Trinity Debate – Zechariah 14

Subject: Zechariah 14 proves the Trinity Doctrine
Date: March 22 2008
Debaters:  Is 1: 18 & t8


Is 1: 18

This is my fourth and final post in this debate. I may post a final wrap-up of the last four posts and allow t8 to do the same, if he is amenable. People can make their own minds up as whose posts have been the most persuasive, who has been most faithful to the sciptures. I thought I would save what I consider to be the strongest proof text for last. The passage I have selected is Zechariah chapter 14, it reads as follows:

Zechariah 14
1Behold, a day is coming for the LORD when the spoil taken from you will be divided among you.
2For I will gather all the nations against Jerusalem to battle, and the city will be captured, the houses plundered, the women ravished and half of the city exiled, but the rest of the people will not be cut off from the city.
3Then the LORD will go forth and fight against those nations, as when He fights on a day of battle.
4In that day His feet will stand on the Mount of Olives, which is in front of Jerusalem on the east; and the Mount of Olives will be split in its middle from east to west by a very large valley, so that half of the mountain will move toward the north and the other half toward the south.
5You will flee by the valley of My mountains, for the valley of the mountains will reach to Azel; yes, you will flee just as you fled before the earthquake in the days of Uzziah king of Judah Then the LORD, my God, will come, and all the holy ones with Him!
6In that day there will be no light; the luminaries will dwindle.
7For it will be a unique day which is known to the LORD, neither day nor night, but it will come about that at evening time there will be light.
8And in that day living waters will flow out of Jerusalem, half of them toward the eastern sea and the other half toward the western sea; it will be in summer as well as in winter.
9And the LORD will be king over all the earth; in that day the LORD will be the only one, and His name the only one.
10All the land will be changed into a plain from Geba to Rimmon south of Jerusalem; but Jerusalem will rise and remain on its site from Benjamin’s Gate as far as the place of the First Gate to the Corner Gate, and from the Tower of Hananel to the king’s wine presses.
11People will live in it, and there will no longer be a curse, for Jerusalem will dwell in security.
12Now this will be the plague with which the LORD will strike all the peoples who have gone to war against Jerusalem; their flesh will rot while they stand on their feet, and their eyes will rot in their sockets, and their tongue will rot in their mouth.
13It will come about in that day that a great panic from the LORD will fall on them; and they will seize one another’s hand, and the hand of one will be lifted against the hand of another.
14Judah also will fight at Jerusalem; and the wealth of all the surrounding nations will be gathered, gold and silver and garments in great abundance.
15So also like this plague will be the plague on the horse, the mule, the camel, the donkey and all the cattle that will be in those camps.
16Then it will come about that any who are left of all the nations that went against Jerusalem will go up from year to year to worship the King, the LORD of hosts, and to celebrate the Feast of Booths.
17And it will be that whichever of the families of the earth does not go up to Jerusalem to worship the King, the LORD of hosts, there will be no rain on them.
18If the family of Egypt does not go up or enter, then no rain will fall on them; it will be the plague with which the LORD smites the nations who do not go up to celebrate the Feast of Booths.
19This will be the punishment of Egypt, and the punishment of all the nations who do not go up to celebrate the Feast of Booths.
20In that day there will be inscribed on the bells of the horses, “HOLY TO THE LORD ” And the cooking pots in the LORD’S house will be like the bowls before the altar.
21Every cooking pot in Jerusalem and in Judah will be holy to the LORD of hosts; and all who sacrifice will come and take of them and boil in them And there will no longer be a Canaanite in the house of the LORD of hosts in that day.

Question: Who is the central figure in view here? Who specifically is this person designated “YHWH”? The Father? Yeshua?….

It’s my contention this person is Yeshua. This chapter in Zechariah is, of course, overtly prophetic of the second coming, the outpouring of his wrath on the wicked who have survived the tribulation (the “nations”) and have foolishly decided to wage war with Him as well as His millennial reign from Mt Zion in Jerusalem. Moreover, none of the things described in the chapter are predicted to be fulfilled by the Father in the New Testament (hereafter designated NT). Zechariah is a book that is replete with references to the Messiah; a triumphant king humbly riding a donkey (9:9), they will look to me, the one they have pierced (12:10), sold for 30 pieces of silver (11:12-13), His disciples would be “scattered” after His death (13:7). So it naturally follows that Zechariah is also messianic, the context confirms this. The detail given in the Chapter 14 passage about the person (the King) and the era in which He inhabits the Earth aligns tightly to much of the eschatological (end times) scripture pertaining to Yeshua in other parts of the Bible, especially that found in Revelation.

As a small aside, in Acts 1:11 we are told that Yeshua will return in “just the same way as you have watched Him go into heaven”.

Acts 1:9-11
9And after He had said these things, He was lifted up while they were looking on, and a cloud received Him out of their sight. 10And as they were gazing intently into the sky while He was going, behold, two men in white clothing stood beside them. 11They also said, “Men of Galilee, why do you stand looking into the sky? This Jesus, who has been taken up from you into heaven, will come in just the same way as you have watched Him go into heaven.” 12Then they returned to Jerusalem from the mount called Olivet, which is near Jerusalem, a Sabbath day’s journey away.

