Quantum entanglement could stretch across time

[Stu]

Quote (theodorej @ Feb. 03 2011,23:15)

Greetings Stu….. Your description of the expression of either Joy or anger having its origins in a electrochemical reaction clearly explains the physical aspect scientifically….It is what perpertrates this electrochemical reaction that is the question….since science chooses to leave the equation unsolved,I take the liberty by virtue of my faith to add the quantum factor of the unknown and add the term spirit to the equation..Am I being unscientific by solving the equation this way..

Where is the solution in doing this?

Stuart

[Stu]

Quote (t8 @ Feb. 04 2011,09:37)

Quote (Stu @ Feb. 03 2011,18:17) What experiences could possibly have any relevance? The fact is that if a person survives a near-death experience, then they are not actually qualified to comment on what happens after you die, because they have not actually been brain dead. I guess you could say there is more proof that there is life after death than proof that there isn't.  But it would be wrong because the amount of proof is exactly the same for both positions. Stu. Prove to me that you existed last week? Your proof would likely be testimony based. For all we know, you were born 2 days ago, and all your previous memories and others were implanted. Or everything is just a dream that you think is real similar to other dreams you have. Obviously experience is hard to measure scientifically, but if you experience life after death with a live brain, then that is experience that the brain is able to record and report back. Those who are brain dead don't come back to report what happened. And the fact that remembered NDE's see the same thing as opposed to a red fire engine with blue wheels also weighs in.

There is no proof I existed last week, you are of course correct in this.

However is it not a contradiction in terms to claim you might experience life after death with a live brain? That is not experience of what happens after death.

Stuart

[theodorej]

Quote (Stu @ Feb. 04 2011,15:28)

Quote (theodorej @ Feb. 03 2011,23:15) Greetings Stu….. Your description of the expression of either Joy or anger having its origins in a electrochemical reaction clearly explains the physical aspect scientifically….It is what perpertrates this electrochemical reaction that is the question….since science chooses to leave the equation unsolved,I take the liberty by virtue of my faith to add the quantum factor of the unknown and add the term spirit to the equation..Am I being unscientific by solving the equation this way.. Where is the solution in doing this? Stuart

Stu….The solution is from a scientific perspective….If you accept the unknown factor in the equation that being the existance of a spirit the equation is solved…

[Stu]

Quote (theodorej @ Feb. 04 2011,23:41)

Quote (Stu @ Feb. 04 2011,15:28) Quote (theodorej @ Feb. 03 2011,23:15) Greetings Stu….. Your description of the expression of either Joy or anger having its origins in a electrochemical reaction clearly explains the physical aspect scientifically….It is what perpertrates this electrochemical reaction that is the question….since science chooses to leave the equation unsolved,I take the liberty by virtue of my faith to add the quantum factor of the unknown and add the term spirit to the equation..Am I being unscientific by solving the equation this way.. Where is the solution in doing this? Stuart Stu….The solution is from a scientific perspective….If you accept the unknown factor in the equation that being the existance of a spirit the equation is solved…

HOW is “the equation solved”?

What “equation”?

You have said absolutely nothing here theodorej.

Stuart

[theodorej]

Quote (Stu @ Feb. 05 2011,11:39)

Quote (theodorej @ Feb. 04 2011,23:41) Quote (Stu @ Feb. 04 2011,15:28) Quote (theodorej @ Feb. 03 2011,23:15) Greetings Stu….. Your description of the expression of either Joy or anger having its origins in a electrochemical reaction clearly explains the physical aspect scientifically….It is what perpertrates this electrochemical reaction that is the question….since science chooses to leave the equation unsolved,I take the liberty by virtue of my faith to add the quantum factor of the unknown and add the term spirit to the equation..Am I being unscientific by solving the equation this way.. Where is the solution in doing this? Stuart Stu….The solution is from a scientific perspective….If you accept the unknown factor in the equation that being the existance of a spirit the equation is solved… HOW is “the equation solved”? What “equation”? You have said absolutely nothing here theodorej. Stuart

Greetings Stu…..Just as the jibrish that I espoused, so goes the findings of science whose basis is nothing more than their theories about the spirit of man that are driven by their defient position of marveling at the creation and denying the creator…

[Stu]

Quote (theodorej @ Feb. 06 2011,02:02)

