Science is the standard of truth NOT

[Proclaimer]

“Junk' DNA: New Revelation Suggests It's Not So Useless After All”

Okay. So how many believed scientists when they told us that all that DNA was junk or leftover unused code as a result of Evolutionary changes that rendered the code not useful anymore. I certainly never fell for that obvious flawed scientific idea  because I know they are wrong all the time. Text books are continually updated because they are wrong and replace error with more error sometimes.

The moral of the story is that when a scientist tries to explain to you that there is no need for God, just know that they don't have a great track record with truth. In fact they are wrong most of the time. How many rewrites have you seen in your life time?

So long as you know this, then science has its place. Not as the standard of truth, but as the way to figure out how things work. Scientists like Sir Isaac Newton saw science as the way to explain how God made things or to understand certain natural designs in order to use them ourselves.

Have a good day and I look forward to a flood of comments from irate Atheists who disagree with the obvious.

[princess]

Quote

Text books are continually updated because they are wrong and replace error with more error sometimes.

Well T8 they do the same with the bible, so were lays the difference?

Quote

So long as you know this, then science*religion* has its place. Not as the standard of truth

Don't be narrow minded T8, or are your goggles rose colored?

Thanks! You have a good day also.

**denotes addition to T8's statement, for clarification.

[TimothyVI]

That is what is so great about science.
If the scientist gets something wrong they continue
to study it, and if they find a mistake, they admit it and alter their theory accordingly.

If something is wrong in religion, apologists merely rewrite definitions for words to make it seem right when it is not.

Tim

[terraricca]

Quote (TimothyVI @ Sep. 10 2012,04:27)

That is what is so great about science. If the scientist gets something wrong they continue to study it, and if they find a mistake, they admit it and alter their theory accordingly. If something is wrong in religion, apologists merely rewrite definitions for words to make it seem right when it is not. Tim

tim

how many died on the mistakes of scientist

their is not one findings in medical that as not cost animals or humans to die, religion only takes you away from Gods truth,but does not kills you ,if they do it is because of your stupidity ,would you jump of a bridge if someone ask you I would certainly not do it ,

unless that someone would be God ,but I know that HE will never ask me that .

[TimothyVI]

Hi T,

I would much rather trust science and a doctor to treat leprosy than use this.

Leviticus 14:2-52)
“This shall be the law of the leper.”
God's law for lepers: Get two birds. Kill one. Dip the live bird in the blood of the dead one. Sprinkle

the blood on the leper seven times, and then let the blood-soaked bird fly away. Next find a lamb and

kill it. Wipe some of its blood on the patient's right ear, thumb, and big toe. Sprinkle seven times

with oil and wipe some of the oil on his right ear, thumb and big toe. Repeat. Finally find another

pair of birds. Kill one and dip the live bird in the dead bird's blood. Wipe some blood on the

patient's right ear, thumb, and big toe. Sprinkle the house with blood 7 times. That's all there is to

it.

Tim

[Proclaimer]

Quote (TimothyVI @ Sep. 10 2012,00:27)

That is what is so great about science. If the scientist gets something wrong they continue to study it, and if they find a mistake, they admit it and alter their theory accordingly. If something is wrong in religion, apologists merely rewrite definitions for words to make it seem right when it is not. Tim

Agreed. My point is however, is you will debate people with today's view of science and they will swear it is the truth. That is my point. I love science, but it is not the standard of truth to me that it is to many. And Atheists have pretty much put all their faith in it and yet things are continually being proven wrong. Not many are able to be objective about this.

[Proclaimer]

Quote (princess @ Sep. 09 2012,15:09)

Quote Text books are continually updated because they are wrong and replace error with more error sometimes. Well T8 they do the same with the bible, so were lays the difference? Quote So long as you know this, then science*religion* has its place. Not as the standard of truth Don't be narrow minded T8, or are your goggles rose colored? Thanks! You have a good day also. **denotes addition to T8's statement, for clarification.

OK, I was not aware that the bible was being rewritten all the time or as much as text books. I thought it stuck to the oldest translations and was only translated, not rewritten. My bad?

[princess]

Quote (terraricca @ Sep. 10 2012,00:45)

tim how many died on the mistakes of scientist their is not one findings in medical that as not cost animals or humans to die, religion only takes you away from Gods truth,but does not kills you ,if they do it is because of your stupidity ,would you jump of a bridge if someone ask you I would certainly not do it , unless that someone would be God ,but I know that HE will never ask me that .

T,

How many have died or been killed for God?

[princess]

Quote (t8 @ Sep. 10 2012,09:38)

Quote (princess @ Sep. 09 2012,15:09) Quote Text books are continually updated because they are wrong and replace error with more error sometimes. Well T8 they do the same with the bible, so were lays the difference? Quote So long as you know this, then science*religion* has its place. Not as the standard of truth Don't be narrow minded T8, or are your goggles rose colored? Thanks! You have a good day also. **denotes addition to T8's statement, for clarification. OK, I was not aware that the bible was being rewritten all the time or as much as text books. I thought it stuck to the oldest translations and was only translated, not rewritten. My bad?

T8, I was mistaken I thought you were aware of such matters regarding the origin of bible and the languages it stems from.  

