days. So the clear teaching you speak of is perhaps not in order, rather a revelation of this.

    Romans 16:25-27
    25 Now to him who is able to establish you by my gospel and the proclamation of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery hidden for long ages past,
    26 but now revealed and made known through the prophetic writings by the command of the eternal God, so that all nations might believe and obey him
    27 to the only wise God be glory forever through Jesus Christ! Amen.

    But there are many scriptures that teach he did or demonstrate that he did. These seem to be applicable to a mystery being revealed.

    For a list of some of the more compelling revelations of Christ, go here:
    https://heavennet.net/answers/answer31.htm

    I believe that Christ existed in heaven in glory with God before emptying himself of his glory and becoming a humble man. I also believe that he returned to the same glory he had before with God.

    It is these and other scriptures that clinch it for me.

    Also, where is it written that he didn't pre-exist? If you say that it should be a clear teaching, where is the clear teaching that says that he existed for the first time ever in the womb of Mary?


    Hi t8:

    There are some scriptures that make a plain statement by which in MHO we need to understand those that are not as easy to understand.

    First about the creation:

    Gen. 1:1
    In the beginning God created * the heaven and the earth.

    1:26
    And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.  
    1:27
    So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he

    Although in Verse 26 God says “Let us make man in our image” verse 27 says “So God created man in his own image”, and so indicates that God alone is the creator, and the following verse also bears this out:Gen. 2:7
    And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

    The first man was made a living soul, and the following verse indicates that all mankind since then was born of a woman:

    3:20
    And Adam called his wife's name Eve; because she was the mother of all living.

    The scripture tells us that Jesus was and is a man who is unique in that he is the Only begotten Son of the living God, but he was born of a woman just as all of humanity.

    Mt 1:20
    But while he thought on these things, behold, the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a dream, saying, Joseph, thou son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife: for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost.

    And so, if he was conceived of the Holy Ghost, He is the only man who God is his Father in this way, but in that he was conceived in the womb of Mary, he had a beginning and did not pre-exist his birth of the virgin Mary at least not as a man.

    I know that this a simplistic approach to this argument but what are your thoughts about this?

    #54395

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 01 2007,09:00)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 01 2007,03:34)
    You can play with the word “natural birth” and try to say it means Jesus came into existence like you and me if you want, but if what you say is true then Jesus still didnt have a natural birth because he had no natural Father!


    And here is the mystery!

    Jesus did have a natural birth – Mary would slap your face if she heard you say otherwise!  She endured the pregnancy that not only brought her physical pain but social pain as well.  Mary endured the labor pains!  She gave birth to her son in the most “natural” way possible these days.  There were no labor drugs or epidurals in those days, mister.  So don't deny Mary her due.

    Indeed, Jesus did not have a “natural” Father.  But he   did have a Father……this is the mystery…….God provided what was needed to have a son of his very own.  A Son (so to speak) from his body.  A son, that like Abraham, he could leave his inheritence to.  Understanding this is to understand the who and what Jesus truly is.


    I said…

    Quote

    You can play with the word “natural birth” and try to say it means Jesus came into existence like you and me if you want, but if what you say is true then Jesus still didnt have a natural birth because he had no natural Father.

    You said…

    Quote

    Jesus did have a natural birth – Mary would slap your face if she heard you say otherwise!

    Then you proceed to tell me that he didnt have a natural birth like us!

    You said…

    Quote

    Indeed, Jesus did not have a “natural” Father.  But he   did have a Father……this is the mystery…….God provided what was needed to have a son of his very own.

    Again if he didnt have a natural Father and God was his Father and Mary was a virgin.

    Then that would clasify his birth as not being natural like ours!

    Wouldnt you say?

    ???

    #54396

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 01 2007,08:54)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 01 2007,03:34)
    Why didnt he just say that Jesus was born in the world.


    WJ, he did!

    Matthew 1:18
    “This is how the birth of Jesus Christ came about…..”

    vs. 21
    “She will give birth to a son….”

    vs. 23
    “The virgin will be with child and will give birth to a son….”

    The reason it is difficult for you to accept this simple truth is because it is too simple.  Jesus was born into the world.


    not3

    I know he was born!

    But you didnt answer my question as to why John would refer to him comming in the flesh.

    Why that particular language?

    ???

    #54460
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 02 2007,11:43)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 01 2007,08:54)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 01 2007,03:34)
    Why didnt he just say that Jesus was born in the world.


    WJ, he did!

    Matthew 1:18
    “This is how the birth of Jesus Christ came about…..”

    vs. 21
    “She will give birth to a son….”

    vs. 23
    “The virgin will be with child and will give birth to a son….”

    The reason it is difficult for you to accept this simple truth is because it is too simple.  Jesus was born into the world.


    not3

    I know he was born!

    But you didnt answer my question as to why John would refer to him comming in the flesh.

    Why that particular language?

    ???


    Why that particular language?
    John was defending Christ agains the pagen religions of the day – Gnostics believed Christ wasn't really “human” and only a spirit. That is why he used the word “flesh” to describe Jesus' coming to us…..he was human and made of flesh.

    #54461
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 02 2007,11:40)
    I said…Quote

    You can play with the word “natural birth” and try to say it means Jesus came into existence like you and me if you want, but if what you say is true then Jesus still didnt have a natural birth because he had no natural Father.

    You said…Quote

    Jesus did have a natural birth – Mary would slap your face if she heard you say otherwise!

    Then you proceed to tell me that he didnt have a natural birth like us!

    You said…Quote

    Indeed, Jesus did not have a “natural” Father. But he did have a Father……this is the mystery…….God provided what was needed to have a son of his very own.

    Again if he didnt have a natural Father and God was his Father and Mary was a virgin.

    Then that would clasify his birth as not being natural like ours!

    Wouldnt you say?


    No.

    Jesus did have a natural BIRTH. I think you are walking right past the obvious……he was born and therefore he had a “natural birth” just like you did. Unless, of course you think he came out of Mary a different way? Birth is birth.

    What you are pointing out is related to birth but not the birth itself – the fact that Jesus didn't have an earthly Dad; true. But this did not affect his BIRTH.

    #54785
    Not3in1
    Participant

    How many different beliefs do we have here on Jesus' preexistence? Has anyone been keeping track? I know Nick and t8 share a common view; Adam and I share a very close view….anyone else care to share?

    #54792
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 03 2007,10:45)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 02 2007,11:43)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 01 2007,08:54)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 01 2007,03:34)
    Why didnt he just say that Jesus was born in the world.


    WJ, he did!

    Matthew 1:18
    “This is how the birth of Jesus Christ came about…..”

    vs. 21
    “She will give birth to a son….”

    vs. 23
    “The virgin will be with child and will give birth to a son….”

    The reason it is difficult for you to accept this simple truth is because it is too simple.  Jesus was born into the world.


    not3

    I know he was born!

    But you didnt answer my question as to why John would refer to him comming in the flesh.

    Why that particular language?

    ???


    Why that particular language?  
    John was defending Christ agains the pagen religions of the day – Gnostics believed Christ wasn't really “human” and only a spirit.  That is why he used the word “flesh” to describe Jesus' coming to us…..he was human and made of flesh.


    Hi not3,
    Jesus Christ CAME IN the flesh.
    You cannot rewrite this as WAS FLESH.

    #54793
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Well unless you are Gnostic, certainly he came in the flesh. I'm not sure that I said “was flesh”? did I? We all come in the flesh, for that matter – right?

Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2024 Heaven Net

Navigation

© 1999 - 2023 - Heaven Net
or

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

or

Create Account