Quote (Stu @ Feb. 05 2011,11:39) Quote (theodorej @ Feb. 04 2011,23:41) Quote (Stu @ Feb. 04 2011,15:28) Quote (theodorej @ Feb. 03 2011,23:15) Greetings Stu….. Your description of the expression of either Joy or anger having its origins in a electrochemical reaction clearly explains the physical aspect scientifically….It is what perpertrates this electrochemical reaction that is the question….since science chooses to leave the equation unsolved,I take the liberty by virtue of my faith to add the quantum factor of the unknown and add the term spirit to the equation..Am I being unscientific by solving the equation this way.. Where is the solution in doing this? Stuart Stu….The solution is from a scientific perspective….If you accept the unknown factor in the equation that being the existance of a spirit the equation is solved… HOW is “the equation solved”? What “equation”? You have said absolutely nothing here theodorej. Stuart Greetings Stu…..Just as the jibrish that I espoused, so goes the findings of science whose basis is nothing more than their theories about the spirit of man that are driven by their defient position of marveling at the creation and denying the creator…

What creator?

Stuart

[Ed J]

Quote (Stu @ Feb. 06 2011,10:36)

Quote (theodorej @ Feb. 06 2011,02:02) Quote (Stu @ Feb. 05 2011,11:39) Quote (theodorej @ Feb. 04 2011,23:41) Quote (Stu @ Feb. 04 2011,15:28) Quote (theodorej @ Feb. 03 2011,23:15) Greetings Stu….. Your description of the expression of either Joy or anger having its origins in a electrochemical reaction clearly explains the physical aspect scientifically….It is what perpertrates this electrochemical reaction that is the question….since science chooses to leave the equation unsolved,I take the liberty by virtue of my faith to add the quantum factor of the unknown and add the term spirit to the equation..Am I being unscientific by solving the equation this way.. Where is the solution in doing this? Stuart Stu….The solution is from a scientific perspective….If you accept the unknown factor in the equation that being the existance of a spirit the equation is solved… HOW is “the equation solved”? What “equation”? You have said absolutely nothing here theodorej. Stuart Greetings Stu…..Just as the jibrish that I espoused, so goes the findings of science whose basis is nothing more than their theories about the spirit of man that are driven by their defient position of marveling at the creation and denying the creator… What creator? Stuart

.

                             YHVH

“There is an intelligence originating outside of time that can now
be mathematically linked to the Christian Bible and even labeled… “GOD”!“

Witnessing to the world in behalf of YHVH! (Psalm 45:17)
117=יהוה האלהים (JEHOVAH GOD) YÄ-hä-vā  hä ĔL-ō-Hêêm!
Ed J (AKJV Isaiah 49:16 / Isaiah 60:14 / Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org   …(Eccl.9:12-16)

[Proclaimer]

Quote (Stu @ Feb. 06 2011,10:36)

What creator? Stuart

That's right. Everything came from nothing or something that wasn't alive. The first is impossible/ridiculous, the latter is funny. Because it is like saying that something has always existed, and we know for sure that it wasn't aware or alive even though we have absolutely no proof whatsoever.

Then on the other-hand some Atheist cosmologists say that everything we see was determined in the first moment of the Big Bang. So that means that if there was life, it was determined back then. Those who believe in God of course have been saying that all along.

We often marvel at the ignorance in times past and fail to see it in our own time. Stu, I am here to remind you of how your belief system is based on bias alone.

Stu, your belief system is a 2 option horse race where both horses have no legs. I am here to remind you that neither horse won or can win.

[Stu]

Quote (t8 @ Feb. 12 2011,16:27)

Quote (Stu @ Feb. 06 2011,10:36) What creator? Stuart That's right. Everything came from nothing or something that wasn't alive. The first is impossible/ridiculous, the latter is funny. Because it is like saying that something has always existed, and we know for sure that it wasn't aware or alive even though we have absolutely no proof whatsoever. Then on the other-hand some Atheist cosmologists say that everything we see was determined in the first moment of the Big Bang. So that means that if there was life, it was determined back then. Those who believe in God of course have been saying that all along. We often marvel at the ignorance in times past and fail to see it in our own time. Stu, I am here to remind you of how your belief system is based on bias alone. Stu, your belief system is a 2 option horse race where both horses have no legs. I am here to remind you that neither horse won or can win.

So, what creator?

