- This topic is empty.
- AuthorPosts
- September 15, 2005 at 5:50 am#8735BrandonIkeParticipant
1. it's easier to keep it the way it is. more people recognize the title “God” and it's been used for centuries.
2. it doesn't matter what. you have faith that our heavenly Father will let you call Him whatever you want. the title “God” is a verbal intonation with the vocal cords. you can still go to heaven.
3. too many pagan words already. onespirit listed many words with mythological origins. this can be overwhelming to identify and fix.
4. personally, david, you don't want to accept any changes until your church, jehovah's witnesses, officially does?
[/B]nick hassan, david, t8, onespirit you've given your position on the matter. i'd like an understanding. we have freedom of religion here in america.
September 15, 2005 at 5:56 am#8737davidParticipant1. it's easier to keep it the way it is. more people recognize the name “Jehovah” and it's been used for centuries. (as opposed to Yahweh)
2. it doesn't matter what. you have faith that our heavenly Father will let you call Him whatever you want. the name “Jehovah” is a verbal intonation with the vocal cords.
4. personally, Brandon, you can use the same arguements to use the name Jehovah, yet you said that was wrong a couple days ago.
Yes, and much of that freedom of religion in America was granted because Jehovah's Witnesses have gone to the supreme court 30 or so times whenever people have tried to stop them. They've won about 27 of those cases. If you study law, you will likely have to study the cases of Jehovah's Witnesses.
September 15, 2005 at 5:58 am#8738davidParticipantBrandon, are you saying we should keep using the word “god” despite what Elijah says?
September 15, 2005 at 6:15 am#8739EliyahParticipantPeople, I shown you so many many many scriptures concerning Yahweh's Name in the scriptures and the importance of His name, and His name was substituted MORE THAN 6 thousand 8 hundred and 23 times with pagan titles.
There are absolutely a CLOUD OF WITNESSES in scriptures concerning the importance of His true Name, and if people don't want to accept those many many, then they will answer to Yahweh for it, but I certainly would not take a chance on that CLOUD of testimony against me in Yahweh's coming judgement.
Yes, it is true that in America there is freedom of religion, but what matters is what is right in Yah's Word, and what He says, for Peter said, “” We had better obey Yah rather than men””.
Eliyah C.
September 15, 2005 at 6:18 am#8740BrandonIkeParticipantno, i want an understanding on your position, david. i think the titles that were substituted in should be reverted back to our heavenly Father's true name given to moses. i need to do more research.
September 15, 2005 at 6:20 am#8742BrandonIkeParticipanti made a mistake in trying to make the bottom part in bold letters. i have genuine mistakes i'd like to edit, but i understand that people can abuse this feature.
September 15, 2005 at 6:23 am#8743davidParticipantHey Nick, did you know that when world war II struck, Jehovah's Witnesses were banned in New Zealand, just like Canada?
Elijah, I think we all recognize the importance of Jehovah's name. I don't think anyone disagreed with that. Yes there is a cloud of Witnesses concerning the importance of his name. Isn't brandon asking if anything can or should be done with this baal=lord, god=gad thing?
Brandon. It really doesn't matter if you have freedom of religion. If the government were to suddenly put an end to your freedom, whom would you follow, man or God?
September 15, 2005 at 6:24 am#8744davidParticipantOh, sorry, I see Elijah just made that point.
September 15, 2005 at 6:25 am#8745BrandonIkeParticipantno, i'm not asking if anything should be done in my post. i'm asking for an understanding why you reject eliyah.
September 15, 2005 at 6:29 am#8746davidParticipantReally? You're opening post was confusing then.
I don't know that I've ever completely rejected Elijah. I find his words quite interesting. I'm still looking into this, as you are. I'm just being a little more cautious about this. Mat 10:16.
September 15, 2005 at 6:32 am#8747BrandonIkeParticipantEDIT TO MY ORIGINAL POST i do not accept those 4 entries i posted. those are possible explanations i've thought of for why posters have rejected eliyah.
September 15, 2005 at 6:34 am#8748davidParticipantI see. Then my responce to your original post really didn't make sence then?
What you said was sort of one of these things:
This sentance is not true.
September 15, 2005 at 6:48 am#8749EliyahParticipantDavid, you can be as cautious as you want, just take your time, I'm im no hurry here, inspite what a few other may say.
BrandonIke, People reject me because of this Message, many places has rejected this truth, and the truth is never very popular among the many, it was the same in ancient times too, and there is many examples in the scriptures to prove it.
If I had come to this forum speaking every agreeing plausable words of traditional teachings, then everyone would have accepted me right off for merely saying pleasing words of traditional christianity.
Well, people are not rejecting me, they are rejecting the truth of YHWH, and to those who have eyes to see and ears to hear, the very many scriptures that have been given proves the facts, and YHWH KNOWS my heart, no matter how much people reject me, and frankly I don't care if people do reject me, but what I do care is for people, and what YHWH says in His word, and what He thinks of me.
September 15, 2005 at 6:50 am#8750davidParticipantThe next post I give will be true.
September 15, 2005 at 6:50 am#8751davidParticipantThe last post was false.
September 15, 2005 at 6:52 am#8752davidParticipantThose last two posts reveal how this forum feels to me. Is the second post true?
September 15, 2005 at 6:58 am#8753BrandonIkeParticipantdavid, simply the editing feature is taken off here. i should have been more clear in my original post. simple. i asked the question in the title. i posted possible explanations as to why. those numbered entries weren't my own affirmations.
simple, the edit feature is off, i clarified myself quickly.
September 15, 2005 at 7:05 am#8754BrandonIkeParticipanthttps://heavennet.net/cgi-bin/forum/ikonboard.cgi?act=ST;f=1;t=342 please go to this post instead
September 19, 2005 at 11:54 pm#8838davidParticipantSo, brandon, I take it you've stopped using the word [you know] and replaced it with Elohim.
Have you?
September 20, 2005 at 12:33 am#8839BrandonIkeParticipantyes, i've tried to. i need to do more research.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.