- This topic has 4,515 replies, 99 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by
Proclaimer.
- AuthorPosts
- March 6, 2006 at 4:18 pm#11789
Cubes
ParticipantQuote (Is 1:18 @ Mar. 06 2006,04:42) Hey Cubes.
I get the feeling you think i'm trying to trap you in something here. I'm not. I was simply asking you if you believed Jesus was somehow birthed by The Father pre-incarnation, or if you believe that He became a Son during His earthly life. From what you've written I take it that it's the former. I understand that a lot of people hold to this but I see NO scriptural evidence for this birth event. What have you read that has lead you to the conclusion that Yahshua became a Son pre-incarnation and ALWAYS existed as a Son (in an anthropic context).Quote On the other hand Jesus speaks of his Father as though he's been his Son for more than 33 years.
And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with the glory which I had with thee before the world was.
I dont see how you can draw the conclusion that “Jesus speaks of his Father as though he's been his Son for more than 33 years” from this verse. If anything it shows that the shared the same glory and that argues against a subordination.
Hi Is,No I don't feel that you are trying to trap me but I do feel though that we're going off on a rabbit trail and off topic when we focus on WHEN Jesus became a son, rather than the thing that matters to our salvation: that he is the Son of God. That's all I am saying.
Jesus was born of Mary some 2,000 years ago and it may well be that he became God's Son on that day. I am called to believe that he really is the Son of God and I do.
Speculatively, it could be that God called him “my son” about 14 months before the day that he was born on earth. If so, technically, he was a Son 14 months earlier but was revealed to men in the Manger. Some even didn't know about it till some thirty or so years later during his ministry years.
I feel that there is little to be gained by dwelling on this line of thinking.I have to run but would continue shortly.
March 6, 2006 at 4:59 pm#11790hybrid
ParticipantQuote (Cubes @ Mar. 06 2006,16:18) Hi Is, No I don't feel that you are trying to trap me but I do feel though that we're going off on a rabbit trail and off topic when we focus on WHEN Jesus became a son, rather than the thing that matters to our salvation: that he is the Son of God. That's all I am saying.
Jesus was born of Mary some 2,000 years ago and it may well be that he became God's Son on that day. I am called to believe that he really is the Son of God and I do.
Speculatively, it could be that God called him “my son” about 14 months before the day that he was born on earth. If so, technically, he was a Son 14 months earlier but was revealed to men in the Manger. Some even didn't know about it till some thirty or so years later during his ministry years.
I feel that there is little to be gained by dwelling on this line of thinking.I have to run but would continue shortly.
gee cubes,it's well and good to believe that jesus was the son of the living god.
but john, thomas, paul, hebrewa and peter never stopped there, and went a little further….
Titus 2:13-15
13 while we wait for the blessed hope-the glorious appearing of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ, 14 who gave himself for us to redeem us from all wickedness and to purify for himself a people that are his very own, eager to do what is good.15 These, then, are the things you should teach.
NIV2 Peter 1:1
To those who through the righteousness of our God and Savior Jesus Christ have received a faith as precious as ours:
NIVJohn 20:28
28 Thomas said to him, “My Lord and my God!”
NIVJohn 1:1
and the Word was God.
NIVHeb 1:8-9
But about the Son he says,“Your throne, O God, will last for ever and ever,
and righteousness will be the scepter of your kingdom.
9 You have loved righteousness and hated wickedness;
therefore God, your God, has set you above your companions
by anointing you with the oil of joy.”
NIVthe scriptures were too numerous to ignore….
that jesus christ was indeed god in the flesh.
.
March 6, 2006 at 5:39 pm#11791Cubes
ParticipantHello Hybrid,
No argument there. However the bible also shows that Jesus Christ is a God/god ('elohiym) (John 1:1, Ps 45:5-6), Son of the Most High God/god ('elohiym).
Ashtoreth, the goddess of the Zidonians is also elohiym. 1 Ki 11:5
The angels of Ps 8:5 are also `elohiym.There are many Gods/gods indeed but as written:
Daniel 11:32
And such as do wickedly against the covenant shall he corrupt by flatteries: but the people that do know their God ['elohiym] shall be strong, and do [exploits].As with Elijah and Jesus, those who know who the True God/god is among the many Gods/gods, shall do exploits.
March 6, 2006 at 5:51 pm#11792Cubes
ParticipantHi Is 1:18:
ADDENDUM: There is no way to determine the specific day WHEN God made the declaration, “you are my son, today I have begotten you.” What we can say is that there was a time WHEN God begat the Lord Jesus as his son and that before that, he had not yet been begotten.
John says that before he became flesh he was the Word that was with God and *–a–* God.
My insertion:(*–a–*).
