- This topic is empty.
- AuthorPosts
- February 15, 2010 at 5:49 am#177968
NickHassan
ParticipantHi CA,
Is this the tradition Jesus warned about in Mk7?
Wake up.February 15, 2010 at 9:05 am#177993Ed J
ParticipantQuote (CatholicApologist @ Feb. 15 2010,16:26) 25 Short Biblical Arguments For the Binding Authority of Tradition
Hi CA,Welcome back!
Do you believe in: “Solo Fida”?God bless
Ed J
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgFebruary 15, 2010 at 12:28 pm#178007Elizabeth
ParticipantCA
On 2. Jesus said, it is tradition that keeps us from understanding truth, Mat. 15:9
On 3. Aren't Protestant, churches that came out of the Catholic church? Do they not “basically” teach the same doctrine?
On 4. There are two wrongs in your statement, and you don't even recognize them; One; no human being is worth veneration. Two; the pope is father of no child, at least he shouldn't be.
On 5. 2Ti 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
On 6. Like what?
On 7. Early “Christians”, first Century, had already erred from the apostolic teachings.
On 8. You know that Jesus was referring to all the extras the Pharisees had added to the Law.
On 9. The papacy was self appointed and self crowned, it is in no way the succession of the apostles, in fact, it was the emperor Justinian who in 533 AD decided that only the pope of Rome, for there were many popes/bishops, should hold that title, and be the “head” of all clergy.
On 10. You forgot to mention which scripture says that.
On 11. ?
On 12. What did Peter interpret? Bibles weren't available for many Centuries to come.
On 13. You are really hung up on tradition. What “universal” church, and instituted by whom? Constantine?
On 14. The church fathers appealed to whose scripture, their own? why did the “church fathers” forbid the reading of scriptures, punishable by death? and who where the heretics, all who disagreed with the church doctrine? Rev. 13:15?
On 15. Yes, as long as you refer to the tradition of the teaching of the apostles, it's a good tradition.
On 16. As long as they are in line with the written word, there should be no problem.
On 17. Well, you're wrong, Eze 18:4 Behold, all souls are mine; as the soul of the father, so also the soul of the son is mine: the soul that sinneth, it shall die.
On 18. ?
On 19. Jesus was born a Jew, he had to obey the law, not until he died on the cross, did the new covenant come into effect.
On 20. 2Pe 1:19 We have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well that ye take heed, as unto a light that shineth in a dark place, until the day dawn, and the day star arise in your hearts:
2Pe 1:20 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.
2Pe 1:21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.On 21. That depends on the coin, does it not?
On 22. Is that why the Catholic church has written her own doctrines?
On 23. It should be apostolic, but, is that why Paul wrote this?
Gal 1:6 ¶ I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:
Gal 1:7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
Have you ever read these scriptures?
Gal 1:8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
Gal 1:9 As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.On 24. If you were ever to read the bible, not the popes, you would find out real quick what the problem is.
You ask, “is the Bible the only infallible authority”? the answer is YES!
Georg
February 15, 2010 at 4:17 pm#178023Catholic Apologist
ParticipantQuote (Ed J @ Feb. 15 2010,20:05) Quote (CatholicApologist @ Feb. 15 2010,16:26) 25 Short Biblical Arguments For the Binding Authority of Tradition
Hi CA,Welcome back!
Do you believe in: “Solo Fida”?God bless
Ed J
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
Sola Fide is heresy and unbiblical. The only place in the Bible where you find the words “faith alone” is in James. It says that we are NOT justified by faith alone. Pretty clear.Maybe we can talk about that on a new thread.
February 15, 2010 at 4:23 pm#178024Catholic Apologist
ParticipantQuote (Elizabeth @ Feb. 15 2010,23:28) CA On 2. Jesus said, it is tradition that keeps us from understanding truth, Mat. 15:9
On 3. Aren't Protestant, churches that came out of the Catholic church? Do they not “basically” teach the same doctrine?
On 4. There are two wrongs in your statement, and you don't even recognize them; One; no human being is worth veneration. Two; the pope is father of no child, at least he shouldn't be.
On 5. 2Ti 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
On 6. Like what?
On 7. Early “Christians”, first Century, had already erred from the apostolic teachings.
On 8. You know that Jesus was referring to all the extras the Pharisees had added to the Law.
On 9. The papacy was self appointed and self crowned, it is in no way the succession of the apostles, in fact, it was the emperor Justinian who in 533 AD decided that only the pope of Rome, for there were many popes/bishops, should hold that title, and be the “head” of all clergy.
