Trinity Debate – Zechariah 14

Subject: Zechariah 14 proves the Trinity Doctrine
Date: March 22 2008
Debaters:  Is 1: 18 & t8


Is 1: 18

This is my fourth and final post in this debate. I may post a final wrap-up of the last four posts and allow t8 to do the same, if he is amenable. People can make their own minds up as whose posts have been the most persuasive, who has been most faithful to the sciptures. I thought I would save what I consider to be the strongest proof text for last. The passage I have selected is Zechariah chapter 14, it reads as follows:

Zechariah 14
1Behold, a day is coming for the LORD when the spoil taken from you will be divided among you.
2For I will gather all the nations against Jerusalem to battle, and the city will be captured, the houses plundered, the women ravished and half of the city exiled, but the rest of the people will not be cut off from the city.
3Then the LORD will go forth and fight against those nations, as when He fights on a day of battle.
4In that day His feet will stand on the Mount of Olives, which is in front of Jerusalem on the east; and the Mount of Olives will be split in its middle from east to west by a very large valley, so that half of the mountain will move toward the north and the other half toward the south.
5You will flee by the valley of My mountains, for the valley of the mountains will reach to Azel; yes, you will flee just as you fled before the earthquake in the days of Uzziah king of Judah Then the LORD, my God, will come, and all the holy ones with Him!
6In that day there will be no light; the luminaries will dwindle.
7For it will be a unique day which is known to the LORD, neither day nor night, but it will come about that at evening time there will be light.
8And in that day living waters will flow out of Jerusalem, half of them toward the eastern sea and the other half toward the western sea; it will be in summer as well as in winter.
9And the LORD will be king over all the earth; in that day the LORD will be the only one, and His name the only one.
10All the land will be changed into a plain from Geba to Rimmon south of Jerusalem; but Jerusalem will rise and remain on its site from Benjamin’s Gate as far as the place of the First Gate to the Corner Gate, and from the Tower of Hananel to the king’s wine presses.
11People will live in it, and there will no longer be a curse, for Jerusalem will dwell in security.
12Now this will be the plague with which the LORD will strike all the peoples who have gone to war against Jerusalem; their flesh will rot while they stand on their feet, and their eyes will rot in their sockets, and their tongue will rot in their mouth.
13It will come about in that day that a great panic from the LORD will fall on them; and they will seize one another’s hand, and the hand of one will be lifted against the hand of another.
14Judah also will fight at Jerusalem; and the wealth of all the surrounding nations will be gathered, gold and silver and garments in great abundance.
15So also like this plague will be the plague on the horse, the mule, the camel, the donkey and all the cattle that will be in those camps.
16Then it will come about that any who are left of all the nations that went against Jerusalem will go up from year to year to worship the King, the LORD of hosts, and to celebrate the Feast of Booths.
17And it will be that whichever of the families of the earth does not go up to Jerusalem to worship the King, the LORD of hosts, there will be no rain on them.
18If the family of Egypt does not go up or enter, then no rain will fall on them; it will be the plague with which the LORD smites the nations who do not go up to celebrate the Feast of Booths.
19This will be the punishment of Egypt, and the punishment of all the nations who do not go up to celebrate the Feast of Booths.
20In that day there will be inscribed on the bells of the horses, “HOLY TO THE LORD ” And the cooking pots in the LORD’S house will be like the bowls before the altar.
21Every cooking pot in Jerusalem and in Judah will be holy to the LORD of hosts; and all who sacrifice will come and take of them and boil in them And there will no longer be a Canaanite in the house of the LORD of hosts in that day.

Question: Who is the central figure in view here? Who specifically is this person designated “YHWH”? The Father? Yeshua?….

It’s my contention this person is Yeshua. This chapter in Zechariah is, of course, overtly prophetic of the second coming, the outpouring of his wrath on the wicked who have survived the tribulation (the “nations”) and have foolishly decided to wage war with Him as well as His millennial reign from Mt Zion in Jerusalem. Moreover, none of the things described in the chapter are predicted to be fulfilled by the Father in the New Testament (hereafter designated NT). Zechariah is a book that is replete with references to the Messiah; a triumphant king humbly riding a donkey (9:9), they will look to me, the one they have pierced (12:10), sold for 30 pieces of silver (11:12-13), His disciples would be “scattered” after His death (13:7). So it naturally follows that Zechariah is also messianic, the context confirms this. The detail given in the Chapter 14 passage about the person (the King) and the era in which He inhabits the Earth aligns tightly to much of the eschatological (end times) scripture pertaining to Yeshua in other parts of the Bible, especially that found in Revelation.

As a small aside, in Acts 1:11 we are told that Yeshua will return in “just the same way as you have watched Him go into heaven”.

Acts 1:9-11
9And after He had said these things, He was lifted up while they were looking on, and a cloud received Him out of their sight. 10And as they were gazing intently into the sky while He was going, behold, two men in white clothing stood beside them. 11They also said, “Men of Galilee, why do you stand looking into the sky? This Jesus, who has been taken up from you into heaven, will come in just the same way as you have watched Him go into heaven.” 12Then they returned to Jerusalem from the mount called Olivet, which is near Jerusalem, a Sabbath day’s journey away.

