You: Your style of writing is horrific and obnoxious …..

Me: Fine, what about my intentions? I keep on writing in that particular style, for a reason NO?

You: try paragraph format, it’s how the rest of the world actually writes.

Me: Is it? Click on the address hereunder and you experience another type of HORRIFIC and OBNOXIOUS wri…[Read more]

You: Accusing me of not continuing our “conversation” because I “don’t like your format”,….

couldn’t be further from the truth.

Me: if you wanted to be honest and also TO JUSTIFY YOURSELF why haven’t you been more specific and posted my own words, instead of the above,?

I have proven to you specifically black on white, THAT MY WRITI…[Read more]

<span style=”color: #0000ff;”>You: Accusing me of not continuing our “conversation” because I “don’t like your format”,….</span>

<span style=”color: #0000ff;”>couldn’t be further from the truth. </span>

Me: if you wanted to be honest and also TO JUSTIFY YOURSELF why haven’t you been more specific and posted my own words, instead of the…[Read more]

You: Didn’t read a word since you don’t know how to write in paragraph format…

ME: DESIRETRUTH????
This is the biggest lie I’ve ever read in these forums!
AS SIMPLE AS THAT!

You: either learn how to properly communicate in the written format, and I will respond OR don’t, and I won’t. It’s that simple!

Do you want me to believe tha…[Read more]

YOU: What does the Ezekiel passage of GOD raising a valley of dry bones have to do with being of the seed of David?

THAT IS PRECISELY WHAT I EXPECTED FROM YOU!

I  POSTED EZEKIEL 37 CONCERNING THE DRY BONES, AS A RESPONSE TO YOUR OTHER VERY SIMILAR COMMENT POSTED  PREVIOUSLY,

HEREUNDER,

You: The most obvious “criteria” of the Messi…[Read more]

You: The most obvious “criteria” of the Messiah is his lineage and both Matthew and Luke say

Jesus’ daddy is the spirit and therefore
has no male biological connection to David and Solomon. 
 

DT, TO START WITH,

YOU JUST CONFIRMED HOW FEEBLE-MINDED PERSON SPIRITUALLY YOU ARE, WITH EVERY RESPECT, BY SAYING THAT GOD IS NOT IN THE POSITI…[Read more]

Hi DT and all,

I did discuss the case of Isaac’s birth well back on this thread with Jodi once.

FINALLY THANKS TO THE HOLY SPIRIT I AM BACK TO ANSWER YOUR SPIRITUALLY DEAD POST IN GENERAL.

TODAY IS THE FEAST OF THE PENTECOST AND I AM MORE THAN CONVINCED THAT THE HOLY SPIRIT FURNISHED ME WITH MORE LIGHT, AND I AM IN THE POSITON TO SHARE W…[Read more]

You:

   Me: I TELL YOU, NOTHING OF FLESH AT ALL!

You: You don’t tell me much of anything except foolishness.

ME: I ALREADY MADE CLEAR ABOUT YOUR WISDOM, READ AGAIN WHAT I TOLD YOU IN MY POST 946297

INSTEAD, YOU OPTED TO PLAY WITH WORDS,

 WHICH PROVES THAT YOU ARE NOT EVEN SMELLING THE TRUTH,

THE FACT THAT YOU ARE AS YOU PROC…[Read more]

You: @Carmel,
Me: I REPEAT WHAT I SAID IN MY POST: 946277 TRUTH HURTS!!!!

You: You have to present truth first.

ME: HERE COMES THE PURE TRUTH, AND YOU HAVE TO START

CHEWING GOD’S SPIRITUAL WORK:

NOTHING OF FLESH AT ALL!

Genesis 17:1 And after he began to be ninety and nine years old, the Lord appeared to him: and said unto him:

IF…[Read more]

You: The question still stands, how can Jesus be the messiah when his biological father isn’t of the line of David, the line of Solomon, or a descendant of Abraham;

when Jesus’ “father” is the spirit?

I REPEAT WHAT I SAID IN MY POST: 946277

TRUTH HURTS!!!!

ME: SO IS THAT HOW YOU BELIEVE IN A GOD WHO IS OMNIPOTENT???

YOU SIMPLY…[Read more]

You:You then bring up Abraham and Sarah and presume in Gen 21:1 (which has nothing to do with the Messiah) 

MUSTN’T THE JEWISH MESSIAH BE A SON OF ABRAHAM???

 It would seem it is you who doesna’t believe in God’s power to open the womb of a barren woman.

Kind of like HE did for Rachael and Hagar.

Me: Just read what I sugge…[Read more]

You: We cannot forget it was the spirit is who impregnated Mary and NOT of the seed of David.
Once again, you are justifying lies.
TRUTH HURTS!!!!