On 10. You forgot to mention which scripture says that.
On 11. ?
On 12. What did Peter interpret? Bibles weren't available for many Centuries to come.
On 13. You are really hung up on tradition. What “universal” church, and instituted by whom? Constantine?
On 14. The church fathers appealed to whose scripture, their own? why did the “church fathers” forbid the reading of scriptures, punishable by death? and who where the heretics, all who disagreed with the church doctrine? Rev. 13:15?
On 15. Yes, as long as you refer to the tradition of the teaching of the apostles, it's a good tradition.
On 16. As long as they are in line with the written word, there should be no problem.
On 17. Well, you're wrong, Eze 18:4 Behold, all souls are mine; as the soul of the father, so also the soul of the son is mine: the soul that sinneth, it shall die.
On 18. ?
On 19. Jesus was born a Jew, he had to obey the law, not until he died on the cross, did the new covenant come into effect.
On 20. 2Pe 1:19 We have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well that ye take heed, as unto a light that shineth in a dark place, until the day dawn, and the day star arise in your hearts:
2Pe 1:20 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.
2Pe 1:21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.On 21. That depends on the coin, does it not?
On 22. Is that why the Catholic church has written her own doctrines?
On 23. It should be apostolic, but, is that why Paul wrote this?
Gal 1:6 ¶ I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:
Gal 1:7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
Have you ever read these scriptures?
Gal 1:8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
Gal 1:9 As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.On 24. If you were ever to read the bible, not the popes, you would find out real quick what the problem is.
You ask, “is the Bible the only infallible authority”? the answer is YES!
Georg
Hi Georg,Let's start with the first point you take issue with.
2. Tradition can't be separated from the Bible; that would be like trying to separate hydrogen atoms from a water molecule.
You say – “On 2. Jesus said, it is tradition that keeps us from understanding truth, Mat. 15:9”
Go read Mat. 15:9. Jesus is speaking of the “traditions of MEN”
You must have taken a scissors and cut 2 Thess. 2:15 out of your Bible:
“Therefore, brethren, stand fast; and hold the traditions which you have learned, whether by word, or by our epistle.”
You are commanded to hold to the holy traditions.
Repent and believe the gospel.
February 15, 2010 at 4:56 pm#178027terraricca
ParticipantCA
i am glad the middle ages are gone ,are they??February 15, 2010 at 5:15 pm#178030Elizabeth
ParticipantQuote (CatholicApologist @ Feb. 16 2010,03:23) Quote (Elizabeth @ Feb. 15 2010,23:28) CA On 2. Jesus said, it is tradition that keeps us from understanding truth, Mat. 15:9
On 3. Aren't Protestant, churches that came out of the Catholic church? Do they not “basically” teach the same doctrine?
On 4. There are two wrongs in your statement, and you don't even recognize them; One; no human being is worth veneration. Two; the pope is father of no child, at least he shouldn't be.
On 5. 2Ti 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
On 6. Like what?
On 7. Early “Christians”, first Century, had already erred from the apostolic teachings.
On 8. You know that Jesus was referring to all the extras the Pharisees had added to the Law.
On 9. The papacy was self appointed and self crowned, it is in no way the succession of the apostles, in fact, it was the emperor Justinian who in 533 AD decided that only the pope of Rome, for there were many popes/bishops, should hold that title, and be the “head” of all clergy.
On 10. You forgot to mention which scripture says that.
On 11. ?
On 12. What did Peter interpret? Bibles weren't available for many Centuries to come.
On 13. You are really hung up on tradition. What “universal” church, and instituted by whom? Constantine?
On 14. The church fathers appealed to whose scripture, their own? why did the “church fathers” forbid the reading of scriptures, punishable by death? and who where the heretics, all who disagreed with the church doctrine? Rev. 13:15?
On 15. Yes, as long as you refer to the tradition of the teaching of the apostles, it's a good tradition.
On 16. As long as they are in line with the written word, there should be no problem.
On 17. Well, you're wrong, Eze 18:4 Behold, all souls are mine; as the soul of the father, so also the soul of the son is mine: the soul that sinneth, it shall die.
On 18. ?
On 19. Jesus was born a Jew, he had to obey the law, not until he died on the cross, did the new covenant come into effect.
On 20. 2Pe 1:19 We have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well that ye take heed, as unto a light that shineth in a dark place, until the day dawn, and the day star arise in your hearts:
2Pe 1:20 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.
2Pe 1:21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.On 21. That depends on the coin, does it not?
