Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 281 through 300 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #56891
    Is 1:18
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 28 2007,18:36)

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 28 2007,18:25)
    and therefore He was not denying he was God either


    I personally think that Jesus is disappointed to see that he spent his whole ministry pointing us to his Father, and to his God – only to see that we have made HIM the object of our praise and worship; indeed we have made HIM God.

    HE is the Son of God.


    Not3, if Yeshua is not the object of your praise then you are out of step with the NT writers….

    Gotta go, home group tonight….

    #56893
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi Is 1.18

    Lk 18
    11 I am the good shepherd: the good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep.

    Number 2570
    Transliteration:
    kalos {kal-os'}
    Word Origin:
    of uncertain affinity
    TDNT:
    3:536,402
    Part of Speech:
    adjective
    Usage in the KJV:
    good 83, better 7, honest 5, meet 2, goodly 2, misc 3

    Total: 102
    Lk 18
    'And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? none is good, save one, that is , God.'

    Number 18
    Transliteration:
    agathos {ag-ath-os'}
    Word Origin:
    a primary word
    TDNT:
    1:10,3
    Part of Speech:
    adjective
    Usage in the KJV:
    good 77, good thing 14, that which is good3588 8, the thing which is good3588 1, well 1, benefit 1

    Total: 102

    Different words

    #56894
    Is 1:18
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 28 2007,20:02)
    Hi Is 1.18

    Lk 18
    11 I am the good shepherd: the good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep.

    Number 2570
    Transliteration:
    kalos {kal-os'}
    Word Origin:
    of uncertain affinity
    TDNT:
    3:536,402
    Part of Speech:
    adjective
    Usage in the KJV:
    good 83, better 7, honest 5, meet 2, goodly 2, misc 3

    Total: 102
    Lk 18
    'And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? none is good, save one, that is , God.'

    Number 18
    Transliteration:
    agathos {ag-ath-os'}
    Word Origin:
    a primary word
    TDNT:
    1:10,3
    Part of Speech:
    adjective
    Usage in the KJV:
    good 77, good thing 14, that which is good3588 8, the thing which is good3588 1, well 1, benefit 1

    Total: 102

    Different words


    I didn't quote that verse, WJ did. But I certainly affirm that Yeshua is “good”.

    Tell me what you think, was He relatively good or absolutely good?

    #56897
    Is 1:18
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 28 2007,20:02)
    Hi Is 1.18

    Lk 18
    11 I am the good shepherd: the good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep.

    Number 2570
    Transliteration:
    kalos {kal-os'}
    Word Origin:
    of uncertain affinity
    TDNT:
    3:536,402
    Part of Speech:
    adjective
    Usage in the KJV:
    good 83, better 7, honest 5, meet 2, goodly 2, misc 3

    Total: 102
    Lk 18
    'And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? none is good, save one, that is , God.'

    Number 18
    Transliteration:
    agathos {ag-ath-os'}
    Word Origin:
    a primary word
    TDNT:
    1:10,3
    Part of Speech:
    adjective
    Usage in the KJV:
    good 77, good thing 14, that which is good3588 8, the thing which is good3588 1, well 1, benefit 1

    Total: 102

    Different words


    “Kalos is simply a synonym for agathos. In Luke 8:15, we find the two words used interchangeably: “But the seed in the good (kalos) ground, these are the ones who have heard the word in an honest and good (agathos) heart…” The good ground represents the good hearts of the hearers.”
    http://www.forananswer.org/Mark/Mk10_18.htm

    #56898
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi Is 1.18,
    Are our opinions relevant?

    #56900
    Is 1:18
    Participant

    Why would you offer them if they are irrelavent? Why would you bother posting anything at all here if you deem it all irrelavent?

    Can you answer my question?

    Quote
    Tell me what you think, was He relatively good or absolutely good?

    #56902
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi Is 1.18
    You ask
    “Tell me what you think, was He relatively good or absolutely good? “

    Why should we offer opinions on a biblical site?
    Opinions and reliance on logic and inference leads men off the path of truth.

    #56905
    Is 1:18
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 28 2007,21:45)
    Why should we offer opinions on a biblical site?


