- This topic is empty.
- AuthorPosts
- December 13, 2012 at 4:07 am#324287AnonymousInactive
Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 12 2012,20:04) Quote (AWHN @ Dec. 12 2012,18:02) (2)”According to the Greek definition, what does the word 'anti-christos' mean in total?”
Hi AWHN,…
2) Against Christ and instead of Christ.
…
God bless
Ed JSince point 1{a} is now established without equivocation, that Judas Iscariot is the “son of perdition” spoken of by Jesus in John 17:12, to all but those which will choose to remain blind [so be it], we can then move onward, and look at point 2 for a moment, and then we shall backtrack unto point 1{b} afterward.
Greek: anti-christos
anti-christos is a compound word, from two Greek words:
Anti and Christos.
“AntiChrist”. What does this word mean?
Let us look at a few definitions of the word itself:
Antichristos; ἀντίχριστος : “1) the adversary of the Messiah” [Strong's Concordance] and also “the adversary of the Messiah…of the corrupt power and influence hostile to Christian interests, especially that which is at work in false teachers who have come from the bosom of the church and are disseminating error…” [Thayer's Lexicon] and also “…can mean either “against Christ” or “instead of Christ”, or perhaps combining the two, “one who, assuming the guise of Christ, opposes Christ” (Westcott) … What the Apostle says of him so closely resembles what he says of the first beast in Rev. 13, and what the Apostle Paul says of the Man of Sin in 2 Thess. 2., that the same person seems to be in view in all these passages, rather than the second beast in Rev. 13, the false prophet; for the latter supports the former in all his Antichristian assumptions.” [Vine's Expository]
Now, let us look at the word broken down into its components:
Anti; ἀντί: “1) over against, opposite to, before; 2) for, instead of, in place of (something); a) instead of; b) for; c) for that, because; d) wherefore, for this cause” [Strong's Concordance] and also “1) over against, opposite to, before; 2) indicating exchange, succession, for, instead of, in the place of (something), … e) of succession to the place of another; 3) as a prefix it denotes a) opposite, over against; b) mutual efficiency of two; c) requittal; d) hostile opposition; e) official substitution, instead of” [Thayer's Lexicon] and also “…instead of, in the place of, in the room of…” [Vine's Expository]
Christos; Χριστός: “Christ = “anointed”; 1) Christ was the Messiah, the Son of God; 2) anointed” [Strong's Concordance] and also “anointed” [Thayer's Lexicon] and also “anointed, translates as 'Messiah'” [Vine's Expository] which speaks of Jesus, “the Christ”.
Therefore “AntiChrist” means that “which is in the place of or instead of Christ“ so “opposing Christ”.
December 13, 2012 at 4:28 am#324292terrariccaParticipantcould any one explain me the difference between those two verse in their version;
Rev 13:16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: KJV
Rev 13:16 He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, NIV (1984)
December 13, 2012 at 5:04 am#324295AnonymousInactiveQuote (Ed J @ Dec. 12 2012,20:04) Quote (AWHN @ Dec. 12 2012,18:02) …(1a)”Which two passages in scripture specifically speak of the 'son of perdition', and (b)to whom do those two texts specifically apply?” …
Hi AWHN,1a) John 17:12 & 2Thess.2:3
1b) Lucifer[/u] (the son that causes perdition)…God bless
Ed JThen with the information that we have so far on the “son of perdition” in John 17:12, who being identified by scripture as “Judas Iscariot”, we then have the very character to consider in the other “son of perdition” of 2 Thessalonians 2:3.
Let no man deceive you by any means: for [that day shall not come], except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; 2 Thessalonians 2:3
Since the other was Judas Iscariot, let us consider the qualities of Judas, as it will help clearly identify the other:
Judas Iscariot:
…was an inner member of Jesus disciples, one of the twelve and so ie a 'christian' [though this came after] in name, and was counted among the followers of Jesus, even calling Jesus – “Master” and “Lord”, and was greedy, covetous, and was a betrayer, which betrayed Jesus by a kiss, a most personal and intimate contact of a friend, in utilizing the combined corrupted Church [religious] and State [politcal] to accomplish the betrayal, and earlier in following Jesus was able to do miracles at one point in Jesus name and believed with Peter and the others that Jesus is the Son of God.
Therefore the other “son of perdition” of 2 Thessalonians 2:3 shall likewise have the same character, and same manner… for the two are so name by the singular designation “son of perdition”.
The Anti-Christ of 2 Thessalonians 2:3 cannot be Islam in the least, for this and numerous other reason yet to come.
Islam/Muslims are not an inner member of Jesus disciples, as it claims to follow after Mahomet [Mohammed]. They are not 'Christians”, they are “Mahometans”, and they do not recognize Jesus as “Master” and “Lord”, but rather simply as a “prophet” [one of many, even lesser than Mahomet]. Islam/Muslims are not a “betrayer”, and do not have “miracles” in Jesus name, but they do have some in “Mary's” name… and most especially they do not believe Jesus to be the “Son of God” at all, for according to their theology, 'Allah' hath no such “Son”.
December 13, 2012 at 5:26 am#324297AnonymousInactiveQuote (Ed J @ Dec. 12 2012,20:04) Quote (AWHN @ Dec. 12 2012,18:02) (3a)”Which is older, the Papacy [Papal Rome and Catholism], or Mahometanism [Islam], (3b)therefore which could only have already begun to show in the days of Paul and John of which they warned?”
(4)”From where did those come from of which both Paul and John warn even in their day?”…
Hi AWHN,…3a) Catholism
3b) Are you suggesting John's books were not Prophetic?
4) The HolySpirit…God bless
Ed JLet me briefly speak on point 3{a and b} and come back to it a bit later.
