Trinity Debate – Zechariah 14

Subject: Zechariah 14 proves the Trinity Doctrine
Date: March 22 2008
Debaters:  Is 1: 18 & t8


Is 1: 18

This is my fourth and final post in this debate. I may post a final wrap-up of the last four posts and allow t8 to do the same, if he is amenable. People can make their own minds up as whose posts have been the most persuasive, who has been most faithful to the sciptures. I thought I would save what I consider to be the strongest proof text for last. The passage I have selected is Zechariah chapter 14, it reads as follows:

Zechariah 14
1Behold, a day is coming for the LORD when the spoil taken from you will be divided among you.
2For I will gather all the nations against Jerusalem to battle, and the city will be captured, the houses plundered, the women ravished and half of the city exiled, but the rest of the people will not be cut off from the city.
3Then the LORD will go forth and fight against those nations, as when He fights on a day of battle.
4In that day His feet will stand on the Mount of Olives, which is in front of Jerusalem on the east; and the Mount of Olives will be split in its middle from east to west by a very large valley, so that half of the mountain will move toward the north and the other half toward the south.
5You will flee by the valley of My mountains, for the valley of the mountains will reach to Azel; yes, you will flee just as you fled before the earthquake in the days of Uzziah king of Judah Then the LORD, my God, will come, and all the holy ones with Him!
6In that day there will be no light; the luminaries will dwindle.
7For it will be a unique day which is known to the LORD, neither day nor night, but it will come about that at evening time there will be light.
8And in that day living waters will flow out of Jerusalem, half of them toward the eastern sea and the other half toward the western sea; it will be in summer as well as in winter.
9And the LORD will be king over all the earth; in that day the LORD will be the only one, and His name the only one.
10All the land will be changed into a plain from Geba to Rimmon south of Jerusalem; but Jerusalem will rise and remain on its site from Benjamin’s Gate as far as the place of the First Gate to the Corner Gate, and from the Tower of Hananel to the king’s wine presses.
11People will live in it, and there will no longer be a curse, for Jerusalem will dwell in security.
12Now this will be the plague with which the LORD will strike all the peoples who have gone to war against Jerusalem; their flesh will rot while they stand on their feet, and their eyes will rot in their sockets, and their tongue will rot in their mouth.
13It will come about in that day that a great panic from the LORD will fall on them; and they will seize one another’s hand, and the hand of one will be lifted against the hand of another.
14Judah also will fight at Jerusalem; and the wealth of all the surrounding nations will be gathered, gold and silver and garments in great abundance.
15So also like this plague will be the plague on the horse, the mule, the camel, the donkey and all the cattle that will be in those camps.
16Then it will come about that any who are left of all the nations that went against Jerusalem will go up from year to year to worship the King, the LORD of hosts, and to celebrate the Feast of Booths.
17And it will be that whichever of the families of the earth does not go up to Jerusalem to worship the King, the LORD of hosts, there will be no rain on them.
18If the family of Egypt does not go up or enter, then no rain will fall on them; it will be the plague with which the LORD smites the nations who do not go up to celebrate the Feast of Booths.
19This will be the punishment of Egypt, and the punishment of all the nations who do not go up to celebrate the Feast of Booths.
20In that day there will be inscribed on the bells of the horses, “HOLY TO THE LORD ” And the cooking pots in the LORD’S house will be like the bowls before the altar.
21Every cooking pot in Jerusalem and in Judah will be holy to the LORD of hosts; and all who sacrifice will come and take of them and boil in them And there will no longer be a Canaanite in the house of the LORD of hosts in that day.

Question: Who is the central figure in view here? Who specifically is this person designated “YHWH”? The Father? Yeshua?….

It’s my contention this person is Yeshua. This chapter in Zechariah is, of course, overtly prophetic of the second coming, the outpouring of his wrath on the wicked who have survived the tribulation (the “nations”) and have foolishly decided to wage war with Him as well as His millennial reign from Mt Zion in Jerusalem. Moreover, none of the things described in the chapter are predicted to be fulfilled by the Father in the New Testament (hereafter designated NT). Zechariah is a book that is replete with references to the Messiah; a triumphant king humbly riding a donkey (9:9), they will look to me, the one they have pierced (12:10), sold for 30 pieces of silver (11:12-13), His disciples would be “scattered” after His death (13:7). So it naturally follows that Zechariah is also messianic, the context confirms this. The detail given in the Chapter 14 passage about the person (the King) and the era in which He inhabits the Earth aligns tightly to much of the eschatological (end times) scripture pertaining to Yeshua in other parts of the Bible, especially that found in Revelation.

As a small aside, in Acts 1:11 we are told that Yeshua will return in “just the same way as you have watched Him go into heaven”.

Acts 1:9-11
9And after He had said these things, He was lifted up while they were looking on, and a cloud received Him out of their sight. 10And as they were gazing intently into the sky while He was going, behold, two men in white clothing stood beside them. 11They also said, “Men of Galilee, why do you stand looking into the sky? This Jesus, who has been taken up from you into heaven, will come in just the same way as you have watched Him go into heaven.” 12Then they returned to Jerusalem from the mount called Olivet, which is near Jerusalem, a Sabbath day’s journey away.