Stuart

[Proclaimer]

Nice rebuttal Stu. Very clever. I wish I could have thought of it

But we are talking about the need of a creator. Not who that creator is.
No point in jumping the gun.
Baby steps first, then one day you might be able to run.

[Stu]

Quote (t8 @ Mar. 09 2011,07:48)

Nice rebuttal Stu. Very clever. I wish I could have thought of it But we are talking about the need of a creator. Not who that creator is. No point in jumping the gun. Baby steps first, then one day you might be able to run.

OK then, what need is there of a creator?

Stuart

[Stu]

Quote (Ed J @ Feb. 06 2011,21:10)

Quote (Stu @ Feb. 06 2011,10:36) Quote (theodorej @ Feb. 06 2011,02:02) Quote (Stu @ Feb. 05 2011,11:39) Quote (theodorej @ Feb. 04 2011,23:41) Quote (Stu @ Feb. 04 2011,15:28) Quote (theodorej @ Feb. 03 2011,23:15) Greetings Stu….. Your description of the expression of either Joy or anger having its origins in a electrochemical reaction clearly explains the physical aspect scientifically….It is what perpertrates this electrochemical reaction that is the question….since science chooses to leave the equation unsolved,I take the liberty by virtue of my faith to add the quantum factor of the unknown and add the term spirit to the equation..Am I being unscientific by solving the equation this way.. Where is the solution in doing this? Stuart Stu….The solution is from a scientific perspective….If you accept the unknown factor in the equation that being the existance of a spirit the equation is solved… HOW is “the equation solved”? What “equation”? You have said absolutely nothing here theodorej. Stuart Greetings Stu…..Just as the jibrish that I espoused, so goes the findings of science whose basis is nothing more than their theories about the spirit of man that are driven by their defient position of marveling at the creation and denying the creator… What creator? Stuart .                              YHVH “There is an intelligence originating outside of time that can now be mathematically linked to the Christian Bible and even labeled… “GOD”!“ Witnessing to the world in behalf of YHVH! (Psalm 45:17) 117=יהוה האלהים (JEHOVAH GOD) YÄ-hä-vā  hä ĔL-ō-Hêêm! Ed J (AKJV Isaiah 49:16 / Isaiah 60:14 / Joshua 22:34) http://www.holycitybiblecode.org   …(Eccl.9:12-16)

Yeah you keep saying that but you have never ACTUALLY DONE THE LINKING.

I'm sorry I mentioned it because no doubt it will inspire you to another round of regaling us with more of this pseudomathematical nonsense like a four year old might.

Please don't reply to me on this subject until you have learned something about the statistical analysis that YOU REFUSE to do.

Stuart

[Ed J]

Quote (Stu @ Mar. 09 2011,16:13)

Quote (Ed J @ Feb. 06 2011,21:10) Quote (Stu @ Feb. 06 2011,10:36) Quote (theodorej @ Feb. 06 2011,02:02) Quote (Stu @ Feb. 05 2011,11:39) Quote (theodorej @ Feb. 04 2011,23:41) Quote (Stu @ Feb. 04 2011,15:28) Quote (theodorej @ Feb. 03 2011,23:15) Greetings Stu….. Your description of the expression of either Joy or anger having its origins in a electrochemical reaction clearly explains the physical aspect scientifically….It is what perpertrates this electrochemical reaction that is the question….since science chooses to leave the equation unsolved,I take the liberty by virtue of my faith to add the quantum factor of the unknown and add the term spirit to the equation..Am I being unscientific by solving the equation this way.. Where is the solution in doing this? Stuart Stu….The solution is from a scientific perspective….If you accept the unknown factor in the equation that being the existance of a spirit the equation is solved… HOW is “the equation solved”? What “equation”? You have said absolutely nothing here theodorej. Stuart Greetings Stu…..Just as the jibrish that I espoused, so goes the findings of science whose basis is nothing more than their theories about the spirit of man that are driven by their defient position of marveling at the creation and denying the creator… What creator? Stuart .                              YHVH “There is an intelligence originating outside of time that can now be mathematically linked to the Christian Bible and even labeled… “GOD”!“ Witnessing to the world in behalf of YHVH! (Psalm 45:17) 117=יהוה האלהים (JEHOVAH GOD) YÄ-hä-vā  hä ĔL-ō-Hêêm! Ed J (AKJV Isaiah 49:16 / Isaiah 60:14 / Joshua 22:34) http://www.holycitybiblecode.org   …(Eccl.9:12-16) Yeah you keep saying that but you have never ACTUALLY DONE THE LINKING. I'm sorry I mentioned it because no doubt it will inspire you to another round of regaling us with more of this pseudomathematical nonsense like a four year old might. Please don't reply to me on this subject until you have learned something about the statistical analysis that YOU REFUSE to do. Stuart

Hi Stuart,

I showed you; but your 'ape brain' can't make the “natural selection” of linking TRUTH together!
Perhaps 'you' just need to evolve more?   …The “pattern” was created; it didn't evolve!

