- This topic is empty.
- Posts
The couple who discovered the split-rock in Saudia Arabia
http://splitrockresearch.org/content/Welcome/I found this update video from Jim and Peggy Caldwell
http://www.godslearningchannel.com/stream….&q=Highanalysis
http://images.google.com/imgres?….rl=httpmovie-trailer w/outtakes and slide show
http://www.exodusconspiracy.com/index.htmlThis video is related to the others because of location. Maybe more. Could be Nephilim Reptillian
Mystery Giant Skeleton Satellite Images
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmp68Er0ZVc
The video contains satellite images of an object that resembles a giant insect-like skeleton. It rests on a valley floor, and measures 305 feet long in Google Earth. Together with the tail-like remnants, the total length is 1,900 feet. The images are from Google Earth which also appear in Google Maps, and more recently in Terraserver. The ones in Terraserver have better contrast and do not have the overcast clouds, but were of poor quality at the time this video was made.The GPS coordinates of this object are:
28.5634N, 35.2808E
The skeptics continue to call it a mountain, but the location is on a valley floor adjacent to the mountain Jabal Al Lawz in northwest Saudi Arabia.
Jabal Al Lawz is a mountain that some believe is the Biblical Mount Sinai. Biblical references to Leviathan's location may lend further support to that conclusion. The area is off limits to civilians and tourists.
If you want to see the object in 3-D, print the image from Google and the other view from Terraserver. They must be printed to the same scale, which requires effort and precision. Next, place the images side by side, and view them with stereoscopic glasses. You will notice that the black dot on the lower right of the object appears to stick up quite a ways, and appears to be a tree. you will also notice that a hill runs into the 'head' of the object, eliminating most of the shadow.
It has been said that there is a similar formation .62 miles to the south at 28.554502N, 35.281567E, and it is true that in some respects it is similar. But in my opinion, that formation appears to be substantially different because unlike this one it does not cast a shadow, has fuzzy edges that are not so clearly defined, and is a different color. However, like this one it is also on a valley floor, so I leave it to you to decide.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