Yeshua ascended from the Mount of Olives and the angel affirmed that He will return “in just the same manner”. Zech 14:4 tells us that YHWH’s feet will stand on the very same spot; the Mt of Olives.

Zechariah 14:4
4And his feet shall stand in that day upon the mount of Olives, which is before Jerusalem on the east, and the mount of Olives shall cleave in the midst thereof toward the east and toward the west, and there shall be a very great valley; and half of the mountain shall remove toward the north, and half of it toward the south.

“the old traditional opinion is not improbable, that our Lord shall come again to judge the earth, where He left the earth, near the place of His Agony and Crucifixion for us. So shall “the Feet” of God literally, “stand upon the Mount of Olives.”
Source: http://bibletools.org/….s

Curious….

Okay let me try to illustrate some of the commonalities between what is written of YHWH in Zech 14:1-4 and what is written of Yeshua elsewhere in the Bible, passages that make Yeshua the only legitimate candidate for the person we read about in Zech 14. Rather than comprehensively expound this chapter (which I’m not qualified to do) I’ll just let some key verses and their parallel scriptures speak for themselves, readers can draw their own conclusions.

Zechariah 14:1-4 describe YHWH “coming” to Earth, before and after His ascension Yeshua many times declared He is coming again:

Zechariah 14
1Behold, a day is coming for the LORD when the spoil taken from you will be divided among you.
2For I will gather all the nations against Jerusalem to battle, and the city will be captured, the houses plundered, the women ravished and half of the city exiled, but the rest of the people will not be cut off from the city.
3Then the LORD will go forth and fight against those nations, as when He fights on a day of battle.
4In that day His feet will stand on the Mount of Olives, which is in front of Jerusalem on the east; and the Mount of Olives will be split in its middle from east to west by a very large valley, so that half of the mountain will move toward the north and the other half toward the south.

CF.

Matthew 24:30
30″And then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in the sky, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the SON OF MAN COMING ON THE CLOUDS OF THE SKY with power and great glory. (cf. Matt 16:27, 24:37; Mark 8:38, 13:26; Luke 21:27)

Revelation 3:11
11I am coming quickly; hold fast what you have, so that no one will take your crown.

Revelation 22:7
7″And behold, I am coming quickly Blessed is he who heeds the words of the prophecy of this book.”

Revelation 22:12
“Behold, I am coming quickly, and My reward is with Me, to render to every man according to what he has done.

Revelation 22:20
He who testifies to these things says, “Yes, I am coming quickly ” Amen Come, Lord Jesus.

The apostles, of course, were expecting and prophesied Yeshua’s return: 

Matthew 24:3
3As He was sitting on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to Him privately, saying, “Tell us, when will these things happen, and what will be the sign of Your coming, and of the end of the age?”

1 Thessalonians 3:13
To the end he may stablish your hearts unblameable in holiness before God, even our Father, at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ with all his saints.

1 Timothy 6:14
That you keep the commandment without stain or reproach until the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ

2 Timothy 1:10
10but now has been revealed by the appearing of our Savior Christ Jesus, who abolished death and brought life and immortality to light through the gospel

2 Timothy 4:1
1I solemnly charge you in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus, who is to judge the living and the dead, and by His appearing and His kingdom:

2 Timothy 4:8
8in the future there is laid up for me the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous Judge, will award to me on that day; and not only to me, but also to all who have loved His appearing

Titus 2:13-14
13looking for the blessed hope and the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Christ Jesus, 14who gave Himself for us to redeem us from every lawless deed, and to purify for Himself a people for His own possession, zealous for good deeds.

Revelation 1:7
7BEHOLD, HE IS COMING WITH THE CLOUDS, and every eye will see Him, even those who pierced Him; and all the tribes of the earth will mourn over Him. So it is to be. Amen.

Zech 14:3-4 and 14:12 describe YHWH in the role of a punisher/avenger of “nations” (v2) , when Yeshua does come it has been foretold that He will also come in the role as punisher/avenger: 

Zechariah 14:12
12And this shall be the plague wherewith the LORD will smite all the people that have fought against Jerusalem; Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet, and their eyes shall consume away in their holes, and their tongue shall consume away in their mouth.

CF.

2 Thessalonians 2:8
8Then that lawless one will be revealed whom the Lord will slay with the breath of His mouth and bring to an end by the appearance of His coming;

Revelation 2:16
16’Therefore repent; or else I am coming to you quickly, and I will make war against them with the sword of My mouth.

Revelation 17:14
14″These will wage war against the Lamb, and the Lamb will overcome them, because He is Lord of lords and King of kings, and those who are with Him are the called and chosen and faithful.”

Revelation 19:15
15And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.

(also compare Rev 2:16 and 19:15 with Isa 11:4)

Zechariah 14:5 declares that when YHWH comes He will be accompanied by His saints, this is also true of Yeshua when He comes again: 

Zechariah 14:5
5And ye shall flee to the valley of the mountains; for the valley of the mountains shall reach unto Azal: yea, ye shall flee, like as ye fled from before the earthquake in the days of Uzziah king of Judah: and the LORD [YHWH] my God shall come, and all the saints with thee.

CF.

1 Thessalonians 3:13
To the end he may stablish your hearts unblameable in holiness before God, even our Father, at the coming of ourLord Jesus Christ with all his saints.