                        God's Signature
             The Bible(63) → AKJV Bible(74)

יהוה=26 (God's Name: YHVH pronounced YÄ-hä-vā)
YHVH=63 (God's Name יהוה translated into English)
Jesus=74 (God's Son's name in English is: “Joshua”)
HolySpirit=151 (“FATHER: The Word”: in all believers)
God The Father=117 (Representing “GOD”: יהוה האלהים)

                             “YHVH is GOD”=117
PSALM 117 is [The Bible's Center Chapter], and [smallest chapter] of the [LARGEST BOOK]!

From small to LARGE YHVH(63) is at The Center of all Truth, including “The Bible”(63).

Witnessing to the world in behalf of YHVH! (Psalm 45:17)
117=יהוה האלהים (JEHOVAH GOD) YÄ-hä-vā  hä ĔL-ō-Hêêm!
Ed J (AKJV Isaiah 49:16 / Isaiah 60:14 / Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org   …(Eccl.9:12-16)

[Proclaimer]

Quote (Stu @ Mar. 09 2011,16:07)

Quote (t8 @ Mar. 09 2011,07:48) Nice rebuttal Stu. Very clever. I wish I could have thought of it But we are talking about the need of a creator. Not who that creator is. No point in jumping the gun. Baby steps first, then one day you might be able to run. OK then, what need is there of a creator? Stuart

Start here.

It is the only option that is possible for a start.
The other two contenders are impossible.

Contenders

[Proclaimer]

Quote (Stu @ Feb. 05 2011,11:39)

HOW is “the equation solved”? What “equation”? You have said absolutely nothing here theodorej. Stuart

Something has to be infinite, otherwise it all came from nothing.

Solved:
God is eternal. He doesn't have a beginning.
If you don't believe in God, then replace him with something eternal and let us know what that something is please.

Gravity?

[Ed J]

Quote (t8 @ Mar. 09 2011,19:07)

Quote (Stu @ Mar. 09 2011,16:07) Quote (t8 @ Mar. 09 2011,07:48) Nice rebuttal Stu. Very clever. I wish I could have thought of it But we are talking about the need of a creator. Not who that creator is. No point in jumping the gun. Baby steps first, then one day you might be able to run. OK then, what need is there of a creator? Stuart Start here. It is the only option that is possible for a start. The other two contenders are impossible. Contenders Creator Nothing Something eternal that is non-aware/living. There are no other contenders. A creator is the only option to choose from Stu. I could go on much more, but I will keep it simple for you.

Hi T8,

The “CREATOR” is the ONLY “natural selection” to make!…   The others simply don't work.

Someone once said…    'natural selection only keeps what works.'

Your brother
in Christ, Jesus!
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

[Stu]

Quote (Ed J @ Mar. 09 2011,18:52)

