Trinity Debate – Zechariah 14

Subject: Zechariah 14 proves the Trinity Doctrine
Date: March 22 2008
Debaters:  Is 1: 18 & t8


Is 1: 18

This is my fourth and final post in this debate. I may post a final wrap-up of the last four posts and allow t8 to do the same, if he is amenable. People can make their own minds up as whose posts have been the most persuasive, who has been most faithful to the sciptures. I thought I would save what I consider to be the strongest proof text for last. The passage I have selected is Zechariah chapter 14, it reads as follows:

Zechariah 14
1Behold, a day is coming for the LORD when the spoil taken from you will be divided among you.
2For I will gather all the nations against Jerusalem to battle, and the city will be captured, the houses plundered, the women ravished and half of the city exiled, but the rest of the people will not be cut off from the city.
3Then the LORD will go forth and fight against those nations, as when He fights on a day of battle.
4In that day His feet will stand on the Mount of Olives, which is in front of Jerusalem on the east; and the Mount of Olives will be split in its middle from east to west by a very large valley, so that half of the mountain will move toward the north and the other half toward the south.
5You will flee by the valley of My mountains, for the valley of the mountains will reach to Azel; yes, you will flee just as you fled before the earthquake in the days of Uzziah king of Judah Then the LORD, my God, will come, and all the holy ones with Him!
6In that day there will be no light; the luminaries will dwindle.
7For it will be a unique day which is known to the LORD, neither day nor night, but it will come about that at evening time there will be light.
8And in that day living waters will flow out of Jerusalem, half of them toward the eastern sea and the other half toward the western sea; it will be in summer as well as in winter.
9And the LORD will be king over all the earth; in that day the LORD will be the only one, and His name the only one.
10All the land will be changed into a plain from Geba to Rimmon south of Jerusalem; but Jerusalem will rise and remain on its site from Benjamin’s Gate as far as the place of the First Gate to the Corner Gate, and from the Tower of Hananel to the king’s wine presses.
11People will live in it, and there will no longer be a curse, for Jerusalem will dwell in security.
12Now this will be the plague with which the LORD will strike all the peoples who have gone to war against Jerusalem; their flesh will rot while they stand on their feet, and their eyes will rot in their sockets, and their tongue will rot in their mouth.
13It will come about in that day that a great panic from the LORD will fall on them; and they will seize one another’s hand, and the hand of one will be lifted against the hand of another.
14Judah also will fight at Jerusalem; and the wealth of all the surrounding nations will be gathered, gold and silver and garments in great abundance.
15So also like this plague will be the plague on the horse, the mule, the camel, the donkey and all the cattle that will be in those camps.
16Then it will come about that any who are left of all the nations that went against Jerusalem will go up from year to year to worship the King, the LORD of hosts, and to celebrate the Feast of Booths.
17And it will be that whichever of the families of the earth does not go up to Jerusalem to worship the King, the LORD of hosts, there will be no rain on them.
18If the family of Egypt does not go up or enter, then no rain will fall on them; it will be the plague with which the LORD smites the nations who do not go up to celebrate the Feast of Booths.
19This will be the punishment of Egypt, and the punishment of all the nations who do not go up to celebrate the Feast of Booths.
20In that day there will be inscribed on the bells of the horses, “HOLY TO THE LORD ” And the cooking pots in the LORD’S house will be like the bowls before the altar.
21Every cooking pot in Jerusalem and in Judah will be holy to the LORD of hosts; and all who sacrifice will come and take of them and boil in them And there will no longer be a Canaanite in the house of the LORD of hosts in that day.

Question: Who is the central figure in view here? Who specifically is this person designated “YHWH”? The Father? Yeshua?….

It’s my contention this person is Yeshua. This chapter in Zechariah is, of course, overtly prophetic of the second coming, the outpouring of his wrath on the wicked who have survived the tribulation (the “nations”) and have foolishly decided to wage war with Him as well as His millennial reign from Mt Zion in Jerusalem. Moreover, none of the things described in the chapter are predicted to be fulfilled by the Father in the New Testament (hereafter designated NT). Zechariah is a book that is replete with references to the Messiah; a triumphant king humbly riding a donkey (9:9), they will look to me, the one they have pierced (12:10), sold for 30 pieces of silver (11:12-13), His disciples would be “scattered” after His death (13:7). So it naturally follows that Zechariah is also messianic, the context confirms this. The detail given in the Chapter 14 passage about the person (the King) and the era in which He inhabits the Earth aligns tightly to much of the eschatological (end times) scripture pertaining to Yeshua in other parts of the Bible, especially that found in Revelation.

As a small aside, in Acts 1:11 we are told that Yeshua will return in “just the same way as you have watched Him go into heaven”.

Acts 1:9-11
9And after He had said these things, He was lifted up while they were looking on, and a cloud received Him out of their sight. 10And as they were gazing intently into the sky while He was going, behold, two men in white clothing stood beside them. 11They also said, “Men of Galilee, why do you stand looking into the sky? This Jesus, who has been taken up from you into heaven, will come in just the same way as you have watched Him go into heaven.” 12Then they returned to Jerusalem from the mount called Olivet, which is near Jerusalem, a Sabbath day’s journey away.

