Trinity Debate Zechariah 12:10

Subject:  Zechariah 12:10 proves the Trinity Doctrine
Date: April 22 2007
Debaters:  Is 1: 18 & t8

 


Is 1:18

Okay short and sweet this time….

In the below passage Zechariah records a quite amazing prophecy:

Zechariah 12:10
“I will pour out on the house of David and on the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the Spirit of grace and of supplication, so that they will look on Me whom they have pierced; and they will mourn for Him, as one mourns for an only son, and they will weep bitterly over Him like the bitter weeping over a firstborn.

What’s significant (in the context of this debate submission) about the highlighted statement above is that the preceding verses (1, 4, 6 and 9) unmistakably bear out that it was a prophecy made by YHWH, and would be fulfilled by YHWH. YHWH foretold that they (the inhabitants of Jerusalem) will look upon “Me” whom they (the inhabitants of Jerusalem) pierced.

Zechariah 12:1-9
1The burden of the word of the LORD [YHWH] concerning Israel. Thus declares the LORD [YHWH] who stretches out the heavens, lays the foundation of the earth, and forms the spirit of man within him, 2″Behold, I am going to make Jerusalem a cup that causes reeling to all the peoples around; and when the siege is against Jerusalem, it will also be against Judah. 3″It will come about in that day that I will make Jerusalem a heavy stone for all the peoples; all who lift it will be severely injured And all the nations of the earth will be gathered against it. 4″In that day,” declares the LORD [YHWH], “I will strike every horse with bewilderment and his rider with madness. But I will watch over the house of Judah, while I strike every horse of the peoples with blindness. 5″Then the clans of Judah will say in their hearts, ‘A strong support for us are the inhabitants of Jerusalem through the LORD of hosts, their God.’ 6″In that day I [YHWH] will make the clans of Judah like a firepot among pieces of wood and a flaming torch among sheaves, so they will consume on the right hand and on the left all the surrounding peoples, while the inhabitants of Jerusalem again dwell on their own sites in Jerusalem. 7″The LORD also will save the tents of Judah first, so that the glory of the house of David and the glory of the inhabitants of Jerusalem will not be magnified above Judah. 8″In that day the LORD will defend the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and the one who is feeble among them in that day will be like David, and the house of David will be like God, like the angel of the LORD before them. 9″And in that day I [YHWH] will set about to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem.

There is no mention of a secondary identity in the Zechariah’s predictive prophecy. The “me” in “they will look on Me whom they have pierced” is YHWH. In the immediately-preceding verse YHWH affirmed “I will set about to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem”, which of course only the Almighty could accomplish. With that in mind, please consider Who it was that John taught fulfilled this prophecy:

John 19:33-37
33but coming to Jesus, when they saw that He was already dead, they did not break His legs. 34But one of the soldiers pierced His side with a spear, and immediately blood and water came out. 35And he who has seen has testified, and his testimony is true; and he knows that he is telling the truth, so that you also may believe. 36For these things came to pass to fulfill the Scripture, “NOT A BONE OF HIM SHALL BE BROKEN.” 37And again another Scripture says, “THEY SHALL LOOK ON HIM WHOM THEY PIERCED.

According to John, Zechariah 10:12 is a predictive reference to the piercing (vs 34) incurred by Yeshua during His crucifixion (“For these things came to pass to fulfill the Scripture” – v 36). Let me be as clear as I can here t8: Only YHWH could fulfill this prophecy, because it was made specifically by YHWH (through Zechariah) and of YHWH. It cannot be fulfilled by proxy, the piercing was to be incurred by YHWH and it is YHWH that would be looked upon. No one else, the language in the Zechariah text is unambiguous and does not allow for it. John unequivocally tells us that Yeshua literally fulfilled the Zech 12:10 prophecy at Calvary, but crucially He fulfilled it after His body had expired (v 33). The Roman soldiers and other bystanders (the inhabitants of Jerusalem) looked upon His lifeless body, but John and Zechariah tell us that this was the body of YHWH. So, the obvious implication here is: even His dead body was considered utterly divine, it was the body of YHWH. So any argument linking Yeshua’s deity with His indwelling by the Holy Spirit is vaporised in this verse.

If YHWH makes a prophecy that only YHWH can fulfill, and Yahshua fulfills it, then He is YHWH. There is no other acceptable conclusion.