Indeed Catholicism is older than Islam, even as any historical source will show, and both they themselves will admit.
As to the second part of the question, I was thinking of several texts in mind, by asking, here:
For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock. Acts 20:29
Islam is not entered “in among” Christianity, it is external to Christianity.
Also of your own selves shall men arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them. Acts 20:30
Islam did not arise from True Christianity.
…but more upon those two points later… for the 4th point is really answered here, in that it was the Roman Empire hindering:
For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth [will let], until he be taken out of the way. 2 Thessalonians 2:7
Notice, it was already working in Paul's day. Definitely not Islam, which came not about for some 500 years.
What then is the power which was “let[ting]” this “mystery of iniquity” which was already at work then in Paul's day?
Again, this shows that Paul verily knew that the Antichrist power that was going to arise [future tense] and was not of the 3rd Kingdom [Greece, therefore not Antiochus Epiphanes IV in any sense, to be spoken about later on Daniel 8, for the “little horn” does not arise out of Greece and its divisions, but rather from one of the 4 winds, see Hebrew Masculine Feminine]. For this Antichrist power to come was being hindered in his [Paul's day, during the 4th Kingdom] own day, for Paul says, “he who now letteth” [ie., he who now, at this present time, at this very moment, restrains].
Paul also knew that once this Antichrist arose in power, once the restraining power was removed, that it was to remain [though suffer what appeared to be a deadly mortal wound at one point, yet regain] until the very 2nd Advent of Christ Jesus, therefore it was to last for many many hundreds of years:
And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming: 2 Thessalonians 2:8
Yet before any of those events could take place, Paul had already told the Thessalonian Church that certain events were to occur:
Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things? 2 Thessalonians 2:5
There was to be a “falling away” first, a great apostacy from the True and Everlasting Gospel and Faith of Jesus Christ:
Let no man deceive you by any means: for [that day shall not come], except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; 2 Thessalonians 2:3
And this Antichrist power, that was yet to come, having at its head this “man of sin”, the very “son of perdition” [as Judas was] was to hold its position over the very Church of God, claiming to be doing so “in the place” of God; [Latin] “Vicarius Christi”; “Vicarius Filii Dei”; [Greek] “AntiChristos”:
Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God. 2 Thessalonians 2:4
We can see then, that which was withholding was the Roman Empire itself under the rule of Caesars. Others anciently also reveal this:
“…Again, in the second epistle he addresses them with even greater earnestness: Now I beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto Him, that you be not soon shaken in mind, nor be troubled, either by spirit, or by word, that is, the word of false prophets, or by letter, that is, the letter of false apostles, as if from us, as that the day of the Lord is at hand. Let no man deceive you by any means. For that day shall not come, unless indeed there first come a falling away, he means indeed of this present empire, and that man of sin be revealed, that is to say, Antichrist, the son of perdition, who opposes and exalts himself above all that is called God or religion; so that he sits in the temple of God, affirming that he is God. Do you not remember, that when I was with you, I used to tell you these things? And now you know what detains, that he might be revealed in his time. For the mystery of iniquity does already work; only he who now hinders must hinder, until he be taken out of the way. 2 Thessalonians 2:1-7 What obstacle is there but the Roman state, the falling away of which, by being scattered into ten kingdoms, shall introduce Antichrist …” [Roman Catholic Online Fathers Of The Church; On The Resurrection Of The Flesh (Tertullian); “Chapter 24. Other Passages Quoted from St. Paul, Which Categorically Assert the Resurrection of the Flesh at the Final Judgment.”] – http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0316.htm
“… One may naturally enquire, what is that which withholds, and after that would know, why Paul expresses it so obscurely. What then is it that withholds, that is, hinders him from being revealed? Some indeed say, the grace of the Spirit, but others the Roman empire, to whom I most of all accede. Wherefore? Because if he meant to say the Spirit, he would not have spoken obscurely, but plainly, that even now the grace of the Spirit, that is the gifts, withhold him. And otherwise he ought now to have come, if he was about to come when the gifts ceased; for they have long since ceased. But because he said this of the Roman empire, he naturally glanced at it, and speaks covertly and darkly. For he did not wish to bring upon himself superfluous enmities, and useless dangers. For if he had said that after a little while the Roman empire would be dissolved, they would immediately have even overwhelmed him, as a pestilent person, and all the faithful, as living and warring to this end. And he did not say that it will be quickly, although he is always saying it— but what? “that he may be revealed in his own season,”… But he did not also wish to point him out plainly: and this not from cowardice, but instructing us not to bring upon ourselves unnecessary enmities, when there is nothing to call for it. So indeed he also says here. “Only there is one that restrains now, until he be taken out of the way”, that is, when the Roman empire is taken out of the way, then he shall come. And naturally. For as long as the fear of this empire lasts, no one will willingly exalt himself, but when that is dissolved, he will attack the anarchy, and endeavor to seize upon the government both of man and of God. For as the kingdoms before this were destroyed, for example, that of the Medes by the Baby
lonians, that of the Babylonians by the Persians, that of the Persians by the Macedonians, that of the Macedonians by the Romans: … And these things Daniel delivered to us with great clearness. …” [Roman Catholic Online Fathers Of The Church; Homilies On Second Thessalonians (Chrysostom); Homily 4] – http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/23054.htm“…The impediment is the Roman Empire; the main event impeded is the “man of sin” (most Latin Fathers and later interpreters) …” [Roman Catholic Online Encyclopedia; “A”; Antichrist; In The Pauline Epistles; [second option of 4 listed]] – http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01559a.htm
“…I will nevertheless mention such conjectures as I have heard or read.