On 22. Is that why the Catholic church has written her own doctrines?
On 23. It should be apostolic, but, is that why Paul wrote this?
Gal 1:6 ¶ I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:
Gal 1:7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
Have you ever read these scriptures?
Gal 1:8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
Gal 1:9 As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.On 24. If you were ever to read the bible, not the popes, you would find out real quick what the problem is.
You ask, “is the Bible the only infallible authority”? the answer is YES!
Georg
Hi Georg,Let's start with the first point you take issue with.
2. Tradition can't be separated from the Bible; that would be like trying to separate hydrogen atoms from a water molecule.
You say – “On 2. Jesus said, it is tradition that keeps us from understanding truth, Mat. 15:9”
Go read Mat. 15:9. Jesus is speaking of the “traditions of MEN”
You must have taken a scissors and cut 2 Thess. 2:15 out of your Bible:
“Therefore, brethren, stand fast; and hold the traditions which you have learned, whether by word, or by our epistle.”
You are commanded to hold to the holy traditions.
Repent and believe the gospel.
I just have to jump in here. The last statement you made about that we are commanded to keep the tradition, the holy tradition?
Have you ever read what
Ephesians 2:8 says this
For by grace we have been saved through Faith and that not of yourselves; it is a gift of God.
verse 9 not of works lest anyone should boast.
verse 10 For we are His workmanship created in Christ Jesus works which God prepared beforehand that we should walk in them.
Also Christ magnified the Law on the Sermon on the Mount.
If I can recall I think the Catholic Church still goes by the Ten Commandments. Which was the Old Covenant.
Exodus 34:27 The LORD said to Moses,”Write these words, according to the tenor of these words I have made a Covenant with you and with Israel.”
verse 28 So He was there with the LORD forty days and forty nights, neither eating bread nor drank water. And He wrote on the tablets the words of the covenant the Ten Commandments.
That was the old Covenant.
We are in the New Covenant in
Luke 22:20 …..”This cup is the new covenant in My Blood which is shed for you.
He also gave us the great Commandment in
Math. 22:37 Jesus said to him:” You shall love the LORD God with all of your Heart and all of your soul, and all of your mind.
verse 38 “This is the first great commandment.
verse 39 “And the second is like it:” You shall love your neighbor as yourself.”
verse 40 “On these two commandment hang all the Law and the Prophets.Can you see what is so different then the Old? No Sabbath..
Exodus 31:16Therefore the Children of Israel shall keep the Sabbath, to observe the Sabbath throughout their generation as a perpetual covenant.
verse 17 It is a sign between Me and the children of Israel forever.
If I can remember it was taught to us to keep Sunday Holy and it was a Mortal Sin if you did not, unless you were sick etc.
It was never for us to begin with. Along with keeping the trinity how wrong can it get. Besides how you adore the Pope, Christ here on earth you call him. Then on good Friday you kiss the Cross, it is called Veneration of the cross. Nice….
The gospel is the good news which is what? That Christ died for us and now we are under Faith in Ephesians which I quoted. Your Tradition is the trinity which is a man made doctrine and not of God. You are forgetting that we were Catholics at one time, and believe you me, I am forever thankful to God that He called us out of that Church. Amen and Amen
IreneFebruary 15, 2010 at 8:55 pm#178129Catholic Apologist
ParticipantQuote (Elizabeth @ Feb. 16 2010,04:15) Quote (CatholicApologist @ Feb. 16 2010,03:23) Elizabeth,Feb. wrote:Hi Georg,
Let's start with the first point you take issue with.
2. Tradition can't be separated from the Bible; that would be like trying to separate hydrogen atoms from a water molecule.
You say – “On 2. Jesus said, it is tradition that keeps us from understanding truth, Mat. 15:9”
Go read Mat. 15:9. Jesus is speaking of the “traditions of MEN”
You must have taken a scissors and cut 2 Thess. 2:15 out of your Bible:
“Therefore, brethren, stand fast; and hold the traditions which you have learned, whether by word, or by our epistle.”
You are commanded to hold to the holy traditions.
Repent and believe the gospel.
I just have to jump in here. The last statement you made about that we are commanded to keep the tradition, the holy tradition?
Have you ever read what
Ephesians 2:8 says this
For by grace we have been saved through Faith and that not of yourselves; it is a gift of God.
verse 9 not of works lest anyone should boast.
verse 10 For we are His workmanship created in Christ Jesus works which God prepared beforehand that we should walk in them.
Also Christ magnified the Law on the Sermon on the Mount.