Jude 1
14And Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these, saying, Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints.

Revelation 19:13-14
13And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God. 14And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean.

Zechariah 14:9, 16-17 testifies that YHWH will rule the nations from Jerusalem (also see Isa 24:23, Micah 4:7), other scripture reveals that Yeshua will rule as King on Earth 

Zechariah 14:9, 16-17
9And the LORD [YHWH] shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall there be one LORD [YHWH], and his name one….16And it shall come to pass, that every one that is left of all the nations which came against Jerusalem shall even go up from year to year to worship the Kingthe LORD [YHWH] of hosts, and to keep the feast of tabernacles. 17And it shall be, that whoso will not come up of all the families of the earth unto Jerusalem to worship the Kingthe LORD [YHWH] of hosts, even upon them shall be no rain.

Isaiah 24:23
23Then the moon will be abashed and the sun ashamed, For the LORD of hosts will reign on Mount Zion and in Jerusalem, And His glory will be before His elders.

Micah 4:7
7″I will make the lame a remnant; And the outcasts a strong nation, And the LORD will reign over them in Mount Zion; From now on and forever

CF.

Daniel 7:13-14
13″I kept looking in the night visions, And behold, with the clouds of heaven one like a Son of Man was coming, and He came up to the Ancient of Days and was presented before Him. 14″And to Him was given dominion, glory and a kingdom, that all the peoples, nations and men of every language might serve Him. His dominion is an everlasting dominion, which will not pass away; and His kingdom is one which will not be destroyed.

Daniel 7:27
27’Then the sovereignty, the dominion and the greatness of all the kingdoms under the whole heaven will be given to the people of the saints of the Highest One; His kingdom will be an everlasting kingdom, and all the dominions will serve and obey Him.’

Matthew 25:34
Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world:

2 Timothy 2:10-12
10For this reason I endure all things for the sake of those who are chosen, so that they also may obtain the salvation which is in Christ Jesus and with it eternal glory. 11It is a trustworthy statement: For if we died with Him, we will also live with Him; 12If we endure, we will also reign with Him; If we deny Him, He also will deny us;

Revelation 12:5
5And she gave birth to a son, a male child, who is to rule all the nations with a rod of iron; and her child was caught up to God and to His throne.

Revelation 17:14
These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful.

Revelation 20:4
4Then I saw thrones, and they sat on them, and judgment was given to them And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony of Jesus and because of the word of God, and those who had not worshiped the beast or his image, and had not received the mark on their forehead and on their hand; and they came to life and reigned with Christ for a thousand years.

Moreover, He will do this from the throne of David (a throne located in Jerusalem), which His Father will establish: 

2 Samuel 7:12-13
12″When your days are complete and you lie down with your fathers, I will raise up your descendant after you, who will come forth from you, and I will establish his kingdom.13″He shall build a house for My name, and I will establishthe throne of his kingdom forever.

Isaiah 9:6-7
6For a child will be born to us, a son will be given to us; And the government will rest on His shoulders; And His name will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God,
Eternal Father, Prince of Peace. 7There will be no end to the increase of His government or of peace, On the throne of David and over his kingdom, To establish it and to uphold it with justice and righteousness

Isaiah 16:5
A throne will even be established in lovingkindness, And a judge will sit on it in faithfulness in the tent ofDavid; Moreover, he will seek justice And be prompt in righteousness

Luke 1:32
32″He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High; and the Lord God will give Him the throne of His father David; 33and He will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and His kingdom will have no end.”

So it’s quite apparent that Zechariah 14:1-4 prophetically describes Yeshua’s coming to Earth, the outpouring of His retribution upon the wicked “nations” and His Kingly reign from Mt Zion in Jerusalem, where He will be seated on David’s throne. Jerusalem, Mt Zion, David’s throne – these are manifestly physical locations, on Earth! The NT does not tesify of the Father ever residing on Earth. In actual fact Yeshua will not hand over the Kingdom to His Father until all rule, authority and power has been abolished, He must reign until all enemies have been put under His feet  (1 Cor 15:24-25). This will not occur until after Satan has been loosed a little while to deceive the nations one last time (Rev 20:7), and this will not happen until after the 1000 year reign of Christ has consummated. The Father, evidently, will still be in Heaven during this time. But here’s the important point I’ve been driving at  – Yeshua is explicitly called YHWH on twelve separate occasions in Zechariah 14; verses 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 20 and  21. Would the Bible ascribe the exclusively divine name to someone who is not YHWH?? I think not! That would be grossly misleading, to say the least. On this point it may be argued by t8 that Yeshua is assigned this name on account of His role as YHWH’s agent, i.e. YHWH, Yeshua’s Father, is ruling through Him therefore it is rightful that he bears His Father’s name. However this can be debunked by appealing to the complete absence of a parallel example. Nowhere else in scripture can we find an instance where an agent of YHWH is bestowed the name of YHWH (or any name for that matter) because he/she is acting on His behalf. Moses and Abraham often acted as YHWH’s agent, yet they are certainly never described as YHWH. This is also true of the NT believers, Paul and Peter were used by God but they are nowhere called God in the NT. Taken to a further extreme, any spirit-filled believer has at some time been ‘used’ by God and yet it’s more than inappropriate for us to be called YHWH, everyone knows this. What’s more, any notion that the law of agency applies to Yeshua in Zech 14 can be utterly dispelled upon reading verse 16 & 17:

Zechariah 14:16-17
16And it shall come to pass, that every one that is left of all the nations which came against Jerusalem shall even go up from year to year to worship the King, the LORD of hosts, and to keep the feast of tabernacles.
17And it shall be, that whoso will not come up of all the families of the earth unto Jerusalem to worshipthe King, the LORD of hosts, even upon them shall be no rain.