    Because that's what people do here. That's the main reason message boards exist.

    Quote
    Opinions and reliance on logic and inference leads men off the path of truth.


    You are free to deem your opinion worthless if it means avoiding answering an awkward question. I think it's better to just front up with an answer and be honest about the real value you attach to your opinion.

    #56909
    Adam Pastor
    Participant

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 28 2007,07:03)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 28 2007,17:31)

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 28 2007,16:51)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 28 2007,15:43)
    Only this – there is One God – the Father – and one Lord – Jesus Christ.


    So the Father is, in no sense, our Lord?


    My turn…….now you're being silly, Isaiah!


    Well, there was serious point in it. If you interpret 1 Cor 8:6 as a exclusivist statement of ontology, then it works both ways….Jesus is in no sense our God but equally the Father is in no sense our Lord….it's quicksand…..


    That's right.
    In the context of 1 Cor 8.6 the Father is not the 'One Lord'; just as Jesus is not the 'One God'

    Why?
    Because the ONE GOD, YAHWEH, the Father, has made Jesus of Nazareth, both Lord and Messiah … GOD has made him 'Lord of all' [Acts 2.36, 10.36]

    Hence
    (Phil 2:11)  And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord,
    to the glory of God the Father.

    There is indeed a difference between LORD and Lord especially in the Hebrew text.

    LORD in caps is GOD's Name, viz. YAHWEH
    He is called 'Lord' that is, He is called Adonai (449 times in the Hebrew text)
    No man including Jesus is called Adonai; that alone is GOD's title.

    YAHWEH alone is Adonai
    Therefore the ONE GOD, ADONAI YAHWEH [Lord GOD in our English text];
    has made the man Messiah Jesus, the One Lord of all.
    It goes without saying that Christ's Lordship does not include YAHWEH GOD ALMIGHTY
    (cp. 1 Cor 15.27 he is excepted)

    So, Paul declares that in this world of so-called gods & lords;
    to US [THE EARLY APOSTOLIC CHURCH]
    there is ONE God, the Father …
    and there is ONE Lord, Jesus the Messiah

    That is it! These claims are exclusive.

    • Almighty GOD alone is GOD … there is no other almighty or co-equal God besides Him! He alone is GOD, there is no other.
      YAHWEH alone is the ONE GOD, the Father. The Only True GOD [John 17.3]
      (1 Cor 8:4)  … that there is none other God but one.
    • And Jesus of Nazareth the Messiah is the ONE Lord. He alone is the ONE Lord; because the Only True GOD, his Father; has made him 'Lord' to His (GOD's) glory.
    • So, ONE GOD, the Father
      and ONE Man, the Lord Jesus the Messiah, the Son of the Father. [2 john 3]
    • (1 Tim 2:5)  For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men,
      the man Christ Jesus;

        It can't be broken down much simpler than that!

    #56910
    kenrch
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 28 2007,16:37)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 28 2007,16:35)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 28 2007,16:15)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 28 2007,15:37)
    Hi not3,
    Those who accept trinity cannot align this God with the OT.
    They must say the God of the NT supercedes the revelation of God in the OT.
    They must actually reject the OT in favour of the NT yet a good storeman uses both.
    They say they see glimpses of their god in the OT but can never find anything written about such a being.
    As you show this god is a new and strange unbiblical god.
    We should abhor such teaching about new gods.
    WE have a true God.
    His son told us.


    Those who are Henotheist, basically Polytheist, daibolically appose the Monotheistic teachings of the OT scriptures.

    Their doctrine teaches that God made everything through a “lesser god” or “lessor being”, that they call “a son of God” before he was ever born a son!

    They deny the Hebrew scriptures. Look!

    Thus saith the LORD, thy redeemer, and he that formed thee from the womb, I am the LORD that maketh all things; that stretcheth forth the heavens alone; that spreadeth abroad the earth by myself;

    Isa 45:21
    Tell ye, and bring them near; yea, let them take counsel together: who hath declared this from ancient time? who hath told it from that time? have not I the LORD? and *there is no God else beside me*; a just God and a Saviour; *there is none beside me*.