If I can recall I think the Catholic Church still goes by the Ten Commandments. Which was the Old Covenant.
Exodus 34:27 The LORD said to Moses,”Write these words, according to the tenor of these words I have made a Covenant with you and with Israel.”
verse 28 So He was there with the LORD forty days and forty nights, neither eating bread nor drank water. And He wrote on the tablets the words of the covenant the Ten Commandments.
That was the old Covenant.
We are in the New Covenant in
Luke 22:20 …..”This cup is the new covenant in My Blood which is shed for you.
He also gave us the great Commandment in
Math. 22:37 Jesus said to him:” You shall love the LORD God with all of your Heart and all of your soul, and all of your mind.
verse 38 “This is the first great commandment.
verse 39 “And the second is like it:” You shall love your neighbor as yourself.”
verse 40 “On these two commandment hang all the Law and the Prophets.Can you see what is so different then the Old? No Sabbath..
Exodus 31:16Therefore the Children of Israel shall keep the Sabbath, to observe the Sabbath throughout their generation as a perpetual covenant.
verse 17 It is a sign between Me and the children of Israel forever.
If I can remember it was taught to us to keep Sunday Holy and it was a Mortal Sin if you did not, unless you were sick etc.
It was never for us to begin with. Along with keeping the trinity how wrong can it get. Besides how you adore the Pope, Christ here on earth you call him. Then on good Friday you kiss the Cross, it is called Veneration of the cross. Nice….
The gospel is the good news which is what? That Christ died for us and now we are under Faith in Ephesians which I quoted. Your Tradition is the trinity which is a man made doctrine and not of God. You are forgetting that we were Catholics at one time, and believe you me, I am forever thankful to God that He called us out of that Church. Amen and Amen
Irene
Irene,You did a lot of typing. But I missed the part where you explained exactly WHAT you think 2 Thess. 2:15 is actually saying.
You don't LIKE that it says TRADITIONS….do you?
February 15, 2010 at 9:00 pm#178133Catholic Apologist
ParticipantQuote (terraricca @ Feb. 16 2010,03:56) CA
i am glad the middle ages are gone ,are they??
Sounds like you prefer the utter wickedness of American and Western society…yes?February 15, 2010 at 9:07 pm#178137NickHassan
ParticipantHi CA,
Philosophical musings waste everybody's time..
All must repent and come to Jesus.
No church can save youFebruary 15, 2010 at 9:07 pm#178139karmarie
ParticipantQuote (CatholicApologist @ Feb. 16 2010,08:00) Quote (terraricca @ Feb. 16 2010,03:56) CA
i am glad the middle ages are gone ,are they??
Sounds like you prefer the utter wickedness of American and Western society…yes?
Hi CA and welcome back
Have to agree with you there!February 15, 2010 at 9:27 pm#178151Elizabeth
ParticipantQuote (CatholicApologist @ Feb. 16 2010,03:23) Quote (Elizabeth @ Feb. 15 2010,23:28) CA On 2. Jesus said, it is tradition that keeps us from understanding truth, Mat. 15:9
On 3. Aren't Protestant, churches that came out of the Catholic church? Do they not “basically” teach the same doctrine?
On 4. There are two wrongs in your statement, and you don't even recognize them; One; no human being is worth veneration. Two; the pope is father of no child, at least he shouldn't be.
On 5. 2Ti 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
On 6. Like what?
On 7. Early “Christians”, first Century, had already erred from the apostolic teachings.
On 8. You know that Jesus was referring to all the extras the Pharisees had added to the Law.
On 9. The papacy was self appointed and self crowned, it is in no way the succession of the apostles, in fact, it was the emperor Justinian who in 533 AD decided that only the pope of Rome, for there were many popes/bishops, should hold that title, and be the “head” of all clergy.
On 10. You forgot to mention which scripture says that.
On 11. ?
On 12. What did Peter interpret? Bibles weren't available for many Centuries to come.
On 13. You are really hung up on tradition. What “universal” church, and instituted by whom? Constantine?
On 14. The church fathers appealed to whose scripture, their own? why did the “church fathers” forbid the reading of scriptures, punishable by death? and who where the heretics, all who disagreed with the church doctrine? Rev. 13:15?
On 15. Yes, as long as you refer to the tradition of the teaching of the apostles, it's a good tradition.
On 16. As long as they are in line with the written word, there should be no problem.
On 17. Well, you're wrong, Eze 18:4 Behold, all souls are mine; as the soul of the father, so also the soul of the son is mine: the soul that sinneth, it shall die.