Now some questions for you t8:

Q1) Was the “me” that was foretold to be pierced and looked upon by the inhabitant of Jerusalem in Zech 12:10 a refererence to YHWH? If not, please provide lexical evidence to the contrary.

Q2) According to John’s inspired-understanding, was Yeshua in fact the “me” in the Zech 12:10 prophecy (John 19:37)? If not, please explain.

Q3) If YHWH makes a prophecy that only YHWH can fulfill, and Yeshua fulfills it, is it reasonable to conclude that Yeshua is YHWH? If not why not?

Blessings



t8

Q1) Was the “me” that was foretold to be pierced and looked upon by the inhabitant of Jerusalem in Zech 12:10 a refererence to YHWH? If not, please provide lexical evidence to the contrary.

I think the ME is YHWH. The one who is to be pierced (HIM) is Yeshua.

It says “…They will look on me, the one they have pierced, and they will mourn for him as one mourns for an only child,…”

Grammatically, the “Me” and the “him” cannot refer to the same individual can it.

It is clearly talking about 2, not 1. Otherwise it would say: “They will look on me, the one they have pierced, and they will mourn for ME as one mourns for an only child,”. Of course it doesn’t say that, so the “him” is obviously different to the “me”.

Q2) According to John’s inspired-understanding, was Yeshua in fact the “me” in the Zech 12:10 prophecy (John 19:37)? If not, please explain.

Is Yeshua the ME or the HIM? I say he is the HIM. If Yeshua was both, then the language would use ME or HIM, but not both.

Q3) If YHWH makes a prophecy that only YHWH can fulfill, and Yeshua fulfills it, is it reasonable to conclude that Yeshua is YHWH? If not why not?

YHWH didn’t make this prophecy about himself from what I can see. We know that YHWH is not a man and he doesn’t have bones and blood. It is rediculous to believe that God whom the universe cannot contain squeezed himself into a human body. Rather, it was the Word that became flesh and the apostles beheld his glory as the son of God. Even if YHWH did make the prophecy about himself, we know that YHWH sent his son and it was YHWH’s will that his son drink the cup that was prepared for him. So if YHWH was in Christ, then to that degree was YHWH the one being punished. But Christ did say “My God My God, why hast thou forsaken me”.

But the way it appears to me on the outset is that they would look to YHWH, because of the HIM who was pierced.

NOTE: My rebuttal is based on the English version of these verses. It is possible that the English version may not be that clear or even accurate. If this is the case, then a more accurate version of the Zechariah verse could change what I have written.

Anyway, it is interesting to note that John 19:33-37 also refers to another prophecy i.e., NOT A BONE OF HIM SHALL BE BROKEN.”
When we look at that prophecy, we see clearly that the YHWH (LORD) is one and the one whom not a bone shall be broken is another.

It is obvious to all that the bolded verses below are either or both Yeshua and YHWH. But the interesting part is that we cannot confuse Yeshua with actually being YHWH.

Psalm 22:1-19
My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?
Why are you so far from saving me,
so far from the words of my groaning?

2 O my God, I cry out by day, but you do not answer,
by night, and am not silent.

3 Yet you are enthroned as the Holy One;
you are the praise of Israel.

4 In you our fathers put their trust;
they trusted and you delivered them.

5 They cried to you and were saved;
in you they trusted and were not disappointed.

6 But I am a worm and not a man,
scorned by men and despised by the people.

7 All who see me mock me;
they hurl insults, shaking their heads:

“He trusts in the LORD;
let the LORD rescue him.
Let him deliver him,
since he delights in him.”

9 Yet you brought me out of the womb;
you made me trust in you
even at my mother’s breast.

10 From birth I was cast upon you;
from my mother’s womb you have been my God.

11 Do not be far from me,
for trouble is near
and there is no one to help.

12 Many bulls surround me;
strong bulls of Bashan encircle me.

13 Roaring lions tearing their prey
open their mouths wide against me.

14 I am poured out like water,
and all my bones are out of joint.
My heart has turned to wax;
it has melted away within me.

15 My strength is dried up like a potsherd,
and my tongue sticks to the roof of my mouth;
you lay me in the dust of death.