Some think that the Apostle Paul referred to the Roman empire, and that he was unwilling to use language more explicit, lest he should incur the calumnious charge of wishing ill to the empire which it was hoped would be eternal; … However, it is not absurd to believe that these words of the apostle, “Only he who now holds, let him hold until he be taken out of the way,” refer to the Roman empire, as if it were said, “Only he who now reigns, let him reign until he be taken out of the way.” “And then shall the wicked be revealed:” no one doubts that this means Antichrist. …” [Roman Catholic Online Fathers Of The Church; The City of God (Book XX); (St. Agustine); Concerning the last judgment, and the declarations regarding it in the old and new testaments.; Chapter 19.— What the Apostle Paul Wrote to the Thessalonians About the Manifestation of Antichrist Which Shall Precede the Day of the Lord.] – http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/120120.htm
“5. The Fathers held that the Roman empire was the “let,” or hindrance, referred to by Paul in 2 Thessalonians, which kept back the manifestation of the “man of sin.” This point is of great importance. Paul distinctly tells us that he knew, and that the Thessalonians knew, what that hindrance was, and that it was then in existence. The early Church, through the writings of the Fathers, tells us what it knew upon the subject, and with remarkable unanimity affirms that this “let,” or hindrance, was the Roman empire as governed by the Caesars; that while the Caesars held imperial power, it was impossible for the predicted antichrist to arise, and that on the fall of the Caesars he would arise. Here we have a point on which Paul affirms the existence of knowledge in the Christian Church. The early Church knew, he says, what this hindrance was. The early Church tells us what it did know upon the subject, and no one in these days can be in a position to contradict its testimony as to what Paul had, by word of mouth only, told the Thessalonians. It is a point on which ancient tradition alone can have any authority. Modern speculation is positively impertinent on such a subject.4 … From Irenaeus, who lived close to apostolic times, down to Chrysostom and Jerome, the Fathers taught that the power withholding the manifestation of the “man of sin” was the Roman empire as governed by the Caesars. The Fathers therefore belong to the historic, and not to the futurist school of interpretation; for futurists imagine that the hindrance to the manifestation of the man of sin is still in existence, though the Caesars have long since passed away. …” [Romanism and the Reformation; H. Grattan Guiness; Pg 52-53] – http://www.whitehorsemedia.com/docs/ROMANISM_AND_THE_REFORMATION.pdf
December 13, 2012 at 5:55 am#324299AnonymousInactiveQuote (Ed J @ Dec. 12 2012,20:04) Quote (AWHN @ Dec. 12 2012,18:02) … (7)”According to scripture alone, what is the definition of 'Blasphemy'?”…
Hi AWHN,…7) Speak against…
God bless
Ed JBiblically, Mr. Ed J, Blasphemy is defined here:
(H) It would have a “mouth” speaking “[great] words” of “blasphemy” against and in the place of The Most High God [Dn 7:8,25; Rev 13:5-6, 17:5; Jn 10:33; Mk 2:7; Lk 5:21; 1 Tm 1:13, 2:5]
Blasphemy:
Claiming perogatives of God
“… spoken blasphemy … ye have heard his blasphemy.” Matthew 26:65 and “… they all condemned him to be guilty of death.” Mark 14:64 [context]
“…for blasphemy; … thou, being a man, makest thyself God.” John 10:33
Claiming to forgive Sins, which alone belongs to God
“…speak blasphemies? who can forgive sins but God only?” Mark 2:27 & “… but God alone?” Luke 5:21
Names of Blasphemy
“…a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy…” Revelation 17:3
Religious [in God's name] persecutor
“…a blasphemer, and a persecutor, and injurious: …” 1 Timothy 1:3
Hypocrite, God's name in Vain
“…the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but [are] the synagogue of Satan.” Revelation 2:9
There is only one power on earth, which even now exists, which fits each of the definitions in perfectness, and it is not Islam, but rather that Papal power, which claims to be the [Latin] Vicarius Christi, which in the Greek is Anti-Christos…
Let us see this from their own sources:
Forgiveness of Sins:
“…He forgives sin in answer to the observation that God alone can forgive sin (Mark 2:7, 10; Luke 5:21, 24; etc). …” [Roman Catholic Online Encyclopedia; “J”; The Character Of Jesus Christ; subsection “Divinity of Jesus”] – http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08382a.htm
“Absolution … (Ab = from; solvere = to free) … the priest … he frees man from sin. … over sin Peter is supreme. … implies supreme power both legislative and judicial: power to forgive sins, power to free from sin's penalties. … “Ego te absolvo”…”[Roman Catholic Online Encyclopedia; “A”; Absolution] – http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01061a.htm
“…the priest has … the power of delivering sinners from Hell, of making them worthy of Paradise, … And God Himself is obliged to abide by the judgment of His priests, and either not to pardon or to pardon, according as they refuse or give absolution … “Such is,” says St. Maximus of Turin, “this judiciary power ascribed to Peter that its decision carries with it the decision of God.” The sentence of the priest precedes, and God subscribes to it, writes St. Peter Damian. …” [St. Alphonsus Liguori C.SS.R. Doctor of the Church; “Dignities and Duties of the Priest”, Vol. 12, pp. 27; “Nihil Obstat. Arthur J. Scanlan, S.T.D., Censor Librorum – Imprimatur. + Patritius Cardinalis Hayes, Archiepiscopus Neo-Eboracensis – Die 24 Mar., 1927 – APPROBATION. – By virtue of the authority granted me by the Most Rev. Patrick Murray, Superior General of the Congregation of the Most Holy Redeemer, I hereby sanction the publication of the work entitled “DIGNITY AND DUTIES OF THE PRIEST,” which is Volume XII of the complete edition in English of the works of St. Alphonsus de Liguori. JAMES BARRON, C.SS.R., Provincial”] – http://www.catholictradition.org/Priests/priesthood1-2.htm