Yeshua ascended from the Mount of Olives and the angel affirmed that He will return “in just the same manner”. Zech 14:4 tells us that YHWH’s feet will stand on the very same spot; the Mt of Olives.

Zechariah 14:4
4And his feet shall stand in that day upon the mount of Olives, which is before Jerusalem on the east, and the mount of Olives shall cleave in the midst thereof toward the east and toward the west, and there shall be a very great valley; and half of the mountain shall remove toward the north, and half of it toward the south.

“the old traditional opinion is not improbable, that our Lord shall come again to judge the earth, where He left the earth, near the place of His Agony and Crucifixion for us. So shall “the Feet” of God literally, “stand upon the Mount of Olives.”
Source: http://bibletools.org/….s

Curious….

Okay let me try to illustrate some of the commonalities between what is written of YHWH in Zech 14:1-4 and what is written of Yeshua elsewhere in the Bible, passages that make Yeshua the only legitimate candidate for the person we read about in Zech 14. Rather than comprehensively expound this chapter (which I’m not qualified to do) I’ll just let some key verses and their parallel scriptures speak for themselves, readers can draw their own conclusions.

Zechariah 14:1-4 describe YHWH “coming” to Earth, before and after His ascension Yeshua many times declared He is coming again:

Zechariah 14
1Behold, a day is coming for the LORD when the spoil taken from you will be divided among you.
2For I will gather all the nations against Jerusalem to battle, and the city will be captured, the houses plundered, the women ravished and half of the city exiled, but the rest of the people will not be cut off from the city.
3Then the LORD will go forth and fight against those nations, as when He fights on a day of battle.
4In that day His feet will stand on the Mount of Olives, which is in front of Jerusalem on the east; and the Mount of Olives will be split in its middle from east to west by a very large valley, so that half of the mountain will move toward the north and the other half toward the south.

CF.

Matthew 24:30
30″And then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in the sky, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the SON OF MAN COMING ON THE CLOUDS OF THE SKY with power and great glory. (cf. Matt 16:27, 24:37; Mark 8:38, 13:26; Luke 21:27)

Revelation 3:11
11I am coming quickly; hold fast what you have, so that no one will take your crown.

Revelation 22:7
7″And behold, I am coming quickly Blessed is he who heeds the words of the prophecy of this book.”

Revelation 22:12
“Behold, I am coming quickly, and My reward is with Me, to render to every man according to what he has done.

Revelation 22:20
He who testifies to these things says, “Yes, I am coming quickly ” Amen Come, Lord Jesus.

The apostles, of course, were expecting and prophesied Yeshua’s return: 

Matthew 24:3
3As He was sitting on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to Him privately, saying, “Tell us, when will these things happen, and what will be the sign of Your coming, and of the end of the age?”

1 Thessalonians 3:13
To the end he may stablish your hearts unblameable in holiness before God, even our Father, at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ with all his saints.

1 Timothy 6:14
That you keep the commandment without stain or reproach until the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ

2 Timothy 1:10
10but now has been revealed by the appearing of our Savior Christ Jesus, who abolished death and brought life and immortality to light through the gospel

2 Timothy 4:1
1I solemnly charge you in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus, who is to judge the living and the dead, and by His appearing and His kingdom:

2 Timothy 4:8
8in the future there is laid up for me the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous Judge, will award to me on that day; and not only to me, but also to all who have loved His appearing

Titus 2:13-14
13looking for the blessed hope and the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Christ Jesus, 14who gave Himself for us to redeem us from every lawless deed, and to purify for Himself a people for His own possession, zealous for good deeds.

Revelation 1:7
7BEHOLD, HE IS COMING WITH THE CLOUDS, and every eye will see Him, even those who pierced Him; and all the tribes of the earth will mourn over Him. So it is to be. Amen.

Zech 14:3-4 and 14:12 describe YHWH in the role of a punisher/avenger of “nations” (v2) , when Yeshua does come it has been foretold that He will also come in the role as punisher/avenger: 

Zechariah 14:12
12And this shall be the plague wherewith the LORD will smite all the people that have fought against Jerusalem; Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet, and their eyes shall consume away in their holes, and their tongue shall consume away in their mouth.

CF.

2 Thessalonians 2:8
8Then that lawless one will be revealed whom the Lord will slay with the breath of His mouth and bring to an end by the appearance of His coming;

Revelation 2:16
16’Therefore repent; or else I am coming to you quickly, and I will make war against them with the sword of My mouth.

Revelation 17:14
14″These will wage war against the Lamb, and the Lamb will overcome them, because He is Lord of lords and King of kings, and those who are with Him are the called and chosen and faithful.”

Revelation 19:15
15And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.