On 18. ?
On 19. Jesus was born a Jew, he had to obey the law, not until he died on the cross, did the new covenant come into effect.
On 20. 2Pe 1:19 We have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well that ye take heed, as unto a light that shineth in a dark place, until the day dawn, and the day star arise in your hearts:
2Pe 1:20 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.
2Pe 1:21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.On 21. That depends on the coin, does it not?
On 22. Is that why the Catholic church has written her own doctrines?
On 23. It should be apostolic, but, is that why Paul wrote this?
Gal 1:6 ¶ I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:
Gal 1:7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
Have you ever read these scriptures?
Gal 1:8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
Gal 1:9 As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.On 24. If you were ever to read the bible, not the popes, you would find out real quick what the problem is.
You ask, “is the Bible the only infallible authority”? the answer is YES!
Georg
Hi Georg,Let's start with the first point you take issue with.
2. Tradition can't be separated from the Bible; that would be like trying to separate hydrogen atoms from a water molecule.
You say – “On 2. Jesus said, it is tradition that keeps us from understanding truth, Mat. 15:9”
Go read Mat. 15:9. Jesus is speaking of the “traditions of MEN”
You must have taken a scissors and cut 2 Thess. 2:15 out of your Bible:
“Therefore, brethren, stand fast; and hold the traditions which you have learned, whether by word, or by our epistle.”
You are commanded to hold to the holy traditions.
Repent and believe the gospel.
CALook again, Paul is talking about what he has taught them or written to them, “whether by word, OR BY OUR EPISTLE”.
Mat 15:1 ¶ Then came to Jesus scribes and Pharisees, which were of Jerusalem, saying,
Mat 15:2 Why do thy disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? for they wash not their hands when they eat bread.
Mat 15:3 But he answered and said unto them, Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition?This is what Mat. 15:9 is referring to.
Apparently you agree with me on the rest.
Georg
February 15, 2010 at 10:01 pm#178163Catholic Apologist
ParticipantQuote (Elizabeth @ Feb. 16 2010,08:27) Quote (CatholicApologist @ Feb. 16 2010,03:23) Elizabeth,Feb. wrote:Hi Georg,
Let's start with the first point you take issue with.
2. Tradition can't be separated from the Bible; that would be like trying to separate hydrogen atoms from a water molecule.
You say – “On 2. Jesus said, it is tradition that keeps us from understanding truth, Mat. 15:9”
Go read Mat. 15:9. Jesus is speaking of the “traditions of MEN”
You must have taken a scissors and cut 2 Thess. 2:15 out of your Bible:
“Therefore, brethren, stand fast; and hold the traditions which you have learned, whether by word, or by our epistle.”
You are commanded to hold to the holy traditions.
Repent and believe the gospel.
CALook again, Paul is talking about what he has taught them or written to them, “whether by word, OR BY OUR EPISTLE”.
Mat 15:1 ¶ Then came to Jesus scribes and Pharisees, which were of Jerusalem, saying,
Mat 15:2 Why do thy disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? for they wash not their hands when they eat bread.
Mat 15:3 But he answered and said unto them, Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition?This is what Mat. 15:9 is referring to.
Apparently you agree with me on the rest.
Georg
Georg,Didn't think I'd see the day when you would agree with the Church (again…why did you apostasize?).
You wrote:
“Look again, Paul is talking about what he has taught them or written to them, “whether by word, OR BY OUR EPISTLE”.”
Alright…we're making progress.
So you are agreeing that Paul didn't write EVERYTHING down in Scripture. Some things he handed on “BY WORD” only. Hmmm….
So I guess I want to know which Sacred Oral Traditions you currently hold? How do you substantiate their authenticity as coming through the apostles down to the present day?
February 15, 2010 at 10:06 pm#178165NickHassan
ParticipantQuote (CatholicApologist @ Feb. 16 2010,08:00) Quote (terraricca @ Feb. 16 2010,03:56) CA
i am glad the middle ages are gone ,are they??
Sounds like you prefer the utter wickedness of American and Western society…yes?
Hi CA,
So what of the paedophilic priests who are rampant within your lofty walls?Is this wickedness not the worst and most cruel kind?
