666

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 12 posts - 21 through 32 (of 32 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #228684

    Quote (Stu @ Dec. 13 2010,15:42)
    I saw some numbers behind this used car dealer.  I think they might be the number of the beast.  Or the cost of a Subaru Gullible.

    Do any of you guys have a biblical perspective on this more pressing issue?

    Stuart


    The bible doesn't give meaning to other groups of numbers. All other numbers are either amounts for those enlisted in war in the hebrew aramaic scriptures or just plain inventory.

    #228685
    Stu
    Participant

    I guess the bible is not that great at maths, is it.

    1 Kings 7:23 And he made a molten sea, ten cubits from the one brim to the other: it was round all about, and his height was five cubits: and a line of thirty cubits did compass it round about.

    Of course, it should say thirty-one cubits did compass it round about.

    Stuart

    #228710
    Ed J
    Participant

    Hi Stuart,

    You rounded off Pi to 3.1 and “The Bible” rounded of Pi to 3.0,
    do you see this as a problem? And if so, explain why?

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

    #228737
    Stu
    Participant

    Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 14 2010,00:47)
    Hi Stuart,

    You rounded off Pi to 3.1 and “The Bible” rounded of Pi to 3.0,
    do you see this as a problem? And if so, explain why?

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org


    Is this a sloppy god you worship?

    Stuart

    #228739
    Ed J
    Participant

    Quote (Stu @ Dec. 14 2010,05:17)

    Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 14 2010,00:47)
    Hi Stuart,

    You rounded off Pi to 3.1 and “The Bible” rounded of Pi to 3.0,
    do you see this as a problem? And if so, explain why?

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org


    Is this a sloppy god you worship?

    Stuart


    Hi Stuart,

    Do you think it was important to know exactly
    how many cubits the molten sea was? If so, why?

    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

    #228858
    theodorej
    Participant

    Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 14 2010,00:47)
    Hi Stuart,

    You rounded off Pi to 3.1 and “The Bible” rounded of Pi to 3.0,
    do you see this as a problem? And if so, explain why?

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org


    Greetings Ed……This is a topic I find interesting…Iam from the school of Pi being 3.1….please enlighten me…

    #228859
    Ed J
    Participant

    Quote (theodorej @ Dec. 15 2010,23:21)

    Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 14 2010,00:47)
    Hi Stuart,

    You rounded off Pi to 3.1 and “The Bible” rounded of Pi to 3.0,
    do you see this as a problem? And if so, explain why?

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org


    Greetings Ed……This is a topic I find interesting…Iam from the school of Pi being 3.1….please enlighten me…


    Hi Theodore J,

    Stuart, is trying to discredit the bible for rounding Pi off to 3.0,
    when he himself only rounds off Pi to 3.1. In machinery specks, they
    go down to thousands; in terms of Pi (rounded off) would be 3.142(3.14159).
    I personally use 3.1416 to keep the accuracy (of calculations) down to the thousands!

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

    #228978
    Stu
    Participant

    Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 15 2010,23:46)

    Quote (theodorej @ Dec. 15 2010,23:21)

    Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 14 2010,00:47)
    Hi Stuart,

    You rounded off Pi to 3.1 and “The Bible” rounded of Pi to 3.0,
    do you see this as a problem? And if so, explain why?

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org


    Greetings Ed……This is a topic I find interesting…Iam from the school of Pi being 3.1….please enlighten me…


    Hi Theodore J,

    Stuart, is trying to discredit the bible for rounding Pi off to 3.0,
    when he himself only rounds off Pi to 3.1. In machinery specks, they
    go down to thousands; in terms of Pi (rounded off) would be 3.142(3.14159).
    I personally use 3.1416 to keep the accuracy (of calculations) down to the thousands!

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org


    You are right, of course. Your god is even more mathematically sloppy than you.

    Stuart

    #228992
    Ed J
    Participant

    Quote (Stu @ Dec. 16 2010,16:09)

    Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 15 2010,23:46)

    Quote (theodorej @ Dec. 15 2010,23:21)

    Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 14 2010,00:47)
    Hi Stuart,

    You rounded off Pi to 3.1 and “The Bible” rounded of Pi to 3.0,
    do you see this as a problem? And if so, explain why?

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org


    Greetings Ed……This is a topic I find interesting…Iam from the school of Pi being 3.1….please enlighten me…


    Hi Theodore J,

    Stuart, is trying to discredit the bible for rounding Pi off to 3.0,
    when he himself only rounds off Pi to 3.1. In machinery specks, they
    go down to thousands; in terms of Pi (rounded off) would be 3.142(3.14159).
    I personally use 3.1416 to keep the accuracy (of calculations) down to the thousands!

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org


    You are right, of course.  Your god is even more mathematically sloppy than you.