16 Dogs have surrounded me;
a band of evil men has encircled me,
they have pierced my hands and my feet.

17 I can count all my bones;
people stare and gloat over me.

18 They divide my garments among them
and cast lots for my clothing.

19 But you, O LORD, be not far off;
O my Strength, come quickly to help me.

So we have 3 reasons why YHWH cannot be Yeshua in Zech 12:10.

  1. Me and Him cannot be the same individual grammatically speaking.
  2. Psalm 22:1-19 the other quoted scripture by John, clearly indentifies Yeshua and YHWH as different identities.
  3. There is no contradiction in truth.
 

So an explanation that fits with John, Zechariah, and David (or Psalm writer) is that YHWH and Yeshua are 2 different identities and because of him who was pierced (Yeshua), people would look to YHWH (his God). This has come to pass as many now look to YHWH because of Yeshua’s sacrifice. See the below verse as an immediate example of fulfillment.

Acts 2:36-39
36 “Therefore let all Israel be assured of this: God has made this Jesus, whom you crucified, both Lord and Christ.”
37 When the people heard this, they were cut to the heart and said to Peter and the other apostles, “Brothers, what shall we do?”
38 Peter replied, “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
39 The promise is for you and your children and for all who are far off—for all whom the Lord our God will call.”


Discussion

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 20 posts - 101 through 120 (of 518 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #54230
    Cult Buster
    Participant

    Joh 1:5  And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not. :O

    #54234
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi CB,
    'Make sure the light in you is not darkness for O how deep that darkness can be'
    Surely you are not still groping around in the dark?
    Seek the light.

    #54273
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Cult Buster @ May 31 2007,18:53)
    Some of you folk need to think seriously before you continue to blaspheme the name of Christ Jehovah.


    Oh, my goodness! My eyes were burning as I read this sentence.

    Jesus would be so disappointed to know that he spent so much in vain – pointing us to his Father who is God – only to see that the children have turned HIM into God.

    Where, O where in scripture might I find “Christ Jehovah”? It is so offensive to me that I almost didn't want to type it. Now I understand how Tim2 felt when he didn't want to type “sex” and “God” in the same sentence.

    #54274
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ May 31 2007,19:03)
    So you think Yeshua is infinite in Power, Wisdom, Strength, Love, and fills all things, and is from everlasting to everlasting, and is bigger than the heavens, and is an exact representation of all God is, and he is just a mere man?


    Oh, I never said he was a mere man.  I think you got too smiley-face happy to read what I wrote.  :)

    I said he was God's Son.

    #54289
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (Cult Buster @ June 01 2007,13:53)
    It is evident that in Heb 1:3 Christ is being described as a divine Being. He is of the same substance as God.


    To CultB.

    In your quote you just admitted that Jesus isn't God himself.

    You clearly are speaking about 2.

    A being of the same substance as God is a being that is like God himself in the respect that he has the same substance.

    Can you see this? You admitted in a round about way that there is a difference between what and who, or nature/substance and identity.

    When you say that he is the same as… you are talking about one identity who is like another identity in nature or substance. So you just admitted that Jesus isn't God himself, or God in identity.

    You said it yourself. He has the same substance as God himself.

    I rest my case.

    #54314

    Quote (t8 @ June 01 2007,10:30)

    Quote (Cult Buster @ June 01 2007,13:53)
    It is evident that in Heb 1:3 Christ is being described as a divine Being. He is of the same substance as God.


    To CultB.

    In your quote you just admitted that Jesus isn't God himself.

    You clearly are speaking about 2.

    A being of the same substance as God is a being that is like God himself in the respect that he has the same substance.

    Can you see this? You admitted in a round about way that there is a difference between what and who, or nature/substance and identity.

    When you say that he is the same as… you are talking about one identity who is like another identity in nature or substance. So you just admitted that Jesus isn't God himself, or God in identity.

    You said it yourself. He has the same substance as God himself.

    I rest my case.


    t8

    Does God have substance?

    Does God have the same substance as Jesus?

    He must because Jesus has his substance!

    So by your logic God is Not God if he has the same substance as Jesus!

    You shouldnt rest your case so quickly!

    :O

    #54318
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Your words just confirm that your God is a substance.

    But the true God is the Father of the Lord Jesus Christ.

    If your God is a substance with 3 persons, then you pray to a substance when you call God “him”.

    Can you see that?

    I rest my case again.

