Trinity Debate Zechariah 12:10

Subject:  Zechariah 12:10 proves the Trinity Doctrine
Date: April 22 2007
Debaters:  Is 1: 18 & t8

 


Is 1:18

Okay short and sweet this time….

In the below passage Zechariah records a quite amazing prophecy:

Zechariah 12:10
“I will pour out on the house of David and on the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the Spirit of grace and of supplication, so that they will look on Me whom they have pierced; and they will mourn for Him, as one mourns for an only son, and they will weep bitterly over Him like the bitter weeping over a firstborn.

What’s significant (in the context of this debate submission) about the highlighted statement above is that the preceding verses (1, 4, 6 and 9) unmistakably bear out that it was a prophecy made by YHWH, and would be fulfilled by YHWH. YHWH foretold that they (the inhabitants of Jerusalem) will look upon “Me” whom they (the inhabitants of Jerusalem) pierced.

Zechariah 12:1-9
1The burden of the word of the LORD [YHWH] concerning Israel. Thus declares the LORD [YHWH] who stretches out the heavens, lays the foundation of the earth, and forms the spirit of man within him, 2″Behold, I am going to make Jerusalem a cup that causes reeling to all the peoples around; and when the siege is against Jerusalem, it will also be against Judah. 3″It will come about in that day that I will make Jerusalem a heavy stone for all the peoples; all who lift it will be severely injured And all the nations of the earth will be gathered against it. 4″In that day,” declares the LORD [YHWH], “I will strike every horse with bewilderment and his rider with madness. But I will watch over the house of Judah, while I strike every horse of the peoples with blindness. 5″Then the clans of Judah will say in their hearts, ‘A strong support for us are the inhabitants of Jerusalem through the LORD of hosts, their God.’ 6″In that day I [YHWH] will make the clans of Judah like a firepot among pieces of wood and a flaming torch among sheaves, so they will consume on the right hand and on the left all the surrounding peoples, while the inhabitants of Jerusalem again dwell on their own sites in Jerusalem. 7″The LORD also will save the tents of Judah first, so that the glory of the house of David and the glory of the inhabitants of Jerusalem will not be magnified above Judah. 8″In that day the LORD will defend the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and the one who is feeble among them in that day will be like David, and the house of David will be like God, like the angel of the LORD before them. 9″And in that day I [YHWH] will set about to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem.

There is no mention of a secondary identity in the Zechariah’s predictive prophecy. The “me” in “they will look on Me whom they have pierced” is YHWH. In the immediately-preceding verse YHWH affirmed “I will set about to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem”, which of course only the Almighty could accomplish. With that in mind, please consider Who it was that John taught fulfilled this prophecy:

John 19:33-37
33but coming to Jesus, when they saw that He was already dead, they did not break His legs. 34But one of the soldiers pierced His side with a spear, and immediately blood and water came out. 35And he who has seen has testified, and his testimony is true; and he knows that he is telling the truth, so that you also may believe. 36For these things came to pass to fulfill the Scripture, “NOT A BONE OF HIM SHALL BE BROKEN.” 37And again another Scripture says, “THEY SHALL LOOK ON HIM WHOM THEY PIERCED.

According to John, Zechariah 10:12 is a predictive reference to the piercing (vs 34) incurred by Yeshua during His crucifixion (“For these things came to pass to fulfill the Scripture” – v 36). Let me be as clear as I can here t8: Only YHWH could fulfill this prophecy, because it was made specifically by YHWH (through Zechariah) and of YHWH. It cannot be fulfilled by proxy, the piercing was to be incurred by YHWH and it is YHWH that would be looked upon. No one else, the language in the Zechariah text is unambiguous and does not allow for it. John unequivocally tells us that Yeshua literally fulfilled the Zech 12:10 prophecy at Calvary, but crucially He fulfilled it after His body had expired (v 33). The Roman soldiers and other bystanders (the inhabitants of Jerusalem) looked upon His lifeless body, but John and Zechariah tell us that this was the body of YHWH. So, the obvious implication here is: even His dead body was considered utterly divine, it was the body of YHWH. So any argument linking Yeshua’s deity with His indwelling by the Holy Spirit is vaporised in this verse.