    Isa 46:9
    Remember the former things of old: for *I am God, and there is none else*; I am God, and *there is none like me*, ???

    How do they explain this?


    Hi W,
    You boast of your logic but then present this claim of one God having recently told us of two or even three deities. What gives?


    NH

    :)


    Quote
    Not so! When have you heard me claim three deitys?

    One God, Three persons, One Spirit!

    Forgive me WJ but would you please explain that statement.

    Are you saying that one Spirit is in three persons? Or is the Spirit ONE OF the three persons? If so then what are the other two persons? One Spirit would indicate that the other two are not Spirit. And if the Spirit is a person then wouldn't that mean that you are saying that there are three persons and One Spirit-Person?

    Do you mean that God is three persons and one of the three is the Spirit? If so then shouldn't it be Two persons and one Spirit-Person? Or three persons and one of them is the Spirit.

    Or two persons and One Spirit? Two persons having the same Spirit.

    I'm sorry but to me you are saying that there are three persons and one Spirit. If the Spirit is a person then wouldn't that make FOUR (4) Persons?

    Please clarify that for me, PLEASE! :)

    #56911
    kenrch
    Participant

    Quote (Adam Pastor @ June 29 2007,00:15)

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 28 2007,07:03)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 28 2007,17:31)

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 28 2007,16:51)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 28 2007,15:43)
    Only this – there is One God – the Father – and one Lord – Jesus Christ.


    So the Father is, in no sense, our Lord?


    My turn…….now you're being silly, Isaiah!


    Well, there was serious point in it. If you interpret 1 Cor 8:6 as a exclusivist statement of ontology, then it works both ways….Jesus is in no sense our God but equally the Father is in no sense our Lord….it's quicksand…..


    That's right.
    In the context of 1 Cor 8.6 the Father is not the 'One Lord'; just as Jesus is not the 'One God'

    Why?
    Because the ONE GOD, YAHWEH, the Father, has made Jesus of Nazareth, both Lord and Messiah … GOD has made him 'Lord of all' [Acts 2.36, 10.36]

    Hence
    (Phil 2:11)  And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord,
    to the glory of God the Father.

    There is indeed a difference between LORD and Lord especially in the Hebrew text.

    LORD in caps is GOD's Name, viz. YAHWEH
    He is called 'Lord' that is, He is called Adonai (449 times in the Hebrew text)
    No man including Jesus is called Adonai; that alone is GOD's title.

    YAHWEH alone is Adonai
    Therefore the ONE GOD, ADONAI YAHWEH [Lord GOD in our English text];
    has made the man Messiah Jesus, the One Lord of all.
    It goes without saying that Christ's Lordship does not include YAHWEH GOD ALMIGHTY
    (cp. 1 Cor 15.27 he is excepted)

    So, Paul declares that in this world of so-called gods & lords;
    to US [THE EARLY APOSTOLIC CHURCH]
    there is ONE God, the Father …
    and there is ONE Lord, Jesus the Messiah

    That is it! These claims are exclusive.

    • Almighty GOD alone is GOD … there is no other almighty or co-equal God besides Him! He alone is GOD, there is no other.
      YAHWEH alone is the ONE GOD, the Father. The Only True GOD [John 17.3]
      (1 Cor 8:4)  … that there is none other God but one.
    • And Jesus of Nazareth the Messiah is the ONE Lord. He alone is the ONE Lord; because the Only True GOD, his Father; has made him 'Lord' to His (GOD's) glory.
    • So, ONE GOD, the Father
      and ONE Man, the Lord Jesus the Messiah, the Son of the Father. [2 john 3]
    • (1 Tim 2:5)  For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men,
      the man Christ Jesus;

        It can't be broken down much simpler than that!


    Adam Pastor are trying to break up the party of confusion? That is just TOO simple!
    Smith has a son. Is his son a Smith? If Smith owns everything does that means his son does too? If the son of Smith owns everything then what does his father own? Does the father, Smith, own the son, Smith, who owns everything? :laugh:

    #56912
    kenrch
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 28 2007,18:36)

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 28 2007,18:25)
    and therefore He was not denying he was God either


    I personally think that Jesus is disappointed to see that he spent his whole ministry pointing us to his Father, and to his God – only to see that we have made HIM the object of our praise and worship; indeed we have made HIM God.