Yeshua ascended from the Mount of Olives and the angel affirmed that He will return “in just the same manner”. Zech 14:4 tells us that YHWH’s feet will stand on the very same spot; the Mt of Olives.

Zechariah 14:4
4And his feet shall stand in that day upon the mount of Olives, which is before Jerusalem on the east, and the mount of Olives shall cleave in the midst thereof toward the east and toward the west, and there shall be a very great valley; and half of the mountain shall remove toward the north, and half of it toward the south.

“the old traditional opinion is not improbable, that our Lord shall come again to judge the earth, where He left the earth, near the place of His Agony and Crucifixion for us. So shall “the Feet” of God literally, “stand upon the Mount of Olives.”
Source: http://bibletools.org/….s

Curious….

Okay let me try to illustrate some of the commonalities between what is written of YHWH in Zech 14:1-4 and what is written of Yeshua elsewhere in the Bible, passages that make Yeshua the only legitimate candidate for the person we read about in Zech 14. Rather than comprehensively expound this chapter (which I’m not qualified to do) I’ll just let some key verses and their parallel scriptures speak for themselves, readers can draw their own conclusions.

Zechariah 14:1-4 describe YHWH “coming” to Earth, before and after His ascension Yeshua many times declared He is coming again:

Zechariah 14
1Behold, a day is coming for the LORD when the spoil taken from you will be divided among you.
2For I will gather all the nations against Jerusalem to battle, and the city will be captured, the houses plundered, the women ravished and half of the city exiled, but the rest of the people will not be cut off from the city.
3Then the LORD will go forth and fight against those nations, as when He fights on a day of battle.
4In that day His feet will stand on the Mount of Olives, which is in front of Jerusalem on the east; and the Mount of Olives will be split in its middle from east to west by a very large valley, so that half of the mountain will move toward the north and the other half toward the south.

CF.

Matthew 24:30
30″And then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in the sky, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the SON OF MAN COMING ON THE CLOUDS OF THE SKY with power and great glory. (cf. Matt 16:27, 24:37; Mark 8:38, 13:26; Luke 21:27)

Revelation 3:11
11I am coming quickly; hold fast what you have, so that no one will take your crown.

Revelation 22:7
7″And behold, I am coming quickly Blessed is he who heeds the words of the prophecy of this book.”

Revelation 22:12
“Behold, I am coming quickly, and My reward is with Me, to render to every man according to what he has done.

Revelation 22:20
He who testifies to these things says, “Yes, I am coming quickly ” Amen Come, Lord Jesus.

The apostles, of course, were expecting and prophesied Yeshua’s return: 

Matthew 24:3
3As He was sitting on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to Him privately, saying, “Tell us, when will these things happen, and what will be the sign of Your coming, and of the end of the age?”

1 Thessalonians 3:13
To the end he may stablish your hearts unblameable in holiness before God, even our Father, at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ with all his saints.

1 Timothy 6:14
That you keep the commandment without stain or reproach until the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ

2 Timothy 1:10
10but now has been revealed by the appearing of our Savior Christ Jesus, who abolished death and brought life and immortality to light through the gospel

2 Timothy 4:1
1I solemnly charge you in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus, who is to judge the living and the dead, and by His appearing and His kingdom:

2 Timothy 4:8
8in the future there is laid up for me the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous Judge, will award to me on that day; and not only to me, but also to all who have loved His appearing

Titus 2:13-14
13looking for the blessed hope and the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Christ Jesus, 14who gave Himself for us to redeem us from every lawless deed, and to purify for Himself a people for His own possession, zealous for good deeds.

Revelation 1:7
7BEHOLD, HE IS COMING WITH THE CLOUDS, and every eye will see Him, even those who pierced Him; and all the tribes of the earth will mourn over Him. So it is to be. Amen.

Zech 14:3-4 and 14:12 describe YHWH in the role of a punisher/avenger of “nations” (v2) , when Yeshua does come it has been foretold that He will also come in the role as punisher/avenger: 

Zechariah 14:12
12And this shall be the plague wherewith the LORD will smite all the people that have fought against Jerusalem; Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet, and their eyes shall consume away in their holes, and their tongue shall consume away in their mouth.

CF.

2 Thessalonians 2:8
8Then that lawless one will be revealed whom the Lord will slay with the breath of His mouth and bring to an end by the appearance of His coming;

Revelation 2:16
16’Therefore repent; or else I am coming to you quickly, and I will make war against them with the sword of My mouth.

Revelation 17:14
14″These will wage war against the Lamb, and the Lamb will overcome them, because He is Lord of lords and King of kings, and those who are with Him are the called and chosen and faithful.”

Revelation 19:15
15And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.