If YHWH makes a prophecy that only YHWH can fulfill, and Yahshua fulfills it, then He is YHWH. There is no other acceptable conclusion.

Now some questions for you t8:

Q1) Was the “me” that was foretold to be pierced and looked upon by the inhabitant of Jerusalem in Zech 12:10 a refererence to YHWH? If not, please provide lexical evidence to the contrary.

Q2) According to John’s inspired-understanding, was Yeshua in fact the “me” in the Zech 12:10 prophecy (John 19:37)? If not, please explain.

Q3) If YHWH makes a prophecy that only YHWH can fulfill, and Yeshua fulfills it, is it reasonable to conclude that Yeshua is YHWH? If not why not?

Blessings



t8

Q1) Was the “me” that was foretold to be pierced and looked upon by the inhabitant of Jerusalem in Zech 12:10 a refererence to YHWH? If not, please provide lexical evidence to the contrary.

I think the ME is YHWH. The one who is to be pierced (HIM) is Yeshua.

It says “…They will look on me, the one they have pierced, and they will mourn for him as one mourns for an only child,…”

Grammatically, the “Me” and the “him” cannot refer to the same individual can it.

It is clearly talking about 2, not 1. Otherwise it would say: “They will look on me, the one they have pierced, and they will mourn for ME as one mourns for an only child,”. Of course it doesn’t say that, so the “him” is obviously different to the “me”.

Q2) According to John’s inspired-understanding, was Yeshua in fact the “me” in the Zech 12:10 prophecy (John 19:37)? If not, please explain.

Is Yeshua the ME or the HIM? I say he is the HIM. If Yeshua was both, then the language would use ME or HIM, but not both.

Q3) If YHWH makes a prophecy that only YHWH can fulfill, and Yeshua fulfills it, is it reasonable to conclude that Yeshua is YHWH? If not why not?

YHWH didn’t make this prophecy about himself from what I can see. We know that YHWH is not a man and he doesn’t have bones and blood. It is rediculous to believe that God whom the universe cannot contain squeezed himself into a human body. Rather, it was the Word that became flesh and the apostles beheld his glory as the son of God. Even if YHWH did make the prophecy about himself, we know that YHWH sent his son and it was YHWH’s will that his son drink the cup that was prepared for him. So if YHWH was in Christ, then to that degree was YHWH the one being punished. But Christ did say “My God My God, why hast thou forsaken me”.

But the way it appears to me on the outset is that they would look to YHWH, because of the HIM who was pierced.

NOTE: My rebuttal is based on the English version of these verses. It is possible that the English version may not be that clear or even accurate. If this is the case, then a more accurate version of the Zechariah verse could change what I have written.

Anyway, it is interesting to note that John 19:33-37 also refers to another prophecy i.e., NOT A BONE OF HIM SHALL BE BROKEN.”
When we look at that prophecy, we see clearly that the YHWH (LORD) is one and the one whom not a bone shall be broken is another.

It is obvious to all that the bolded verses below are either or both Yeshua and YHWH. But the interesting part is that we cannot confuse Yeshua with actually being YHWH.

Psalm 22:1-19
My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?
Why are you so far from saving me,
so far from the words of my groaning?

2 O my God, I cry out by day, but you do not answer,
by night, and am not silent.

3 Yet you are enthroned as the Holy One;
you are the praise of Israel.

4 In you our fathers put their trust;
they trusted and you delivered them.

5 They cried to you and were saved;
in you they trusted and were not disappointed.

6 But I am a worm and not a man,
scorned by men and despised by the people.

7 All who see me mock me;
they hurl insults, shaking their heads:

“He trusts in the LORD;
let the LORD rescue him.
Let him deliver him,
since he delights in him.”

9 Yet you brought me out of the womb;
you made me trust in you
even at my mother’s breast.

10 From birth I was cast upon you;
from my mother’s womb you have been my God.

11 Do not be far from me,
for trouble is near
and there is no one to help.

12 Many bulls surround me;
strong bulls of Bashan encircle me.

13 Roaring lions tearing their prey
open their mouths wide against me.

14 I am poured out like water,
and all my bones are out of joint.
My heart has turned to wax;
it has melted away within me.

