- This topic is empty.
- AuthorPosts
- December 13, 2010 at 5:50 am#228684betweenchristendomandjwsParticipant
Quote (Stu @ Dec. 13 2010,15:42) I saw some numbers behind this used car dealer. I think they might be the number of the beast. Or the cost of a Subaru Gullible. Do any of you guys have a biblical perspective on this more pressing issue?
Stuart
The bible doesn't give meaning to other groups of numbers. All other numbers are either amounts for those enlisted in war in the hebrew aramaic scriptures or just plain inventory.December 13, 2010 at 6:07 am#228685StuParticipantI guess the bible is not that great at maths, is it.
1 Kings 7:23 And he made a molten sea, ten cubits from the one brim to the other: it was round all about, and his height was five cubits: and a line of thirty cubits did compass it round about.
Of course, it should say thirty-one cubits did compass it round about.
Stuart
December 13, 2010 at 2:47 pm#228710Ed JParticipantHi Stuart,
You rounded off Pi to 3.1 and “The Bible” rounded of Pi to 3.0,
do you see this as a problem? And if so, explain why?God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgDecember 13, 2010 at 7:17 pm#228737StuParticipantQuote (Ed J @ Dec. 14 2010,00:47) Hi Stuart, You rounded off Pi to 3.1 and “The Bible” rounded of Pi to 3.0,
do you see this as a problem? And if so, explain why?God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
Is this a sloppy god you worship?Stuart
December 13, 2010 at 7:29 pm#228739Ed JParticipantQuote (Stu @ Dec. 14 2010,05:17) Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 14 2010,00:47) Hi Stuart, You rounded off Pi to 3.1 and “The Bible” rounded of Pi to 3.0,
do you see this as a problem? And if so, explain why?God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
Is this a sloppy god you worship?Stuart
Hi Stuart,Do you think it was important to know exactly
how many cubits the molten sea was? If so, why?Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgDecember 15, 2010 at 1:21 pm#228858theodorejParticipantQuote (Ed J @ Dec. 14 2010,00:47) Hi Stuart, You rounded off Pi to 3.1 and “The Bible” rounded of Pi to 3.0,
do you see this as a problem? And if so, explain why?God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
Greetings Ed……This is a topic I find interesting…Iam from the school of Pi being 3.1….please enlighten me…December 15, 2010 at 1:46 pm#228859Ed JParticipantQuote (theodorej @ Dec. 15 2010,23:21) Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 14 2010,00:47) Hi Stuart, You rounded off Pi to 3.1 and “The Bible” rounded of Pi to 3.0,
do you see this as a problem? And if so, explain why?God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
Greetings Ed……This is a topic I find interesting…Iam from the school of Pi being 3.1….please enlighten me…
Hi Theodore J,Stuart, is trying to discredit the bible for rounding Pi off to 3.0,
when he himself only rounds off Pi to 3.1. In machinery specks, they
go down to thousands; in terms of Pi (rounded off) would be 3.142(3.14159).
I personally use 3.1416 to keep the accuracy (of calculations) down to the thousands!God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgDecember 16, 2010 at 6:09 am#228978StuParticipantQuote (Ed J @ Dec. 15 2010,23:46) Quote (theodorej @ Dec. 15 2010,23:21) Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 14 2010,00:47) Hi Stuart, You rounded off Pi to 3.1 and “The Bible” rounded of Pi to 3.0,
do you see this as a problem? And if so, explain why?God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
Greetings Ed……This is a topic I find interesting…Iam from the school of Pi being 3.1….please enlighten me…
Hi Theodore J,Stuart, is trying to discredit the bible for rounding Pi off to 3.0,
when he himself only rounds off Pi to 3.1. In machinery specks, they
go down to thousands; in terms of Pi (rounded off) would be 3.142(3.14159).
I personally use 3.1416 to keep the accuracy (of calculations) down to the thousands!God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
You are right, of course. Your god is even more mathematically sloppy than you.Stuart
December 16, 2010 at 7:12 am#228992Ed JParticipantQuote (Stu @ Dec. 16 2010,16:09) Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 15 2010,23:46) Quote (theodorej @ Dec. 15 2010,23:21) Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 14 2010,00:47) Hi Stuart, You rounded off Pi to 3.1 and “The Bible” rounded of Pi to 3.0,
do you see this as a problem? And if so, explain why?God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
Greetings Ed……This is a topic I find interesting…Iam from the school of Pi being 3.1….please enlighten me…
Hi Theodore J,Stuart, is trying to discredit the bible for rounding Pi off to 3.0,
when he himself only rounds off Pi to 3.1. In machinery specks, they
go down to thousands; in terms of Pi (rounded off) would be 3.142(3.14159).