(also compare Rev 2:16 and 19:15 with Isa 11:4)

Zechariah 14:5 declares that when YHWH comes He will be accompanied by His saints, this is also true of Yeshua when He comes again: 

Zechariah 14:5
5And ye shall flee to the valley of the mountains; for the valley of the mountains shall reach unto Azal: yea, ye shall flee, like as ye fled from before the earthquake in the days of Uzziah king of Judah: and the LORD [YHWH] my God shall come, and all the saints with thee.

CF.

1 Thessalonians 3:13
To the end he may stablish your hearts unblameable in holiness before God, even our Father, at the coming of ourLord Jesus Christ with all his saints.

Jude 1
14And Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these, saying, Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints.

Revelation 19:13-14
13And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God. 14And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean.

Zechariah 14:9, 16-17 testifies that YHWH will rule the nations from Jerusalem (also see Isa 24:23, Micah 4:7), other scripture reveals that Yeshua will rule as King on Earth 

Zechariah 14:9, 16-17
9And the LORD [YHWH] shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall there be one LORD [YHWH], and his name one….16And it shall come to pass, that every one that is left of all the nations which came against Jerusalem shall even go up from year to year to worship the Kingthe LORD [YHWH] of hosts, and to keep the feast of tabernacles. 17And it shall be, that whoso will not come up of all the families of the earth unto Jerusalem to worship the Kingthe LORD [YHWH] of hosts, even upon them shall be no rain.

Isaiah 24:23
23Then the moon will be abashed and the sun ashamed, For the LORD of hosts will reign on Mount Zion and in Jerusalem, And His glory will be before His elders.

Micah 4:7
7″I will make the lame a remnant; And the outcasts a strong nation, And the LORD will reign over them in Mount Zion; From now on and forever

CF.

Daniel 7:13-14
13″I kept looking in the night visions, And behold, with the clouds of heaven one like a Son of Man was coming, and He came up to the Ancient of Days and was presented before Him. 14″And to Him was given dominion, glory and a kingdom, that all the peoples, nations and men of every language might serve Him. His dominion is an everlasting dominion, which will not pass away; and His kingdom is one which will not be destroyed.

Daniel 7:27
27’Then the sovereignty, the dominion and the greatness of all the kingdoms under the whole heaven will be given to the people of the saints of the Highest One; His kingdom will be an everlasting kingdom, and all the dominions will serve and obey Him.’

Matthew 25:34
Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world:

2 Timothy 2:10-12
10For this reason I endure all things for the sake of those who are chosen, so that they also may obtain the salvation which is in Christ Jesus and with it eternal glory. 11It is a trustworthy statement: For if we died with Him, we will also live with Him; 12If we endure, we will also reign with Him; If we deny Him, He also will deny us;

Revelation 12:5
5And she gave birth to a son, a male child, who is to rule all the nations with a rod of iron; and her child was caught up to God and to His throne.

Revelation 17:14
These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful.

Revelation 20:4
4Then I saw thrones, and they sat on them, and judgment was given to them And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony of Jesus and because of the word of God, and those who had not worshiped the beast or his image, and had not received the mark on their forehead and on their hand; and they came to life and reigned with Christ for a thousand years.

Moreover, He will do this from the throne of David (a throne located in Jerusalem), which His Father will establish: 

2 Samuel 7:12-13
12″When your days are complete and you lie down with your fathers, I will raise up your descendant after you, who will come forth from you, and I will establish his kingdom.13″He shall build a house for My name, and I will establishthe throne of his kingdom forever.

Isaiah 9:6-7
6For a child will be born to us, a son will be given to us; And the government will rest on His shoulders; And His name will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God,
Eternal Father, Prince of Peace. 7There will be no end to the increase of His government or of peace, On the throne of David and over his kingdom, To establish it and to uphold it with justice and righteousness

Isaiah 16:5
A throne will even be established in lovingkindness, And a judge will sit on it in faithfulness in the tent ofDavid; Moreover, he will seek justice And be prompt in righteousness

Luke 1:32
32″He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High; and the Lord God will give Him the throne of His father David; 33and He will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and His kingdom will have no end.”