February 15, 2010 at 11:04 pm#178179terraricca
ParticipantCA
Quote (CatholicApologist @ Feb. 16 2010,08:00)
Quote (terraricca @ Feb. 16 2010,03:56)
CA
i am glad the middle ages are gone ,are they??Sounds like you prefer the utter wickedness of American and Western society…yes?
no,i like truth and Godly devotion,and in no way associate my name to any organization who covers up wickedness and proclaim it selves the church of God.
your question to me looks more like do you prefer evil over Satan
February 16, 2010 at 12:31 am#178242Catholic Apologist
ParticipantQuote (terraricca @ Feb. 16 2010,10:04) CA
Quote (CatholicApologist @ Feb. 16 2010,08:00)
Quote (terraricca @ Feb. 16 2010,03:56)
CA
i am glad the middle ages are gone ,are they??Sounds like you prefer the utter wickedness of American and Western society…yes?
no,i like truth and Godly devotion,and in no way associate my name to any organization who covers up wickedness and proclaim it selves the church of God.
your question to me looks more like do you prefer evil over Satan
No. My question was fine.You were eschewing the time period called the “Middle Ages”. You made it sound as though you thought the “Modern Age” was more enlightened in some way….like you were glad you didn't live in those times.
So yes, it did seem as though you preferred this godless age to that one.
You don't like looking silly do you?
February 16, 2010 at 12:47 am#178252NickHassan
ParticipantHi CA,
Worshiping bread and wine and men and women and their teachings is unlikely to bring much favour with Almighty God.February 16, 2010 at 12:17 pm#178340Elizabeth
ParticipantQuote (CatholicApologist @ Feb. 16 2010,09:01) Quote (Elizabeth @ Feb. 16 2010,08:27) Quote (CatholicApologist @ Feb. 16 2010,03:23) Elizabeth,Feb. wrote:Hi Georg,
Let's start with the first point you take issue with.
2. Tradition can't be separated from the Bible; that would be like trying to separate hydrogen atoms from a water molecule.
You say – “On 2. Jesus said, it is tradition that keeps us from understanding truth, Mat. 15:9”
Go read Mat. 15:9. Jesus is speaking of the “traditions of MEN”
You must have taken a scissors and cut 2 Thess. 2:15 out of your Bible:
“Therefore, brethren, stand fast; and hold the traditions which you have learned, whether by word, or by our epistle.”
You are commanded to hold to the holy traditions.
Repent and believe the gospel.
CALook again, Paul is talking about what he has taught them or written to them, “whether by word, OR BY OUR EPISTLE”.
Mat 15:1 ¶ Then came to Jesus scribes and Pharisees, which were of Jerusalem, saying,
Mat 15:2 Why do thy disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? for they wash not their hands when they eat bread.
Mat 15:3 But he answered and said unto them, Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition?This is what Mat. 15:9 is referring to.
Apparently you agree with me on the rest.
Georg
Georg,Didn't think I'd see the day when you would agree with the Church (again…why did you apostasize?).
You wrote:
“Look again, Paul is talking about what he has taught them or written to them, “whether by word, OR BY OUR EPISTLE”.”
Alright…we're making progress.
So you are agreeing that Paul didn't write EVERYTHING down in Scripture. Some things he handed on “BY WORD” only. Hmmm….
So I guess I want to know which Sacred Oral Traditions you currently hold? How do you substantiate their authenticity as coming through the apostles down to the present day?
No CAWe were talking about “tradition”, lets not change the subject.
Georg
February 16, 2010 at 12:20 pm#178342Elizabeth
ParticipantQuote (CatholicApologist @ Feb. 16 2010,11:31) Quote (terraricca @ Feb. 16 2010,10:04) CA
Quote (CatholicApologist @ Feb. 16 2010,08:00)
Quote (terraricca @ Feb. 16 2010,03:56)
CA
i am glad the middle ages are gone ,are they??Sounds like you prefer the utter wickedness of American and Western society…yes?
no,i like truth and Godly devotion,and in no way associate my name to any organization who covers up wickedness and proclaim it selves the church of God.
your question to me looks more like do you prefer evil over Satan
No. My question was fine.You were eschewing the time period called the “Middle Ages”. You made it sound as though you thought the “Modern Age” was more enlightened in some way….like you were glad you didn't live in those times.
So yes, it did seem as though you preferred this godless age to that one.
You don't like looking silly do you?
CAI believe terraricca was referring to the time when the Catholic church persecuted and killed all that disagreed with her.
Georg
February 16, 2010 at 12:32 pm#178344terraricca
Participantgeorg
you right that s what i refer to ,i guess since CA is catholic ,this would not come to his mind,
almost 1200 years of abuse,crimes,deceit,lies,accumulation of earthly wealth(Satan gift)without love of God.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.