    HE is the Son of God.


    AMEN Sister!

    #56919
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 28 2007,19:25)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 28 2007,18:36)

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 28 2007,18:25)
    and therefore He was not denying he was God either


    I personally think that Jesus is disappointed to see that he spent his whole ministry pointing us to his Father, and to his God – only to see that we have made HIM the object of our praise and worship; indeed we have made HIM God.

    HE is the Son of God.


    Not3, if Yeshua is not the object of your praise then you are out of step with the NT writers….

    Gotta go, home group tonight….


    Isaiah,

    The OT is quite thicker than the NT, is it not? Ha! My point is that God is a jealous God! He desires praise, honor, and glory for BEING GOD ALMIGHTY! Since there is only ONE GOD ALMIGHTY – He wants us to recognize who he is.

    The Father is God alone.

    Jesus also wanted us to recognize who he was. That was really important to him. It's important to us on a very real level that those we are intimate with – know who we are! If they do not know who we are, we certainly will not be vulnerable to them and share our deepest heart. Jesus told us who he was – he is the Son of God.

    Paul confirms what these two have told us (what God has told us about himself, and what Jesus has told us about himself). Paul says that for US there is but ONE GOD, and ONE Jesus Christ.

    Did Jesus direct us to “his” ministry and “his” teachings? Of course he did. He was on a mission – he had been sent to bring in the new covenant. Of course he is going to be the center of that covenant. But he never took our eyes off of God and put them on him! In John 17, Jesus prayed and thanked God for giving him his people. He told God that these people “knew for certain” who is was. And he felt his mission on earth was near completion.

    Who did Peter confess Jesus to be?

    Peter did not worship Jesus as God! If Peter did not worship Jesus as God, then I think I'm safe to follow his example. Considering he is one of the NT writers……I will heed your warning, but look to scripture to give me final direction.

    #56920
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Adam Pastor @ June 29 2007,00:15)

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 28 2007,07:03)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 28 2007,17:31)

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 28 2007,16:51)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 28 2007,15:43)
    Only this – there is One God – the Father – and one Lord – Jesus Christ.


    So the Father is, in no sense, our Lord?


    My turn…….now you're being silly, Isaiah!


    Well, there was serious point in it. If you interpret 1 Cor 8:6 as a exclusivist statement of ontology, then it works both ways….Jesus is in no sense our God but equally the Father is in no sense our Lord….it's quicksand…..


    That's right.
    In the context of 1 Cor 8.6 the Father is not the 'One Lord'; just as Jesus is not the 'One God'

    Why?
    Because the ONE GOD, YAHWEH, the Father, has made Jesus of Nazareth, both Lord and Messiah … GOD has made him 'Lord of all' [Acts 2.36, 10.36]

    Hence
    (Phil 2:11)  And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord,
    to the glory of God the Father.

    There is indeed a difference between LORD and Lord especially in the Hebrew text.

    LORD in caps is GOD's Name, viz. YAHWEH
    He is called 'Lord' that is, He is called Adonai (449 times in the Hebrew text)
    No man including Jesus is called Adonai; that alone is GOD's title.

    YAHWEH alone is Adonai
    Therefore the ONE GOD, ADONAI YAHWEH [Lord GOD in our English text];
    has made the man Messiah Jesus, the One Lord of all.
    It goes without saying that Christ's Lordship does not include YAHWEH GOD ALMIGHTY
    (cp. 1 Cor 15.27 he is excepted)

    So, Paul declares that in this world of so-called gods & lords;
    to US [THE EARLY APOSTOLIC CHURCH]
    there is ONE God, the Father …
    and there is ONE Lord, Jesus the Messiah

    That is it! These claims are exclusive.