The “King, the Lord of Hosts” will be worshipped by the nations, and refusal to do this will result in dire consequences for them. Verses 20-21 make it plain that this worship is is highest form, that reserved only for YHWH. It goes without saying that YHWH cannot be worshipped by proxy, that is overt blasphemy, idolatry. No one may rightly recieve worship on God’s behalf, it’s ludicrous to even entertain this idea.

In summary, in Zechariah chapter 14 we see that Yeshua is in fact YHWH. He is the only legitimate candidate for the central figure in the Chapter based on the detail given in therein compared with other passages concerning the second coming (with His saints – Rev 19:14), Armageddon battle (Rev 19:11-19) and millennial reign as King from Mt Zion (Rev 20:4). It’s also important to understand that these things are not attributed to the Father in the NT, only Yeshua. Yeshua is explicitly called “LORD” (YHWH) no less than 12 times in the passage (verses 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 20 and  21) and “LORD (YHWH) of Hosts” on four occasions (verses 16, 17 and 21 [twice]). It seems obvious to me that the Holy Spirit Who inspired the book would not set out to deceive or confuse readers on the matter of Who YHWH is by assigning this name to the recipient who was not YHWH, therefore I conclude that Yeshua is called YHWH because He is YHWH!

Three questions for t8:

1. Is the central figure in Zechariah 14 described as YHWH in fact Yeshua? If not, precisely who is it? And what is you scriptural evidence for your choice?

2. Is Yeshua assigned the exclusively divine name “LORD” (i.e. YHWH) multiple times in this chapter?

3. If you agree that Zechariah 14 describes Yeshua, and that He is indeed called YHWH in this chapter, on what grounds do you argue that He is not YHWH when in this passage plainly says that He is??

Blessings


t8

The answer to your post is easily summed up in these 2 verses of which there are numerous complimentary verses I could quote if I wanted.

2 Corinthians 5:18-19
18 Now all these things are from God, who reconciled us to Himself through Christ and gave us the ministry of reconciliation,

19 namely, that God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself

God was in Christ. That is the answer. Just as God was in Christ when he came to earth, so God will be in him when he comes again.

So God will come, through Christ.

Remember God is invisible, so it’s not like he will come in his own body where you will be able to touch him. God is invisible, he is a spirit, and he is bigger than you can imagine.

God will come to earth through the Christ who is Jesus.

Likewise God can reside in us too.

To think that God is a being wholly contained in a body is bit silly. God will be in Christ and he will still be present outside of Christ too.

God does all these things, and he sends his servants to do his bidding. Simple as that.

This also explains how God is the only savoiur and sends Christ to do his will thereby saving us through Christ.

This is God’s will.


 

You can read the rest of the discussion here:


Discussion

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 20 posts - 81 through 100 (of 407 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #133389
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi TT,
    If your assumptions are added to what is written does that remain reliable?
    Jesus is the Son of God.
    That is written

    #133410
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Cindy @ June 13 2009,11:02)
    Hi Mandy and thank you.  I have been gone, have you noticed?  I hurt myself on the chair and my Leg is still black and blue.  It hurt to walk on it, so I have not been on the Computer at all. Love Irene


    Oh, Irene I'm so sorry to hear that!

    I'm not here regularly enough anymore to notice when someone is here or not here….sorry. But I miss you anyway!

    Much love and take care of yourself! You and Georg are important to this website!
    Mandy

    #133418
    Cindy
    Participant

    Hi Mandy and thank you. My leg is still blue, I have such bad vein's, because of all the Steroid I was given for my bad Lung. I really appreciate You, You are always so sweet. We need someone like you here. So I return the compliment.
    Love Irene

    #133420
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 14 2009,19:59)

    Quote (Cindy @ June 13 2009,11:02)
    Hi Mandy and thank you.  I have been gone, have you noticed?  I hurt myself on the chair and my Leg is still black and blue.  It hurt to walk on it, so I have not been on the Computer at all. Love Irene


    Oh, Irene I'm so sorry to hear that!

    I'm not here regularly enough anymore to notice when someone is here or not here….sorry.  But I miss you anyway!

    Much love and take care of yourself!  You and Georg are important to this website!
    Mandy


    Hi Irene,
    I hope you heal as quickly as possible. I know you are 70 years old and bruises take longer to heal at that age.

    blessings,

    Jack

    #133429
    Cindy
    Participant

    Hello Jack Thank you very much for your good Wishes. You are right everything takes longer when you old. Life is but a vapor, that is so true. First one can't wait to be 21 and then all of a sudden your 70, just like that. I am not kidding.
    Peace and Love Irene
    :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

    #133485
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (thethinker @ June 14 2009,05:52)
    t8,
    Produce a trinitarian commentator who denies that Jesus Christ came in the flesh. I can produce one anti-trinitarian here that denies it,


    They do not deny it outright. That would be too obvious. They say he came in the flesh, and that Jesus is God, and that God came in the flesh or God took on flesh.