    #54320

    Quote (t8 @ June 01 2007,12:36)
    Your words just confirm that your God is a substance.

    But the true God is the Father of the Lord Jesus Christ.

    If your God is a substance with 3 persons, then you pray to a substance when you call God “him”.

    Can you see that?

    I rest my case again.

    t8

    So God dosnt have substance? :D

    You should know that God is One t8. Why do you call another being your Lord and master?

    Dont you know this is forbidden! For the Lord God is a Jealous God and there is none other beside him or like him!

    You cant have “Two masters”!

    Luke 13:16
    *No servant can serve two masters*: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other.

    Again, you rest your case to soon!

    :D

    #54323
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi W,
    It is you who have chosen another god.
    Go back to the bible.

    #54328
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    To WJ.

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 02 2007,07:48)
    t8

    So God dosnt have substance? :D

    You should know that God is One t8. Why do you call another being your Lord and master?

    Dont you know this is forbidden! For the Lord God is a Jealous God and there is none other beside him or like him!

    You cant have “Two masters”!

    Luke 13:16
    *No servant can serve two masters*: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other.


    The other being you refer to is God's son.

    Anyway, God is Spirit and he has divine nature.

    Angels are spirits and we will partake of divine nature, so am I to conclude given your logic, that angels and men are God?

    What really is your point? That God is a gooey substance of some kind because I really don't care about that. It is not written that God is a substance. Substance is a created thing and God is not created.

    I rest my case again and leave you with the definition of substance for your own understanding in this matter.

    sub·stance /ˈsʌbstəns/ Pronunciation Key – Show Spelled Pronunciation[suhb-stuhns] Pronunciation Key – Show IPA Pronunciation
    –noun
    1.that of which a thing consists; physical matter or material: form and substance.
    2.a species of matter of definite chemical composition: a chalky substance.
    3.controlled substance.
    4.the subject matter of thought, discourse, study, etc.
    5.the actual matter of a thing, as opposed to the appearance or shadow; reality.
    6.substantial or solid character or quality: claims lacking in substance.
    7.consistency; body: soup without much substance.
    8.the meaning or gist, as of speech or writing.
    9.something that has separate or independent existence.

    #54329
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    I should also add that if I serve Christ, then I am serving God because Christ is in God's will.

    If you don't understand this, then you need to pray that God gives you understanding and wisdom.

    When you have his understanding, you will know that Jesus is completely in God's will and God sent him to represent himself.

    Jesus comes in his Father's name and we come in Jesus name.

    Ultimately if we are in Jesus name, then we are of God. It is not meant to be taken that we or Jesus is the Most High God.

    #54377
    Tim2
    Participant

    (t8)

    Quote
    Quote (Cult Buster @ June 01 2007,13:53)
    It is evident that in Heb 1:3 Christ is being described as a divine Being. He is of the same substance as God.

    To CultB.

    In your quote you just admitted that Jesus isn't God himself.

    You clearly are speaking about 2.

    A being of the same substance as God is a being that is like God himself in the respect that he has the same substance.

    Can you see this? You admitted in a round about way that there is a difference between what and who, or nature/substance and identity.

    When you say that he is the same as… you are talking about one identity who is like another identity in nature or substance. So you just admitted that Jesus isn't God himself, or God in identity.

    You said it yourself. He has the same substance as God himself.

    I rest my case.

    I feel as though you completely ignored my post:

    Quote

    May 31 2007,18:15

    Hi t8,

    Quote
    You can't have it both ways, he is either from God or God himself.

    I think you are conflating the nature/substance of God with the personality of God. You are starting from the assumption that God is one person. But that is the issue we're discussing. You can't offer an assumption as evidence when the assumption is disputed.

    Now being from God and being God are not mutually exclusive. For we know that God is Light. And we agree that light radiates, and that this is the case with God. So by no means is it impossible for the Light radiating from God to not be God as well. And we are told time and again that this Light radiating from the Father is Jesus. God of God, Light of Light.

    tim

    #54378
    Tim2
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ June 01 2007,13:24)
    To WJ.

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 02 2007,07:48)
    t8

    So God dosnt have substance? :D

    You should know that God is One t8. Why do you call another being your Lord and master?

    Dont you know this is forbidden! For the Lord God is a Jealous God and there is none other beside him or like him!

    You cant have “Two masters”!