    Stuart


    Hi Stuart,

                           God's Signature

    יהוה=26 (God's Name: YHVH pronounced YÄ-hä-vā)
    YHVH=63 (God's Name יהוה translated into English)
    Jesus=74 (God's Son's name in English is: “Joshua”)
    HolySpirit=151 (“FATHER: The Word”: in all believers)
    God The Father=117 (Representing “GOD”: יהוה האלהים)

    The “Theomatics” I present, are what YHVH has orchestrated
    over large timescales. There are only two possible ways to
    attempt to discredit the “Intelligent Design”. And so far
    your attempt to say there is no pattern is FAILING!

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

    #228993
    Stu
    Participant

    Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 16 2010,17:12)

    Quote (Stu @ Dec. 16 2010,16:09)

    Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 15 2010,23:46)

    Quote (theodorej @ Dec. 15 2010,23:21)

    Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 14 2010,00:47)
    Hi Stuart,

    You rounded off Pi to 3.1 and “The Bible” rounded of Pi to 3.0,
    do you see this as a problem? And if so, explain why?

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org


    Greetings Ed……This is a topic I find interesting…Iam from the school of Pi being 3.1….please enlighten me…


    Hi Theodore J,

    Stuart, is trying to discredit the bible for rounding Pi off to 3.0,
    when he himself only rounds off Pi to 3.1. In machinery specks, they
    go down to thousands; in terms of Pi (rounded off) would be 3.142(3.14159).
    I personally use 3.1416 to keep the accuracy (of calculations) down to the thousands!

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org


    You are right, of course.  Your god is even more mathematically sloppy than you.

    Stuart


    Hi Stuart,

                           God's Signature

    יהוה=26 (God's Name: YHVH pronounced YÄ-hä-vā)
    YHVH=63 (God's Name יהוה translated into English)
    Jesus=74 (God's Son's name in English is: “Joshua”)
    HolySpirit=151 (“FATHER: The Word”: in all believers)
    God The Father=117 (Representing “GOD”: יהוה האלהים)

    The “Theomatics” I present, are what YHVH has orchestrated
    over large timescales. There are only two possible ways to
    attempt to discredit the “Intelligent Design”. And so far
    your attempt to say there is no pattern is FAILING!

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org


    …although the competition between you for mathematically sloppiest is intense.

    Stuart

    #229018
    theodorej
    Participant

    Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 15 2010,23:46)

    Quote (theodorej @ Dec. 15 2010,23:21)

    Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 14 2010,00:47)
    Hi Stuart,

    You rounded off Pi to 3.1 and “The Bible” rounded of Pi to 3.0,
    do you see this as a problem? And if so, explain why?

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org


    Greetings Ed……This is a topic I find interesting…Iam from the school of Pi being 3.1….please enlighten me…


    Hi Theodore J,

    Stuart, is trying to discredit the bible for rounding Pi off to 3.0,
    when he himself only rounds off Pi to 3.1. In machinery specks, they
    go down to thousands; in terms of Pi (rounded off) would be 3.142(3.14159).
    I personally use 3.1416 to keep the accuracy (of calculations) down to the thousands!

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org


    Ed…what would be the result of your conclusions be if you choose to round off to an even more reduced equation…or does your research afford you the flexability to apply Pi for maximum probability in various applications of reduction…

    #229025
    Ed J
    Participant

    Quote (theodorej @ Dec. 16 2010,21:46)

    Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 15 2010,23:46)

    Quote (theodorej @ Dec. 15 2010,23:21)

    Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 14 2010,00:47)
    Hi Stuart,

    You rounded off Pi to 3.1 and “The Bible” rounded of Pi to 3.0,
    do you see this as a problem? And if so, explain why?

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org


    Greetings Ed……This is a topic I find interesting…Iam from the school of Pi being 3.1….please enlighten me…


    Hi Theodore J,

    Stuart, is trying to discredit the bible for rounding Pi off to 3.0,
    when he himself only rounds off Pi to 3.1. In machinery specks, they
    go down to thousands; in terms of Pi (rounded off) would be 3.142(3.14159).
    I personally use 3.1416 to keep the accuracy (of calculations) down to the thousands!

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org


    Ed…what would be the result of your conclusions be if you choose to round off to an even more reduced equation…or does your research afford you the flexability to apply Pi for maximum probability in various applications of reduction…


    Hi Theodore J,

    I'm a designer, and machined parts are measured in thousandths of an inch;
    it is necessary if I want all the associated component parts to fit together properly.
    It is not necessary to be as accurate building a round cement pool 15 foot wide (10 cubits).

    But thanks for asking!
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

Viewing 12 posts - 21 through 32 (of 32 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2024 Heaven Net

Navigation

© 1999 - 2023 - Heaven Net
or

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

or

Create Account