    But Jesus is not God, therefore God didn't take a human body for himself, therefore by saying that God took a human body is to deny that Jesus came in the flesh and it is another Jesus being preached. Subtle, but the enemy has more success with being subtle than blatant. That is why he sometimes comes as an angel of light.

    But the Logos became flesh thinker. Not God.
    God existed within flesh because by his spirit he lived in Christ and he lives in his people too. But God doesn't have a flesh body and never has. God is not a man and never has been.

    Also, if we believe that the Father is the Most High God, then we believe that his son who was the Logos came in the flesh and then back to the Father with the glory he had before the world begun. It makes sense when you know that the one true God is the Father.

    All scripture makes sense. If God is a Trinity, then all the verses with the word God in it break.

    #133506
    Cindy
    Participant

    Good post t8 and I do agree with it. We should all see it the way it is written, then we would have no problems. Our Father is indeed above all and in us all. We are the temple of God and His Holy Spirit lives in us.

    Peace and Love Irene

    #133514
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    t8 said:

    Quote
    But the Logos became flesh thinker. Not God.
    God existed within flesh because by his spirit he lived in Christ and he lives in his people too. But God doesn't have a flesh body and never has. God is not a man and never has been.

    Also, if we believe that the Father is the Most High God, then we believe that his son who was the Logos came in the flesh and then back to the Father with the glory he had before the world begun. It makes sense when you know that the one true God is the Father.

    t8,
    I showed you that Paladin denies that Jesus Christ came in the flesh and you don't seem to be bothered by it. Why is he allowed to post in the believer's group? Not that I care but I am only trying to point out anti-trinitarian incinsistency. Anti-trinitarian's don't really give a hoot about truth. Anti-trinitarians here just want to be “anti” something.

    If you were consistent you would relocate Paladin to the unbeliever's group. Paladin is blatantly an antichrist.

    t8 said:

    Quote
    But the Logos became flesh thinker. Not God.All scripture makes sense…. If God is a Trinity, then all the verses with the word God in it break


    I have already showed you that the apostle John taught that God became flesh. John 1:1 literally reads thus,

    Quote
    And God was the Word

    Verse 14 says,

    Quote
    And the Word became flesh

    Premise 1: God was the Word
    Premise 2: The Word became flesh
    Conclusion: Therefore, God became flesh

    t8 said:

    Quote
    Also, if we believe that the Father is the Most High God, then we believe that his son who was the Logos came in the flesh and then back to the Father with the glory he had before the world begun. It makes sense when you know that the one true God is the Father.

    Isaiah said,

    Quote
    For unto us a child is born, and unto us a son is given. And the government shall be upon His shoulder. And HIS NAME shall be called Wonderful. Counselor, MIGHTY GOD, EVERLASTING FATHER, PRINCE OF PEACE…. (Isaiah 9:6)

    Please explain Isaiah 9:6.

    thinker

    #133519
    Cindy
    Participant

    thinker The Word that became flesh is the one that became Jesus, you do know that, right?
    ( Quote thinker} For unto us a child is born, and unto us a son is given. And the government shall be upon His shoulder. And HIS NAME shall be called Wonderful. Counselor, MIGHTY GOD, EVERLASTING FATHER, PRINCE OF PEACE…. (Isaiah 9:6)
    When it says Father, that has to be a mistake, we know that our Heavenly Father would not take on flesh.
    Peace and Love Irene

    #133532
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (Cindy @ June 15 2009,21:41)
    thinker  The Word that became flesh is the one that became Jesus, you do know that, right?
    ( Quote thinker} For unto us a child is born, and unto us a son is given. And the government shall be upon His shoulder. And HIS NAME shall be called Wonderful. Counselor, MIGHTY GOD, EVERLASTING FATHER, PRINCE OF PEACE…. (Isaiah 9:6)
    When it says Father, that has to be a mistake, we know that our Heavenly Father would not take on flesh.  
    Peace and Love Irene


    Irene,
    I agree that the Father did not take flesh. I want to see how t8 answers that Jesus is named the “mighty God” and the “everlasting father.” The wording is NOT a mistake. The online Hebrew-Greek Interlinear reads that Jesus is the “father of future.”

    http://www.scripture4all.org/OnlineInterlinear/OTpdf/isa9.pdf

    The name “Jesus” means “Jehovah saves.” If Jesus was not Jehovah and He was not the Savior then the name “Jesus” did not truly belong to Him.

    thinker

    #133538
    Cindy
    Participant

    thinker In Ephesians were it says that there is ' one Body, one Spirit, one Baptism, one Lord (Jesus Christ), one Faith, one Father of all, who is above all and in us all. Yo make sure that you don't claim, that Lord is not Jesus, in Chapter 3:13-17 it explains who is who. Also Jesus himself talks about His Father. Whatever it was that Jesus is called Jehovah is certainly wrong. I do not believe in the explanation of some men. Somebody has to be wrong and I will take the Scriptures of the Bible before any man.
    Also you know that Jesus tells us that ” My Father is greater then I.”
    You do know that the Father in the O.T. was called Jehovah many times. And you want to believe because of one Scripture, that maybe was added be man, you are going to believe it? Give me a break.
    Peace adn Love Irene
    P.S. don't come me with some other man made stuff.