Quote (Stu @ Mar. 09 2011,16:13) Quote (Ed J @ Feb. 06 2011,21:10) Quote (Stu @ Feb. 06 2011,10:36) Quote (theodorej @ Feb. 06 2011,02:02) Quote (Stu @ Feb. 05 2011,11:39) Quote (theodorej @ Feb. 04 2011,23:41) Quote (Stu @ Feb. 04 2011,15:28) Quote (theodorej @ Feb. 03 2011,23:15) Greetings Stu….. Your description of the expression of either Joy or anger having its origins in a electrochemical reaction clearly explains the physical aspect scientifically….It is what perpertrates this electrochemical reaction that is the question….since science chooses to leave the equation unsolved,I take the liberty by virtue of my faith to add the quantum factor of the unknown and add the term spirit to the equation..Am I being unscientific by solving the equation this way.. Where is the solution in doing this? Stuart Stu….The solution is from a scientific perspective….If you accept the unknown factor in the equation that being the existance of a spirit the equation is solved… HOW is “the equation solved”? What “equation”? You have said absolutely nothing here theodorej. Stuart Greetings Stu…..Just as the jibrish that I espoused, so goes the findings of science whose basis is nothing more than their theories about the spirit of man that are driven by their defient position of marveling at the creation and denying the creator… What creator? Stuart .                              YHVH “There is an intelligence originating outside of time that can now be mathematically linked to the Christian Bible and even labeled… “GOD”!“ Witnessing to the world in behalf of YHVH! (Psalm 45:17) 117=יהוה האלהים (JEHOVAH GOD) YÄ-hä-vā  hä ĔL-ō-Hêêm! Ed J (AKJV Isaiah 49:16 / Isaiah 60:14 / Joshua 22:34) http://www.holycitybiblecode.org   …(Eccl.9:12-16) Yeah you keep saying that but you have never ACTUALLY DONE THE LINKING. I'm sorry I mentioned it because no doubt it will inspire you to another round of regaling us with more of this pseudomathematical nonsense like a four year old might. Please don't reply to me on this subject until you have learned something about the statistical analysis that YOU REFUSE to do. Stuart Hi Stuart, I showed you; but your 'ape brain' can't make the “natural selection” of linking TRUTH together! Perhaps 'you' just need to evolve more?   …The “pattern” was created; it didn't evolve!                         God's Signature              The Bible(63) → AKJV Bible(74) יהוה=26 (God's Name: YHVH pronounced YÄ-hä-vā) YHVH=63 (God's Name יהוה translated into English) Jesus=74 (God's Son's name in English is: “Joshua”) HolySpirit=151 (“FATHER: The Word”: in all believers) God The Father=117 (Representing “GOD”: יהוה האלהים)                              “YHVH is GOD”=117 PSALM 117 is [The Bible's Center Chapter], and [smallest chapter] of the [LARGEST BOOK]! From small to LARGE YHVH(63) is at The Center of all Truth, including “The Bible”(63). Witnessing to the world in behalf of YHVH! (Psalm 45:17) 117=יהוה האלהים (JEHOVAH GOD) YÄ-hä-vā  hä ĔL-ō-Hêêm! Ed J (AKJV Isaiah 49:16 / Isaiah 60:14 / Joshua 22:34) http://www.holycitybiblecode.org   …(Eccl.9:12-16)

Please don't reply to me on this subject until you have learned something about the statistical analysis that YOU REFUSE to do.

Stuart

[Stu]

Quote (t8 @ Mar. 09 2011,19:07)

Start here. It is the only option that is possible for a start. The other two contenders are impossible. Contenders Creator Nothing Something eternal that is non-aware/living. There are no other contenders. A creator is the only option to choose from Stu. I could go on much more, but I will keep it simple for you.

I refer you to my original question.

What need is there of a creator?

You just asserted it. You did not say why it was a necessity.

Stuart

[Ed J]

Quote (Stu @ Mar. 09 2011,21:46)

Quote (Ed J @ Mar. 09 2011,18:52) Quote (Stu @ Mar. 09 2011,16:13) Quote (Ed J @ Feb. 06 2011,21:10) Quote (Stu @ Feb. 06 2011,10:36) What creator? .                              YHVH “There is an intelligence originating outside of time that can now be mathematically linked to the Christian Bible and even labeled… “GOD”!“ Yeah you keep saying that but you have never ACTUALLY DONE THE LINKING. I'm sorry I mentioned it because no doubt it will inspire you to another round of regaling us with more of this pseudomathematical nonsense like a four year old might. Please don't reply to me on this subject until you have learned something about the statistical analysis that YOU REFUSE to do. Stuart Hi Stuart, I showed you; but your 'ape brain' can't make the “natural selection” of linking TRUTH together! Perhaps 'you' just need to evolve more?   …The “pattern” was created; it didn't evolve!                         God's Signature              The Bible(63) → AKJV Bible(74) 1. יהוה=26 (God's Name: YHVH pronounced YÄ-hä-vā) 2. YHVH=63 (God's Name יהוה translated into English) 3. Jesus=74 (God's Son's name in English is: “Joshua”) 4. HolySpirit=151 (“FATHER: The Word”: in all believers) 5. God The Father=117 (Representing “GOD”: יהוה האלהים)                              “YHVH is GOD”=117 PSALM 117 is [The Bible's Center Chapter], and [smallest chapter] of the [LARGEST BOOK]! From small to LARGE YHVH(63) is at The Center of all Truth, including “The Bible”(63). Witnessing to the world in behalf of YHVH! (Psalm 45:17) 117=יהוה האלהים (JEHOVAH GOD) YÄ-hä-vā  hä ĔL-ō-Hêêm! Ed J (AKJV Isaiah 49:16 / Isaiah 60:14 / Joshua 22:34) http://www.holycitybiblecode.org   …(Eccl.9:12-16) Please don't reply to me on this subject until you have learned something about the statistical analysis that YOU REFUSE to do. Stuart