ME: SO IS THAT HOW YOU BELIEVE IN A  GOD WHO IS OMNIPOTENT???

YOU HAVE FAITH AS MUCH AS THE MUSLIMS, IF NOT LESS, AS THEY BELIEVE THAT GOD CANNOT HAVE A SON SINCE HE HAS NOT A WOMAN!!

HA…[Read more]

You: We cannot forget it was the spirit is who impregnated Mary and NOT of the seed of David. Once again, you are justifying lies.

Me: Let’s consider FOR THE TIME BEING, the discussion of Jesus’ genealogy BETWEEN US, as the SON OF MAN, ENDED IN A STALEMATE.

THUS FOR A CHANGE, I AM TACKLING THIS PROCESS, AS YOU HINTED OUT, FROM GOD’S S…[Read more]

<span style=”color: #0000ff;”>You: Carmel, I would bet that the only way that YOU SEE that I am contradicting myself or that YOU SEE that I am admitting what I deny, is if you are taking what I have said and are applying it to what YOU further believe and then pretend that I believe that too.</span>

Me: Jodi, read again what you…[Read more]

<span style=”color: #0000ff;”> “The WORD” is God’s Spirit with the promise that it will </span>
<h2><spa…[Read more]

You: We cannot forget it was the spirit is who impregnated Mary and NOT of the seed of David. Once again, you are justifying lies.

Me: Let’s consider FOR THE TIME BEING, the discussion of Jesus’ genealogy BETWEEN US, as the SON OF MAN, ENDED IN A STALEMATE.

THUS FOR A CHANGE, I AM TACKLING THIS PROCESS, AS YOU HINTED OUT, FROM GOD’S…[Read more]

Me: “when there were no sons to preserve the inheritance, the husband (son-in-law) would become the son upon marriage to keep up the family name.”

You: I haven’t found this verse that says when marrying the daughter of a son less man the man being married becomes

the “son” of that man…..

 ME: Back to square one!

Luke is following…[Read more]

<span style=”color: #0000ff;”>You: Me: Lineage ran through the father and NOT the mother.</span>

<span style=”color: #0000ff;”>The mother has NOTHING to do with lineage,</span>

Me: NOT QUITE PRECISE:

Luke gives the name Heli (the father of Mary) but then doesn’t list Mary but mentions Joseph. Why?

LET’S SEE HOW VITAL THE WOMAN IS, C…[Read more]

You: Thank you for putting this at the top; I don’t have to read any further, because the rest of what you will say will be foolishness.

What part of Numbers 1:2 escapes your understanding? Did you even go look it up before you made this “statement” of justification?!? Let me give you the passage for your reading enjoyment:

Num 1:2 “…[Read more]

ME: THE ABOVE IS IRRELEVANT, AS JESUS WAS NOT OF JECONIAH, JOSEPH WAS, AND JESUS IS NOT THE SON OF JOSEPH AT ALL. BUT THE SON OF MARY  OF NATHAN!

ANOTHER OF DAVID’S LINEAGE.

This is also also in contrast to Matthew, as Luke begins his genealogy with his own time and goes ba…[Read more]

YOU: <span style=”color: #0000ff;”>I’ve already said all I can; </span>

<span style=”color: #0000ff;”>all you have given me are man’s opinions and reasonings for why Jechoniah is listed. </span>

ISN’T THAT WHAT YOU ASKED FOR?

Also, the prophecy need mean no more than Jeconiah’s immediate sons wouldn’t be kings because the Babylon…[Read more]

You: Couple issues with this passage and claiming it speaks of Jesus; the most glaring and obvious, Jesus was never called “Immanuel.”

Then I would encourage you to read chapter 7 in its entirety (as Jodi says context, context, context and Gene says we shouldn’t be “cherry picking” – like picking one verse out of 25 and not applying it…[Read more]

You: Copy and pasting an entire page from a website doesn’t really constitute as research;

it just means you looked something up and re-posted it.

Me: IT ALSO MEANS SOMETHING ELSE! JUST READ WHAT I SAID IN MY POST#946135

I am not that KEEN and as familiar as YOU ARE with the Hebrew scriptures I opted to do some r…[Read more]

You: @Carmel,

Why would I go with an Aramaic translation when we have access to the Hebrew? You found an interesting translation;

how long did it take for you to find that butchering of God’s word?

ME: for the sake of the truth:

ALL MY LIFE:

FROM MY SIDE THAT’S WHAT YOU ARE DOING AS WELL!!! NO???

HERE IS WHAT YOU ASKED F…[Read more]

Hi DT.