Yeshua ascended from the Mount of Olives and the angel affirmed that He will return “in just the same manner”. Zech 14:4 tells us that YHWH’s feet will stand on the very same spot; the Mt of Olives.

Zechariah 14:4
4And his feet shall stand in that day upon the mount of Olives, which is before Jerusalem on the east, and the mount of Olives shall cleave in the midst thereof toward the east and toward the west, and there shall be a very great valley; and half of the mountain shall remove toward the north, and half of it toward the south.

“the old traditional opinion is not improbable, that our Lord shall come again to judge the earth, where He left the earth, near the place of His Agony and Crucifixion for us. So shall “the Feet” of God literally, “stand upon the Mount of Olives.”
Source: http://bibletools.org/….s

Curious….

Okay let me try to illustrate some of the commonalities between what is written of YHWH in Zech 14:1-4 and what is written of Yeshua elsewhere in the Bible, passages that make Yeshua the only legitimate candidate for the person we read about in Zech 14. Rather than comprehensively expound this chapter (which I’m not qualified to do) I’ll just let some key verses and their parallel scriptures speak for themselves, readers can draw their own conclusions.

Zechariah 14:1-4 describe YHWH “coming” to Earth, before and after His ascension Yeshua many times declared He is coming again:

Zechariah 14
1Behold, a day is coming for the LORD when the spoil taken from you will be divided among you.
2For I will gather all the nations against Jerusalem to battle, and the city will be captured, the houses plundered, the women ravished and half of the city exiled, but the rest of the people will not be cut off from the city.
3Then the LORD will go forth and fight against those nations, as when He fights on a day of battle.
4In that day His feet will stand on the Mount of Olives, which is in front of Jerusalem on the east; and the Mount of Olives will be split in its middle from east to west by a very large valley, so that half of the mountain will move toward the north and the other half toward the south.

CF.

Matthew 24:30
30″And then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in the sky, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the SON OF MAN COMING ON THE CLOUDS OF THE SKY with power and great glory. (cf. Matt 16:27, 24:37; Mark 8:38, 13:26; Luke 21:27)

Revelation 3:11
11I am coming quickly; hold fast what you have, so that no one will take your crown.

Revelation 22:7
7″And behold, I am coming quickly Blessed is he who heeds the words of the prophecy of this book.”

Revelation 22:12
“Behold, I am coming quickly, and My reward is with Me, to render to every man according to what he has done.

Revelation 22:20
He who testifies to these things says, “Yes, I am coming quickly ” Amen Come, Lord Jesus.

The apostles, of course, were expecting and prophesied Yeshua’s return: 

Matthew 24:3
3As He was sitting on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to Him privately, saying, “Tell us, when will these things happen, and what will be the sign of Your coming, and of the end of the age?”

1 Thessalonians 3:13
To the end he may stablish your hearts unblameable in holiness before God, even our Father, at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ with all his saints.

1 Timothy 6:14
That you keep the commandment without stain or reproach until the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ

2 Timothy 1:10
10but now has been revealed by the appearing of our Savior Christ Jesus, who abolished death and brought life and immortality to light through the gospel

2 Timothy 4:1
1I solemnly charge you in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus, who is to judge the living and the dead, and by His appearing and His kingdom:

2 Timothy 4:8
8in the future there is laid up for me the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous Judge, will award to me on that day; and not only to me, but also to all who have loved His appearing

Titus 2:13-14
13looking for the blessed hope and the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Christ Jesus, 14who gave Himself for us to redeem us from every lawless deed, and to purify for Himself a people for His own possession, zealous for good deeds.

Revelation 1:7
7BEHOLD, HE IS COMING WITH THE CLOUDS, and every eye will see Him, even those who pierced Him; and all the tribes of the earth will mourn over Him. So it is to be. Amen.

Zech 14:3-4 and 14:12 describe YHWH in the role of a punisher/avenger of “nations” (v2) , when Yeshua does come it has been foretold that He will also come in the role as punisher/avenger: 

Zechariah 14:12
12And this shall be the plague wherewith the LORD will smite all the people that have fought against Jerusalem; Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet, and their eyes shall consume away in their holes, and their tongue shall consume away in their mouth.

CF.

2 Thessalonians 2:8
8Then that lawless one will be revealed whom the Lord will slay with the breath of His mouth and bring to an end by the appearance of His coming;

Revelation 2:16
16’Therefore repent; or else I am coming to you quickly, and I will make war against them with the sword of My mouth.

Revelation 17:14
14″These will wage war against the Lamb, and the Lamb will overcome them, because He is Lord of lords and King of kings, and those who are with Him are the called and chosen and faithful.”

Revelation 19:15
15And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.

(also compare Rev 2:16 and 19:15 with Isa 11:4)

Zechariah 14:5 declares that when YHWH comes He will be accompanied by His saints, this is also true of Yeshua when He comes again: 

Zechariah 14:5
5And ye shall flee to the valley of the mountains; for the valley of the mountains shall reach unto Azal: yea, ye shall flee, like as ye fled from before the earthquake in the days of Uzziah king of Judah: and the LORD [YHWH] my God shall come, and all the saints with thee.

CF.

1 Thessalonians 3:13
To the end he may stablish your hearts unblameable in holiness before God, even our Father, at the coming of ourLord Jesus Christ with all his saints.

