Nick, I wasn’t aware that truth had an alternate. Do you find truth in humanism?

t8: “The globe earth explains it better though and it is very simple. Both poles have the same properties and experience about the same amount of auroras. In the Flat Earth, model, there is one pole and the edge of the disk. They both experience auroras for some unknown reason, but less so on the edge of the disk so that it gives around equal…[Read more]

Nick: “Knowledge will increase.  Do you believe only your team offers truth? You would cast doubt on all others who search the heavens. You would offer yourself and fellow travellers as the light in the darkness. But we follow the anointed one who has that appointed role. His interest was in the salvation of souls.”

Nick, I’m an amat…[Read more]

t8, you may be right but 3,100 cubic miles of water makes a pretty large bucketful.

In your description though, it sounds more like bouyancy and density than gravity. Just an observation.

t8, you’re right about the theory of gravity. Larger masses are supposed to have more gravational force. However, as we saw in the last video, not sure if you’ve seen it yet, there is a lot of water in the atmosphere! How much?  About 3,200 cubic miles of water in the atmosphere. And let’s not forget about the clouds which are much higher and m…[Read more]

Nick: “So because scientists have got some things wrong we should never trust any of their observations. We should trust yours?”

Science is about disproving things. Scientists get things wrong all the time, if they didn’t we would never learn.

Interesting question though, should we trust their observations? Yes, if they are observable,…[Read more]

t8: “I performed that experiment in the video Dig4Truth and got a completely different result.”

You are correct that if you are not perfectly level to the tabletop then you would probably see the coin all the way. If you think about that when you are slightly above the edge then you would necessarily see the entire top. This is supported by…[Read more]

t8: “Finally, I imagine that if we were on a flat disk, what you should observe in a very flat part of the terrain is the sun disappearing over the horizon then being brought back by magnification until such point that the sun decreases in size to the size of a star in fact and then fade from there. It wouldn’t be an abrupt disappearance and r…[Read more]

t8: “The Earth easily wins the gravitational tug of war. The moon still has an influence and the fact that there are different tides depending on where the moon is backs up this up.”

I agree. And by the way, thanks for the challenging questions.

The earth’s gravitational field certainly would be greater, much greater, assuming it exists.…[Read more]

t8: “But if you really wanted to prove that the Earth is flat, you could run this experiment yourself with ease. Try doing it with the moon first and if you need further clarification, do it with the sun and video recorder in front of the lense. Given that both emit light or reflect it, you should be able to track it for quite a while after it…[Read more]

t8: “By that reckoning, we should observe auroras thousands if not millions of times more in my part of the world than the north pole.”

Thats not necessarily so. Auroras are limited to where the excitement of the atmosphere is located. Just because there is a lot of area doesn’t mean that it must be covered by auroras.

Not to put too fine a point on this, I’m not picking on anyone but just using a comment by Gene that is a common sentiment to illustrate the point of whom we should trust. I believe this is a blind spot in the “church”. We have been indoctrinated into thinking that because a scientist or a majority of scientists has a belief it has to be true. For…[Read more]

mila: “😀 Yes. I am also asking my kids “Should we really believe all that scientists have told us is true?” And there’s a lot of truth in that.”

Very good point. I have to wonder if Gene would also include “all the scientists” that consider evolution to be true.

If we have been lied to about evolution by most “scientists” why would we th…[Read more]

Gene: “Check it out for yourselves”

That’s a great idea Gene. And that’s all we’re really asking, check it out for yourselves. That’s how the growing masses of FE people all got started!

Did mention that water always finds its level? Another knd of important point.

Also, if we were on a sphere we could never see the horizon at eye level. On a sphere all direction move away and down from the observer. However, if we are looking thru a drone at a 1,000 feet, a plane at 35,000 feet or a ballon at 114,000 feet the horizon is always…[Read more]

I suppose one experiment would be to have a container with very few particles of our atmosphere, like at the top of our atmosphere and then expose it to a vacuum. What would happen? I think we all know the answer.

The particles would equalize with the vacuum container. It is a law of physics. But somehow it magically doesn’t do that on our…[Read more]

Hey Mike, I thought this was interesting.

Man measures star distances using parallax trigonometry. By choosing two measurable observation points and making an imaginary triangle to a third point, and using simple trigonometry, man calculates the distance to the third point.
The most distant observation points available to an earthbound…[Read more]

Hey miia, did you hear about this?

Scary!

Hey Mike, about how long do you think that moon transit was? I would guess maybe several to 6 hours of time? Maybe more?

Funny but the clouds didn’t change shape. Hmm.

t8: “Good question. A quick google showed me this:

the vacuum of space does not exert any force on the atmosphere at all. It does not “suck” the air. We associate the word “suck” with “vacuums” but it’s a misnomer. That’s not what vacuums do.
Consider an example where we’ve pumped all of the air out of some box and created a vacuum inside of…[Read more]