- This topic is empty.
- AuthorPosts
- July 17, 2008 at 11:13 am#105692StuParticipant
Quote (TimothyVI @ July 17 2008,22:48) Quote (Stu @ July 17 2008,12:25) How many antichrists are there? [1] Just one, John Hagee
[2] 144,000
[3] About 4,000,000,000
[4] dogs, sorcerers, whoremongers, murderers, idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie (about 800,000,000 in total)Do animal sacrifices take away sins?
[1] Yes
[2] No
[3] All of the aboveStuart
In both cases number three is the correct answer.In question number one, the entire population of the world that are not Christians are in effect antichrists.
Tim
46 points to Tim VI for two correct answers. The writer of 1 John adds that antichrists are liars. I guess even Atheists for Jesus and others who do not 'oppose the christ' as such are liars too.With animal sacrifices we have another example of how there is a verse to justify almost any eventuality – as long as you ignore the competing ones.
Stuart
July 24, 2008 at 2:11 pm#105693kejonnParticipantIf a master beats his slave to death, will he be punished?
[1] Only if the slave dies immediately
[2] Always
[3] Never
[4] None of the aboveJuly 24, 2008 at 7:57 pm#105694TimothyVIParticipantNumber one of course.
If the slave died a couple of days later it could have easily been
from something else other than the beating.Tim
July 24, 2008 at 9:13 pm#105695kejonnParticipantVery good Tim VI! Of course, the bible does not say what the punishment is, just that the owner will be punished. But the other part is not quite right, the reason that the owner would not be punished if the slave died in a day or two is that the slave is just property after all.
Exo 21:20 “If a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod and he dies at his hand, he shall be punished.
Exo 21:21 “If, however, he survives a day or two, no vengeance shall be taken; for he is his property.July 24, 2008 at 9:21 pm#105696kejonnParticipantBy Torah law, which Jewish king should have never been an Israelite, much less a king of Israel?
[1] Saul
[2] David
[3] Jehu
[4] None of the aboveJuly 24, 2008 at 9:26 pm#105697TimothyVIParticipantQuote (kejonn @ July 25 2008,09:13) Very good Tim VI! Of course, the bible does not say what the punishment is, just that the owner will be punished. But the other part is not quite right, the reason that the owner would not be punished if the slave died in a day or two is that the slave is just property after all. Exo 21:20 “If a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod and he dies at his hand, he shall be punished.
Exo 21:21 “If, however, he survives a day or two, no vengeance shall be taken; for he is his property.
The part that was not quite right was tongue in cheek, but there is not a a little face for that.Tim
July 24, 2008 at 9:48 pm#105698TimothyVIParticipantQuote (kejonn @ July 25 2008,09:21) By Torah law, which Jewish king should have never been an Israelite, much less a king of Israel?
[1] Saul
[2] David
[3] Jehu
[4] None of the above
Number 2His great grandmother was a Moabite who married one of the sons of Elimelech
which was against the law of the Torah to begin with. So all births after that would not have been eligible to be King of Israel.
Actually both Elimelech's son and Ruth should have been stoned to death.Tim
July 24, 2008 at 10:15 pm#105699charityParticipantQuote (TimothyVI @ July 25 2008,09:48) Quote (kejonn @ July 25 2008,09:21) By Torah law, which Jewish king should have never been an Israelite, much less a king of Israel?
[1] Saul
[2] David
[3] Jehu
[4] None of the above
Number 2His great grandmother was a Moabite who married one of the sons of Elimelech
which was against the law of the Torah to begin with. So all births after that would not have been eligible to be King of Israel.
Actually both Elimelech's son and Ruth should have been stoned to death.Tim
SO Number two I take it was a seed from Abraham, one of his children,
Rather than on family that was determent to have that seed turn up in there linage?