So it’s quite apparent that Zechariah 14:1-4 prophetically describes Yeshua’s coming to Earth, the outpouring of His retribution upon the wicked “nations” and His Kingly reign from Mt Zion in Jerusalem, where He will be seated on David’s throne. Jerusalem, Mt Zion, David’s throne – these are manifestly physical locations, on Earth! The NT does not tesify of the Father ever residing on Earth. In actual fact Yeshua will not hand over the Kingdom to His Father until all rule, authority and power has been abolished, He must reign until all enemies have been put under His feet  (1 Cor 15:24-25). This will not occur until after Satan has been loosed a little while to deceive the nations one last time (Rev 20:7), and this will not happen until after the 1000 year reign of Christ has consummated. The Father, evidently, will still be in Heaven during this time. But here’s the important point I’ve been driving at  – Yeshua is explicitly called YHWH on twelve separate occasions in Zechariah 14; verses 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 20 and  21. Would the Bible ascribe the exclusively divine name to someone who is not YHWH?? I think not! That would be grossly misleading, to say the least. On this point it may be argued by t8 that Yeshua is assigned this name on account of His role as YHWH’s agent, i.e. YHWH, Yeshua’s Father, is ruling through Him therefore it is rightful that he bears His Father’s name. However this can be debunked by appealing to the complete absence of a parallel example. Nowhere else in scripture can we find an instance where an agent of YHWH is bestowed the name of YHWH (or any name for that matter) because he/she is acting on His behalf. Moses and Abraham often acted as YHWH’s agent, yet they are certainly never described as YHWH. This is also true of the NT believers, Paul and Peter were used by God but they are nowhere called God in the NT. Taken to a further extreme, any spirit-filled believer has at some time been ‘used’ by God and yet it’s more than inappropriate for us to be called YHWH, everyone knows this. What’s more, any notion that the law of agency applies to Yeshua in Zech 14 can be utterly dispelled upon reading verse 16 & 17:

Zechariah 14:16-17
16And it shall come to pass, that every one that is left of all the nations which came against Jerusalem shall even go up from year to year to worship the King, the LORD of hosts, and to keep the feast of tabernacles.
17And it shall be, that whoso will not come up of all the families of the earth unto Jerusalem to worshipthe King, the LORD of hosts, even upon them shall be no rain.

The “King, the Lord of Hosts” will be worshipped by the nations, and refusal to do this will result in dire consequences for them. Verses 20-21 make it plain that this worship is is highest form, that reserved only for YHWH. It goes without saying that YHWH cannot be worshipped by proxy, that is overt blasphemy, idolatry. No one may rightly recieve worship on God’s behalf, it’s ludicrous to even entertain this idea.

In summary, in Zechariah chapter 14 we see that Yeshua is in fact YHWH. He is the only legitimate candidate for the central figure in the Chapter based on the detail given in therein compared with other passages concerning the second coming (with His saints – Rev 19:14), Armageddon battle (Rev 19:11-19) and millennial reign as King from Mt Zion (Rev 20:4). It’s also important to understand that these things are not attributed to the Father in the NT, only Yeshua. Yeshua is explicitly called “LORD” (YHWH) no less than 12 times in the passage (verses 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 20 and  21) and “LORD (YHWH) of Hosts” on four occasions (verses 16, 17 and 21 [twice]). It seems obvious to me that the Holy Spirit Who inspired the book would not set out to deceive or confuse readers on the matter of Who YHWH is by assigning this name to the recipient who was not YHWH, therefore I conclude that Yeshua is called YHWH because He is YHWH!

Three questions for t8:

1. Is the central figure in Zechariah 14 described as YHWH in fact Yeshua? If not, precisely who is it? And what is you scriptural evidence for your choice?

2. Is Yeshua assigned the exclusively divine name “LORD” (i.e. YHWH) multiple times in this chapter?

3. If you agree that Zechariah 14 describes Yeshua, and that He is indeed called YHWH in this chapter, on what grounds do you argue that He is not YHWH when in this passage plainly says that He is??

Blessings


t8

The answer to your post is easily summed up in these 2 verses of which there are numerous complimentary verses I could quote if I wanted.

2 Corinthians 5:18-19
18 Now all these things are from God, who reconciled us to Himself through Christ and gave us the ministry of reconciliation,

19 namely, that God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself

God was in Christ. That is the answer. Just as God was in Christ when he came to earth, so God will be in him when he comes again.

So God will come, through Christ.

Remember God is invisible, so it’s not like he will come in his own body where you will be able to touch him. God is invisible, he is a spirit, and he is bigger than you can imagine.

God will come to earth through the Christ who is Jesus.

Likewise God can reside in us too.

To think that God is a being wholly contained in a body is bit silly. God will be in Christ and he will still be present outside of Christ too.

God does all these things, and he sends his servants to do his bidding. Simple as that.

This also explains how God is the only savoiur and sends Christ to do his will thereby saving us through Christ.

This is God’s will.


 

You can read the rest of the discussion here:


Discussion

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 20 posts - 61 through 80 (of 407 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #133289
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 11 2009,04:35)
    Hi t8

    If I were you I would concede also, especially in light of all the evidence that claims Jesus is God!

    Blessings WJ


    Ha ha. That is priceless, especially after the in depth examination of scripture that has gone on here for the last number of years on this subject. I do feel sorry for you though. Just as Saul's zeal was opposing God and the one whom he has sent, you are also opposing him by preaching a false doctrine that has caused all manor of division and even death.

    But then it is no surprise because if the idea in following verse is possible, then your comments are certainly within the realm of possibility even after been given hundreds of scriptures that break the truth, when God is thought of as a trinity.

    John 16:2
    They will put you out of the synagogue; in fact, a time is coming when anyone who kills you will think he is offering a service to God.

    Just shows how people can be deluded into thinking they are doing the one true God a service when in fact they are opposing him.