I personally use 3.1416 to keep the accuracy (of calculations) down to the thousands!God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
You are right, of course. Your god is even more mathematically sloppy than you.Stuart
Hi Stuart,God's Signature
יהוה=26 (God's Name: YHVH pronounced YÄ-hä-vā)
YHVH=63 (God's Name יהוה translated into English)
Jesus=74 (God's Son's name in English is: “Joshua”)
HolySpirit=151 (“FATHER: The Word”: in all believers)
God The Father=117 (Representing “GOD”: יהוה האלהים)The “Theomatics” I present, are what YHVH has orchestrated
over large timescales. There are only two possible ways to
attempt to discredit the “Intelligent Design”. And so far
your attempt to say there is no pattern is FAILING!God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgDecember 16, 2010 at 7:32 am#228993StuParticipantQuote (Ed J @ Dec. 16 2010,17:12) Quote (Stu @ Dec. 16 2010,16:09) Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 15 2010,23:46) Quote (theodorej @ Dec. 15 2010,23:21) Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 14 2010,00:47) Hi Stuart, You rounded off Pi to 3.1 and “The Bible” rounded of Pi to 3.0,
do you see this as a problem? And if so, explain why?God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
Greetings Ed……This is a topic I find interesting…Iam from the school of Pi being 3.1….please enlighten me…
Hi Theodore J,Stuart, is trying to discredit the bible for rounding Pi off to 3.0,
when he himself only rounds off Pi to 3.1. In machinery specks, they
go down to thousands; in terms of Pi (rounded off) would be 3.142(3.14159).
I personally use 3.1416 to keep the accuracy (of calculations) down to the thousands!God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
You are right, of course. Your god is even more mathematically sloppy than you.Stuart
Hi Stuart,God's Signature
יהוה=26 (God's Name: YHVH pronounced YÄ-hä-vā)
YHVH=63 (God's Name יהוה translated into English)
Jesus=74 (God's Son's name in English is: “Joshua”)
HolySpirit=151 (“FATHER: The Word”: in all believers)
God The Father=117 (Representing “GOD”: יהוה האלהים)The “Theomatics” I present, are what YHVH has orchestrated
over large timescales. There are only two possible ways to
attempt to discredit the “Intelligent Design”. And so far
your attempt to say there is no pattern is FAILING!God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
…although the competition between you for mathematically sloppiest is intense.Stuart
December 16, 2010 at 11:46 am#229018theodorejParticipantQuote (Ed J @ Dec. 15 2010,23:46) Quote (theodorej @ Dec. 15 2010,23:21) Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 14 2010,00:47) Hi Stuart, You rounded off Pi to 3.1 and “The Bible” rounded of Pi to 3.0,
do you see this as a problem? And if so, explain why?God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
Greetings Ed……This is a topic I find interesting…Iam from the school of Pi being 3.1….please enlighten me…
Hi Theodore J,Stuart, is trying to discredit the bible for rounding Pi off to 3.0,
when he himself only rounds off Pi to 3.1. In machinery specks, they
go down to thousands; in terms of Pi (rounded off) would be 3.142(3.14159).
I personally use 3.1416 to keep the accuracy (of calculations) down to the thousands!God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
Ed…what would be the result of your conclusions be if you choose to round off to an even more reduced equation…or does your research afford you the flexability to apply Pi for maximum probability in various applications of reduction…December 16, 2010 at 12:39 pm#229025Ed JParticipantQuote (theodorej @ Dec. 16 2010,21:46) Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 15 2010,23:46) Quote (theodorej @ Dec. 15 2010,23:21) Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 14 2010,00:47) Hi Stuart, You rounded off Pi to 3.1 and “The Bible” rounded of Pi to 3.0,
do you see this as a problem? And if so, explain why?God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
Greetings Ed……This is a topic I find interesting…Iam from the school of Pi being 3.1….please enlighten me…
Hi Theodore J,Stuart, is trying to discredit the bible for rounding Pi off to 3.0,
when he himself only rounds off Pi to 3.1. In machinery specks, they
go down to thousands; in terms of Pi (rounded off) would be 3.142(3.14159).
I personally use 3.1416 to keep the accuracy (of calculations) down to the thousands!God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
Ed…what would be the result of your conclusions be if you choose to round off to an even more reduced equation…or does your research afford you the flexability to apply Pi for maximum probability in various applications of reduction…
Hi Theodore J,I'm a designer, and machined parts are measured in thousandths of an inch;
it is necessary if I want all the associated component parts to fit together properly.
It is not necessary to be as accurate building a round cement pool 15 foot wide (10 cubits).But thanks for asking!
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org - AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.