    Luke 13:16
    *No servant can serve two masters*: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other.


    The other being you refer to is God's son.

    Anyway, God is Spirit and he has divine nature.

    Angels are spirits and we will partake of divine nature, so am I to conclude given your logic, that angels and men are God?

    What really is your point? That God is a gooey substance of some kind because I really don't care about that. It is not written that God is a substance. Substance is a created thing and God is not created.

    I rest my case again and leave you with the definition of substance for your own understanding in this matter.

    sub·stance      /ˈsʌbstəns/ Pronunciation Key – Show Spelled Pronunciation[suhb-stuhns] Pronunciation Key – Show IPA Pronunciation
    –noun
    1.that of which a thing consists; physical matter or material: form and substance.
    2.a species of matter of definite chemical composition: a chalky substance.
    3.controlled substance.
    4.the subject matter of thought, discourse, study, etc.
    5.the actual matter of a thing, as opposed to the appearance or shadow; reality.
    6.substantial or solid character or quality: claims lacking in substance.
    7.consistency; body: soup without much substance.
    8.the meaning or gist, as of speech or writing.
    9.something that has separate or independent existence.


    Regarding your claim that the angels are like God, I already directed you to my post in Dualism:

    Quote
    So the issue is whether or not God shares a common attribute with creation, which you call “godlike, having divine nature, spirit.”  Agreed?

    The relevant Scriptures are:

    John 1:1 -“and Theos was the Word.”  Some scholars believe that Theos, though a noun, is used here in a qualitative sense, as in, “The Word had the nature of God.”
    Acts 17:29 -“We ought not to think that the Theion is like gold, silver, or stone.”
    Romans 1:20 -“His eternal power and Theiotes have been understood …”
    Colossians 2:9 -“In Him dwells all the fullness of the Theotetos bodily.”
    2 Peter 1:3 -“His Theias power has granted to us …”
    2 Peter 1:4 -“That through these you may become koinonoi Theias fuseos …”

    I believe these are all of the qualitative uses of Theos, Theios, and Theotes in the New Testament.  Note that the angels are not described by these words in the New Testament, so your only connection to them is that they are spirits, which I'll discuss below.  

    Trenchard's Dictionary of New Testament Greek gives these definitions:

    Theos (noun) -“deity, god, goddess; God (of Christ); God (in Israelite and Christian contexts); god (of humans and of the belly); god (of the devil).  Theos is used 1317 times in the New Testament.
    Theotetos (noun) -divine character or nature, deity, divinity.  Used once, in Colossians 2:9.
    Theios (adjective) -divine; divine being, divinity.  Used three times, which are above:  Acts 17:29, 2 Peter 1:3-4.
    Theiotes (noun) -divinity, divine nature, divineness.  Used once in Romans 1:20.

    My first observation is that Theotetos and Theiotes, are used exclusively of God in the New Testament.  According to http://www.antioch.com.sg/cgi-bin/bible/vines/get_defn.pl?num=1213#1 Theos is used exclusively of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, except for (1) the Israelite judges in John 10:34, (2) the pagan gods in Acts 14:11; Acts 19:26; Acts 28:6; 1 Cor 8:5; Gal 4:8, (3) the devil in 2 Corinthians 4:4, and (4) the belly in Philippians 3:19.  Clearly cases 2, 3, and 4 refer not to these things actually being gods, but to them being the rulers or leaders of these people (who follow paganism, the devil, and their belly).  

    So, the angels are never called by these words in the New Testament, and one of the words, Theias, is used with reference to men once, in 2 Peter 1:4, where it said they will koinonoi Theias phuseos.  Calvin,   http://www.ccel.org/ccel/calvin/calcom45.vii.ii.i.html notes that the “nature” here is not “essence”, ousia, but “quality,” phuseos.  He explains, ” they only intended to say that when divested of all the vices of the flesh, we shall be partakers of divine and blessed immortality and glory, so as to be as it were one with God as far as our capacities will allow.”  His editor explains, “Escaping the corruption of the world is “godliness,” is “virtue;” and partaking of the divine nature is “life,” is “glory.”