Jude 1
14And Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these, saying, Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints.

Revelation 19:13-14
13And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God. 14And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean.

Zechariah 14:9, 16-17 testifies that YHWH will rule the nations from Jerusalem (also see Isa 24:23, Micah 4:7), other scripture reveals that Yeshua will rule as King on Earth 

Zechariah 14:9, 16-17
9And the LORD [YHWH] shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall there be one LORD [YHWH], and his name one….16And it shall come to pass, that every one that is left of all the nations which came against Jerusalem shall even go up from year to year to worship the Kingthe LORD [YHWH] of hosts, and to keep the feast of tabernacles. 17And it shall be, that whoso will not come up of all the families of the earth unto Jerusalem to worship the Kingthe LORD [YHWH] of hosts, even upon them shall be no rain.

Isaiah 24:23
23Then the moon will be abashed and the sun ashamed, For the LORD of hosts will reign on Mount Zion and in Jerusalem, And His glory will be before His elders.

Micah 4:7
7″I will make the lame a remnant; And the outcasts a strong nation, And the LORD will reign over them in Mount Zion; From now on and forever

CF.

Daniel 7:13-14
13″I kept looking in the night visions, And behold, with the clouds of heaven one like a Son of Man was coming, and He came up to the Ancient of Days and was presented before Him. 14″And to Him was given dominion, glory and a kingdom, that all the peoples, nations and men of every language might serve Him. His dominion is an everlasting dominion, which will not pass away; and His kingdom is one which will not be destroyed.

Daniel 7:27
27’Then the sovereignty, the dominion and the greatness of all the kingdoms under the whole heaven will be given to the people of the saints of the Highest One; His kingdom will be an everlasting kingdom, and all the dominions will serve and obey Him.’

Matthew 25:34
Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world:

2 Timothy 2:10-12
10For this reason I endure all things for the sake of those who are chosen, so that they also may obtain the salvation which is in Christ Jesus and with it eternal glory. 11It is a trustworthy statement: For if we died with Him, we will also live with Him; 12If we endure, we will also reign with Him; If we deny Him, He also will deny us;

Revelation 12:5
5And she gave birth to a son, a male child, who is to rule all the nations with a rod of iron; and her child was caught up to God and to His throne.

Revelation 17:14
These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful.

Revelation 20:4
4Then I saw thrones, and they sat on them, and judgment was given to them And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony of Jesus and because of the word of God, and those who had not worshiped the beast or his image, and had not received the mark on their forehead and on their hand; and they came to life and reigned with Christ for a thousand years.

Moreover, He will do this from the throne of David (a throne located in Jerusalem), which His Father will establish: 

2 Samuel 7:12-13
12″When your days are complete and you lie down with your fathers, I will raise up your descendant after you, who will come forth from you, and I will establish his kingdom.13″He shall build a house for My name, and I will establishthe throne of his kingdom forever.

Isaiah 9:6-7
6For a child will be born to us, a son will be given to us; And the government will rest on His shoulders; And His name will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God,
Eternal Father, Prince of Peace. 7There will be no end to the increase of His government or of peace, On the throne of David and over his kingdom, To establish it and to uphold it with justice and righteousness

Isaiah 16:5
A throne will even be established in lovingkindness, And a judge will sit on it in faithfulness in the tent ofDavid; Moreover, he will seek justice And be prompt in righteousness

Luke 1:32
32″He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High; and the Lord God will give Him the throne of His father David; 33and He will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and His kingdom will have no end.”

So it’s quite apparent that Zechariah 14:1-4 prophetically describes Yeshua’s coming to Earth, the outpouring of His retribution upon the wicked “nations” and His Kingly reign from Mt Zion in Jerusalem, where He will be seated on David’s throne. Jerusalem, Mt Zion, David’s throne – these are manifestly physical locations, on Earth! The NT does not tesify of the Father ever residing on Earth. In actual fact Yeshua will not hand over the Kingdom to His Father until all rule, authority and power has been abolished, He must reign until all enemies have been put under His feet  (1 Cor 15:24-25). This will not occur until after Satan has been loosed a little while to deceive the nations one last time (Rev 20:7), and this will not happen until after the 1000 year reign of Christ has consummated. The Father, evidently, will still be in Heaven during this time. But here’s the important point I’ve been driving at  – Yeshua is explicitly called YHWH on twelve separate occasions in Zechariah 14; verses 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 20 and  21. Would the Bible ascribe the exclusively divine name to someone who is not YHWH?? I think not! That would be grossly misleading, to say the least. On this point it may be argued by t8 that Yeshua is assigned this name on account of His role as YHWH’s agent, i.e. YHWH, Yeshua’s Father, is ruling through Him therefore it is rightful that he bears His Father’s name. However this can be debunked by appealing to the complete absence of a parallel example. Nowhere else in scripture can we find an instance where an agent of YHWH is bestowed the name of YHWH (or any name for that matter) because he/she is acting on His behalf. Moses and Abraham often acted as YHWH’s agent, yet they are certainly never described as YHWH. This is also true of the NT believers, Paul and Peter were used by God but they are nowhere called God in the NT. Taken to a further extreme, any spirit-filled believer has at some time been ‘used’ by God and yet it’s more than inappropriate for us to be called YHWH, everyone knows this. What’s more, any notion that the law of agency applies to Yeshua in Zech 14 can be utterly dispelled upon reading verse 16 & 17:

Zechariah 14:16-17
16And it shall come to pass, that every one that is left of all the nations which came against Jerusalem shall even go up from year to year to worship the King, the LORD of hosts, and to keep the feast of tabernacles.
17And it shall be, that whoso will not come up of all the families of the earth unto Jerusalem to worshipthe King, the LORD of hosts, even upon them shall be no rain.