“Seek where you will, through heaven and earth, and you will find but one created being who can forgive the sinner…That extraordinary being is the priest the Catholic priest.” [Michael Muller, The Catholic Priest, page 78] – http://www.archive.org/stream….2up
“The pope's universal coercive jurisdiction… the powers … are plenary. … nothing is withheld. … Peter's authority is subordinated to no earthly superior. … are to be forthwith ratified in heaven. They do not need the antecedent approval of any other tribunal. … This judicial authority will even include the power to pardon sin. … supreme power … carries with it a supreme magisterium — authority to declare that doctrine and to prescribe a rule of faith obligatory on all. …” [Roman Catholic Online Encyclopedia, The Pope] – http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/12260a.htm
Blasphemous names:
“All names which in the scriptures are applied to Christ, by virtue of which it is established that he is over the church, all the same names are applied to the Pope.” [Cardinal Robert Bellarmine (Full Italian name: Roberto Francesco Romolo Bellarmino (Canonized-1930 and Doctor of the Church (Jesuit))), Disputationes de Controversiis (aka: Disputationes de Controversiis Christianae Fidei adversus hujus temporis Haereticos) [Lectures Concerning the Controversies of the Christian Faith Against the Heretics of This Time], Tom. 2, “Controversia Prima,” Book 2 (De Conciliorum Auctoritate)[“On Authority of the Councils”], Chapter 17, (1628 ed.) Vol. 1, pp. 266-translated]
In Latin: “Secundo probatur ratione, in Scripturis fundata; nam omnia nomina, quae in Scripturis tribuuntur Christo, unde constat eum esse supra Ecclesiam, eadem omnia tribuuntur Pontifici.” – http://cdigital.dgb.uanl.mx/la…._21.pdf
“All names” even the “Us, We, and Our”.
“3. Papa idem est ac Pater patrum.”
“3. The Pope is the Father of Fathers.”[Jesus said, “And call no [man] your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.” Mt 23:9]
“5. Papa appellatur Sanctissimus, et quare?”
“5. The Pope is called Most Holy, and why?”“7. Merito solus Papa appellatur nomine Sanctissimi, et quare?”
“7. The Pope alone merits the name Most Holy, and why?”“8. Papa prae excellentia suae supremae dignitatis vocantur Episcopus Episcoporum.”
“8. The Pope by reason of the excellence of his supreme dignity is called the Bishop of Bishops”[said Peter, Jesus is: “…the Shepherd and Bishop of your souls…” [1 Pt 2:25]]
“3. Hinc Papa idem est ac Pater patrum, ut notat Gloss. Communiter recepta in Prooemio”
“3. Hence the Pope is the same as the Father of fathers, as is noted to the Gloss. It is commonly received in the Foreword”[Lucius Ferraris, “Prompta Bibliotheca …” Vol. 6, “Papa”, Article 2; pg 41-42] – http://books.google.com/books?i….f=false
Perogatives/rights of God alone:
“But the supreme teacher in the Church is the Roman Pontiff. Union of minds, therefore, requires, together with a perfect accord in the one faith, complete
submission and obedience of will to the Church and to the Roman Pontiff, as to God Himself.”[“His Holiness Pope Leo XIII”, “Sapientiae Christianae”, On Christians as Citizens, Encyclical letter, January 10th, 1890; Section 22] – http://www.newadvent.org/library/docs_le13sc.htm also http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Leo13/l13sapie.htm“Supreme teacher”? Yet Scripture says, “But the Comforter, [which is] the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.” Jn 14:26
“But since We hold upon this earth the place of God Almighty, …” [“The Great Encyclical Letters of Pope Leo XIII”, Encyclical Letter June 20, 1894] –
http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Leo13/l13praec.htmReligious Persecutor, Blasphemer:
“… That the Church of Rome has shed more innocent blood than any other institution that has ever existed among mankind, will be questioned by no Protestant who has a competent knowledge of history. …” [History of the Rise and Influence of the spirit of Rationalism in Europe Vol . II [2]; By W.E.H. Lecky, M.A. Revised Edition. In Two Volumes. New York and London; D. Appleton and Company 1919. pp 40; [1.] Llorente, Hist. De l'Inquisition, tom. iv. [4] pp 271,272. “… Llorente … himself at one time secretary in the Inquisition, and … had access to all the secret papers of the tribunal, will always be the highest authority. …”] – http://files.libertyfund.org/files/1667/Lecky_1341.02.pdf
December 13, 2012 at 6:16 am#324302AnonymousInactiveQuote (Ed J @ Dec. 12 2012,20:04) Quote (AWHN @ Dec. 12 2012,18:02) … (6)”Where did the 'Little Horn' of Daniel 7 arise from, and what did that Beast represent Biblically?”…
Hi AWHN,…
6) The Greek (Dan.8:9) and Roman Empires (Dan.7:7). …God bless
Ed JThe “little horn” always comes out of the 4th Kingdom [Rome], in both Daniel 7 and Daniel 8, let us see how, and how it cannot possibly come out of the 3rd Kingdom [Greecian]:
The text of Daniel 8:9 says, “out of one of them”.
What is the “them”?
In the previous verse we read of only two possibilities it can be, and as by the very inherent structure of the text we see in actuality there is only one understanding that is correct:
Therefore the he goat waxed very great: and when he was strong, the great horn was broken; and for it came up four notable ones toward the four winds of heaven. – Daniel 8:8
Here are the Reasons why the “Little Horn” of Daniel 8 cannot be Antiochus Epiphanes IV [etc], but rather it must be Roman.
[1.] In Hebrew, nouns and pronouns have gender [masculine/feminine].