<span style=”color: #0000ff;”>You: I’m wanting to make sure I understand what God said first before trying understand the meanings behind what a bunch of sages debated.</span>

FIRST AND FOREMOST, WITH EVERY RESPECT, KNOWING YOU AND YOUR PERSPECTIVES, ENTIRELY PHYSICAL;

YOU ARE IN A VERY UNREALISTIC  SITUATION I’M AFRAID,  AS UND…[Read more]

You: Nothing in what you wrote supported why Jechoniah should be in the lineage of Jesus,

Me: I agree!

Thus as I am not that KEEN and as familiar as YOU ARE with the Hebrew scriptures I opted to do some research, THROUGH A JEW AND RABBINIC SOURCES.

They also agree that God reversed the curse on Jeconiah, which they attribute to…[Read more]

You: Jechoniah is listed in the lineage of Jesus (Matt 1:11),

a name that God said

“Write ye this man childless,

a man that shall not prosper in his days:

for no man of his seed shall prosper,

sitting upon the throne of David, and ruling anymore in Judah.”

(Jer 22:30) Did you catch it? Jechoniah is in the lineage of Jes…[Read more]

Hi DT,

You: Jechoniah is listed in the lineage of Jesus (Matt 1:11), a name that God said “Write ye this man childless, a man that shall not prosper in his days: for no man of his seed shall prosper, sitting upon the throne of David, and ruling any more in Judah.” (Jer 22:30) Did you catch it? Jechoniah is in the lineage of Jesus, but God sai…[Read more]

You: You: JESUS and LUCIFER! THE VERY FIRST-EVER MARRIAGE

Me: HA HA HA HA HA HA!! Don’t think I have ever read that in God’s word or anything interpreted as such

John3:28 You yourselves do bear me witness, that I said, I am not Christ, but that I am sent before him. 
29He that hath the bride, is the bridegroom:
but the friend of the b…[Read more]

You: How do you come up with this stuff?!?

James 1:5 But if any of you want wisdom, let him ask of God,

who giveth to all men abundantly, and upbraideth not;
and it shall be given him. 
6But let him ask in faith, nothing wavering. For he that wavereth is like a wave of the sea, which is moved and carried about by the wind. 7Therefore…[Read more]

YOU: What happened or what changed between the OT and NT? 

WHEN WILL YOU GET IT INTO YOUR MIND, THAT THE OT. IS OBSOLETE?

EVEN THE GOD OF THE OT IS DIFFERENT NEVER MIND THE COVENANT HE MADE!

READ:

Jeremiah 31:31Behold the days shall come, saith the Lord,
and I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel,
and with the house of…[Read more]

You: You: JESUS and LUCIFER! THE VERY FIRST-EVER MARRIAGE

Me: HA HA HA HA HA HA!! Don’t think I have ever read that in God’s word or anything interpreted as such

John3:28 You yourselves do bear me witness, that I said, I am not Christ, but that I am sent before him. 

29He that hath the bride, is the bridegroom:

but the friend of the…[Read more]

You: What is the point you are trying to get at?

READ AND DISCERN! 

THANKS TO THE LIGHT FROM ABOVE!

You: GOD WAS ALONE BEFORE CREATION — you know this how? What about the angels?

MAN WAS ALONE IN HIS CREATION — was he, wasn’t God there too?

Me: DT, IF I HAD TO TAKE YOUR FIRST TWO ANSWERS SERIOUSLY, THERE WOULD ONLY BE ONE JUSTUF…[Read more]

You: @Carmel,

GOD WAS ALONE BEFORE CREATION

— you know this how? What about the angels?

Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created heaven, and earth. 

MAN WAS ALONE IN HIS CREATION

— was he, wasn’t God there too?

Genesis 2:7 And the Lord God formed man of the slime of the earth: and breathed into his face the breath of life, and man be…[Read more]

Read it again and reflect.

GOD WAS ALONE BEFORE CREATION,

MAN WAS ALONE IN HIS CREATION

GOD MADE A HELPER FOR THE MAN LIKE HIMSELF,

ANOTHER HUMAN BEING THE WOMAN;

OUT OF THE MAN!

GOD, THE DEITY, ANDROGYNOUS, MALE AND FEMALE,  MADE A HELPER FOR THE FATHER LIKE HIMSELF, ANOTHER DIVINE BEING JESUS, THE SON OF GOD, ANDROGYNOUS MALE…[Read more]

Hi DT,

You: I have no idea what translation you’re using, but throw it away; it’s corrupt. Gen 2:18 in every translation I reference it says

“I” will make him a helper – no “us.” This means God alone is going to do this.

Peshitta Holy Bible Translated

Genesis 2:18 And LORD JEHOVAH God said,

“It is not good for Adam to be alone.[Read more]