The “King, the Lord of Hosts” will be worshipped by the nations, and refusal to do this will result in dire consequences for them. Verses 20-21 make it plain that this worship is is highest form, that reserved only for YHWH. It goes without saying that YHWH cannot be worshipped by proxy, that is overt blasphemy, idolatry. No one may rightly recieve worship on God’s behalf, it’s ludicrous to even entertain this idea.

In summary, in Zechariah chapter 14 we see that Yeshua is in fact YHWH. He is the only legitimate candidate for the central figure in the Chapter based on the detail given in therein compared with other passages concerning the second coming (with His saints – Rev 19:14), Armageddon battle (Rev 19:11-19) and millennial reign as King from Mt Zion (Rev 20:4). It’s also important to understand that these things are not attributed to the Father in the NT, only Yeshua. Yeshua is explicitly called “LORD” (YHWH) no less than 12 times in the passage (verses 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 20 and  21) and “LORD (YHWH) of Hosts” on four occasions (verses 16, 17 and 21 [twice]). It seems obvious to me that the Holy Spirit Who inspired the book would not set out to deceive or confuse readers on the matter of Who YHWH is by assigning this name to the recipient who was not YHWH, therefore I conclude that Yeshua is called YHWH because He is YHWH!

Three questions for t8:

1. Is the central figure in Zechariah 14 described as YHWH in fact Yeshua? If not, precisely who is it? And what is you scriptural evidence for your choice?

2. Is Yeshua assigned the exclusively divine name “LORD” (i.e. YHWH) multiple times in this chapter?

3. If you agree that Zechariah 14 describes Yeshua, and that He is indeed called YHWH in this chapter, on what grounds do you argue that He is not YHWH when in this passage plainly says that He is??

Blessings


t8

The answer to your post is easily summed up in these 2 verses of which there are numerous complimentary verses I could quote if I wanted.

2 Corinthians 5:18-19
18 Now all these things are from God, who reconciled us to Himself through Christ and gave us the ministry of reconciliation,

19 namely, that God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself

God was in Christ. That is the answer. Just as God was in Christ when he came to earth, so God will be in him when he comes again.

So God will come, through Christ.

Remember God is invisible, so it’s not like he will come in his own body where you will be able to touch him. God is invisible, he is a spirit, and he is bigger than you can imagine.

God will come to earth through the Christ who is Jesus.

Likewise God can reside in us too.

To think that God is a being wholly contained in a body is bit silly. God will be in Christ and he will still be present outside of Christ too.

God does all these things, and he sends his servants to do his bidding. Simple as that.

This also explains how God is the only savoiur and sends Christ to do his will thereby saving us through Christ.

This is God’s will.


 

You can read the rest of the discussion here:


Discussion

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 20 posts - 101 through 120 (of 407 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #134240
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Lightenup wrote:

    Quote
    Tim Elston, a doctoral candidate of the New Testament at Denver Seminary with a BA in Linguistics from the University of Oregon, explains it thus:

    The absence of the article before “God” in John 1:1 is meant to indicate that “God” is the predicate nominative rather than the subject of the phrase. Because Greek does not use word order to indicate subject/object/predicate distinctions, one of its optional features is, where there is ambiguity in a subject-predicate nominative construction, to indicate the subject by preceding it with a definite article and to indicate the predicate nominative by the absence of a definite article. This is called “Colwell's Rule.”

    Hi Kathi,
    You have made this very interesting. But please note that Elston first says that the grammar he proposes is an “optional feature” and then calls it “Colwell's rule.” Well, which is it? Is it “optional” or is it a “rule?”

    Then Elston says,

    Quote
    This rule is evident at 1 John 4:8, “God is love.” The Greek reads: ho [the] Theos [God] agape [love] estin [is]. If agape had the definite article, instead of Theos, then the correct translation would be “Love is God.” But the definite article on Theos indicates “God” as the subject, and the absence of the article on agape indicates agape as the predicate nominative; thus, “God is love.” This amounts to a qualification of God rather than a deification of love.

    Elston's example from 1 John 4:8 is not convincing because the verse is written in the Greek exactly as it is translated in our English Bibles. In other words, 1 John 4:8 is not an example at all.

    Then you said:

    Quote
    If it said “God was the word” then “the word” would be in the accusative case-the direct object which it is not, it is in the nominative case with the article making it the subject.  The word here in Greek is logos and not logov.

    You assume to be a rule what Elston himself says is an “optional feature.” The definite article is used in the first reference to God which is all that is needed. Therefore, the article is understood in the second reference to God.

    Ἐν ἀρχῇ ἦν ὁ λόγος, καὶ ὁ λόγος ἦν πρὸς τὸν θεόν, καὶ θεὸς ἦν ὁ λόγος.