When the gender of a noun is feminine, a pronoun that refers to it, must also be the same, that is to say feminine. Let us look at the texts again:
“…four notable ones [horns] [feminine]… four winds [feminine] of heaven [plural, masculine].”
“…out of one [feminine] of them [masculine]…”
With this evidence before us, there is only a singular correct choice between the two options [horns or winds].
The pronoun “them” cannot refer back to the words “notable ones” [horns], because the word “them” is masculine, not feminine.
This means that the word “them” can only be referring to the word “heaven
”, which is both plural and masculine.The numeral “one” [feminine] then refers to that which is adjoined to the word “heaven”, namely the “winds” [feminine].
Therefore:
“…out of one [feminine] of them [masculine] of the winds [feminine] of heaven [plural masculine] came forth a little horn…”
This power came not out of one of the “four notable ones” [horns] of the Greek empire when it was divided, no indeed, for this “little horn” power was something new and came from elsewhere, another beast not seen in Daniel 8 [but in Daniel 7], even as Daniel 7 already spoke to us. It would be of the divided 4th Empire, it would be Roman.
Paul clearly speaks to this, saying that this “little horn” was to be yet future from His day.
Again, this shows that Paul verily knew that the Antichrist power that was going to arise [future tense] and was not of the 3rd Kingdom [Greece, therefore not Antiochus Epiphanes IV in any sense, to be spoken about later on Daniel 8, for the “little horn” does not arise out of Greece and its divisions, but rather from one of the 4 winds, see Hebrew Masculine Feminine].
For this Antichrist power to come was being hindered in his [Paul's day, during the 4th Kingdom] own day, for Paul says, “he who now letteth” [ie., he who now, at this present time, at this very moment, restrains].
Paul also knew that once this Antichrist arose in power, once the restraining power was removed, that it was to remain [though suffer what appeared to be a deadly mortal wound at one point, yet regain] until the very 2nd Advent of Christ Jesus, therefore it was to last for many many hundreds of years:
And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming: 2 Thessalonians 2:8
Yet before any of those events could take place, Paul had already told the Thessalonian Church that certain events were to occur:
Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things? 2 Thessalonians 2:5
There was to be a “falling away” first, a great apostacy from the True and Everlasting Gospel and Faith of Jesus Christ:
Let no man deceive you by any means: for [that day shall not come], except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; 2 Thessalonians 2:3
…and there are yet several more reasons to come why it cannot come out of Greece when we consider Daniel 8 in more detail in context with the other books of Daniel.
December 13, 2012 at 8:47 am#324310journey42ParticipantQuote (terraricca @ Dec. 13 2012,14:28) could any one explain me the difference between those two verse in their version; Rev 13:16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: KJV
Rev 13:16 He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, NIV (1984)
Hi PierreKJV says the mark will be IN his hand or IN his forehead,
and the NIV says ON his hand or ON his forehead.If it's a chip, it will have to go inside the skin,
if a tattoo of some sort, it will go on the skin.
Take your pick?December 15, 2012 at 12:59 am#324434terrariccaParticipantQuote (journey42 @ Dec. 13 2012,13:47) Quote (terraricca @ Dec. 13 2012,14:28) could any one explain me the difference between those two verse in their version; Rev 13:16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: KJV
Rev 13:16 He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, NIV (1984)
Hi PierreKJV says the mark will be IN his hand or IN his forehead,
and the NIV says ON his hand or ON his forehead.If it's a chip, it will have to go inside the skin,
if a tattoo of some sort, it will go on the skin.
Take your pick?
J42but your answer that you just give me ;tell me is it an physical or a spiritual answer
December 15, 2012 at 3:26 am#324448journey42ParticipantQuote (terraricca @ Dec. 15 2012,10:59) Quote (journey42 @ Dec. 13 2012,13:47) Quote (terraricca @ Dec. 13 2012,14:28) could any one explain me the difference between those two verse in their version; Rev 13:16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: KJV
Rev 13:16 He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, NIV (1984)
Hi PierreKJV says the mark will be IN his hand or IN his forehead,
and the NIV says ON his hand or ON his forehead.If it's a chip, it will have to go inside the skin,
if a tattoo of some sort, it will go on the skin.
Take your pick?
J42but your answer that you just give me ;tell me is it an physical or a spiritual answer
Pierre,These elite's from the illuminati have re-written history. They have meddled with everything. Definitions, translations, language. They even made millions believe that the KJV is not the original word of God and that it is tampered. So they bring out a “better version” that they have made themselves. Look at the men that have introduced all these new bible versions and infiltrated them through out the churches. Look at the background of them and see who they really are. We all need to open our eyes and be one step ahead.
If someone starts off with a NIV, he will not know the difference. But if someone starts off with the KJV he will see it, without anyone even saying anything, because a word changed here and there can change the whole meaning of the sentence.
For example “The Assyrian” , they changed it to “Assyrians” This takes the focus of the ONE that God mentions, and they generalise it to mean many, a nation, and God is speaking of only one in particular. You wouldn't notice it. But we do, because the whole doctrine of the bible has to be perfectly flowing, with no contradictions.
So the evidence they provide and make worldwide to back their “versions” is already calculated. Meanings of words, definitions etc, changed.. Why do we need so many different dictionary's? They have caused a division in the Christian world. Any information Babylon provides you is not to be trusted, for it serves their own purpose. And this purpose all leads up to what is coming. They control the churches, and the preachers. They have turned them into “Salesmen”. They are like Gods, and they make the people hang off their every word.
If scientists say something is billions of years old, don't trust them, for Satan is behind all of this and he is very clever, for his sole purpose is to discredit, manipulate, twist, and water down the very words of God. He is using the soft kill method. He is prepared in advance as he conquers and divides. Be aware of his devices. He has many Christians in his hand, and most of them all say that they are free, but still in prison. God let this happen, because they built on a different foundation, a different Jesus.