    #133582
    942767
    Participant

    Hi thethinker:

    For unto us a child is born, and unto us a son is given. And the government shall be upon His shoulder. And HIS NAME shall be called Wonderful. Counselor, MIGHTY GOD, EVERLASTING FATHER, PRINCE OF PEACE…. (Isaiah 9:6)

    Please explain Isaiah 9:6.

    The scripture states that his “name” shall be called… Not “he” he shall be called…

    This is what Strong's has for “name”:

    Quote
    Outline of Biblical Usage 1) name

    a) name

    b) reputation, fame, glory

    c) the Name (as designation of God)

    d) memorial, monument

    Hebrews 1:3 states that Jesus is the express image of God's person.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty

    #133910
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (Cindy @ June 16 2009,03:51)
    thinker  In Ephesians were it says that there is ' one Body, one Spirit, one Baptism, one Lord (Jesus Christ), one Faith, one Father of all, who is above all and in us all. Yo make sure that you don't claim, that Lord is not Jesus, in Chapter 3:13-17 it explains who is who. Also Jesus himself talks about His Father.  Whatever it was that Jesus is called Jehovah is certainly wrong.  I do not believe in the explanation of some men. Somebody has to be wrong and I will take the Scriptures of the Bible before any man.
    Also you know that Jesus tells us that ” My Father is greater then I.”
    You do know that the Father in the O.T. was called Jehovah many times.  And you want to believe because of one Scripture, that maybe was added be man, you are going to believe it?  Give me a break.
    Peace adn Love Irene
    P.S. don't come me with some other man made stuff.


    Irene,
    I have no idea what you are talking about! I said that Christ was NOT the father. Then I gave you what the inspired Hebrew Scriptures say. They say that Jesus is the father of the ages. This does NOT mean that He is God the Father. It means that He is the father of time. Hebrews 1 says that it was through the Son that the ages came into being. It is in this sense that Christ is called “father.”

    Please pay attention!

    thinker

    #133911
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (942767 @ June 16 2009,10:22)
    Hi thethinker:

    For unto us a child is born, and unto us a son is given. And the government shall be upon His shoulder. And HIS NAME shall be called Wonderful. Counselor, MIGHTY GOD, EVERLASTING FATHER, PRINCE OF PEACE…. (Isaiah 9:6)

    Please explain Isaiah 9:6.

    The scripture states that his “name” shall be called… Not “he” he shall be called…

    This is what Strong's has for “name”:

    Quote
    Outline of Biblical Usage 1) name

    a) name

    b) reputation, fame, glory

    c) the Name (as designation of God)

    d) memorial, monument

    Hebrews 1:3 states that Jesus is the express image of God's person.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    Marty,

    What kind of logic is this? God told Moses that He is the “I AM.” Then He said, “This is My name forever” (Exodus 3:15). Are you saying that Christ is not Savior because the name “Jesus” is only a name? By your own weird logic you must deny that God is “I AM” because it is merely a name.  ???

    thinker

    #133920
    Cindy
    Participant

    Quote (thethinker @ June 19 2009,02:59)

    Quote (Cindy @ June 16 2009,03:51)
    thinker  In Ephesians were it says that there is ' one Body, one Spirit, one Baptism, one Lord (Jesus Christ), one Faith, one Father of all, who is above all and in us all. Yo make sure that you don't claim, that Lord is not Jesus, in Chapter 3:13-17 it explains who is who. Also Jesus himself talks about His Father.  Whatever it was that Jesus is called Jehovah is certainly wrong.  I do not believe in the explanation of some men. Somebody has to be wrong and I will take the Scriptures of the Bible before any man.
    Also you know that Jesus tells us that ” My Father is greater then I.”
    You do know that the Father in the O.T. was called Jehovah many times.  And you want to believe because of one Scripture, that maybe was added be man, you are going to believe it?  Give me a break.
    Peace adn Love Irene
    P.S. don't come me with some other man made stuff.


    Irene,
    I have no idea what you are talking about! I said that Christ was NOT the father. Then I gave you what the inspired Hebrew Scriptures say. They say that Jesus is the father of the ages. This does NOT mean that He is God the Father. It means that He is the father of time. Hebrews 1 says that it was through the Son that the ages came into being. It is in this sense that Christ is called “father.”

    Please pay attention!

    thinker


    thethinker Wait are you not contradicting yourself?

    First you say that Jesus is not called the Father, and then you quote Hebrew that says that Jesus is the Father of the ages. You can't believe both? If Scripture says so then be it.
    I want to make you aware that I too don't know it all.  We all are learning yet.

