- This topic is empty.
- AuthorPosts
- February 11, 2013 at 8:03 am#333084ProclaimerParticipant
And it is hilarious that you say that God chose the AKJV Bible and made the translators to say it that way even though there is a thing called free will and the translators had a Trinity bias leading to the Comma Johanneum etc. But let's ignore that last point for now.
It's as if, God said, right I am going to write the correct bible in the year 1611. I will call it the AKJV. (Got to get that word 'authorise' in there to make it legit). It will be the only Word of God and it will be in English the second or third biggest language in the world. To prove this is the only correct version, I will incorporate sophisticated Gematria based on a new English number system where letters equal units that progress in ones. A = 1 B = 2 etc.
Further I will send my Gematria Prophet Ed J to the world to demonstrate this. He will weave sophisticated Mathematics even into that which he writes/types. He will have the truth and no one else will be like him. His words will add up. He will even correct Paul by using Gematira to show where that brother erred.
All who listen to Ed will understand. Those that do not ignore God's only true version of the Bible and do so to their own peril.
That is the story so far isn't it Ed? Are there any other fantastical things that need to be added. I am trying to get a summary of how things are according to Ed.
February 11, 2013 at 8:07 am#333086Ed JParticipantMaking a case for “The Pattern of Five” – which I call “God's Signature”
1.
…..'There are “FIVE” Major Prophetic Books in the bible.1. Isaiah ……………………………….Isaiah’s name means “JEHOVAH is Salvation”
2. Jeremiah ……………………………Jeremiah’s name means “JEHOVAH is High”
3. Ezekiel ………………………………Ezekiel’s name means “EL will strengthen”
4. Lamentations …………………….Lamentations means: what, where, how.
5. Daniel ……………………………….Daniel's name means “GOD (EL) is Judge”2.
…..There are exactly “FIVE” ways to spell GOD in Greek.1) θεος………is the nominative singular
2) θεου……..is the genitive singular
3) θεω………is the dative singular
4) θεον……..is the accusative singular
5) θεε……….is the vocative singular3.
…..There are exactly “FIVE” words from The Hebrew Masoretic texts translated to God in the “AKJV Bible”.1) Strong’s 426: אלה (ĔL-äh) elah: corresponding to 433; God:-God, god.
2) Strong’s 433: אלוה (ĔL-ō-äh) eloah: from 410; a deity or The Deity:-God, god. See 430
3) Strong’s 6697: צור (tsû-är) tsoor: a rock; a refuge(house); X(times) mighty God, sharp, X stone, X strength.
4) Strong’s 430: אלהים (ĔL-ō-Hêêm) elohiym: plural of 433; gods in the ordinary sense;
but specifically used in the plural of the supreme God; angels, X exceedingly; God, X great, judges, X mighty.
5) Strong’s 410: אל (ĔL) ale: mighty; strength; The Almighty (also used of any deity):- God, X goodly, X great; power.4.
…..Exactly “Five” ways God's Name is written in singular form in the “AKJV Bible” (Note: JEHOVAH is also written in three phrases)1) JEHOVAH is My Name “YHVH”=63 (Exodus 6:3)
2) JEHOVAH is The Most High “GOD The Father”=117 (Psalm 83:18)
3) The LORD JEHOVAH=151 is [The Savior=117] in “Jesus Christ”=151 (Isaiah 12:2)
4) The LORD JEHOVAH=151 is Everlasting strength in “Holy Spirit”=151 (Isaiah 26:4)
5) JAH (Psalm 68:4) The Name of “GOD”=26 is יהוה=26 spoken as “YÄ”=26 and “YÄ-hä-vā5.
…..“HolyCityBibleCode” now documents “The God Numbers”(151) (26, 63, 74, 117, 151) showing
……the significance of this as “God's Signature” – which was encoded into the “AKJV Bible”(74)
God's Signature
Proof of God=117
GOD(26) → The Bible(63) → AKJV Bible(74) → The LORD JEHOVAH(151)יהוה=26 (God's Name: YHVH pronounced YÄ-hä-vā)
YHVH=63 (God's Name יהוה translated into English)
Jesus=74 (God's Son's name in English is: “Joshua”)
HolySpirit=151 (“FATHER: The Word”: in all believers)
God The Father=117 (Representing “GOD”: יהוה האלהים)God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgFebruary 11, 2013 at 8:10 am#333088Ed JParticipantQuote (t8 @ Feb. 11 2013,10:52) Quote (Ed J @ Feb. 09 2013,15:39) Hi T8, I have a question for you: (as you say, this is a fair question)
Does The Bible center around “God the Father”?- “Yes”
- “No”
- “I don't know”
Note: you are only allowed one choice.