    Please note that I highlighted in bold the definite article with the first reference to “God.” This means that in the second reference to “God” the article is understood. Therefore, the translation “And God was the Word” is both literal and grammatically acceptable. Elston admits that his approach is an “optional feature.”

    Lightenup said:

    Quote
    Titus 2:13, I have no problem seeing Jesus as our great God and Savior.  I see scriptures saying that He is our great God but I do not see scriptures saying that He is our great Most High God.  There is a difference.

    There is no difference between Most High God” and “Great God.” You are parsing language in such a way as to fit your presuppositions. Your treatment of language appears suspicious. The word  “great” is “megas” and is superlative,

    Examples:

    Quote
    But there was a certain man called Simon, who previously practised sorcery in the city and astonished the people of Samaria, claiming that he was someone great, to whom they all gave heed, from the least to the greatest (Acts 8:9-10)

    and,

    Quote
    None shalll teach his neighbor, and none his brother, saying, “Know the Lord,” for they all shall know me, from the least of them to the greatest of them (Heb. 8:11)

    The words “great” and “greatest” are the same word “megas” (see Strong's # 3173, 3176, 3187). Paul knew nothing of which you are talking about. Jesus Christ is the “greatest” God. I must give you credit for making it interesting though.

    thinker

    #134242
    942767
    Participant

    Quote (thethinker @ June 19 2009,03:06)

    Quote (942767 @ June 16 2009,10:22)
    Hi thethinker:

    For unto us a child is born, and unto us a son is given. And the government shall be upon His shoulder. And HIS NAME shall be called Wonderful. Counselor, MIGHTY GOD, EVERLASTING FATHER, PRINCE OF PEACE…. (Isaiah 9:6)

    Please explain Isaiah 9:6.

    The scripture states that his “name” shall be called… Not “he” he shall be called…

    This is what Strong's has for “name”:

    Quote
    Outline of Biblical Usage 1) name

    a) name

    b) reputation, fame, glory

    c) the Name (as designation of God)

    d) memorial, monument

    Hebrews 1:3 states that Jesus is the express image of God's person.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    Marty,

    What kind of logic is this? God told Moses that He is the “I AM.” Then He said, “This is My name forever” (Exodus 3:15). Are you saying that Christ is not Savior because the name “Jesus” is only a name? By your own weird logic you must deny that God is “I AM” because it is merely a name.  ???

    thinker


    Hi thethinker:

    Is his name Jesus, or is it “wonderful”, “counselor”, “mighty God” …?

    Love in Christ,
    Marty

    #134248
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Marty said:

    Quote
    Hi thethinker:

    Is his name Jesus, or is it “wonderful”, “counselor”, “mighty God” …?

    Marty,
    Is God's name Jehovah, Adonai or Elohim?

    thinker

    #134262
    942767
    Participant

    Quote (thethinker @ June 23 2009,12:41)
    Marty said:

    Quote
    Hi thethinker:

    Is his name Jesus, or is it “wonderful”, “counselor”, “mighty God” …?

    Marty,
    Is God's name Jehovah, Adonai or Elohim?

    thinker


    He said His Name is YHWH.

    #134277
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (942767 @ June 23 2009,13:42)

    Quote (thethinker @ June 23 2009,12:41)
    Marty said:

    Quote
    Hi thethinker:

    Is his name Jesus, or is it “wonderful”, “counselor”, “mighty God” …?

    Marty,
    Is God's name Jehovah, Adonai or Elohim?

    thinker


    He said His Name is YHWH.


    God has many names. Who is Elohim and Adonai then?

    thinker

    #134281
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (thethinker @ June 22 2009,19:57)
    Lightenup wrote:

    Quote
    Tim Elston, a doctoral candidate of the New Testament at Denver Seminary with a BA in Linguistics from the University of Oregon, explains it thus:

    The absence of the article before “God” in John 1:1 is meant to indicate that “God” is the predicate nominative rather than the subject of the phrase. Because Greek does not use word order to indicate subject/object/predicate distinctions, one of its optional features is, where there is ambiguity in a subject-predicate nominative construction, to indicate the subject by preceding it with a definite article and to indicate the predicate nominative by the absence of a definite article. This is called “Colwell's Rule.”

    Hi Kathi,
    You have made this very interesting. But please note that Elston first says that the grammar he proposes is an “optional feature” and then calls it “Colwell's rule.” Well, which is it? Is it “optional” or is it a “rule?”

    Then Elston says,

    Quote
    This rule is evident at 1 John 4:8, “God is love.” The Greek reads: ho [the] Theos [God] agape [love] estin [is]. If agape had the definite article, instead of Theos, then the correct translation would be “Love is God.” But the definite article on Theos indicates “God” as the subject, and the absence of the article on agape indicates agape as the predicate nominative; thus, “God is love.” This amounts to a qualification of God rather than a deification of love.

    Elston's example from 1 John 4:8 is not convincing because the verse is written in the Greek exactly as it is translated in our English Bibles. In other words, 1 John 4:8 is not an example at all.

    Then you said:

    Quote
    If it said “God was the word” then “the word” would be in the accusative case-the direct object which it is not, it is in the nominative case with the article making it the subject.  The word here in Greek is logos and not logov.