(also compare Rev 2:16 and 19:15 with Isa 11:4)

Zechariah 14:5 declares that when YHWH comes He will be accompanied by His saints, this is also true of Yeshua when He comes again: 

Zechariah 14:5
5And ye shall flee to the valley of the mountains; for the valley of the mountains shall reach unto Azal: yea, ye shall flee, like as ye fled from before the earthquake in the days of Uzziah king of Judah: and the LORD [YHWH] my God shall come, and all the saints with thee.

CF.

1 Thessalonians 3:13
To the end he may stablish your hearts unblameable in holiness before God, even our Father, at the coming of ourLord Jesus Christ with all his saints.

Jude 1
14And Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these, saying, Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints.

Revelation 19:13-14
13And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God. 14And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean.

Zechariah 14:9, 16-17 testifies that YHWH will rule the nations from Jerusalem (also see Isa 24:23, Micah 4:7), other scripture reveals that Yeshua will rule as King on Earth 

Zechariah 14:9, 16-17
9And the LORD [YHWH] shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall there be one LORD [YHWH], and his name one….16And it shall come to pass, that every one that is left of all the nations which came against Jerusalem shall even go up from year to year to worship the Kingthe LORD [YHWH] of hosts, and to keep the feast of tabernacles. 17And it shall be, that whoso will not come up of all the families of the earth unto Jerusalem to worship the Kingthe LORD [YHWH] of hosts, even upon them shall be no rain.

Isaiah 24:23
23Then the moon will be abashed and the sun ashamed, For the LORD of hosts will reign on Mount Zion and in Jerusalem, And His glory will be before His elders.

Micah 4:7
7″I will make the lame a remnant; And the outcasts a strong nation, And the LORD will reign over them in Mount Zion; From now on and forever

CF.

Daniel 7:13-14
13″I kept looking in the night visions, And behold, with the clouds of heaven one like a Son of Man was coming, and He came up to the Ancient of Days and was presented before Him. 14″And to Him was given dominion, glory and a kingdom, that all the peoples, nations and men of every language might serve Him. His dominion is an everlasting dominion, which will not pass away; and His kingdom is one which will not be destroyed.

Daniel 7:27
27’Then the sovereignty, the dominion and the greatness of all the kingdoms under the whole heaven will be given to the people of the saints of the Highest One; His kingdom will be an everlasting kingdom, and all the dominions will serve and obey Him.’

Matthew 25:34
Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world:

2 Timothy 2:10-12
10For this reason I endure all things for the sake of those who are chosen, so that they also may obtain the salvation which is in Christ Jesus and with it eternal glory. 11It is a trustworthy statement: For if we died with Him, we will also live with Him; 12If we endure, we will also reign with Him; If we deny Him, He also will deny us;

Revelation 12:5
5And she gave birth to a son, a male child, who is to rule all the nations with a rod of iron; and her child was caught up to God and to His throne.

Revelation 17:14
These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful.

Revelation 20:4
4Then I saw thrones, and they sat on them, and judgment was given to them And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony of Jesus and because of the word of God, and those who had not worshiped the beast or his image, and had not received the mark on their forehead and on their hand; and they came to life and reigned with Christ for a thousand years.

Moreover, He will do this from the throne of David (a throne located in Jerusalem), which His Father will establish: 

2 Samuel 7:12-13
12″When your days are complete and you lie down with your fathers, I will raise up your descendant after you, who will come forth from you, and I will establish his kingdom.13″He shall build a house for My name, and I will establishthe throne of his kingdom forever.

Isaiah 9:6-7
6For a child will be born to us, a son will be given to us; And the government will rest on His shoulders; And His name will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God,
Eternal Father, Prince of Peace. 7There will be no end to the increase of His government or of peace, On the throne of David and over his kingdom, To establish it and to uphold it with justice and righteousness

Isaiah 16:5
A throne will even be established in lovingkindness, And a judge will sit on it in faithfulness in the tent ofDavid; Moreover, he will seek justice And be prompt in righteousness

Luke 1:32
32″He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High; and the Lord God will give Him the throne of His father David; 33and He will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and His kingdom will have no end.”