15 My strength is dried up like a potsherd,
and my tongue sticks to the roof of my mouth;
you lay me in the dust of death.

16 Dogs have surrounded me;
a band of evil men has encircled me,
they have pierced my hands and my feet.

17 I can count all my bones;
people stare and gloat over me.

18 They divide my garments among them
and cast lots for my clothing.

19 But you, O LORD, be not far off;
O my Strength, come quickly to help me.

So we have 3 reasons why YHWH cannot be Yeshua in Zech 12:10.

  1. Me and Him cannot be the same individual grammatically speaking.
  2. Psalm 22:1-19 the other quoted scripture by John, clearly indentifies Yeshua and YHWH as different identities.
  3. There is no contradiction in truth.
 

So an explanation that fits with John, Zechariah, and David (or Psalm writer) is that YHWH and Yeshua are 2 different identities and because of him who was pierced (Yeshua), people would look to YHWH (his God). This has come to pass as many now look to YHWH because of Yeshua’s sacrifice. See the below verse as an immediate example of fulfillment.

Acts 2:36-39
36 “Therefore let all Israel be assured of this: God has made this Jesus, whom you crucified, both Lord and Christ.”
37 When the people heard this, they were cut to the heart and said to Peter and the other apostles, “Brothers, what shall we do?”
38 Peter replied, “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
39 The promise is for you and your children and for all who are far off—for all whom the Lord our God will call.”


Discussion

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 20 posts - 81 through 100 (of 518 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #54156
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ May 31 2007,09:30)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ May 31 2007,08:20)
    Hi W,
    The sunlight is not the sun.
    The sun is more than that which it expresses.


    Nh

    Yes the Father is not the Son!

    But they are one God!

    One Spirit, Three Presons. One God!

    :)


    Hi w,
    They have eternal unity from the Jordan but you cannot have significant unity unless you have had separation. God has a son-two beings with life in themself and all the separate will and choices that individuals possess.

    As you say Jesus is the Word, the Son of God, the Christ who came in the flesh.

    So you just need to understand Jn 1.1 in this light and not stumble over the stone of the Son.

    Lay the first and only foundation stone-the Son of God.

    #54160
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ May 31 2007,09:49)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ May 31 2007,09:30)
    Yes the Father is not the Son!


    OK, exactly what is the incarnation again?


    Hi,
    W and Athanasius say it is the Word\Christ who came in the flesh but the others of the trinity theory here prefer to say God came. W says the Word IS God anyway.

    The Son of God has come.

    1 John 5:20
    And we know that the Son of God is come, and hath given us an understanding, that we may know him that is true, and we are in him that is true, even in his Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God, and eternal life.

    #54161
    Tim2
    Participant

    Athanasius said that the Word is God.

    #54167
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (Tim2 @ May 31 2007,23:41)
    t8,

    You say that men reflect the image and glory of God, and you are right. But Jesus is not said to be the “reflection” of God's glory, He is said to be the Radiance. The reflection is something altogether separate and different from the Light, but the Radiance is the Light itself, as Jesus is the true Light. John 1:9.

    I don't believe it says that all redeemed men reflect all the attributes of God together.

    But when we see Jesus we see the Father. It doesn't say we see a reflection of the Father, or part of the Father, or anything less. It says we see the Father.

    Tim


    Hi Tim2.

  • We are made in the image of God.
  • Jesus is the image of God.

    The only difference I can see here is that we were made and Jesus wasn't.

    But we are both images, but needless to say, that Christ is the full expression of God, and we express God's attributes in part only.

    :)

#54168
Proclaimer
Participant

For those who read WJs quoted post below:

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 01 2007,01:33)
True!

You cannot seperate the “Image”, from its source!

You take away the mans Image then the man has no Image and therefore does not exist.

If you take away the image of God, then God has no Image.


The image of the man is the woman.

Adam existed without a woman for a while. But realised he was missing something. But he still existed nevertheless.

Man is the image and glory of God.

Yet we are not God.