    I think we already agreed that 2 Peter 1:4 (and 1 John 3:2) refers to believers receiving a spiritual body like Jesus received at the resurrection.  But this has nothing to do with Him in the beginning being Theos.  Likewise, I don't think you believe that the spiritual body Jesus received at the resurrection is the same as the Spirit that the Father is.  The most you can show from 2 Peter 1:4 is that believers will receive bodies that are incorruptible, which again is falling into the “not” fallacy I showed in my second post.  “God and X are not A.  Therefore, God and X have something in common.”  My point was that you can draw an infinite number of such comparisons between any two things; but you can make zero positive comparisons between God and anything.  You can't say, “God and X are both B.”

    But this is what you attempt to do by saying “God is a spirit” in John 4:24, and “Who makes His angels spirits” in Hebrews 1:7.  But I thought you already agreed that the angels are not the same type of spirit that God is?  I thought we already agreed that they are “not made of the same stuff.”  I think the whole point of Hebrews 1 is to show that Jesus is something other than the angels, so surely you believe the Father is different as well?  And to say God exists in the heavens, as the angels do, doesn't give glory to God, for heaven and the highest heaven cannot contain God (1 Kings 8:27), but they can certainly contain the angels.

    Tim

    Regarding substance, I believe definition number 9 comes closest to that of the creeds.  Your seeming agreement with CB that the Father and the Son are of the same substance would suggest you agree that they are one Thing, God, Who of course has an independent existence.  And given Jesus' affirmation that the Father and He are one, why do you keep trying to make them 2?

    Tim

    #54380

    Quote (t8 @ June 01 2007,13:24)
    To WJ.

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 02 2007,07:48)
    t8

    So God dosnt have substance? :D

    You should know that God is One t8. Why do you call another being your Lord and master?

    Dont you know this is forbidden! For the Lord God is a Jealous God and there is none other beside him or like him!

    You cant have “Two masters”!

    Luke 13:16
    *No servant can serve two masters*: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other.


    The other being you refer to is God's son.

    Anyway, God is Spirit and he has divine nature.

    Angels are spirits and we will partake of divine nature, so am I to conclude given your logic, that angels and men are God?

    What really is your point? That God is a gooey substance of some kind because I really don't care about that. It is not written that God is a substance. Substance is a created thing and God is not created.

    I rest my case again and leave you with the definition of substance for your own understanding in this matter.

    sub·stance      /ˈsʌbstəns/ Pronunciation Key – Show Spelled Pronunciation[suhb-stuhns] Pronunciation Key – Show IPA Pronunciation
    –noun
    1.that of which a thing consists; physical matter or material: form and substance.
    2.a species of matter of definite chemical composition: a chalky substance.
    3.controlled substance.
    4.the subject matter of thought, discourse, study, etc.
    5.the actual matter of a thing, as opposed to the appearance or shadow; reality.
    6.substantial or solid character or quality: claims lacking in substance.
    7.consistency; body: soup without much substance.
    8.the meaning or gist, as of speech or writing.
    9.something that has separate or independent existence.


    t8

    You say…

    Quote

    What really is your point? That God is a gooey substance of some kind because I really don't care about that. It is not written that God is a substance. Substance is a created thing and God is not created.

    Of course you dont care about his substance!

    You say substance is a created thing. Then God must be nothing for he is not created.

    Of course since Jesus is “the exact representation of his substance” he must be a created thing!

    You should follow Thomas example t8 and and cry out “My Lord and My God”.

    Then you can truly say you rest your case!

    :O

    #54381

    Quote (t8 @ June 01 2007,13:33)
    I should also add that if I serve Christ, then I am serving God because Christ is in God's will.

    If you don't understand this, then you need to pray that God gives you understanding and wisdom.

    When you have his understanding, you will know that Jesus is completely in God's will and God sent him to represent himself.

    Jesus comes in his Father's name and we come in Jesus name.

    Ultimately if we are in Jesus name, then we are of God. It is not meant to be taken that we or Jesus is the Most High God.


    t8

    I repeat!

    So God dosnt have substance?

    You should know that God is One t8. Why do you call another being your Lord and master?

    Dont you know this is forbidden! For the Lord God is a Jealous God and there is none other beside him or like him!

    You cant have “Two masters”!

    Luke 13:16
    *No servant can serve two masters*: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other.

    t8, do you believe Yeshua was present with the Father when he said…

    Isa 45:21
    Tell ye, and bring them near; yea, let them take counsel together: who hath declared this from ancient time? who hath told it from that time? have not I the LORD? and *there is no God else beside me*; a just God and a Saviour; *there is none beside me*.