    And here are the 100 scriptures that break, when God is thought of as a trinity. This is by no means an exhaustive list.

    https://heavennet.net/writings/trinity-11.htm

    No matter how zealous you are, or how many times you interpret Thomas's statement toward your itching ears, you cannot deny that these hundred plus many more scriptures break when you replace the word “God” for “Trinity”.

    That alone should make you question. But zeal focussed on the wrong thing, can be very unreasonable. We see exactly the same thing in other religions too. Men who blow themselves up and others are very zealous. Problem is they too are opposing the ways of God.

    God is love and he is truth. These very attributes are personified in God's visible image, his son.

    The truth of God is very different to the traditions of men. I pray and hope that I choose the former and not the latter.

    #133290

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 11 2009,21:33)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 12 2009,07:42)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 11 2009,15:13)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 11 2009,18:15)
    No Mandy, it doesnt swing either way. No one has been able to disprove the GSR for 200 years.


    Hey bro,

    While I don't follow their teachings exclusively, the truthortradition.com folks have an excellent rebuttle to the GSR.  I'm sure if you were interested you could check out their site and what they have to offer.  I've read other accounts as well that have turned the GSR on it's head.  As I said, it simply matters who you are listening to.  Of course the proponents for the rule will say it's never been disproved, while other scholars would argue that they indeed have disproved it.  Go figure.

    Just a quick Google of GSR is enlightening as to whether or not one should trust it exclusively.  But of course I'm going to say that.

    Love,
    Mandy


    Hi Mandy

    But that is not true because they have only claimed that it is disproved without giving a scriptural example that proves what they say.

    Blessings WJ


    Hi,

    Are you talking about the truthortradition folks?  Because they give quite a few examples…have you been to their site?

    Just quickly checking in,
    Mandy


    Hi Mandy

    I have been to the sight, but the link you gave does not bring me to a debate.

    No, I havent seen their examples, so maybe you can give me one of their examples just tell me what scritpure they are saying proves the GSR wrong.

    Blessings Keith

    #133291

    Quote (t8 @ June 12 2009,00:37)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 11 2009,04:35)
    Hi t8

    If I were you I would concede also, especially in light of all the evidence that claims Jesus is God!

    Blessings WJ


    Ha ha. That is priceless, especially after the in depth examination of scripture that has gone on here for the last number of years on this subject.

    But then it is no surprise because if the idea in following verse is possible, then your comments are certainly within the realm of possibility even after been given hundreds of scriptures that break the truth, when God is thought of as a trinity.

    John 16:2
    They will put you out of the synagogue; in fact, a time is coming when anyone who kills you will think he is offering a service to God.

    Just shows haow people can be deluded into thinking they are doing the one true God a service when in fact they are opposing him.


    Hi t8

    Good points! Fron this side the view looks exactly the same! :)

    WJ

    #133292
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Thanks WJ.

    People can be very zealous and yet that zeal can be against God.

    That is why I am careful not to preach that which comes from man. I choose to preach scripture, that way I cannot be faulted. If I have fault it is when I depart from what is written and what God has and is saying.

    In light of this, it is good to keep away from the traditions of men.

    #133296

    Quote (t8 @ June 12 2009,00:50)
    Thanks WJ.

    People can be very zealous and yet that zeal can be against God.

    That is why I am careful not to preach that which comes from man. I choose to preach scripture, that way I cannot be faulted. If I have fault it is when I depart from what is written and what God has and is saying.

    In light of this, it is good to keep away from the traditions of men.


    Hi t8

    But what if the traditions are sound?

    What if a man is not zealous enough?

    What if the scriptures for instance say Jesus is God and men reject that because of their own bias or tradition?

    Could it be that when Jesus comes and they do not have that confession but are rather ashamed to make that confession that he will say I never knew you?

    Would Jesus cast out a man who worships him and gives him the very same honour he gives the Father?

    What if that person knows in his heart of hearts that the Jesus he serves is bigger than life, in fact he knows that he holds the “entire universe” together by the power of his word? Is a being like that not God to mere flesh?

    What if that person can find no difference in the nature of the Father, Jesus and the Spirit, but in fact sees Jesus who is in very nature God as also being the visible image of God, God manifesting himself to him?

    Would Jesus cast him out? Is there any limit to the praise and honour that we should give Jesus?

    The scriptures call Jesus “God”, “Lord and God”, “Great God and Saviour”, “Only Master and Lord”, “Mighty God”, “God with us”, and “Alpha and Omega”!

    So that is my confession and how free I am to not put any limits on Jesus my Lord and My God who is one with the Father and the Spirit, both in nature and in Power and Authority and Glory and Wisdom and Truth and Blessing and Honour forever and ever, Amen!

    Blessings WJ

    #133297
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    WJ, even the truth will not convince you and it is futile to try and make you see. Admittedly debating with you has served a purpose which is to show the fault in the Trinity doctrine as you have questioned everything and taken just about every advantage possible to support your slant.

    But now you are just going in circles and I am sure that you are probably quite dizzy in the process.