So the KJV is correct. IN their right hand, or IN their forehead. and as time progresses, you will see that all we have warned you about is going to take place before your very eyes, exactly the way the scriptures state.
December 15, 2012 at 5:42 am#324458terrariccaParticipantQuote (journey42 @ Dec. 15 2012,08:26) Quote (terraricca @ Dec. 15 2012,10:59) Quote (journey42 @ Dec. 13 2012,13:47) Quote (terraricca @ Dec. 13 2012,14:28) could any one explain me the difference between those two verse in their version; Rev 13:16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: KJV
Rev 13:16 He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, NIV (1984)
Hi PierreKJV says the mark will be IN his hand or IN his forehead,
and the NIV says ON his hand or ON his forehead.If it's a chip, it will have to go inside the skin,
if a tattoo of some sort, it will go on the skin.
Take your pick?
J42but your answer that you just give me ;tell me is it an physical or a spiritual answer
Pierre,These elite's from the illuminati have re-written history. They have meddled with everything. Definitions, translations, language. They even made millions believe that the KJV is not the original word of God and that it is tampered. So they bring out a “better version” that they have made themselves. Look at the men that have introduced all these new bible versions and infiltrated them through out the churches. Look at the background of them and see who they really are. We all need to open our eyes and be one step ahead.
If someone starts off with a NIV, he will not know the difference. But if someone starts off with the KJV he will see it, without anyone even saying anything, because a word changed here and there can change the whole meaning of the sentence.
For example “The Assyrian” , they changed it to “Assyrians” This takes the focus of the ONE that God mentions, and they generalise it to mean many, a nation, and God is speaking of only one in particular. You wouldn't notice it. But we do, because the whole doctrine of the bible has to be perfectly flowing, with no contradictions.
So the evidence they provide and make worldwide to back their “versions” is already calculated. Meanings of words, definitions etc, changed.. Why do we need so many different dictionary's? They have caused a division in the Christian world. Any information Babylon provides you is not to be trusted, for it serves their own purpose. And this purpose all leads up to what is coming. They control the churches, and the preachers. They have turned them into “Salesmen”. They are like Gods, and they make the people hang off their every word.
If scientists say something is billions of years old, don't trust them, for Satan is behind all of this and he is very clever, for his sole purpose is to discredit, manipulate, twist, and water down the very words of God. He is using the soft kill method. He is prepared in advance as he conquers and divides. Be aware of his devices. He has many Christians in his hand, and most of them all say that they are free, but still in prison. God let this happen, because they built on a different foundation, a different Jesus.
So the KJV is correct. IN their right hand, or IN their forehead. and as time progresses, you will see that all we have warned you about is going to take place before your very eyes, exactly the way the scriptures state.
Ps 90:4 For a thousand years in thy sight are but as yesterday when it is past, and as a watch in the night.
Ps 90:5 Thou carriest them away as with a flood; they are as a sleep: in the morning they are like grass which groweth up.
Ps 90:6 In the morning it flourisheth, and groweth up; in the evening it is cut down, and withereth.
Ps 90:7 For we are consumed by thine anger, and by thy wrath are we troubled.
Ps 90:8 Thou hast set our iniquities before thee, our secret sins in the light of thy countenance.
Ps 90:9 For all our days are passed away in thy wrath: we spend our years as a tale that is told.
Ps 90:10 The days of our years are threescore years and ten; and if by reason of strength they be fourscore years, yet is their strength labour and sorrow; for it is soon cut off, and we fly away.
Ps 90:11 Who knoweth the power of thine anger? even according to thy fear, so is thy wrath.
Ps 90:12 So teach us to number our days, that we may apply our hearts unto wisdom.
Ps 90:13 Return, O LORD, how long? and let it repent thee concerning thy servants.
Ps 90:14 O satisfy us early with thy mercy; that we may rejoice and be glad all our days.
Ps 90:15 Make us glad according to the days wherein thou hast afflicted us, and the years wherein we have seen evil.
Ps 90:16 Let thy work appear unto thy servants, and thy glory unto their children.
Ps 90:17 And let the beauty of the LORD our God be upon us: and establish thou the work of our hands upon us; yea, the work of our hands establish thou it.
Ps 91:1 He that dwelleth in the secret place of the most High shall abide under the shadow of the Almighty.
Ps 91:2 I will say of the LORD, He is my refuge and my fortress: my God; in him will I trust.
Ps 91:3 Surely he shall deliver thee from the snare of the fowler, and from the noisome pestilence.
Ps 91:4 He shall cover thee with his feathers, and under his wings shalt thou trust: his truth shall be thy shield and buckler.
Ps 91:5 Thou shalt not be afraid for the terror by night; nor for the arrow that flieth by day;
Ps 91:6 Nor for the pestilence that walketh in darkness; nor for the destruction that wasteth at noonday.
Ps 91:7 A thousand shall fall at thy side, and ten thousand at thy right hand; but it shall not come nigh thee.
Ps 91:8 Only with thine eyes shalt thou behold and see the reward of the wicked.
Ps 91:9 Because thou hast made the LORD, which is my refuge, even the most High, thy habitation;
Ps 91:10 There shall no evil befall thee, neither shall any plague come nigh thy dwelling.
Ps 91:11 For he shall give his angels charge over thee, to keep thee in all thy ways.
Ps 91:12 They shall bear thee up in their hands, lest thou dash thy foot against a stone.this I believe
December 15, 2012 at 7:17 am#324469journey42ParticipantGood scriptures Pierre.
Quote Ps 90:4 For a thousand years in thy sight are but as yesterday when it is past, and as a watch in the night.