So it’s quite apparent that Zechariah 14:1-4 prophetically describes Yeshua’s coming to Earth, the outpouring of His retribution upon the wicked “nations” and His Kingly reign from Mt Zion in Jerusalem, where He will be seated on David’s throne. Jerusalem, Mt Zion, David’s throne – these are manifestly physical locations, on Earth! The NT does not tesify of the Father ever residing on Earth. In actual fact Yeshua will not hand over the Kingdom to His Father until all rule, authority and power has been abolished, He must reign until all enemies have been put under His feet  (1 Cor 15:24-25). This will not occur until after Satan has been loosed a little while to deceive the nations one last time (Rev 20:7), and this will not happen until after the 1000 year reign of Christ has consummated. The Father, evidently, will still be in Heaven during this time. But here’s the important point I’ve been driving at  – Yeshua is explicitly called YHWH on twelve separate occasions in Zechariah 14; verses 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 20 and  21. Would the Bible ascribe the exclusively divine name to someone who is not YHWH?? I think not! That would be grossly misleading, to say the least. On this point it may be argued by t8 that Yeshua is assigned this name on account of His role as YHWH’s agent, i.e. YHWH, Yeshua’s Father, is ruling through Him therefore it is rightful that he bears His Father’s name. However this can be debunked by appealing to the complete absence of a parallel example. Nowhere else in scripture can we find an instance where an agent of YHWH is bestowed the name of YHWH (or any name for that matter) because he/she is acting on His behalf. Moses and Abraham often acted as YHWH’s agent, yet they are certainly never described as YHWH. This is also true of the NT believers, Paul and Peter were used by God but they are nowhere called God in the NT. Taken to a further extreme, any spirit-filled believer has at some time been ‘used’ by God and yet it’s more than inappropriate for us to be called YHWH, everyone knows this. What’s more, any notion that the law of agency applies to Yeshua in Zech 14 can be utterly dispelled upon reading verse 16 & 17:

Zechariah 14:16-17
16And it shall come to pass, that every one that is left of all the nations which came against Jerusalem shall even go up from year to year to worship the King, the LORD of hosts, and to keep the feast of tabernacles.
17And it shall be, that whoso will not come up of all the families of the earth unto Jerusalem to worshipthe King, the LORD of hosts, even upon them shall be no rain.

The “King, the Lord of Hosts” will be worshipped by the nations, and refusal to do this will result in dire consequences for them. Verses 20-21 make it plain that this worship is is highest form, that reserved only for YHWH. It goes without saying that YHWH cannot be worshipped by proxy, that is overt blasphemy, idolatry. No one may rightly recieve worship on God’s behalf, it’s ludicrous to even entertain this idea.

In summary, in Zechariah chapter 14 we see that Yeshua is in fact YHWH. He is the only legitimate candidate for the central figure in the Chapter based on the detail given in therein compared with other passages concerning the second coming (with His saints – Rev 19:14), Armageddon battle (Rev 19:11-19) and millennial reign as King from Mt Zion (Rev 20:4). It’s also important to understand that these things are not attributed to the Father in the NT, only Yeshua. Yeshua is explicitly called “LORD” (YHWH) no less than 12 times in the passage (verses 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 20 and  21) and “LORD (YHWH) of Hosts” on four occasions (verses 16, 17 and 21 [twice]). It seems obvious to me that the Holy Spirit Who inspired the book would not set out to deceive or confuse readers on the matter of Who YHWH is by assigning this name to the recipient who was not YHWH, therefore I conclude that Yeshua is called YHWH because He is YHWH!

Three questions for t8:

1. Is the central figure in Zechariah 14 described as YHWH in fact Yeshua? If not, precisely who is it? And what is you scriptural evidence for your choice?

2. Is Yeshua assigned the exclusively divine name “LORD” (i.e. YHWH) multiple times in this chapter?

3. If you agree that Zechariah 14 describes Yeshua, and that He is indeed called YHWH in this chapter, on what grounds do you argue that He is not YHWH when in this passage plainly says that He is??

Blessings


t8

The answer to your post is easily summed up in these 2 verses of which there are numerous complimentary verses I could quote if I wanted.

2 Corinthians 5:18-19
18 Now all these things are from God, who reconciled us to Himself through Christ and gave us the ministry of reconciliation,

19 namely, that God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself

God was in Christ. That is the answer. Just as God was in Christ when he came to earth, so God will be in him when he comes again.

So God will come, through Christ.

Remember God is invisible, so it’s not like he will come in his own body where you will be able to touch him. God is invisible, he is a spirit, and he is bigger than you can imagine.

God will come to earth through the Christ who is Jesus.

Likewise God can reside in us too.

To think that God is a being wholly contained in a body is bit silly. God will be in Christ and he will still be present outside of Christ too.

God does all these things, and he sends his servants to do his bidding. Simple as that.

This also explains how God is the only savoiur and sends Christ to do his will thereby saving us through Christ.

This is God’s will.


 

You can read the rest of the discussion here:


Discussion

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 20 posts - 321 through 340 (of 407 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #148815
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    t8 said;

    Quote
    2 Corinthians 5:18-19
    18 Now all these things are from God, who reconciled us to Himself through Christ and gave us the ministry of reconciliation,

    19 namely, that God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself…

    In other words, Christ is not really our Savior but the Father alone. Christ really did not carry his own torture stake up the hill. God did it “in” Him.

    “who Himself bore our sins in His own body on the tree, that we, having died to sins, might live for righteousness—by whose stripes you were healed”

    According to t8's logic Christ did not bear our sins HIMSELF. God bore our sins “in” Him. Arianism is THE LIE because it infers and even in some cases blatantly denies that Christ HIMSELF is our Savior and that He bore our sins HIMSELF.

    t8 must revisit his definitions. For God's work of reconciliation “in” Christ necessarily means that God could not have done it without Christ. t8 also needs to study the law of non-contradiction. For Paul's statement does no harm to trinitarianism in the least.

    t8 speaks as though Christ was dispensible in the matter.

    thinker

    #148816
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi TT,
    You find fault with the Spirit of God speaking through Paul?
    Just like BD .