    Scripture doesn't back up your view and all you have are few examples taken out of context compared with hundreds of verses and the context of New Testament itself.

    I and some others here preach that God sent his son into the world that the world might be saved through him. The messiah existed in the form of God and emptied himself and took on human nature, died for our sins and was resurrected to be at God's right hand side with the glory he had before the world begun and where he intercedes for us.

    Your message is that God came in he flesh, God in the flesh died and rose again and he was resurrected back to the Godhead which is a substance that contains 3 persons.

    In support of your gospel, you take some verses here and there and out of context.

    In support of the view I espouse, you could take any verse with the word “God” in it (and without) and there is no contradiction. I challenge you to show what I teach as I have written here as contradicting any scripture or being false. You will not be able to because what I am saying is the very essence of New testament revelation.

    Yet I could show easily that God didn't die and that the one true God is the Father and not some substance that contains 3 persons.

    #133298

    Quote (t8 @ June 12 2009,02:43)
    WJ, even the truth will not convince you and it is futile to try and make you see. Admittedly debating with you has served a purpose which is to show the fault in the Trinity doctrine as you have questioned everything and taken just about every advantage possible to support your slant.

    But now you are just going in circles and I am sure that you are probably quite dizzy in the process.

    Scripture doesn't back up your view and all you have are few examples taken out of context compared with hundreds of verses and the context of New Testament itself.

    I and some others here preach that God sent his son into the world that the world might be saved through him. The messiah existed in the form of God and emptied himself and took on human nature, died for our sins and was resurrected to be at God's right hand side with the glory he had before the world begun and where he intercedes for us.

    Your message is that God came in he flesh, God in the flesh died and rose again and he was resurrected back to the Godhead which is a substance that contains 3 persons.

    In support of your gospel, you take some verses here and there and out of context.

    In support of the view I espouse, you could take any verse with the word “God” in it (and without) and there is no contradiction. I challenge you to show what I teach as I have written here as contradicting any scripture or being false. You will not be able to because what I am saying is the very essence of New testament revelation.

    Yet I could show easily that God didn't die and that the one true God is the Father and not some substance that contains 3 persons.


    Hi t8

    Jesus was also “Spirit” t8 and not just flesh.

    He was/is the Word God that came in the likeness of sinful flesh.

    The Spirit of Jesus “God the Word” did not die, so there is no contradiction in the Trinitarian view.

    The body without the Spirit is dead. The same day Jesus body gave out and died he went to Paradise/hades for three days and three nights.

    Just thought I would clarify that.

    Nothing in my confession is unscriptural t8, and I challenge you to show me where it is.

    Blessings WJ

    #133318
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (942767 @ June 12 2009,15:15)

    Quote (thethinker @ June 12 2009,11:52)
    Marty said:

    Quote
    How can he be YHWH, if YHWH is dwelling in him?

    Because YHWH is a plural unity. Now let me ask you a question. How can all things be created for YHWH and also be created for Christ?

    Proverbs 16:4: “YHWH has made all things FOR Himself, yes, even the wicked for the day of trouble.”

    Colossians 1:16: “All things were created by Him and FOR Him” (Christ).

    thinker


    Hi thethinker:

    1 Timothy 2:5
    For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;

    And the answer to your question is that Jesus is God's heir and we are joint heirs with him, and God made every thing for himself in that it is His to give to whomever he will.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    Marty,
    It says that all things were made BY Him as well as FOR Him. Not a very good explanation on your part. Please try again.

    thinker

    #133319
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ June 12 2009,18:43)
    WJ, even the truth will not convince you and it is futile to try and make you see. Admittedly debating with you has served a purpose which is to show the fault in the Trinity doctrine as you have questioned everything and taken just about every advantage possible to support your slant.

    But now you are just going in circles and I am sure that you are probably quite dizzy in the process.

    Scripture doesn't back up your view and all you have are few examples taken out of context compared with hundreds of verses and the context of New Testament itself.

    I and some others here preach that God sent his son into the world that the world might be saved through him. The messiah existed in the form of God and emptied himself and took on human nature, died for our sins and was resurrected to be at God's right hand side with the glory he had before the world begun and where he intercedes for us.

    Your message is that God came in he flesh, God in the flesh died and rose again and he was resurrected back to the Godhead which is a substance that contains 3 persons.

    In support of your gospel, you take some verses here and there and out of context.

    In support of the view I espouse, you could take any verse with the word “God” in it (and without) and there is no contradiction. I challenge you to show what I teach as I have written here as contradicting any scripture or being false. You will not be able to because what I am saying is the very essence of New testament revelation.

    Yet I could show easily that God didn't die and that the one true God is the Father and not some substance that contains 3 persons.


    t8,
    First, that part of your statement I highlighted in bold contradicts everything you said before and after. Second, Trinitarians also preach that God sent His Son into the world. So please stop boasting that this is distinctive to you guys. Furthermore, we preach it to the world at large and not just on some isolationist discussion board. Trinitarians hold to the Jewish concept of the denomination “Son” as it referred to the Messiah. To the Jew the Son was EQUAL with God (John 5:18). You guys concoct some other definition that is foreign to Jewish thought and to the Bible.