God knows the end in the begging. To him everything has already happened as he has seen it all played out before hand and shared it with us.
A day of the Lord is ….AS…. a thousand years.Quote Ps 90:5 Thou carriest them away as with a flood; they are as a sleep: in the morning they are like grass which groweth up.
Matthew 13:30 Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.Quote Ps 90:6 In the morning it flourisheth, and groweth up; in the evening it is cut down, and withereth.
Luke 8:6 And some fell upon a rock; and as soon as it was sprung up, it withered away, because it lacked moisture.Ps 90:7 For we are consumed by thine anger, and by thy wrath are we troubled.
Ps 90:8 Thou hast set our iniquities before thee, our secret sins in the light of thy countenance.
Luke 8:17 For nothing is secret, that shall not be made manifest; neither anything hid, that shall not be known and come abroad.Quote Ps 90:9 For all our days are passed away in thy wrath: we spend our years as a tale that is told.
This is speaking to Israel.
Ezekiel 22:4 Thou art become GUILTY in thy blood that thou hast shed; and hast defiled thyself in thine idols which thou hast made; and thou hast caused thy days to draw near, and art come even unto thy years; therefore have I made thee a REPROACH UNTO THE HEATH, and a MOCKING TO ALL COUNTRIES.Ezekiel 22:5 Those that be near, and those that be far from thee, shall MOCK THEE, which are infamous and much vexed.
Quote Ps 90:10 The days of our years are threescore years and ten; and if by reason of strength they be fourscore years, yet is their strength labour and sorrow; for it is soon cut off, and we fly away.
Isaiah 65:20 There shall be no more thence an infant of days, nor an old man that hath not filled his days: for THE CHILD SHALL DIE AN HUNDRED YEARS OLD: but the sinner being a hundred years old shall be cursed.Quote Ps 90:11 Who knoweth the power of thine anger? even according to thy fear, so is thy wrath.
Jeremiah 30:24 The fierce anger of the LORD shall not return, until he have done it, and until he have performed the intents of his heart: in the latter days ye shall consider it.Quote Ps 90:12 So teach us to number our days, that we may apply our hearts unto wisdom.
Luke 12:40 Be ye therefore ready also; for the Son of man cometh at an hour when ye think not.Quote Ps 90:13 Return, O LORD, how long? and let it repent thee concerning thy servants.
Micah 4:6 IN THAT DAY, saith the LORD, will I assemble her that halteth, and I will gather her that is driven out, and her that I have afflicted (Israel).Quote Ps 90:14 O satisfy us early with thy mercy; that we may rejoice and be glad all our days
Isaiah 65:18 But be ye glad and rejoice for ever in that which I create: for, behold, I create Jerusalem a rejoicing, and her people a joy.Quote Ps 90:15 Make us glad according to the days wherein thou hast afflicted us, and the years wherein we have seen evil.
Jeremiah 31:13 Then shall the virgin rejoice in the dance, both young men and old together: for I will turn their mourning into joy, and will comfort THEM, and make THEM rejoice from their SORROW.Quote Ps 91:1 He that dwelleth in the secret place of the most High shall abide under the shadow of the Almighty.
John 7:16 My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me.Quote Ps 91:2 I will say of the LORD, He is my refuge and my fortress: my God; in him will I trust.
John 14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.Quote Ps 91:3 Surely he shall deliver thee from the snare of the fowler, and from the noisome pestilence.
Rev 7:3 Saying, Hurt not the earth, neither the sea, nor the trees, till we have SEALED THE SERVANTS of our God in their foreheads.Quote ]Ps 91:4[He shall cover thee with his feathers, and under his wings shalt thou trust: his truth shall be thy shield and buckler.
Isaiah 33:6 And wisdom and knowledge shall be the stability of thy times, and strength of salvation: the fear of the LORD is his treasure.Quote Ps 91:5 Thou shalt not be afraid for the terror by night; nor for the arrow that flieth by day;
1 Peter 3:14 But and if ye suffer for righteousness' sake, happy are ye: and be not afraid of their terror, neither be troubled;Quote Ps 91:6 Nor for the pestilence that walketh in darkness; nor for the destruction that wasteth at noonday.
Rev 9:4 And it was commanded them that they should not hurt the grass of the earth, neither ay green thing, neither any tree; but only those men which have not the seal of God in their foreheads.Rev 18:4 And I heardanother voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.
This is what these scriptures mean to me
December 15, 2012 at 11:30 am#324471WakeupParticipantJ42.
Exellent.
But how can they fit those wonderful scriptures in their dortrines,is the question.Thank you my dear.
wakeup.
December 15, 2012 at 2:04 pm#324474terrariccaParticipantJ42
I can see you have a good view and understanding ,I like that ;
Rev 18:4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.
you quoted this scripture ;and that's fine but do you understand it like wen do you think this applies
December 15, 2012 at 3:48 pm#324481WakeupParticipantQuote (terraricca @ Dec. 16 2012,00:04) J42 I can see you have a good view and understanding ,I like that ;
Rev 18:4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.
you quoted this scripture ;and that's fine but do you understand it like wen do you think this applies
Terra.That scripture is just basic understanding,of which you can not even understand.
Come out of her;who is her?
Show us if you can.wakeup.
December 15, 2012 at 3:52 pm#324482journey42ParticipantQuote Rev 18:4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. you quoted this scripture ;and that's fine but do you understand it like wen do you think this applies
Thank you Pierre,
Good question. The plagues are coming on the world just before the return of Christ. It will be for the last generation. But the message is still for those back then also. Just like when the apostles asked Christ to tell them the signs of his coming. He told them, but it wasn't for them to experience or witness the chaos leading up to it, nevertheless, they would of died knowing what was to come. He was filling them with knowledge. Same as those others back then, no one knew when Christ was returning, so they had to be on guard at all times. They had their own tribulations in their time, but not the plagues.