    • Almighty GOD alone is GOD … there is no other almighty or co-equal God besides Him! He alone is GOD, there is no other.
      YAHWEH alone is the ONE GOD, the Father. The Only True GOD [John 17.3]
      (1 Cor 8:4)  … that there is none other God but one.
    • And Jesus of Nazareth the Messiah is the ONE Lord. He alone is the ONE Lord; because the Only True GOD, his Father; has made him 'Lord' to His (GOD's) glory.
    • So, ONE GOD, the Father
      and ONE Man, the Lord Jesus the Messiah, the Son of the Father. [2 john 3]
    • (1 Tim 2:5)  For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men,
      the man Christ Jesus;

        It can't be broken down much simpler than that!


    Ya, this is what I meant to say!

    :laugh:

    PS – thanks brother!

    #56921
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Now back to preexistence…..we were doing so well! :D

    #56953
    Is 1:18
    Participant

    Quote (Adam Pastor @ June 29 2007,00:15)
    That's right.
    In the context of 1 Cor 8.6 the Father is not the 'One Lord'; just as Jesus is not the 'One God'

    Why?
    Because the ONE GOD, YAHWEH, the Father, has made Jesus of Nazareth, both Lord and Messiah … GOD has made him 'Lord of all' [Acts 2.36, 10.36]

    Hence
    (Phil 2:11)  And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord,
    to the glory of God the Father.


    Well that's interesting AP. By your logic Jesus would have surplanted YHWH as our ultimate authority (owner, ruler, sovereign). Like I said, if you assert that Paul is making a statement of ontological exclusivity in writing 1 Cor 8:6 it creates more dilemmas than it solves. This is especially true when the remaining part of the verse is taken into consideration:

    1 Corinthians 8:6
    yet for us there is but one God, the Father, from whom are all things and we exist for Him; and one Lord, Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we exist through Him.

    If Jesus is being contrasted with “God” by Paul here then why does he go on to say: “by whom are all things, and we exist through Him”? The context of the verse suggests “all things” owe both the origin and preservation of their very existence to both God and Jesus. They worked together in bringing all things into existence and they work together in preserving the Creation. That's not something Paul would write if his intention was to dichotomise the ontologies of God and Jesus. Quite the opposite. If you read 1 Cor 8:1-7 carefully it's apparent that the distinction that Paul is driving at is not Jesus vs God, it's Jesus/God vs false gods. It's because of his language in the passage that some people see this passage as Paul's attempt to rework the Shema (Deut 6:4), placing Jesus right in the centre of it…..

    FYC:

    http://www.northpark.edu/sem/exauditu/papers/wright.html

    Quote
    There is indeed a difference between LORD and Lord especially in the Hebrew text.

    LORD in caps is GOD's Name, viz. YAHWEH
    He is called 'Lord' that is, He is called Adonai (449 times in the Hebrew text)
    No man including Jesus is called Adonai; that alone is GOD's title.


    How is this relevant to 1 Cor 8:6? The word at issue is “kurios” and it's used of both the Father and Son to denote 'authority' (owner, ruler, sovereign). It's also used of both in contexts that demand a “YHWH” rendering (e.g. Rom 10:-9-13).

    Quote
    YAHWEH alone is Adonai
    Therefore the ONE GOD, ADONAI YAHWEH [Lord GOD in our English text];
    has made the man Messiah Jesus, the One Lord of all.
    It goes without saying that Christ's Lordship does not include YAHWEH GOD ALMIGHTY
    (cp. 1 Cor 15.27 he is excepted)


    I would be interested in seeing you prove that in every instance “adonai” is used in the OT that it explicitly refers to the Father of Jesus…..

    Quote
    So, Paul declares that in this world of so-called gods & lords;
    to US [THE EARLY APOSTOLIC CHURCH]
    there is ONE God, the Father …
    and there is ONE Lord, Jesus the Messiah


    See my point above about Paul's intended distinction.

    Quote
    That is it! These claims are exclusive.

    • Almighty GOD alone is GOD … there is no other almighty or co-equal God besides Him! He alone is GOD, there is no other.
      YAHWEH alone is the ONE GOD, the Father. The Only True GOD [John 17.3]
      (1 Cor 8:4)  … that there is none other God but one.


    I guess someone forgot to tell Thomas (John 20:28).

    :D

    Quote

  • And Jesus of Nazareth the Messiah is the ONE Lord. He alone is the ONE Lord; because the Only True GOD, his Father; has made him 'Lord' to His (GOD's) glory.