    Do you think it is wise to speak against the Spirit of God?

    #148822
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Oct. 06 2009,11:10)
    Hi TT,
    You find fault with the Spirit of God speaking through Paul?
    Just like BD .

    Do you think it is wise to speak against the Spirit of God?


    If find fault with the spirit of t8 concerning Paul's words. Paul did not infer that Christ was dispensible in salvation as t8 suggests.

    thinker

    #148841
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi TT,
    You quoted the Word of God then judged it.
    Why do you think you are above scripture?

    #148847
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Oct. 06 2009,12:40)
    Hi TT,
    You quoted the Word of God then judged it.
    Why do you think you are above scripture?


    No Nick,
    I did not judge Paul. I challenged t8's misuse of the scripture. I checked the Greek and the word “in” means “by agency of.”

    “God was by agency of the Christ reconciling the world unto Himself.”

    This means that Christ is THE SAVIOR!

    “He (Christ) has become the AUTHOR of eternal salvation to all those who obey Him” (Hebrews 5:9).

    t8 thinks he proves his Arianism. All he proves is that he is a novice in his handling of the scriptures.

    thinker

    #148854
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi tt,
    But you confuse logic with divine wisdom.
    Does that mean you can judge those who prefer God's Word?

    #148855
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Oct. 06 2009,13:17)
    Hi tt,
    But you confuse logic with divine wisdom.
    Does that mean you can judge those who prefer God's Word?


    You judge the author of Hebrews. He said that Christ is the AUTHOR of eternal salvation.

    thinker

    #148858
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi TT,
    You should come to him and accept his teachings.
    He is the appointed teacher, not Tertullian.

    #148894
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ Oct. 06 2009,09:43)

    Quote (t8 @ Oct. 05 2009,10:53)

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ Oct. 04 2009,19:49)
    I was just pointing out that you committed another informal fallacy of logic. Nothing more.


    Fallacy of logic, or pointing out the consequences of your teaching?

    The reasoning is not incorrect, because it is taught that Jesus rose from the dead. Not even open for dispute. But the Trinity doctrine is not taught. The so-called foundation is not even mentioned. How weird is that?

    Some men think it is inferred. They are entitled to their opinion. They are also entitled to be wrong.

    Also, if the Pope handed out pay cheques for those that defend the foundation of his Church, I think you should not only entitled to receive one, but also honorary recognition too. I mean, lets face it, you are not even Catholic and yet do more for that organisation than most Catholics do.

    Anyway, serious jesting aside, I would say it is not guilt by association, but really a consequence of your actions.

    For example: if a scientist taught the same thing as Hitler's take on evolution and the Jews position in the human tree, then that is not necessarily guilt by association, but this scientist's views would help the Nazi cause, and his views could be quoted in order to support that view. It wouldn't mean that the scientist was actually a Nazi, would it?


    It's argued that the precursor to the establishment known as the Roman Catholic Church was 380AD (although this organisation bore little resemblance to the current model(s), in terms of it's doctrines and traditions), this was 50+ years after the codification of the trinity doctrine in 325AD, in the First Council of Nicaea. The doctine preceded the even the earliest development of the RCC T8. So you have a problem there.

    Also, it's important to note that the doctrine is not exclusive to the Catholics. The vast majority of denominations hold to it. So it's no more a Catholic belief than other doctrines like the incarnation, ascention and resurrection of Christ.


    What are you going on about now?

    You are always looking for ways outside of scripture to make your point of view the winning view. I think you need to go into the New Zealand bush or Australian Outback for a year and have a good think about what you are actually doing with your life.

    For the record: I have never said that the RCC formed and then imposed the Trinity Doctrine for the first time. I never said that it was their invention.

    I think it goes something like this from what I understand.

    Roman Empire > Holy Roman Empire > RCC

    The Trinity doctrine developed before Athanasius and perhaps even before Tertullian, who knows. But it was during the time of the Roman Empire that it shows up. Sometime after the books of the bible were first written.

    The Empire made the doctrine official and it was carried through to the Holy Roman Empire (with some swings of the pendulum), and it is now the foundation of the RCC, many of her daughters, and now you.

    We reject that whole set up and instead rely on what Jesus, the Apostles, and Paul taught. We go to the source and bypass tradition.

    For US there is one God the Father and one lord, the Lord Jesus Christ. I believe that. I belong to that truth. You oppose it.

    I care not (except for exposing the lies) for all the politics and traditions that men including yourself try to impose (open or veiled threats), of resistance, persecution, defamation, excommunication, damnation, torture, burning at the stake, or whatever else is hurled at those who wish not to comply with traditions of men and doctrines of demons and men. Especially those who refused to comply with the Trinity doctrine. Many have even been killed by Trinity Henchmen in the past.