The answer to your other question, yes I understand it. Come out of Babylon (spiritual Babylon) my people (believers) because I'm going to send some nasty plagues, and I don't want to punish you the same as them.
Rev 18:5 For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities.
No forgiveness there. Nothing to wipe their sins away now, last call my people.
These are the warnings, to all Christians, even to the last generation, and Christ has explained what is not acceptable.
Rev 2:2 I know thy works, and thy labour, and thy patience, and how thou canst not bear them which are evil: and thou hast tried them which say they are apostles, and are not, and hast found them liars:
Rev 2:4 Nevertheless have somewhat against thee, because THOU HAST LEFT THY FIRST LOVE (God)
Rev 2:5 Remember therefore from whence thou art fallen, and repent, and do the FIRST WORKS; or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will remove thy candlestick out of his place, except thou REPENT.Rev 2:9 I know thy works and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews (spiritual Jews), and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.
Rev 2:11 He that has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; He that OVERCOMETH shall not be hurt of the second death.
(because you will be in the first resurrection)Rev 2:13 I know thy works, and where thou dwellest, even where Satan's seat is; and thou hold fast my name, and hast not denied my faith, even those days wherein Antipas was my faithful martyr, who was slain among you, where Satan dwelleth.
Rev 2:14 But I have a few things against thee, because thou hast there THEM THAT HOLD THE DOCTRINE OF BALAAM, who taught Balak to cast a stumbling block before the children of Israel, to eat things sacrificed unto idols, and to commit fornication.
(spiritual fornication, eating strange flesh ..false doctrines…. or could be leaving out milk & cookies for Santa, or giving out easter eggs?)Rev 2:15 So hast thou also THEM THAT HOLD THE DOCTRINE OF THE NICOLATIANS, WHICH THING I HATE
(Christmas) introducing old pagan practises and infiltrating them into the church. St NicolasRev 2:16 REPENT, or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will fight against them with the sword of my mouth.
Rev 2:17 He that has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches, To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the hidden manna, and will give him a white stone, and in the stone a new name written, which no man knoweth saving he that receiveth it.
Rev 2:19 I know thy works, and charity, and service and faith, and thy patience, and thy works: and the last to be more than the first.
Rev 2:20 Notwithstanding I have a few things against thee, because thou sufferest that woman Jezebel, which calleth herself a prophetess, to teach and seduce my servants to commit fornication, and eat things sacrificed unto idols.
(More false doctrines, old beliefs, whoring with other teachings. ,the Christians of Babylon)Rev 2:21 And I gave her space to repent of her fornication, and she repented not.
Rev 2:22 Behold, I will cast her into a bed, and them that commit adultery with her into GREAT TRIBULATION (the plagues), except they repent of their deeds.
(Come out of her my people)Rev 2:23 And I will kill her children with death (the teachings that came out of this whore? …not sure here?); and all the churches shall know that I am he which searches the reins and hearts: and I wil give unto every one of you according to your WORKS.
Rev 3:1 …..I know thy works, that thou hast a name that thou livest, and art dead.
Rev 3:2 Be watchful and strengthen the things which remain, that are ready to die: for I have not found thy works perfect before God.
Rev 3:3 Remember therefore how thou hast received and heard, and hold fast, and REPENT, If therefore thou shalt not watch, I will come on thee as a theif, and thou shalt not know what hour I will come upon thee.
(You could die in your sins before I even come, and that will be the hour of my coming for YOU. If you are alive at my coming, you will be deceived and not even know the signs because you did not watch, …or take note)December 15, 2012 at 3:55 pm#324483terrariccaParticipantj42
Quote Rev 18:5 For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities. No forgiveness there. Nothing to wipe their sins away now, last call my people.
right ,but wen would you apply it
December 15, 2012 at 5:07 pm#324489WakeupParticipantQuote (terraricca @ Dec. 16 2012,01:55) j42 Quote Rev 18:5 For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities. No forgiveness there. Nothing to wipe their sins away now, last call my people.
right ,but wen would you apply it
Terra.Once the plaques has come ,then its too late.
wakeup.
December 15, 2012 at 5:18 pm#324490terrariccaParticipantQuote (Wakeup @ Dec. 15 2012,22:07) Quote (terraricca @ Dec. 16 2012,01:55) j42 Quote Rev 18:5 For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities. No forgiveness there. Nothing to wipe their sins away now, last call my people.
right ,but wen would you apply it
Terra.Once the plaques has come ,then its too late.
wakeup.
wupyou move away from my question
December 15, 2012 at 5:33 pm#324491WakeupParticipantQuote (terraricca @ Dec. 16 2012,03:18) Quote (Wakeup @ Dec. 15 2012,22:07) Quote (terraricca @ Dec. 16 2012,01:55) j42 Quote Rev 18:5 For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities. No forgiveness there. Nothing to wipe their sins away now, last call my people.
right ,but wen would you apply it
Terra.Once the plaques has come ,then its too late.
wakeup.
wupyou move away from my question
Terra.Rev.18:5. FOR HER SINS HAS REACHED UNTO HEAVEN.
THATS IT; IT CAN NOT GO ANY HIGHER.Terra;whats going on in your country;under the Denver airport? A city under ground.
All the leaders of the usa will be hiding there in 5days time,because they say, the sun is going to burn up the earth?I think its not only the leaders of the usa but the world.will be hiding in their own city underground.
THERE WILL BE MANY RED FACES,BECAUSE OF SHAME.I have the video.
wakup.
December 15, 2012 at 5:42 pm#324492WakeupParticipant - AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.