So without this knowledge then I can understand your comment completely.

That would make it 'my bad'.

[terraricca]

Quote (TimothyVI @ Sep. 10 2012,09:47)

Hi T, I would much rather trust science and a doctor to treat leprosy than use this. Leviticus 14:2-52) “This shall be the law of the leper.” God's law for lepers: Get two birds. Kill one. Dip the live bird in the blood of the dead one. Sprinkle the blood on the leper seven times, and then let the blood-soaked bird fly away. Next find a lamb and kill it. Wipe some of its blood on the patient's right ear, thumb, and big toe. Sprinkle seven times with oil and wipe some of the oil on his right ear, thumb and big toe. Repeat. Finally find another pair of birds. Kill one and dip the live bird in the dead bird's blood. Wipe some blood on the patient's right ear, thumb, and big toe. Sprinkle the house with blood 7 times. That's all there is to it. Tim

tim

did you try it

[terraricca]

Quote (princess @ Sep. 10 2012,17:37)

Quote (terraricca @ Sep. 10 2012,00:45) tim how many died on the mistakes of scientist their is not one findings in medical that as not cost animals or humans to die, religion only takes you away from Gods truth,but does not kills you ,if they do it is because of your stupidity ,would you jump of a bridge if someone ask you I would certainly not do it , unless that someone would be God ,but I know that HE will never ask me that . T, How many have died or been killed for God?

Princess hi

the ones who die by the mad scientist are victimes of our society ,the ones that die for God in there faith are victimes of the wickedness of this world

in both cases they die as witnesses against this world

[Stu]

Quote (t8 @ Sep. 09 2012,11:07)

“Junk' DNA: New Revelation Suggests It's Not So Useless After All” Okay. So how many believed scientists when they told us that all that DNA was junk or leftover unused code as a result of Evolutionary changes that rendered the code not useful anymore. I certainly never fell for that obvious flawed scientific idea  because I know they are wrong all the time. Text books are continually updated because they are wrong and replace error with more error sometimes. The moral of the story is that when a scientist tries to explain to you that there is no need for God, just know that they don't have a great track record with truth. In fact they are wrong most of the time. How many rewrites have you seen in your life time? So long as you know this, then science has its place. Not as the standard of truth, but as the way to figure out how things work. Scientists like Sir Isaac Newton saw science as the way to explain how God made things or to understand certain natural designs in order to use them ourselves. Have a good day and I look forward to a flood of comments from irate Atheists who disagree with the obvious.

To the contrary, I expect we will soon discover to our great edification that snakes and donkeys can talk and humans can walk on the surface of lakes.

Stuart

[Ed J]

Quote (Stu @ Sep. 10 2012,18:09)

To the contrary, I expect we will soon discover to our great edification that snakes and donkeys can talk and humans can walk on the surface of lakes. Stuart

Hi Stuart,

Even the inside of your brain can talk to you;
Psychiatrists call this condition schizophrenia,
while the bible and Christians call it possession.

God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

[Stu]

Quote (Ed J @ Sep. 10 2012,18:37)

Quote (Stu @ Sep. 10 2012,18:09) To the contrary, I expect we will soon discover to our great edification that snakes and donkeys can talk and humans can walk on the surface of lakes. Stuart Hi Stuart, Even the inside of your brain can talk to you; Psychiatrists call this condition schizophrenia, while the bible and Christians call it possession. God bless Ed J (Joshua 22:34) http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

You mean not only snakes and donkeys but also the inside of your brain can talk to you?

Stuart

[TimothyVI]

Quote (terraricca @ Sep. 10 2012,11:47)

Quote (TimothyVI @ Sep. 10 2012,09:47) Hi T, I would much rather trust science and a doctor to treat leprosy than use this. Leviticus 14:2-52) “This shall be the law of the leper.” God's law for lepers: Get two birds. Kill one. Dip the live bird in the blood of the dead one. Sprinkle the blood on the leper seven times, and then let the blood-soaked bird fly away. Next find a lamb and kill it. Wipe some of its blood on the patient's right ear, thumb, and big toe. Sprinkle seven times with oil and wipe some of the oil on his right ear, thumb and big toe. Repeat. Finally find another pair of birds. Kill one and dip the live bird in the dead bird's blood. Wipe some blood on the patient's right ear, thumb, and big toe. Sprinkle the house with blood 7 times. That's all there is to it. Tim tim did you try it

Good gracious NO!
I would not kill some helpless birds for some nonsense ideas.

God couldn't seem to do anything without shedding the blood of some innocent person or thing.

Tim

[Ed J]

Quote (Stu @ Sep. 10 2012,20:23)

Quote (Ed J @ Sep. 10 2012,18:37) Quote (Stu @ Sep. 10 2012,18:09) To the contrary, I expect we will soon discover to our great edification that snakes and donkeys can talk and humans can walk on the surface of lakes. Stuart Hi Stuart, Even the inside of your brain can talk to you; Psychiatrists call this condition schizophrenia, while the bible and Christians call it possession. God bless Ed J (Joshua 22:34) http://www.holycitybiblecode.org You mean not only snakes and donkeys but also the inside of your brain can talk to you? Stuart

Yep

[Author]

Posts