The right of denial clause

[Ed J]

Hi Everyone,

Are you familiar with the right of denial clause?
This clause dictates that you have the right to deny
inaccurate information about yourself (as in your belief).

Refusing to exercise this right,  is viewed as evidence to the accuracy
of the information that is currently being made known by someone or something.

God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

[Ed J]

Taken from here: (Link)

Quote (david @ Nov. 09 2012,17:42)

While something may be “viewed” one way, that doesn't mean it is accurate.  It only “tends” to point in that direction.   it is not a rule of logic that cannot be broken.  Also, having the right to deny something does not mean one must exercise that right.

Hi David,

Refusing to exercise this right, is viewed as evidence to the accuracy
of the information that is currently being made known by someone or something.

“It only “tends” to point in that direction.”
Thank you for agreeing with me!

Your brother
in Christ, Jesus.
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
holycitybiblecode.org

[david]

Ed, I'm not sure if this thread is for arguing the point.

I think most people on here understand that when you ask someone something directly and they refuse to answer, it is generally considered suspect. I think I have pointed that out about 200 times on here.

But, if you are arguing that it is 100% proof of something, that isn't true. I know personally, that I often disregard things that are foolish, or simply insane. Sometimes, there are larger things at work that you do not see, which will look like it points in one direction, but only because you are making wrong assumptions or missing large chunks of data.

I think everyone agrees that not answering questions TENDS to GENERALLY mean that they don't have an answer, and that their mind is either consciously or subconsciously trying to avoid it. But, it's not always the case.l

[Author]

Posts