    #134125
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (thethinker @ June 16 2009,02:45)

    Quote (Cindy @ June 15 2009,21:41)
    thinker The Word that became flesh is the one that became Jesus, you do know that, right?
    ( Quote thinker} For unto us a child is born, and unto us a son is given. And the government shall be upon His shoulder. And HIS NAME shall be called Wonderful. Counselor, MIGHTY GOD, EVERLASTING FATHER, PRINCE OF PEACE…. (Isaiah 9:6)
    When it says Father, that has to be a mistake, we know that our Heavenly Father would not take on flesh.
    Peace and Love Irene


    Irene,
    I agree that the Father did not take flesh. I want to see how t8 answers that Jesus is named the “mighty God” and the “everlasting father.” The wording is NOT a mistake. The online Hebrew-Greek Interlinear reads that Jesus is the “father of future.”

    http://www.scripture4all.org/OnlineInterlinear/OTpdf/isa9.pdf

    The name “Jesus” means “Jehovah saves.” If Jesus was not Jehovah and He was not the Savior then the name “Jesus” did not truly belong to Him.

    thinker


    Hi Thinker.

    I am travelling in South America at the moment, but caught this post and havent read recent earlier ones yet. But to quickly answer your questions.

    The word in the Hebrew used here is “El” and this word means the following:

    1) god, godlike one, mighty one
    1a) mighty men, men of rank, mighty heroes
    1b) angels
    1c) god, false god, (demons, imaginations)
    1d) God, the one true God, Jehovah
    2) mighty things in nature
    3) strength, power

    “So Jesus is the Mighty El and this can be interpreted to mean that Jesus is the 'Mighty God Like One' which is consistent with the overwhelming amount of scriptures that we have been discussed in these forums.

    The other part of the scripture that mentions the term 'Everlasting Father' seems like a contradiction as it seems to indicate that Jesus is the Heavenly Father. The word Father that is used here is “Ab” and this word is the same word that is used when describing Abraham as our Father and this scripture is just a reference to say that Jesus is our Everlasting Father, in other words he is greater than Abraham, but it certainly doesn't say 'Heavenly Father'.

    #134144
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ June 22 2009,07:57)

    Quote (thethinker @ June 16 2009,02:45)

    Quote (Cindy @ June 15 2009,21:41)
    thinker  The Word that became flesh is the one that became Jesus, you do know that, right?
    ( Quote thinker} For unto us a child is born, and unto us a son is given. And the government shall be upon His shoulder. And HIS NAME shall be called Wonderful. Counselor, MIGHTY GOD, EVERLASTING FATHER, PRINCE OF PEACE…. (Isaiah 9:6)
    When it says Father, that has to be a mistake, we know that our Heavenly Father would not take on flesh.  
    Peace and Love Irene


    Irene,
    I agree that the Father did not take flesh. I want to see how t8 answers that Jesus is named the “mighty God” and the “everlasting father.” The wording is NOT a mistake. The online Hebrew-Greek Interlinear reads that Jesus is the “father of future.”

    http://www.scripture4all.org/OnlineInterlinear/OTpdf/isa9.pdf

    The name “Jesus” means “Jehovah saves.” If Jesus was not Jehovah and He was not the Savior then the name “Jesus” did not truly belong to Him.

    thinker


    Hi Thinker.

    I am travelling in South America at the moment, but caught this post and havent read recent earlier ones yet. But to quickly answer your questions.

    The word in the Hebrew used here is “El” and this word means the following:

    1) god, godlike one, mighty one
    1a) mighty men, men of rank, mighty heroes
    1b) angels
    1c) god, false god, (demons, imaginations)
    1d) God, the one true God, Jehovah
    2) mighty things in nature
    3) strength, power

    “So Jesus is the Mighty El and this can be interpreted to mean that Jesus is the 'Mighty God Like One' which is consistent with the overwhelming amount of scriptures that we have been discussed in these forums.

    The other part of the scripture that mentions the term 'Everlasting Father' seems like a contradiction as it seems to indicate that Jesus is the Heavenly Father. The word Father that is used here is “Ab” and this word is the same word that is used when describing  Abraham as our Father and this scripture is just a reference to say that Jesus is our Everlasting Father, in other words he is greater than Abraham, but it certainly doesn't say 'Heavenly Father'.


    Hi t8,

    Isaiah 9:6 does not indicate that Jesus is the heavenly Father. It says that He is the father of the ages. Hebrews 1:2 says that the AGES were made through the Son. The word “father” simply means that He is the author of all the successive periods of human history.

    thinker

    #134161
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Thinker,
    John 1:1 does not literally say “God is the word” according to proper Greek grammar anyway. In the case where two nominative case words are in the same sentence/clause, the one with the article “the” is the one that does the action. Literally the correct reading is “the word was God.”

    Kathi

    #134184
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ June 22 2009,14:47)
    Thinker,
    John 1:1 does not literally say “God is the word” according to proper Greek grammar anyway.  In the case where two nominative case words are in the same sentence/clause, the one with the article “the” is the one that does the action.  Literally the correct reading is “the word was God.”

    Kathi


    Kathi,
    Please give your source and then explain what theological difference it makes.  And will you accept the grammatical rule that governs Titus 2:13?  Grammatically it is a direct assertion that Jesus Christ is God,

    Quote
    Looking for that blessed hope and glorious appearing of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ

    Note this grammatical rule right from the textbook,

    Quote
    If two substantives are connected by kai and both have the article, they refer to two different persons or things; if the first has the article and the second does not, the second refers to the same person (Syntax of the New Testament Greek, University Press of America, p.76).