Given all the other scriptures that I have seen regarding Jesus, I know and believe that he is not the only True God and Invisible YHWH we know as our Father.So Jesus was w/ the Father and had a glory with him before he came on earth and you take that to mean he is the God w/ whom he had glory, that is part of his corporate being. If so, to a lesser degree, I offer the following scriptures to illustrate that where the Father is Jesus may be since he has been found pleasing to God; where Jesus is his servants may be also; where the Father is glorified, his son may bask in that glory too for sheer proximity and relationship as the apostles basked in the glory of Jesus when they walked w/ him. It still doesn't make the apostles and Jesus the same entity.
“Jhn 12:26 If any man serve me, let him follow me; and where I am, there shall also my servant be: if any man serve me, him will [my] Father honour.
Mat 9:15 And Jesus said unto them, Can the children of the bridechamber mourn, as long as the bridegroom is with them? but the days will come, when the bridegroom shall be taken from them, and then shall they fast.
Luk 10:20 Notwithstanding in this rejoice not, that the spirits are subject unto you; but rather rejoice, because your names are written in heaven.
Rev 3:21 To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne.
Undoubtedly you would agree that there would be some glory round the throne when the saints are gathered there with Jesus!
March 6, 2006 at 6:16 pm#11793Cubes
ParticipantHi Is
You did set me on a rabbit trail! How did I end up talking about the throne? ha ha ha!
March 7, 2006 at 4:26 am#11798hybrid
Participantcubes,
paul and peter clearly did not refer to jesus here as “a” god… but their great god. (mine too)
Titus 2:13-15
13 while we wait for the blessed hope-the glorious appearing of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ, 14 who gave himself for us to redeem us from all wickedness and to purify for himself a people that are his very own, eager to do what is good.15 These, then, are the things you should teach.
NIV2 Peter 1:1
To those who through the righteousness of our God and Savior Jesus Christ have received a faith as precious as ours:
NIVthinking about jesus as a lesser god than the father has also pagan parallelism (in greek mythology)
also the hundred and so usage of the word theos in NT refers to deity (supreme being), with the exception in cor when it was use to refer to satan as the god of this world.
so i think it is also common sense that the word god refer to jesus was within the general rule of the usage of the word in the whole NT.
if you want to believe that the usage of god that refer to jesus was the exception to the rule, that's your call…
.
March 7, 2006 at 3:43 pm#11800Cubes
ParticipantQuote (hybrid @ Mar. 07 2006,04:26) cubes, paul and peter clearly did not refer to jesus here as “a” god… but their great god. (mine too)
Titus 2:13-15
13 while we wait for the blessed hope-the glorious appearing of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ, 14 who gave himself for us to redeem us from all wickedness and to purify for himself a people that are his very own, eager to do what is good.15 These, then, are the things you should teach.
NIV2 Peter 1:1
To those who through the righteousness of our God and Savior Jesus Christ have received a faith as precious as ours:
NIVthinking about jesus as a lesser god than the father has also pagan parallelism (in greek mythology)
also the hundred and so usage of the word theos in NT refers to deity (supreme being), with the exception in cor when it was use to refer to satan as the god of this world.
so i think it is also common sense that the word god refer to jesus was within the general rule of the usage of the word in the whole NT.
if you want to believe that the usage of god that refer to jesus was the exception to the rule, that's your call…
.
Hi Hybrid,I take the call to say emphatically that Jesus Christ is none other than the Son of the Living God, and not the Living God himself. I am confident in the countless passages of the holy scriptures and many witnesses that testify to that fact.
That is what it really boils down to, which I believe to be critical in the matters of salvation.
Were there no scriptures like these and so many others by the apostles, I could be persuaded but there are two many clear passages as to leave us with no shadow of doubt that Jesus is not the Most High God for he worships the most high God himself.
Jhn 8:54 Jesus answered, If I honour myself, my honour is nothing: it is my Father that honoureth me; of whom ye say, that he is your God:Mar 3:35 For whosoever shall do the will of God, the same is my brother, and my sister, and mother.
John 20:17 Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and [to] my God, and your God.
Mat 27:46 And about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? that is to say, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?
Rev 3:5 He that overcometh, the same shall be clothed in white raiment; and I will not blot out his name out of the book of life, but I will confess his name before my Father, and before his angels.
Rev 3:21 To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne.
Rev 3:12 Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God, and he shall go no more out: and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, [which is] new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my God: and my new name.
Some of these passages refer to Jesus post resurrection and ascension. If you understand his usage of “My Father and My God” to not just be meaningless roles and titles, then you should be able to see how the chips fall.
We know that:
1. The Father calls Jesus “`elohiym [God/god]” and “my beloved Son”
2. He said of men, “ye are `elohiym [Gods/gods] and children of the Most High.”
3. The Father refers to himself as God to be compared to no one else, reigning above everyone else.
4. Jesus says all authority has been given unto him, and that he has a Father and that Father is the True God, his God.
5. Jesus is the Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the firstfruits of God's creation, by and through whom God made the worlds.