Hi Stuart,

Obviously “you” know NOTHING of importancy!
Let's say there was an archaeological dig in Antarctica,
looking for signature (as in evidence of) signs of intelligent life.
IT WOULDN'T MATTER HOW MANY ROCKS LOOKED LIKE ARROWHEADS,
ONLY THE GENUINE ARROWHEADS WOULD MATTER, REGARDLESS THE NUMBER!
FIVE such arrowheads were excavated, where experts believed the evidence to be!

                        The headlines therefore read…

“There is an intelligence originating outside of time that can now
be mathematically linked to the Christian Bible and even labeled… “GOD”!“

PS> For more on this evidence…   Click Here
.

[Stu]

Quote (Ed J @ Mar. 10 2011,01:25)

Quote (Stu @ Mar. 09 2011,21:46) Quote (Ed J @ Mar. 09 2011,18:52) Quote (Stu @ Mar. 09 2011,16:13) Quote (Ed J @ Feb. 06 2011,21:10) Quote (Stu @ Feb. 06 2011,10:36) What creator? .                              YHVH “There is an intelligence originating outside of time that can now be mathematically linked to the Christian Bible and even labeled… “GOD”!“ Yeah you keep saying that but you have never ACTUALLY DONE THE LINKING. I'm sorry I mentioned it because no doubt it will inspire you to another round of regaling us with more of this pseudomathematical nonsense like a four year old might. Please don't reply to me on this subject until you have learned something about the statistical analysis that YOU REFUSE to do. Stuart Hi Stuart, I showed you; but your 'ape brain' can't make the “natural selection” of linking TRUTH together! Perhaps 'you' just need to evolve more?   …The “pattern” was created; it didn't evolve!                         God's Signature              The Bible(63) → AKJV Bible(74) 1. יהוה=26 (God's Name: YHVH pronounced YÄ-hä-vā) 2. YHVH=63 (God's Name יהוה translated into English) 3. Jesus=74 (God's Son's name in English is: “Joshua”) 4. HolySpirit=151 (“FATHER: The Word”: in all believers) 5. God The Father=117 (Representing “GOD”: יהוה האלהים)                              “YHVH is GOD”=117 PSALM 117 is [The Bible's Center Chapter], and [smallest chapter] of the [LARGEST BOOK]! From small to LARGE YHVH(63) is at The Center of all Truth, including “The Bible”(63). Witnessing to the world in behalf of YHVH! (Psalm 45:17) 117=יהוה האלהים (JEHOVAH GOD) YÄ-hä-vā  hä ĔL-ō-Hêêm! Ed J (AKJV Isaiah 49:16 / Isaiah 60:14 / Joshua 22:34) http://www.holycitybiblecode.org   …(Eccl.9:12-16) Please don't reply to me on this subject until you have learned something about the statistical analysis that YOU REFUSE to do. Stuart Hi Stuart, Obviously “you” know NOTHING of importancy! Let's say there was an archaeological dig in Antarctica, looking for signature (as in evidence of) signs of intelligent life. IT WOULDN'T MATTER HOW MANY ROCKS LOOKED LIKE ARROWHEADS, ONLY THE GENUINE ARROWHEADS WOULD MATTER, REGARDLESS THE NUMBER! FIVE such arrowheads were excavated, where experts believed the evidence to be!                         The headlines therefore read… “There is an intelligence originating outside of time that can now be mathematically linked to the Christian Bible and even labeled… “GOD”!“ PS> For more on this evidence…   Click Here .

I asked you not to reply until you can do the maths I asked for.

So please stop until you can.

Stuart

[Author]

Posts