God bless
Ed J
I think yes. Overall it is about God.
But it culminates in being about the one whom God sent.So I think it is a hard question. But if I was going to place a bet, I would go with God. And as I said before, there is little reference to the son in the OT and the OT is the bulk of the Bible.
“God the Father”=117Hi T8,
YHVH is GOD=117
God’s Name (יהוה) translates directly into English as YHVH; therefore, YHVH is GOD!
The Gematria total of GOD the Father(117) matches precisely with the Hebrew Gematria
of יהוה האלהים (JEHOVAH GOD); which is 117. Furthermore YHVH is GOD totals 117 as well!The Exact Center of The Bible
The Center Chapter of the Bible just so happens to be (THE LARGEST BOOK) Psalm 117;
since there are EXACTLY 1189 chapters in the entire bible that would make Psalm 117
(smallest chapter) center, because there are 594 chapters before and 594 after.“YHVH is GOD”=117
PSALM 117 is [The Bible's Center Chapter], and
the [smallest chapter] of the [LARGEST BOOK]!What similarity can we draw from this? Well how about: from small to large,
GOD IS AT THE CENTER OF ALL TRUTH, from the smallest of particles
yet larger than our mortal minds can fully comprehend.God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgFebruary 11, 2013 at 8:13 am#333090Ed JParticipantQuote (t8 @ Feb. 11 2013,18:03) And it is hilarious that you say that God chose the AKJV Bible and made the translators to say it that way even though there is a thing called free will and the translators had a Trinity bias leading to the Comma Johanneum etc. But let's ignore that last point for now. It's as if, God said, right I am going to write the correct bible in the year 1611. I will call it the AKJV. (Got to get that word 'authorise' in there to make it legit). It will be the only Word of God and it will be in English the second or third biggest language in the world. To prove this is the only correct version, I will incorporate sophisticated Gematria based on a new English number system where letters equal units that progress in ones. A = 1 B = 2 etc.
Further I will send my Gematria Prophet Ed J to the world to demonstrate this. He will weave sophisticated Mathematics even into that which he writes/types. He will have the truth and no one else will be like him. His words will add up. He will even correct Paul by using Gematira to show where that brother erred.
All who listen to Ed will understand. Those that do not ignore God's only true version of the Bible and do so to their own peril.
That is the story so far isn't it Ed? Are there any other fantastical things that need to be added. I am trying to get a summary of how things are according to Ed.
Hi T8,YHVH is GOD=117
Both the meanings and Gematria totals of [יהוה האלהים] and YHVH is GOD are identical.
YHVH is GOD=117 because God’s Hebrew name (יהוה) translates into English as YHVH.
These facts are present in the verse where the altar “עד” “Ed' is mentioned.(117) יהוה האלהים = YHVH is GOD (117)
וַיִּקְרְאוְּ בְּנֵי־רְאוְּבֵן וְּבְנֵי־גָד לַמִּזְבֵּחַ כִּי עֵד הוְּא בֵּינֹתֵינוְּ כִּי יְהוָה הָאֱלֹהִים Joshua 22:34Joshua 22:34: And the children of Reuben, And the children of Gad
(and half of the tribe of Manasseh (Joshua 22:11)) called “the altar”
(עד Ed); for [Ed] shall be a witness between us that [YHVH is “GOD”].The fact that I use the number 117 as a witness to the “Proof of God”(117) coupled
with my name being “Ed” illustrates the hypothesis that the “altar' called “Ed” symbolizes me.
Now as strange as this may sound, the Theomatic totals of the names of these tribes offer conformation.(Reuben=65 Gad=12 Manasseh=80÷2=40) [65+12+40=117]
Your brother
in Christ, Jesus.
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgFebruary 11, 2013 at 8:19 am#333093Ed JParticipantQuote (t8 @ Feb. 11 2013,18:03) And it is hilarious that you say that God chose the AKJV Bible and made the translators to say it that way even though there is a thing called free will and the translators had a Trinity bias leading to the Comma Johanneum etc. But let's ignore that last point for now. It's as if, God said, right I am going to write the correct bible in the year 1611. I will call it the AKJV. (Got to get that word 'authorise' in there to make it legit). It will be the only Word of God and it will be in English the second or third biggest language in the world. To prove this is the only correct version, I will incorporate sophisticated Gematria based on a new English number system where letters equal units that progress in ones. A = 1 B = 2 etc.