    Third, Christ went down to hades alive. So you do not need to “show” us that God didn't die.

    thinker

    #133320
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 12 2009,16:43)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 11 2009,21:33)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 12 2009,07:42)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 11 2009,15:13)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 11 2009,18:15)
    No Mandy, it doesnt swing either way. No one has been able to disprove the GSR for 200 years.


    Hey bro,

    While I don't follow their teachings exclusively, the truthortradition.com folks have an excellent rebuttle to the GSR.  I'm sure if you were interested you could check out their site and what they have to offer.  I've read other accounts as well that have turned the GSR on it's head.  As I said, it simply matters who you are listening to.  Of course the proponents for the rule will say it's never been disproved, while other scholars would argue that they indeed have disproved it.  Go figure.

    Just a quick Google of GSR is enlightening as to whether or not one should trust it exclusively.  But of course I'm going to say that.

    Love,
    Mandy


    Hi Mandy

    But that is not true because they have only claimed that it is disproved without giving a scriptural example that proves what they say.

    Blessings WJ


    Hi,

    Are you talking about the truthortradition folks?  Because they give quite a few examples…have you been to their site?

    Just quickly checking in,
    Mandy


    Hi Mandy

    I have been to the sight, but the link you gave does not bring me to a debate.

    No, I havent seen their examples, so maybe you can give me one of their examples just tell me what scritpure they are saying proves the GSR wrong.

    Blessings Keith


    Okay, I'll try to find that stuff later tonight. It's pretty interesting. Although you probably won't agree with them, it's just another way to look at things (like we need more possible theories….). :;):

    Have a good one,
    Mandy

    #133329
    Cindy
    Participant

    Quote (thethinker @ June 12 2009,11:44)
    Mandy said:

    Quote
    GSR has had numerous hits to it, some have been quite compelling.  It just depends on where your getting your information on it (it will swing either way, for it or against it).

    Mandy,
    If it will swing either way then please give examples. Furthermore, if the GSr is incorrect then the names “God” and “Savior” are to be distinguished and Titus 2:13  denies that God is Savior at the same time it denies that Jesus is God.

    thinker


    Why is it so hard for you to understand that God is only a tittle. Both the Father and Jesus have other names. Jehovah and Yeshua. And by the own words of Jesus who said:” My Father is greater then I.” If He said it then that means always, not only when He is walking this earth.
    There is no trinity, no where in the Bible. That is a man-made doctrine. Quintus Septimius Florens Tertullian was the first that came up with it. later in His life, He retreaded it.

    Deut. 4:35 ” Unto Thee it was shewed, that thou mightes know that the LORD He is God, there is none else beside Him.
    Notice that LORD is all capital letters. That is always speaking of the Father.

    Deut. 6:4 ” Hear O Israel, the LORD our God in one LORD.”

    1 Corinth. 8 : 4 ” And that there is no other God but one.

    And of course

    Ephesians 4:6 ….. the Father is above alll.

    Is that enough Scriptures to show that there is only one God and Father of all?

    Peace and Love Irene

    #133332
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Cindy @ June 13 2009,10:28)
    And by the own words of Jesus who said:” My Father is greater then I.” If He said it then that means always, not only when He is walking this earth.


    Very good point, Irene!
    :)

    #133334
    Cindy
    Participant

    Hi Mandy and thank you.  I have been gone, have you noticed?  I hurt myself on the chair and my Leg is still black and blue.  It hurt to walk on it, so I have not been on the Computer at all. Love Irene

    #133335
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (thethinker @ June 13 2009,06:38)
    t8,
    First, that part of your statement I highlighted in bold contradicts everything you said before and after.


    I can show you scripture that says the same thing.

    Your problem is with scripture, not me.

    I am merely repeating scripture.

    #133336
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (thethinker @ June 13 2009,06:38)
    Second, Trinitarians also preach that God sent His Son into the world. So please stop boasting that this is distinctive to you guys. Furthermore, we preach it to the world at large and not just on some isolationist discussion board. Trinitarians hold to the Jewish concept of the denomination “Son” as it referred to the Messiah. To the Jew the Son was EQUAL with God (John 5:18). You guys concoct some other definition that is foreign to Jewish thought and to the Bible.


    Ah but Trintarians ALSO say that Jesus is God. Therefore they agree that God sent his son in word, but the spin that God came in the flesh means that in deed they agree that God came in the flesh. Yet we are told that the Word became flesh.

    God cannot die and God is not a man and never will be Thinker. Has this thought crossed your mind?

    So in word you agree, but in deed you disagree because your idea of the son is God and the son is not the one true God, he is the image of God.

    I will let the son speak for himself if you are willing to listen.

    John 8:42
    Jesus said to them, “If God were your Father, you would love me, for I came from God and now am here. I have not come on my own; but he sent me.