    You assume to be a rule what Elston himself says is an “optional feature.” The definite article is used in the first reference to God which is all that is needed. Therefore, the article is understood in the second reference to God.

    Ἐν ἀρχῇ ἦν ὁ λόγος, καὶ ὁ λόγος ἦν πρὸς τὸν θεόν, καὶ θεὸς ἦν ὁ λόγος.

    Please note that I highlighted in bold the definite article with the first reference to “God.” This means that in the second reference to “God” the article is understood. Therefore, the translation “And God was the Word” is both literal and grammatically acceptable. Elston admits that his approach is an “optional feature.”

    Lightenup said:

    Quote
    Titus 2:13, I have no problem seeing Jesus as our great God and Savior.  I see scriptures saying that He is our great God but I do not see scriptures saying that He is our great Most High God.  There is a difference.

    There is no difference between Most High God” and “Great God.” You are parsing language in such a way as to fit your presuppositions. Your treatment of language appears suspicious. The word  “great” is “megas” and is superlative,

    Examples:

    Quote
    But there was a certain man called Simon, who previously practised sorcery in the city and astonished the people of Samaria, claiming that he was someone great, to whom they all gave heed, from the least to the greatest (Acts 8:9-10)

    and,

    Quote
    None shalll teach his neighbor, and none his brother, saying, “Know the Lord,” for they all shall know me, from the least of them to the greatest of them (Heb. 8:11)

    The words “great” and “greatest” are the same word “megas” (see Strong's # 3173, 3176, 3187). Paul knew nothing of which you are talking about. Jesus Christ is the “greatest” God. I must give you credit for making it interesting though.

    thinker


    Thinker,
    The Greek does not go by word order, you know that don't you? Maybe you ought look up the Colwell's rule and learn about predicate nominatives. You might brush up on the accusative case while you are at it.

    Regarding Titus 2:13 none of the Bible translations translate that word as “greatest” even though it can be translated that if context requires it. So, that should show you that it does not mean “greatest” but it means “great” and that context does not require the word to be translated “greatest.” The great God and the Most High GOD are not equivalent. For instance, I could say that a man was great in the xyz company and that tells you that man was someone valuable to the company. If I said “that man is the most high in the xyz company” that has a different meaning and would mean that he was the top guy.

    Do you see the difference.

    Kathi

    #134290
    942767
    Participant

    Quote (thethinker @ June 23 2009,14:45)

    Quote (942767 @ June 23 2009,13:42)

    Quote (thethinker @ June 23 2009,12:41)
    Marty said:

    Quote
    Hi thethinker:

    Is his name Jesus, or is it “wonderful”, “counselor”, “mighty God” …?

    Marty,
    Is God's name Jehovah, Adonai or Elohim?

    thinker


    He said His Name is YHWH.


    God has many names. Who is Elohim and Adonai then?

    thinker


    Hi thethinker:

    Elohim and LORD are titles for God. His name is YHWH.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty

    #134315
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Marty said:

    Quote
    Hi thethinker:

    Elohim and LORD are titles for God.  His name is YHWH.

    Marty,
    Come on! A title is a name.

    Quote
    title: A characteristic or descriptive name (Funk and Wagnall's Dictionary)

    This is getting ridiculous. I am done with this particular point.

    thinker

    #134316
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Lightenup said:

    Quote
    Thinker,
    The Greek does not go by word order, you know that don't you?  Maybe you ought look up the Colwell's rule and learn about predicate nominatives.  You might brush up on the accusative case while you are at it.

    Kathi,
    Elston failed to prove his grammar. He said that it was an “optional feature” and then gives 1 John 4:8 as an example. I showed that 1 John 4:8 cannot be an example because of the word order. It's that simple. Yes I am aware that translation does not always go by word order.

    About Colwell's rule:

    Quote
    In the past, Trinitarians have argued that Colwell’s rule proves that the anarthrous theos in John 1:1c (the Word was God) must be taken as definite. They have done so to combat Arianism and modern day Jehovah’s Witnesses. The New World Translation, the official Bible of Jehovah’s Witnesses, translates John 1:1c as “the Word was a god.” So we can see why Trinitarian scholars would object to such a translation and instead argue for a definite theos, thus proving the deity of Christ in this passage. However, as Daniel Wallace has pointed out, simply appealing to Colwell’s rule alone does not prove that theos must be taken as definite.2 His rule would only say that if theos is definite then it would probably lack the article (and it does). But the reverse is not necessarily true. Simply lacking the article in this construction does not make the noun definite.

    http://www.apostolic.net/biblicalstudies/colwell.htm

    PLEASE NOTE THAT COLWELL'S RULE WAS DONE TO COMBAT ARIANISM. This is NOT how we are to approach grammar. John 1:1 combats Arainism without our help. It literally says, “And God was the Word.” This effectively condemns Arainism without the help of innovative, trinitarian grammars.

    Lightenup said:

    Quote
    Regarding  Titus 2:13 none of the Bible translations translate that word as “greatest” even though it can be translated that if context requires it….The great God and the Most High GOD are not equivalent.

    Paul knew nothing of a hierarchy of gods anywhere in his writings. So I doubt that the translators meant to say that “great” means less. 