    Given that history, I am not surprised that you are enraged at us and come here in the spirit of persecution. Can you not see that you are being used as a pawn in a much bigger game than the one you are playing? You are being used because you are open to being used.

    #148904

    Quote (t8 @ Oct. 06 2009,00:14)

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ Oct. 06 2009,09:43)

    Quote (t8 @ Oct. 05 2009,10:53)

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ Oct. 04 2009,19:49)
    I was just pointing out that you committed another informal fallacy of logic. Nothing more.


    Fallacy of logic, or pointing out the consequences of your teaching?

    The reasoning is not incorrect, because it is taught that Jesus rose from the dead. Not even open for dispute. But the Trinity doctrine is not taught. The so-called foundation is not even mentioned. How weird is that?

    Some men think it is inferred. They are entitled to their opinion. They are also entitled to be wrong.

    Also, if the Pope handed out pay cheques for those that defend the foundation of his Church, I think you should not only entitled to receive one, but also honorary recognition too. I mean, lets face it, you are not even Catholic and yet do more for that organisation than most Catholics do.

    Anyway, serious jesting aside, I would say it is not guilt by association, but really a consequence of your actions.

    For example: if a scientist taught the same thing as Hitler's take on evolution and the Jews position in the human tree, then that is not necessarily guilt by association, but this scientist's views would help the Nazi cause, and his views could be quoted in order to support that view. It wouldn't mean that the scientist was actually a Nazi, would it?


    It's argued that the precursor to the establishment known as the Roman Catholic Church was 380AD (although this organisation bore little resemblance to the current model(s), in terms of it's doctrines and traditions), this was 50+ years after the codification of the trinity doctrine in 325AD, in the First Council of Nicaea. The doctine preceded the even the earliest development of the RCC T8. So you have a problem there.

    Also, it's important to note that the doctrine is not exclusive to the Catholics. The vast majority of denominations hold to it. So it's no more a Catholic belief than other doctrines like the incarnation, ascention and resurrection of Christ.


    What are you going on about now?

    You are always looking for ways outside of scripture to make your point of view the winning view. I think you need to go into the New Zealand bush or Australian Outback for a year and have a good think about what you are actually doing with your life.

    For the record: I have never said that the RCC formed and then imposed the Trinity Doctrine for the first time. I never said that it was their invention.

    I think it goes something like this from what I understand.

    Roman Empire > Holy Roman Empire > RCC

    The Trinity doctrine developed before Athanasius and perhaps even before Tertullian, who knows. But it was during the time of the Roman Empire that it shows up. Sometime after the books of the bible were first written.

    The Empire made the doctrine official and it was carried through to the Holy Roman Empire (with some swings of the pendulum), and it is now the foundation of the RCC, many of her daughters, and now you.

    We reject that whole set up and instead rely on what Jesus, the Apostles, and Paul taught. We go to the source and bypass tradition.

    For US there is one God the Father and one lord, the Lord Jesus Christ. I believe that. I belong to that truth. You oppose it.

    I care not (except for exposing the lies) for all the politics and traditions that men including yourself try to impose (open or veiled threats), of resistance, persecution, defamation, excommunication, damnation, torture, burning at the stake, or whatever else is hurled at those who wish not to comply with traditions of men and doctrines of demons and men. Especially those who refused to comply with the Trinity doctrine. Many have even been killed by Trinity Henchmen in the past.

    Given that history, I am not surprised that you are enraged at us and come here in the spirit of persecution. Can you not see that you are being used as a pawn in a much bigger game than the one you are playing? You are being used because you are open to being used.


    t8

    Quote (t8 @ Oct. 06 2009,00:14)
    I care not (except for exposing the lies) for all the politics and traditions that men including yourself try to impose (open or veiled threats), of resistance, persecution, defamation, excommunication, damnation, torture, burning at the stake, or whatever else is hurled at those who wish not to comply with traditions of men and doctrines of demons and men. Especially those who refused to comply with the Trinity doctrine. Many have even been killed by Trinity Henchmen in the past.

    Given that history, I am not surprised that you are enraged at us and come here in the spirit of persecution. Can you not see that you are being used as a pawn in a much bigger game than the one you are playing? You are being used because you are open to being used.


    Would you care to expound to us how you see your above statement in Pauls post?

    Or is this just more of your patronizing attitude toward those who disagree with you and your Henotheistic doctrine?

    Are you angry that he was able to elequantly refute your Henotheistic views in the debates?

    What gives?

    BTW, you are also being disengenuos about the “Trinitarians” spilling of blood, for history shows the spilling of blood by the Arians and many Trinitarians being exciled and dying by their hands, and they ruled for sometime, but you ignore this, so you create a straw man.

    WJ

    #148943
    Is 1:18
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ Oct. 06 2009,16:14)
    What are you going on about now?

    For the record: I have never said that the RCC formed and then imposed the Trinity Doctrine for the first time. I never said that it was their invention.