    Is God your father, or a substance containing 3 personailties instead?

    #133337
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Irene said:

    Quote
    Why is it so hard for you to understand that God is only a tittle.

    The word “title” as defined by Funk and Wagnall's Dictionary,

    Quote
    2. An appelation significant of office, rank, etc,; esp.., a designation of nobility

    Tell me how Jesus' being God by “title” disproves trinitarianism.

    Irene said:

    Quote
    And by the own words of Jesus who said:”  My Father is greater then I.”

     

    AFTER His exaltation He said that he has ALL authority in heaven and in earth. Therefore, what He said before His exaltation about the Father being greater than Him does NOT apply now.

    thinker

    #133339
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    t8 said:

    Quote
    Ah but Trintarians ALSO say that Jesus is God. Therefore they agree that God sent his son in word, but the spin that God came in the flesh means that in deed they agree that God came in the flesh. Yet we are told that the Word became flesh.

    John 1:1 literally reads thus,

    Quote
    And God was the Word

    Verse 14 says,

    Quote
    And the Word became flesh

    Permise 1: God was the Word
    Premise 2: The Word became flesh
    Conclusion: Therefore, God became flesh

    The term “son” in reference to Jesus referred only to His office as the mediator of the covenant of redemption. Jesus officially became the Son of God at His exaltation. Please note that God also became His Father at that time. It was in reference to Christ's exaltation God said, “I will be a Father to him. So God became the Father at the same point in time that Christ became the Son. Therefore, God did not pre-exist Jesus as “Father”.

    thinker

    #133347
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    So your gospel is that God became flesh and died and rose again.

    That is not what you read in scripture however. It is not what Paul, Peter, John, or Jesus taught.

    It was the Logos who became flesh and it is antichrist to deny that Jesus came in the flesh. So it is within the realm of deception to deny Jesus coming in the flesh by saying that God came in the flesh.

    However, the one true God sent him into the world to do his will.

    Thinker, if God was your Father you would love Christ because he came from God and was sent, not that he is God. That is wrong and therefore cannot be true by definition of being wrong.

    The one true God and Most High is the Father of all. Even the word Father demonstrates this truth.

    #133355
    942767
    Participant

    Quote (thethinker @ June 13 2009,06:20)

    Quote (942767 @ June 12 2009,15:15)

    Quote (thethinker @ June 12 2009,11:52)
    Marty said:

    Quote
    How can he be YHWH, if YHWH is dwelling in him?

    Because YHWH is a plural unity. Now let me ask you a question. How can all things be created for YHWH and also be created for Christ?

    Proverbs 16:4: “YHWH has made all things FOR Himself, yes, even the wicked for the day of trouble.”

    Colossians 1:16: “All things were created by Him and FOR Him” (Christ).

    thinker


    Hi thethinker:

    1 Timothy 2:5
    For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;

    And the answer to your question is that Jesus is God's heir and we are joint heirs with him, and God made every thing for himself in that it is His to give to whomever he will.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    Marty,
    It says that all things were made BY Him as well as FOR Him. Not a very good explanation on your part. Please try again.

    thinker


    OK:

    Try this scripture:

    Quote
    1Cr 2:9 But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him.
    1Cr 2:10 But God hath revealed [them] unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty

    #133379
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ June 13 2009,13:37)
    So your gospel is that God became flesh and died and rose again.

    That is not what you read in scripture however. It is not what Paul, Peter, John, or Jesus taught.

    It was the Logos who became flesh and it is antichrist to deny that Jesus came in the flesh. So it is within the realm of deception to deny Jesus coming in the flesh by saying that God came in the flesh.

    However, the one true God sent him into the world to do his will.

    Thinker, if God was your Father you would love Christ because he came from God and was sent, not that he is God. That is wrong and therefore cannot be true by definition of being wrong.

    The one true God and Most High is the Father of all. Even the word Father demonstrates this truth.


    t8,
    Produce a trinitarian commentator who denies that Jesus Christ came in the flesh. I can produce one anti-trinitarian here that denies it,

    Paladin said:

    Quote
    There is no verse in scripture that says Jesus Christ “came in the flesh.” THAT is a conclusion reached by theologians who do not know how to properly exegete the Greek. (“Did John say God became flesh” thread, p. 2, 11:20)

    Trinitarians confess that Jesus Christ came in the flesh.  We believe that Jesus Christ is God. Therefore, God became flesh. The name “Jesus” means “Jehovah saves.” Did the name “Jesus” truly and properly belong to Jesus? Paladin is the only antichrist on this board.

    I have already showed you that the apostle John taught that God became flesh. John 1:1 literally reads thus,

    Quote
    And God was the Word

    Verse 14 says,

    Quote
    And the Word became flesh

    Permise 1: God was the Word
    Premise 2: The Word became flesh
    Conclusion: Therefore, God became flesh

    thinker

Viewing 20 posts - 61 through 80 (of 407 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2024 Heaven Net

Navigation

© 1999 - 2023 - Heaven Net
or

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

or

Create Account