    Isa 46:9
    Remember the former things of old: for *I am God, and there is none else*; I am God, and *there is none like me*, ???

    How can this be t8, seeing Jesus is the “exact representation of his substance” and the “Express Image of the invisible God”?

    t8 if Jesus is a seperate being from the Father, then you have 2 Lords and 2 masters! Can you see that?

    You see how scriptures just corrected you!

    The Lord our God is “One” Lord!

    :D

    #55497
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 02 2007,05:52)
    Isa 46:9
    Remember the former things of old: for *I am God, and there is none else*; I am God, and *there is none like me*,

    How can this be t8, seeing Jesus is the “exact representation of his substance” and the “Express Image of the invisible God”?


    When my husband and I first met, I owned a little antique shop. I can tell you from experience with antiques that an exact replica of an old antique isn't worth anything compared to the actual antique item itself.

    God is telling us that there is none like him; meaning, that there are no other persons or things that are God. Only he is God.

    Jesus is a representative. And of course he is God' Son, so he is bound to be an image of his Father as well. This makes sense to me. These scriptures do not have to turn Jesus into God, for me. They make sense just as they are written.

    #55507

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 14 2007,16:53)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 02 2007,05:52)
    Isa 46:9
    Remember the former things of old: for *I am God, and there is none else*; I am God, and *there is none like me*,

    How can this be t8, seeing Jesus is the “exact representation of his substance” and the “Express Image of the invisible God”?


    When my husband and I first met, I owned a little antique shop.  I can tell you from experience with antiques that an exact replica of an old antique isn't worth anything compared to the actual antique item itself.

    God is telling us that there is none like him; meaning, that there are no other persons or things that are God.  Only he is God.

    Jesus is a representative.  And of course he is God' Son, so he is bound to be an image of his Father as well.  This makes sense to me.  These scriptures do not have to turn Jesus into God, for me.  They make sense just as they are written.


    not3

    You are missing the point.

    t8 believes Jesus was with the Father from eternity and that that God created all things through him, yet scriptures clearly show “there is none other beside him” and God says “he created all things by himself”!

    :)

    #55512
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Oh, gotcha!

    #56084
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 02 2007,05:52)
    So God dosnt have substance?


    God has a nature if that is what you mean.

    He shares his nature too, as we will be able to partake of that nature.

    Similarly, when I have a son, he shares in my nature. That is he is like me.

    Jesus is God's son, so as you would expect, he is a divine being.

    :)

    #56085
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (Tim2 @ June 02 2007,05:12)
    Regarding substance, I believe definition number 9 comes closest to that of the creeds. Your seeming agreement with CB that the Father and the Son are of the same substance would suggest you agree that they are one Thing, God, Who of course has an independent existence. And given Jesus' affirmation that the Father and He are one, why do you keep trying to make them 2?


    Hi Tim2.

    They are 2 because God has a son. That is 2. The only true God sent his son, that is 2. Even a child can understand that.

    If Christ shares God's nature, that doesn't make him God who shares his nature does it?

    You should know that God is not a substance. Yes God has a nature, but God isn't defined as the nature.

    The Trinity doctrine is really teaching that a substance that existed for all eternity has and spawns 3 persons from within.

    Yes humans have nature but when you are talking to me do you talk to my nature or my identity?

    You talk to me.

    I am t8. My nature is man.

    God is the Father. His nature is divine.

    But the Trinity reverses this and places emphasis on the nature all the while ignoring that men called God “HIM”, not “IT”.

    Do you pray to God's nature or to God himself?

    If you hold to the Trinity doctrine, then you should do as that doctrine logically dictates:

    i.e., pray to the substance when you pray to the ONE God, or pray to them if you are praying to the persons.

    But calling God “HIM” is contradictory to the Trinity doctrine and if you pray to him, you only do so because that is demonstrated and taught in scripture. It doesn't come from the Trinity doctrine does it?

    The Trinity Doctrine gives you 2 options. Neither of these options are expressed in the bible and I doubt that you pray to them or to a one substance either.

Viewing 20 posts - 101 through 120 (of 518 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2024 Heaven Net

Navigation

© 1999 - 2023 - Heaven Net
or

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

or

Create Account