    Lightenup said;

    Quote
    The great God and the Most High GOD are not equivalent.  For instance, I could say that a man was great in the xyz company and that tells you that man was someone valuable to the company.  If I said “that man is the most high in the xyz company” that has a different meaning and would mean that he was the top guy.

    Do you see the difference.

    I see the Lamb receiving the exact same honor, glory and praise as Him which you call the “Most High” God,

    Quote
    Worthy is the Lamb who was slain to receive power and riches and wisdom, and strength and honor and glory and blessing. And every creature which is in heaven and on earth and under the earth and such as are in the sea, and all that is in them, I heard saying: “Blessing and honor and glory and power be to Him who sits on the throne, and to the Lamb, forever and ever” (Rev. 5:12-14)

    If there is a hierarchy of gods in the new testament then why does the whole creation (accept you) give the Lamb the same honor, glory and power as it does to Him that sits upon the throne?

    thinker

    #134317
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi TT,
    Jesus the Lamb received honour?
    The one who receives is less that the one giving any honour. [Heb7]

    And make your mind up whether God is one or two or three…or….

    #134327
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 23 2009,21:09)
    Hi TT,
    Jesus the Lamb received honour?
    The one who receives is less that the one giving any honour. [Heb7]

    And make your mind up whether God is one or two or three…or….


    Nick,
    I don't understand your question about me making up my mind. God is a trinity. I speak only of the Father and the Son because it is the Son's identity and His relation to the Father that is disputed by many here.

    thinker

    #134361
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi TT,
    So let's start from the beginning.
    Where does scripture say God is a trinity ?

    #134375
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (thethinker @ June 23 2009,05:04)
    Lightenup said:

    Quote
    Thinker,
    The Greek does not go by word order, you know that don't you?  Maybe you ought look up the Colwell's rule and learn about predicate nominatives.  You might brush up on the accusative case while you are at it.

    Kathi,
    Elston failed to prove his grammar. He said that it was an “optional feature” and then gives 1 John 4:8 as an example. I showed that 1 John 4:8 cannot be an example because of the word order. It's that simple. Yes I am aware that translation does not always go by word order.

    About Colwell's rule:

    Quote
    In the past, Trinitarians have argued that Colwell’s rule proves that the anarthrous theos in John 1:1c (the Word was God) must be taken as definite. They have done so to combat Arianism and modern day Jehovah’s Witnesses. The New World Translation, the official Bible of Jehovah’s Witnesses, translates John 1:1c as “the Word was a god.” So we can see why Trinitarian scholars would object to such a translation and instead argue for a definite theos, thus proving the deity of Christ in this passage. However, as Daniel Wallace has pointed out, simply appealing to Colwell’s rule alone does not prove that theos must be taken as definite.2 His rule would only say that if theos is definite then it would probably lack the article (and it does). But the reverse is not necessarily true. Simply lacking the article in this construction does not make the noun definite.

    http://www.apostolic.net/biblicalstudies/colwell.htm

    PLEASE NOTE THAT COLWELL'S RULE WAS DONE TO COMBAT ARIANISM. This is NOT how we are to approach grammar. John 1:1 combats Arainism without our help. It literally says, “And God was the Word.” This effectively condemns Arainism without the help of innovative, trinitarian grammars.

    Lightenup said:

    Quote
    Regarding  Titus 2:13 none of the Bible translations translate that word as “greatest” even though it can be translated that if context requires it….The great God and the Most High GOD are not equivalent.

    Paul knew nothing of a hierarchy of gods anywhere in his writings. So I doubt that the translators meant to say that “great” means less. 

    Lightenup said;

    Quote
    The great God and the Most High GOD are not equivalent.  For instance, I could say that a man was great in the xyz company and that tells you that man was someone valuable to the company.  If I said “that man is the most high in the xyz company” that has a different meaning and would mean that he was the top guy.

    Do you see the difference.

    I see the Lamb receiving the exact same honor, glory and praise as Him which you call the “Most High” God,

    Quote
    Worthy is the Lamb who was slain to receive power and riches and wisdom, and strength and honor and glory and blessing. And every creature which is in heaven and on earth and under the earth and such as are in the sea, and all that is in them, I heard saying: “Blessing and honor and glory and power be to Him who sits on the throne, and to the Lamb, forever and ever” (Rev. 5:12-14)

    If there is a hierarchy of gods in the new testament then why does the whole creation (accept you) give the Lamb the same honor, glory and power as it does to Him that sits upon the throne?

    thinker


    Thinker,
    Who is speaking in this passage:

    Rev 3:12
    12 'He who overcomes, I will make him a pillar in the temple of My God, and he will not go out from it anymore; and I will write on him the name of My God, and the name of the city of My God, the new Jerusalem, which comes down out of heaven from My God, and My new name.
    NASU

    After you answer that, tell me if we should acknowledge that the speaker recognizes another as “His God”.

    If He recognizes another as “His God,” then I honor another as “His God.” I give both, the Father and the Son the same honor that they give each other.

    I honor them the same by believing in both, trusting both, and following both. I believe in the SON, I believe in the Father, I trust the Son, I trust the Father, I follow the Son, I follow the Father. I honor them the same.