    Time and time again you've associated the trinity doctrine with the RCC, the inescapable inference is that it's a Catholic doctrine. Maybe you don't realise you do it. Here's one example. Read your own words from page 31 of this thread (emphasis mine):

    Quote
    Of course you are free to side with scripture or the lie. So far you support and promote that lie called the Trinity Doctrine, the foundation of the Roman Catholic faith.

    You are working indirectly for the Pope, but probably don't realise it because you preach the Roman Catholic Faith which is the Trinity doctrine.


    It's the guilt by association fallacy. Very clumsy reasoning. That is what I'm “going on about now”. The post I quoted was just a variation on a theme.

    Quote
    You are always looking for ways outside of scripture to make your point of view the winning view. I think you need to go into the New Zealand bush or Australian Outback for a year and have a good think about what you are actually doing with your life.


    T8, I've said this to you before but I think I may need to repeat it. I don't need a life coach and if I did I don't think you'd be at the top of my list (nothing personal). My life is just fine. I don't make these patronising comments to you and I'd appreciate it if you could do the same.

    #148947
    Is 1:18
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ Oct. 06 2009,16:14)
    For US there is one God the Father and one lord, the Lord Jesus Christ. I believe that. I belong to that truth. You oppose it.


    I've got no issue with 1 Cor 8:6, as you well know. Lord knows we've been through that verse a few times! (and He does too). And if I recall correctly the debate ended pretty abruptly when I asked you if the Father was your Lord as well as your God. Of course you can't really answer that. If you answered “yes” then you concede that Paul could not have been drawing an ontological contra-distinction between Yeshua and the Father. If you answered “no” then you have denyed the Father His rightful Lordship, thereby blaspheming.

    Quote
    Given that history, I am not surprised that you are enraged at us and come here in the spirit of persecution. Can you not see that you are being used as a pawn in a much bigger game than the one you are playing? You are being used because you are open to being used.


    I find this a truly bizaare statement. Show me where I was “enraged” and “persecuted” you or anyone else. I don't get it.

    #148955

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ Oct. 06 2009,01:34)

    Quote (t8 @ Oct. 06 2009,16:14)
    For US there is one God the Father and one lord, the Lord Jesus Christ. I believe that. I belong to that truth. You oppose it.


    I've got no issue with 1 Cor 8:6, as you well know. Lord knows we've been through that verse a few times! (and He does too). And if I recall correctly the debate ended pretty abruptly when I asked you if the Father was your Lord as well as your God. Of course you can't really answer that. If you answered “yes” then you concede that Paul could not have been drawing an ontological contra-distinction between Yeshua and the Father. If you answered “no” then you have denyed the Father His rightful Lordship, thereby blaspheming.

    Quote
    Given that history, I am not surprised that you are enraged at us and come here in the spirit of persecution. Can you not see that you are being used as a pawn in a much bigger game than the one you are playing? You are being used because you are open to being used.


    I find this a truly bizaare statement. Show me where I was “enraged” and “persecuted” you or anyone else. I don't get it.


    Please explain to me how answering yes concedes that Paul could not have been drawing an ontological contra-distinction between Yeshua and the Father?

    Thank you

    #149119
    Is 1:18
    Participant

    Quote (Constitutionalist @ Oct. 06 2009,23:06)
    Please explain to me how answering yes concedes that Paul could not have been drawing an ontological contra-distinction between Yeshua and the Father?

    Thank you


    Okay. Non-trinitarians often use this verse as a proof text in an attempt to 'prove' that Yeshua is not God. The underlying assumption is that Lord and God denote two distinct ontological categories. The Father is “God” to the exclusion of Yeshua, Who is not God in any sense of the word (to us). If that's true then the reverse is also proven- i.e. Yeshua is Lord to the exclusion of the Father and the Father is not Lord in any sense of the word (to us).

    #149121
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi Is 1.18,
    Who needs ontology when they fellowship with the Father and the Son in God's Spirit?

    #149260
    942767
    Participant

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ Oct. 07 2009,18:26)

    Quote (Constitutionalist @ Oct. 06 2009,23:06)
    Please explain to me how answering yes concedes that Paul could not have been drawing an ontological contra-distinction between Yeshua and the Father?

    Thank you


    Okay. Non-trinitarians often use this verse as a proof text in an attempt to 'prove' that Yeshua is not God. The underlying assumption is that Lord and God denote two distinct ontological categories. The Father is “God” to the exclusion of Yeshua, Who is not God in any sense of the word (to us). If that's true then the reverse is also proven- i.e. Yeshua is Lord to the exclusion of the Father and the Father is not Lord in any sense of the word (to us).


    Hi Brother Paul:

    When we obey Jesus, we are obeying God because the commandments that Jesus taught and obeyed came to us from God.