    The textbook gives Titus 2:13 as an example of this rule,

    προσδεχόμενοι τὴν μακαρίαν ἐλπίδα καὶ ἐπιφάνειαν τῆς δόξης τοῦ μεγάλου θεοῦ καὶ σωτῆρος ἡμῶν Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ

    I put the article which comes before “great God” in bold for you. And I also put the Greek “kai” in bold. There is no article before “Savior”. This means that the substantatives “great God” and “Savior” (Jesus Christ) are ONE AND THE SAME.

    This is right from the textbook!

    1. Please provide your source

    2. Will you accept the rule governing Titus 2:13?

    3. What theological difference does it make if grammatically John 1:1 says, “And the Word was God?”

    thinker

    #134197
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (thethinker @ June 22 2009,11:03)

    Quote (Lightenup @ June 22 2009,14:47)
    Thinker,
    John 1:1 does not literally say “God is the word” according to proper Greek grammar anyway.  In the case where two nominative case words are in the same sentence/clause, the one with the article “the” is the one that does the action.  Literally the correct reading is “the word was God.”

    Kathi


    Kathi,
    Please give your source and then explain what theological difference it makes.  And will you accept the grammatical rule that governs Titus 2:13?  Grammatically it is a direct assertion that Jesus Christ is God,

    Quote
    Looking for that blessed hope and glorious appearing of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ

    Note this grammatical rule right from the textbook,

    Quote
    If two substantives are connected by kai and both have the article, they refer to two different persons or things; if the first has the article and the second does not, the second refers to the same person (Syntax of the New Testament Greek, University Press of America, p.76).

    The textbook gives Titus 2:13 as an example of this rule,

    προσδεχόμενοι τὴν μακαρίαν ἐλπίδα καὶ ἐπιφάνειαν τῆς δόξης τοῦ μεγάλου θεοῦ καὶ σωτῆρος ἡμῶν Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ

    I put the article which comes before “great God” in bold for you. And I also put the Greek “kai” in bold. There is no article before “Savior”. This means that the substantatives “great God” and “Savior” (Jesus Christ) are ONE AND THE SAME.

    This is right from the textbook!

    1. Please provide your source

    2. Will you accept the rule governing Titus 2:13?

    3. What theological difference does it make if grammatically John 1:1 says, “And the Word was God?”

    thinker


    Hi Thinker,
    You can go here to see it explained that the nominative without the article is the predicate nominative-the word that receives the action.  Although it is just a guy studying for his doctoral degree in NT, he provides a name of a source.  I don't remember my source for learning this, maybe the teacher in my Greek class.

    http://www.dianedew.com/john1.htm

    Here is an excerpt of what he says:

    Tim Elston, a doctoral candidate of the New Testament at Denver Seminary with a BA in Linguistics from the University of Oregon, explains it thus:

    The absence of the article before “God” in John 1:1 is meant to indicate that “God” is the predicate nominative rather than the subject of the phrase. Because Greek does not use word order to indicate subject/object/predicate distinctions, one of its optional features is, where there is ambiguity in a subject-predicate nominative construction, to indicate the subject by preceding it with a definite article and to indicate the predicate nominative by the absence of a definite article. This is called “Colwell's Rule.”

    This rule is evident at 1 John 4:8, “God is love.” The Greek reads: ho [the] Theos [God] agape [love] estin [is]. If agape had the definite article, instead of Theos, then the correct translation would be “Love is God.” But the definite article on Theos indicates “God” as the subject, and the absence of the article on agape indicates agape as the predicate nominative; thus, “God is love.” This amounts to a qualification of God rather than a deification of love.

    In the case of John 1:1, the writer leaves the article off of Theos in order to mark it unambiguously as the predicate nominative. The absence of the article does not indicate that theos is an indefinite noun, as Jehovah's Witnesses have incorrectly led many to believe, but that it is not the subject of the phrase. The absence of the article on Theos assures the reader that “the Word” is the subject and that “God” is the predicate nominative.

    In Greek, the article is much less a marking of definiteness than it is an article facilitating syntactic clarity. Indicating definiteness is only one of eleven functions of the article in Koine Greek. Moreover, definiteness does not require the article for its indication. Many, many definite nouns in Greek are not indicated as definite by the use of the article or by any other morphological tag. These anarthrous nouns (nouns which do not have the definite article) are definite simply by virtue of their semantic function. The absence of the article with these nouns in no way indicates them as indefinite. The second occurrence of Theos in John 1:1 is one of these anarthrous nouns which are nonetheless definite.

    For further reading see Stanley E. Porter, Idioms of the Greek New Testament (Sheffield, England: Sheffield Academic Press, 1992), 103-114.

    Regarding John 1:1:
    You ask what difference would it make if it said “the word was God” or “God was the word”, well, I'll think about that, maybe none, I am not sure. If it said “God was the word” then “the word” would be in the accusative case-the direct object which it is not, it is in the nominative case with the article making it the subject. The word here in Greek is logos and not logov.  

    Regarding Titus 2:13, I have no problem seeing Jesus as our great God and Savior. I see scriptures saying that He is our great God but I do not see scriptures saying that He is our great Most High God. There is a difference.

    Kathi

Viewing 20 posts - 81 through 100 (of 407 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2024 Heaven Net

Navigation

© 1999 - 2023 - Heaven Net
or

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

or

Create Account