  • If the Father is God to the exclusion of Jesus then equally Jesus is Lord to the exclusion of God. And if this is true then the Father has no right of authority over us. None.

    Quote

  • So, ONE GOD, the Father
    and ONE Man, the Lord Jesus the Messiah, the Son of the Father. [2 john 3]
  • Alright AP, given that you evidently believe that Jesus is Lord (master) to the exclusion of the Father, tell me how this verse fits into that formula:

    Luke 16:13
    13″No servant can serve two masters [Gr. kurios]; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or else he will be devoted to one and despise the other You cannot serve God and wealth.”

    The implication here is we are to devotely serve only one master (kurios), and that master is God. If Jesus is our ONLY Lord then it logically follows that He is also “God” in this verse. Right?

    Quote

  • (1 Tim 2:5)  For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men,
    the man Christ Jesus;

      It can't be broken down much simpler than that!


  • What better mediator that One who is both man and God….

    Blessings
    :)

    #56954
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi Is 1.18,
    You say
    “Well that's interesting AP. By your logic Jesus would have surplanted YHWH as our ultimate authority (owner, ruler, sovereign).

    Christ is appointed our Lord and speaks for God and acts for us with God as our mediator.
    Would you rather oppose the plan of God?

    “Like I said, if you assert that Paul is making a statement of ontological exclusivity in writing 1 Cor 8:6 it creates more dilemmas than it solves.”

    'Ontological' is not in the bible so it introduces an unnecessary human measure to put it here

    “This is especially true when the remaining part of the verse is taken into consideration:

    1 Corinthians 8:6
    yet for us there is but one God, the Father, from whom are all things and we exist for Him; and one Lord, Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we exist through Him”

    We have died in baptism [rom6]and are alive in the Spirit of Christ. Our real life is with and in Christ the mediator of God's powers and life for us.

    #56955
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi Is 1.18,
    More

    “If the Father is God to the exclusion of Jesus then equally Jesus is Lord to the exclusion of God. And if this is true then the Father has no right of authority over us”

    So logic rules over scripture?
    You should learn from the centurion who understood given authority.
    Lk 7
    “1Now when he had ended all his sayings in the audience of the people, he entered into Capernaum.

    2And a certain centurion's servant, who was dear unto him, was sick, and ready to die.

    3And when he heard of Jesus, he sent unto him the elders of the Jews, beseeching him that he would come and heal his servant.

    4And when they came to Jesus, they besought him instantly, saying, That he was worthy for whom he should do this:

    5For he loveth our nation, and he hath built us a synagogue.

    6Then Jesus went with them. And when he was now not far from the house, the centurion sent friends to him, saying unto him, Lord, trouble not thyself: for I am not worthy that thou shouldest enter under my roof:

    7Wherefore neither thought I myself worthy to come unto thee: but say in a word, and my servant shall be healed.

    8For I also am a man set under authority, having under me soldiers, and I say unto one, Go, and he goeth; and to another, Come, and he cometh; and to my servant, Do this, and he doeth it.

    9When Jesus heard these things, he marvelled at him, and turned him about, and said unto the people that followed him, I say unto you, I have not found so great faith, no, not in Israel.

    10And they that were sent, returning to the house, found the servant whole that had been sick.'

    Christ rules for God till he gives the kingdom back to his God.

    1Cor 15
    ” 22For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.

    23But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ's at his coming.

    24Then cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power.

    25For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.

    26The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death.

    27For he hath put all things under his feet. But when he saith all things are put under him, it is manifest that he is excepted, which did put all things under him.

    28And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that God may be all in all.”

    Any doubts that God was and is always God?

    #56956
    Is 1:18
    Participant

    NH,
    Is Yeshua our “Lord” to the exclusion of the Father?

    This is a 'yes' or 'no' question.

    #56957
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi Is 1,18,
    Who is your Lord?
    Who is his Lord God?

    Lords have Lords.
    That is why one is called Lord of Lords

    Revelation 17:14
    These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful.

    Yet he too is subject to his Lord God.

Viewing 20 posts - 281 through 300 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2025 Heaven Net

Navigation

© 1999 - 2025 - Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account