Further I will send my Gematria Prophet Ed J to the world to demonstrate this. He will weave sophisticated Mathematics even into that which he writes/types. He will have the truth and no one else will be like him. His words will add up. He will even correct Paul by using Gematira to show where that brother erred.
All who listen to Ed will understand. Those that do not ignore God's only true version of the Bible and do so to their own peril.
That is the story so far isn't it Ed? Are there any other fantastical things that need to be added. I am trying to get a summary of how things are according to Ed.
Here's a quote of yours I saved for special occasions such as this.Quote (t8 @ Aug. 15 2012,22:27) Ed is obsessed with the Truth Gematria Matrix All truth passes through three stages.
First, it is ridiculed.
Second, it is violently opposed.
Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. ~ Arthur SchopenhauerYour brother
in Christ, Jesus.
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgFebruary 11, 2013 at 10:58 am#333120ProclaimerParticipantEd J. It is true that truth is opposed. But often self-absorbed people are opposed too. But for a different reason.
Jesus opposed the Pharisees. That doesn't mean that their stance against Jesus was true or self-evident.
Ed J. You are deluded. I am trying to see if there is any objectivity or reason left in you that recognises this delusion.
Perhaps not judging by your last few posts.
Lol. When people doubt you, when you have zero credibility left, when they think you are a crackpot, then give them more crackpottery. That seems to be the strategy. lol.
February 11, 2013 at 11:36 am#333125ProclaimerParticipantQuote (t8 @ Feb. 11 2013,21:03) And it is hilarious that you say that God chose the AKJV Bible and made the translators to say it that way even though there is a thing called free will and the translators had a Trinity bias leading to the Comma Johanneum etc. But let's ignore that last point for now. It's as if, God said, right I am going to write the correct bible in the year 1611. I will call it the AKJV. (Got to get that word 'authorise' in there to make it legit). It will be the only Word of God and it will be in English the second or third biggest language in the world. To prove this is the only correct version, I will incorporate sophisticated Gematria based on a new English number system where letters equal units that progress in ones. A = 1 B = 2 etc.
Further I will send my Gematria Prophet Ed J to the world to demonstrate this. He will weave sophisticated Mathematics even into that which he writes/types. He will have the truth and no one else will be like him. His words will add up. He will even correct Paul by using Gematira to show where that brother erred.
All who listen to Ed will understand. Those that do not ignore God's only true version of the Bible and do so to their own peril.
That is the story so far isn't it Ed? Are there any other fantastical things that need to be added. I am trying to get a summary of how things are according to Ed.
Is this the story of Ed J?
What part do I need to remove?February 11, 2013 at 5:19 pm#333145Ed JParticipantQuote (t8 @ Feb. 11 2013,20:58) Ed J. It is true that truth is opposed. But often self-absorbed people are opposed too. But for a different reason.
Hi T8,Glad to hear you consider that you “may be” opposing truth!
God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgFebruary 11, 2013 at 5:21 pm#333146Ed JParticipantQuote (t8 @ Feb. 11 2013,21:36) Quote (t8 @ Feb. 11 2013,21:03) And it is hilarious that you say that God chose the AKJV Bible and made the translators to say it that way even though there is a thing called free will and the translators had a Trinity bias leading to the Comma Johanneum etc. But let's ignore that last point for now. It's as if, God said, right I am going to write the correct bible in the year 1611. I will call it the AKJV. (Got to get that word 'authorise' in there to make it legit). It will be the only Word of God and it will be in English the second or third biggest language in the world. To prove this is the only correct version, I will incorporate sophisticated Gematria based on a new English number system where letters equal units that progress in ones. A = 1 B = 2 etc.
Further I will send my Gematria Prophet Ed J to the world to demonstrate this. He will weave sophisticated Mathematics even into that which he writes/types. He will have the truth and no one else will be like him. His words will add up. He will even correct Paul by using Gematira to show where that brother erred.
All who listen to Ed will understand. Those that do not ignore God's only true version of the Bible and do so to their own peril.
That is the story so far isn't it Ed? Are there any other fantastical things that need to be added. I am trying to get a summary of how things are according to Ed.
(1) Is this the story of Ed J?
(2) What part do I need to remove?