6. That all authority has been given to Jesus by the Father, excepting the Father himself, so that Jesus submits to and shall submit to the Father (1 Cor 15).What we do not see is:
a. Jesus calling himself God and carrying himself as though he is his own Father. Yes, he said “if you've seen me you've seen the Father…” but which is more reasonable, that a man be his own father while he keeps talking about his father still, or that by such a comment, he intends others to understand that he rightly represents his father? I take the latter and knowing Jesus, he'd say that I rightly judged. There are no trick questions and answers.
b. No example of the Father ever calling anyone “My Father” or “My God,” nor is he shown in any example receiving from anyone something that he needs, being surbordinate to anyone or being moved or changed or turned from his glorious state as the invisible God and only potentate of all.
Yes Jesus emptied himself of his glorious form of Godhood but until you can show me a scripture which interpretes John 1:1 to mean he was actually the living God, I shall have to interprete these scriptures by all the other scriptures which at the end of the day, show him to be the Son of God and not the one God being who is the Father. The scriptures that you present are not comparative, in that whenever Jesus is shown in the same scripture with the Father, the utmost esteem is given by the apostles to the Father in recognition that it is He who is the Living God and Jesus is high and exalted Son, our Lord and savior.
March 8, 2006 at 2:53 am#11803Is 1:18
ParticipantHi Cubes,
Sorry I'm not able to pass comment on the individual points you have made for a little while, I have to travel out of town again. I will say this though, and I hope you won't be offended by my bluntness, but it's apparent to me that you strongly believe that Yahshua Messiah is the “Son of God” (as do I) – but still have NO CLUE what this means to you. Do you hold that Yahshua was procreated by the Father? If so, when? (before the incarnation or during?). Do you apply an anthropic understanding of the Father/Son relationship to Yahshua and the Father? IYHO do they have different ontology (like human fathers & sons)?I also would like to ask you if you, like t8, hold to the belief that Yahshua is one of the lords or gods of 1 Cor 8:5?
March 8, 2006 at 2:55 am#11804Is 1:18
ParticipantEdited for clarity:
Hi Cubes,
Sorry I'm not able to pass comment on the individual points you have made for a little while, I have to travel out of town again. I will say this though, and I hope you won't be offended by my bluntness, but it's apparent to me that you strongly believe that Yahshua Messiah is the “Son of God” (as do I) – but I still have NO CLUE what this means to you. Do you hold that Yahshua was procreated by the Father? If so, when? (before the incarnation or during?). Do you apply an anthropic understanding of the Father/Son relationship to Yahshua and the Father? IYHO do they have different ontology (unlike human fathers & sons)?I also would like to ask you if you, like t8, hold to the belief that Yahshua is one of the lords or gods of 1 Cor 8:5?
March 8, 2006 at 11:10 pm#11805Cubes
ParticipantQuote (Is 1:18 @ Mar. 08 2006,02:55) Edited for clarity: Hi Cubes,
Sorry I'm not able to pass comment on the individual points you have made for a little while, I have to travel out of town again. I will say this though, and I hope you won't be offended by my bluntness, but it's apparent to me that you strongly believe that Yahshua Messiah is the “Son of God” (as do I) – but I still have NO CLUE what this means to you. Do you hold that Yahshua was procreated by the Father? If so, when? (before the incarnation or during?). Do you apply an anthropic understanding of the Father/Son relationship to Yahshua and the Father? IYHO do they have different ontology (unlike human fathers & sons)?I also would like to ask you if you, like t8, hold to the belief that Yahshua is one of the lords or gods of 1 Cor 8:5?
Hi Is 1:18:What does it typically mean to say someone is someone's son? Yes, it is literal to me of Jesus. Not as some figure of speech.
Being the son of someone means one is procreated or adopted by another who is chronologically older, he is beloved, a kin, in the family's genealogy naturally or through adoption, an image (through genes and/or attitude), hopefully an heir; a representative of his father as needed; a son is generally shown regard (or the lack of it) by others intended for his father, and a whole host of other subtle things that are too numerous to touch on individually.
Does one need to know one's date or place of birth to have that matter….especially if by objective proof and reliable sources it is verified that one is the son of his father? Not at all.
Hbr 1:2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by [his] SON, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds;
- As the Word that was a God everything was made through Jesus. (John 1:3)
- As the beginning and the firstborn of YHWH's creation, all things were made by/through him and for him (Col 1:15-16).
- As the (only begotten) Son of of God and the heir of all things, YHWH made the worlds by him. (Hebrews 1:2).
Since the worlds were made before the incarnation, he may as well have been begotten beforehand. It would not surprise me or upset my belief in either situation.
He was prophesied of before his actual advent, so at least, we could say that God thought of this before hand…in fact, as far back as in the Garden of Eden when Jesus was prophesied of. God had to have thought of and known and planned for it even if Jesus was not yet in the flesh. So there is another answer to your WHEN.
The parables that Jesus gave indicate that the Landowner sent his Son (Mark 12:1f), not his Word (although that is simultaneously true of him).
Also God sent his son to us and he came.