    And so, I do not see what you are trying to prove by this. There is the LORD who is above all as Ephesians 4:6 states, and the same LORD made Jesus Lord and Christ.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty

    #149270
    Is 1:18
    Participant

    Quote (942767 @ Oct. 08 2009,14:46)
    When we obey Jesus, we are obeying God because the commandments that Jesus taught and obeyed came to us from God.  


    Yes, but strange how Yeshua calls them “my” commandments (John 14:15). Almost like He took ownership of them. Pretty audacious really, unless they really were His.

    Quote
    And so, I do not see what you are trying to prove by this.  There is the LORD who is above all as Ephesians 4:6 states, and the same LORD made Jesus Lord and Christ.


    Not trying to prove anything. 1 Corinthians 8:6 neither proves nor disproves trinitarianism. That was sorta my point. Why don't you ask t8 what he was trying to prove with this statement?

    Quote
    For US there is one God the Father and one lord, the Lord Jesus Christ. I believe that. I belong to that truth. You oppose it.

    BTW, Ephesians 4:6 states this:

    “one God and Father of all who is over all and through all and in all.”

    Reads a little differently than your quote. Sure that's the right verse?

    Blessings friend
    :)

    #149272
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi Is 1.18,
    The commandments of Jesus are different from the ten commandments.

    EG
    love one another as I have loved you.
    you must be born again…..

    We serve the God of Jesus and the Israelites.

    #149284

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Oct. 07 2009,23:28)
    Hi Is 1.18,
    The commandments of Jesus are different from the ten commandments.

    EG
    love one another as I have loved you.
    you must be born again…..

    We serve the God of Jesus and the Israelites.


    Hi Is 1.18,
    The commandments of Jesus are different from the ten commandments.

    Are they?

    And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this [is] the first commandment. Mark 12:30

    ONE: 'You shall have no other gods before Me.'

    TWO: 'You shall not make for yourself a carved image–any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.'

    THREE: 'You shall not take the name of the LORD your God in vain.'

    FOUR: 'Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy.'

    ———————————————————–

    And the second [is] like, [namely] this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these. Mark 12:31

    FIVE: 'Honor your father and your mother.'

    SIX: 'You shall not murder.'

    SEVEN: 'You shall not commit adultery.'

    EIGHT: 'You shall not steal.'

    NINE: 'You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.'

    TEN: 'You shall not covet your neighbor's house; you shall not covet your neighbor's wife, nor his male servant, nor his female servant, nor his ox, nor his donkey, nor anything that is your neighbor's.'

    Seems they are one and the same to me.

    ———————————————————–

    Also are they the Commandments of Jesus? Or did he just re-iterate them?

    And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this [is] the first commandment. Mark 12:30

    And thou shalt love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might. Deuteronomy 6:5

    Know therefore that the LORD thy God, he [is] God, the faithful God, which keepeth covenant and mercy with them that love him and keep his commandments to a thousand generations; Deuteronomy 7:9

    And now, Israel, what doth the LORD thy God require of thee, but to fear the LORD thy God, to walk in all his ways, and to love him, and to serve the LORD thy God with all thy heart and with all thy soul, Deuteronomy 10:12

    ———————————————————–

    And the second [is] like, [namely] this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these. Mark 12:31

    Thou shalt not defraud thy neighbour, neither rob [him]: the wages of him that is hired shall not abide with thee all night until the morning. Leviticus 19:13

    Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people, but thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself: I [am] the LORD. Leviticus 19:18

    Let the scriptures breath.

    #149285

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ Oct. 07 2009,23:14)

    Quote (942767 @ Oct. 08 2009,14:46)
    When we obey Jesus, we are obeying God because the commandments that Jesus taught and obeyed came to us from God.  


    Yes, but strange how Yeshua calls them “my” commandments (John 14:15). Almost like He took ownership of them. Pretty audacious really, unless they really were His.

    Quote
    And so, I do not see what you are trying to prove by this.  There is the LORD who is above all as Ephesians 4:6 states, and the same LORD made Jesus Lord and Christ.


    Not trying to prove anything. 1 Corinthians 8:6 neither proves nor disproves trinitarianism. That was sorta my point. Why don't you ask t8 what he was trying to prove with this statement?

    Quote
    For US there is one God the Father and one lord, the Lord Jesus Christ. I believe that. I belong to that truth. You oppose it.

    BTW, Ephesians 4:6 states this:

    “one God and Father of all who is over all and through all and in all.”

    Reads a little differently than your quote. Sure that's the right verse?

    Blessings friend
    :)


    Quote (942767 @ Oct. 08 2009,14:46)
    When we obey Jesus, we are obeying God because the commandments that Jesus taught and obeyed came to us from God.


    Quote
    Yes, but strange how Yeshua calls them “my” commandments (John 14:15). Almost like He took ownership of them. Pretty audacious really, unless they really were His.

    They are my commandments. Does that make me God? Audacious or not, they are my commandments, I stand in God's stead.

Viewing 20 posts - 321 through 340 (of 407 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2024 Heaven Net

Navigation

© 1999 - 2023 - Heaven Net
or

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

or

Create Account