Hi T8,1) No
2) Your opposition to the truth.God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgFebruary 11, 2013 at 11:47 pm#335272ProclaimerParticipantQuote (Ed J @ Feb. 12 2013,06:19) Quote (t8 @ Feb. 11 2013,20:58) Ed J. It is true that truth is opposed. But often self-absorbed people are opposed too. But for a different reason.
Hi T8,Glad to hear you consider that you “may be” opposing truth!
God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
That is a perfect example of you either misunderstanding something or misquoting something.As if we needed more proof.
February 11, 2013 at 11:49 pm#335274ProclaimerParticipantQuote (Ed J @ Feb. 12 2013,06:21) Hi T8, 1) No
2) Your opposition to the truth.God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
Doesn't make sense. If I remove opposition, then that still leaves the story as it is.February 19, 2013 at 9:59 am#336267ProclaimerParticipantFebruary 21, 2013 at 9:46 pm#336465ProclaimerParticipantLet's wrap this up as Ed J is not opposing the story thus far.
God supposedly sent Ed J into the world to prepare the way for the coming of the messiah.
Ed J is either Elijah or comes in the spirit of Elijah to show the world that God is true and the 1611 AKJV as his only true translation, even though it was translated from newer texts from translators with a heavy Trinitarian bias.Ed J showed this proof with his invented number system where A=1 B=2 etc, even though English doesn't have a number system built into the letters like Hebrew and Greek.
Ed J is a very important messenger because he was sent to prepare the way of our messiah.
So people, it is up to you. Do you believe he is true or is he deluded?
Feel free to have your say.
February 21, 2013 at 10:40 pm#336472Ed JParticipantQuote (t8 @ Feb. 22 2013,07:46) Let's wrap this up as Ed J is not opposing the story thus far. God supposedly sent Ed J into the world to prepare the way for the coming of the messiah.
Ed J is either Elijah or comes in the spirit of Elijah to show the world that God is true and the 1611 AKJV as his only true translation, even though it was translated from newer texts from translators with a heavy Trinitarian bias.Ed J showed this proof with his invented number system where A=1 B=2 etc, even though English doesn't have a number system built into the letters like Hebrew and Greek.
Ed J is a very important messenger because he was sent to prepare the way of our messiah.
So people, it is up to you. Do you believe he is true or is he deluded?
Feel free to have your say.
You're way off base.March 10, 2013 at 7:04 am#337916ProclaimerParticipantEd J. I noticed you dodged the question once again.
But if the answer is here, please link to it instead.I didn't realise when I was in dialog with you that this was the Hot Seat and there was an outstanding question from me. I only noticed as this topic popped up in the Latest Post page.
So please make sure that I have the answer.
Thanks.
March 10, 2013 at 7:22 pm#337960Ed JParticipantHi T8,
Was there a “Yes” “No” “I don't know” question that I missed?
If there was, please re-post it and “I” will certainly address it.God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgMarch 11, 2013 at 10:09 am#338039ProclaimerParticipantQuote (t8 @ Feb. 07 2013,14:08) Hi Ed. I would also like to take you to task over your view about the KJV.
My first question is:
What is the most compelling reason to you that proves the KJV is the only true translation of the Bible.
After your answer, you can ask me a question. If you don't want to, I will ask another question.
I would like to open this to anyone who has a good question to ask Ed J on this topic. So long as he has one open question at a time. Don't want to give him too much work.
In my first post I said, 'What is the most compelling reason to you that proves the KJV is the only true translation of the Bible”? I also described in what manner you can answer the question, so as to give you less reasons to not answer.Obviously not a yes no question, but a question nevertheless.
March 12, 2013 at 11:38 am#338129Ed JParticipantQuote (Ed J @ Mar. 11 2013,06:22) Hi T8, Was there a “Yes” “No” “I don't know” question that I missed?
If there was, please re-post it and “I” will certainly address it.God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
Hi T8,If you are “Truly” interested, then read the thread I started… (Link) …Seek and Ye shall find.
Quote Don't want to give him too much work. It's your work to do, NOT MINE!
God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgMarch 12, 2013 at 9:55 pm#338156ProclaimerParticipantHot Seat Ed J.
Just reply with one sentence. It is not hard.
Last chance.
March 12, 2013 at 9:58 pm#338159ProclaimerParticipantDeep down I knew you would dodge the question again because I do not see you as a transparent and honest person. You hide behind complication and send people on goose chases.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.