Any family can record there woes, get with the argument that has destroyed the earths freedom, and my mommy is the chosen tribe mother, not yours, and we said it, so it must be true!
so much more than just a quizzzz, its a mere bite of a whole cake to be eaten.
July 24, 2008 at 10:21 pm#105700charityParticipantQuote (kejonn @ July 25 2008,02:11) If a master beats his slave to death, will he be punished?
[1] Only if the slave dies immediately
[2] Always
[3] Never
[4] None of the above
(6) ONLY IF HE GETS CAUGHT!!!
Hey Kevin, No Punishment unless your caught out, and you have to be seen…or some how noticed!!!! the lAWLESS RULE THE Day, over the stupid, and the goverment don't care, even benny”s hin till he caught? corruptons rules from the top, in the same manner.July 25, 2008 at 12:49 am#105701kejonnParticipantQuote (TimothyVI @ July 24 2008,16:48) Quote (kejonn @ July 25 2008,09:21) By Torah law, which Jewish king should have never been an Israelite, much less a king of Israel?
[1] Saul
[2] David
[3] Jehu
[4] None of the above
Number 2His great grandmother was a Moabite who married one of the sons of Elimelech
which was against the law of the Torah to begin with. So all births after that would not have been eligible to be King of Israel.
Actually both Elimelech's son and Ruth should have been stoned to death.Tim
Darn, you are too good at this game. Yes, King David was a Moabite, and according to Torah law:Deu 23:3 “No Ammonite or Moabite may enter the assembly of the LORD. Even to the tenth generation, none of them may enter the assembly of the LORD forever
What we see in action here is actually a law written after David sat on the throne, although most believe that the Torah was written by Moses. It was intentionally written to oppose the Davidic dynasty. The bible is chock full of political maneuvering.
July 25, 2008 at 1:00 am#105702kejonnParticipantAccording to the Old Testament, who was eligible to be a priest?
[1] Levites
[2] Aaronic Levites
[3] men from the tribe of Judah
[4] All of the above.July 25, 2008 at 7:20 am#105703StuParticipantI've never heard of Aaronic Levites. That must be the answer.
Stuart
July 25, 2008 at 9:43 am#105704kejonnParticipantNo, sorry Stu.
July 26, 2008 at 3:49 am#105705StuParticipantHow about the Ironic Levites? Or the Sarcastic Moabites?
OK. I'll try [4] all of the above…
Stuart
July 26, 2008 at 10:14 am#105706TimothyVIParticipantStu knew the answer to that one.
He eliminated all of the wrong answers in order to leave the correct one.Way to go Stu.
Tim
July 26, 2008 at 2:04 pm#105707kejonnParticipantYes, you are right Stu. Samuel was from the tribe of Ephraim and 2 Sam 8:18 said David's sons were priests (tribe of Judah). This shows that whoever wrote Samuel was unaware of the Torah laws about only Levites where to be priests. In several places is speaks of only those in the line of Aaron were to be priests, but in one place in merely said “Levites”.
July 26, 2008 at 3:02 pm#105708kejonnParticipantHow many sons did Michal, daughter of King Saul, have?
[1] 0
[2] 3
[3] 5
[4] Both [1] and [3]
[5] None of the aboveJuly 26, 2008 at 3:33 pm#105709TimothyVIParticipantHmmmmm!
I would have to guess at this one or look it up.
Don't know.Tim
July 27, 2008 at 5:18 am#105710StuParticipantIt has to be [4]!
Stuart
July 27, 2008 at 11:14 am#105711kejonnParticipantQuote (Stu @ July 27 2008,00:18) It has to be [4]! Stuart
Hehe, sometimes I make them too obvious!2Sa 6:23 And Michal the daughter of Saul had no child till the day of her death.
2Sa 21:8 And the king took the two sons of Rizpah the daughter of Aiah, whom she bore to Saul, Armoni and Memphibosheth, and the five sons of Michal daughter of Saul, whom she bore to Adriel son of Barzillai the Meholathite.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.