    John 5:22-23
    22 “For not even the Father judges anyone, but He has given all judgment to the Son,
    23 so that all will honor the Son even as they honor the Father. He who does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent Him.
    NASU

    Kathi

    #134390
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Lightenup said:

    Quote
    Thinker,
    Who is speaking in this passage:

    Rev 3:12
    12 'He who overcomes, I will make him a pillar in the temple of My God, and he will not go out from it anymore; and I will write on him the name of My God, and the name of the city of My God, the new Jerusalem, which comes down out of heaven from My God, and My new name.
    NASU

    After you answer that, tell me if we should acknowledge that the speaker recognizes another as “His God”.  

    If He recognizes another as “His God,” then I honor another as “His God.”  I give both, the Father and the Son the same honor that they give each other.

    I honor them the same by believing in both, trusting both, and following both.  I believe in the SON, I believe in the Father, I trust the Son, I trust the Father, I follow the Son, I follow the Father.  I honor them the same.

    John 5:22-23
    22 “For not even the Father judges anyone, but He has given all judgment to the Son,
    23 so that all will honor the Son even as they honor the Father. He who does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent Him.
    NASU

    Kathi

    Kathi,
    You've lost me. I can't tell if you are an Arain or a Trinitarian or a mixture of both. I don't know how to reply to a person who says that Christ is less than the Most High God but yet claims to honor the Father and the Son the same. It does not compute for me. Sorry  ???  I find it easier to discourse with those who deny that Christ is a god of any kind and in any degree.

    thinker

    #134398
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi LU,
    Are you now a binity believer?
    That was the origin of trinity folly.

    #134447
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 23 2009,15:35)
    Hi LU,
    Are you now a binity believer?
    That was the origin of trinity folly.


    Nick,
    Please tell me what the definition of a binity believer is.
    Kathi

    #134448
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (thethinker @ June 23 2009,15:16)
    Lightenup said:

    Quote
    Thinker,
    Who is speaking in this passage:

    Rev 3:12
    12 'He who overcomes, I will make him a pillar in the temple of My God, and he will not go out from it anymore; and I will write on him the name of My God, and the name of the city of My God, the new Jerusalem, which comes down out of heaven from My God, and My new name.
    NASU

    After you answer that, tell me if we should acknowledge that the speaker recognizes another as “His God”.  

    If He recognizes another as “His God,” then I honor another as “His God.”  I give both, the Father and the Son the same honor that they give each other.

    I honor them the same by believing in both, trusting both, and following both.  I believe in the SON, I believe in the Father, I trust the Son, I trust the Father, I follow the Son, I follow the Father.  I honor them the same.

    John 5:22-23
    22 “For not even the Father judges anyone, but He has given all judgment to the Son,
    23 so that all will honor the Son even as they honor the Father. He who does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent Him.
    NASU

    Kathi

    Kathi,
    You've lost me. I can't tell if you are an Arain or a Trinitarian or a mixture of both. I don't know how to reply to a person who says that Christ is less than the Most High God but yet claims to honor the Father and the Son the same. It does not compute for me. Sorry  ???  I find it easier to discourse with those who deny that Christ is a god of any kind and in any degree.

    thinker


    Thinker,
    Would you please answer my question…who is the speaker in that passage in Revelations?

    I have been telling you that I am neither trinitarian nor am I arian. Are you finally getting it?

    Kathi

    #134450
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi LU,
    The first deception Satan led the early church into was that both the Father and the Son were God and that they were a single binity God.
    Having bravely gone thus far into folly some decided that perhaps the Spirit of God was another god in God and thence the trinity idea became orthodoxy.

    #134474
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 23 2009,22:53)
    Hi LU,
    The first deception Satan led the early church into was that both the Father and the Son were God and that they were a single binity God.
    Having bravely gone thus far into folly some decided that perhaps the Spirit of God was another god in God and thence the trinity idea became orthodoxy.


    Hi Nick,
    I don't think that fits me. I believe the Father and the Son are… GOD and Son of GOD. I believe that merely being the actual Son of GOD means that He shares the nature of GOD which is possibly a fullness of grace and truth. Having the very nature of GOD would automatically make Him the begotten God. IMO

    If one has the nature of GOD and authority over all things given to Him by the Most High GOD then I can trust Him, follow Him, and serve Him, and worship Him… I have acknowledged Him as God to me. Why can I trust Him, serve Him, follow Him, and worship Him? Because it pleases the most High GOD whom the Son follows and acknowledges to be His GOD and Father. Following any other would not please the Father. Obviously, I do not believe that the Son is the source of creation, that would be the Father and that makes the Father the only Most High GOD. I believe that the scriptures allow for acknowledging the Son as blessed by His Father to receive our worship, our trust, our loyalty. It pleases the Father for us to abide in His Son who abides in HIM (the Father).

    LU

    #134499
    Cindy
    Participant

    Kathi I was rather surprised that you honor the Father and the Son the same way. I do not. The Son does deserve honor, but not the same then the Father. You do know what it says in Ephesians 4:6 The Father is,above all. So all worship goes to the Father. The Father is the Almighty God while Jesus is the Mighty God. I do know that You do not believe in a trinity doctrine. What Nick said is interesting. I never knew about that. And I wish He would go into more details about it, were He learned of it.
    Love Irene

Viewing 20 posts - 101 through 120 (of 407 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2024 Heaven Net

Navigation

© 1999 - 2023 - Heaven Net
or

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

or

Create Account