Saying that the source cannot exist without the/an image, or cannot be separated, is not true. Men who are the image of God can be separated from God and even Christ who is the image was separated when he cried out, “My God my God, why has thou forsaken me”.

1 Corinthians 11:7
A man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God; but the woman is the glory of man.

WJ used his own logic and scripture corrected him.

#54169
Proclaimer
Participant

Quote (Tim2 @ June 01 2007,06:20)
Athanasius said that the Word is God.


But John didn't say that, did he?

#54170
Proclaimer
Participant

To Kyle.

Quote (Kyle @ May 08 2007,15:03)
“And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.”

Christ speaks of himself in the third person here – at least in most of today's english translations. You obviously can't use logic in this case to prove that the one speaking isn't Jesus Christ.


I could be wrong of course, but it seems that it is John who is speaking as he is the one who wrote this.

Is there proof that this is Christ speaking? Is it a quote in the OT for example?

#54174

Quote (t8 @ May 31 2007,12:06)
For those who read WJs quoted post below:

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 01 2007,01:33)
True!

You cannot seperate the “Image”, from its source!

You take away the mans Image then the man has no Image and therefore does not exist.

If you take away the image of God, then God has no Image.


The image of the man is the woman.

Adam existed without a woman for a while. But realised he was missing something. But he still existed nevertheless.

Man is the image and glory of God.

Yet we are not God.

Saying that the source cannot exist without the/an image, or cannot be separated, is not true. Men who are the image of God can be separated from God and even Christ who is the image was separated when he cried out, “My God my God, why has thou forsaken me”.

1 Corinthians 11:7
A man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God; but the woman is the glory of man.

WJ used his own logic and scripture corrected him.


t8

Not so!

There is a difference in likeness and image!

We were created “IN” the image of God!

Jesus “Is” the image of God!

“An Image” and “the image” is two different things!

If you see Jesus you see God! He is the exact representation of his substance.

Not so with any other being including man who has his likeness!

If you see man in Christ or Christ in man you see the likeness of God, you are not the image you are Christ like, hence “Christians”!

So again if you take away your image or Gods not the likeness then the source ceases because it has no image!

Jesus does not reflect God as a mirror, Jesus reflects God as in face to face!

:O

#54179
Proclaimer
Participant

To WJ.

The image of man is the woman. If you took away Eve, would Adam have ceased to exist?

The answer of course contradicts your statement that you cannot separate the source and image.

Again, Jesus the image of God took the sins of the world upon himself. When God forsook him, was Jesus still the image of God?

Can you see how scripture corrected you?

#54180
Proclaimer
Participant

To WJ.

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 01 2007,07:34)
Jesus does not reflect God as a mirror, Jesus reflects God as in face to face!


Oh OK.

So Jesus face reflects God's face.

I agree that Jesus face reflects God.

Well then, you just admitted that Jesus wasn't God.

:)

#54195
Tim2
Participant

To be clear, 1 Corinthians 11:7 says womans is the glory of man, not the image of man.

#54196
Tim2
Participant

Where does it say that Jesus reflects God? It says that Jesus is the Radiance of God's glory. The radiance comes directly from the source. A reflection bounces off of another object.

#54201
NickHassan
Participant

Hi Tim 2,
Of course God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself[2Cor5], in fact to the fulness of deity[col], so he indeed expressed and radiated all of the nature of God to mankind. But he never took the credit or responsibility for any of these amazing powers ascribing them to God. We should too lest we call him a liar.

#54215
Proclaimer
Participant

Quote (Tim2 @ June 01 2007,10:34)
To be clear, 1 Corinthians 11:7 says womans is the glory of man, not the image of man.


Thanks. This is true. It doesn't say that.

#54216
Proclaimer
Participant

Quote (Tim2 @ June 01 2007,10:37)
Where does it say that Jesus reflects God? It says that Jesus is the Radiance of God's glory. The radiance comes directly from the source. A reflection bounces off of another object.


Radiance means of.

E.g., radiance of the sun comes from the sun.

The son of God also came from God.

Here are some uses of radiance. I haven't got time right now to see if they are all the same word in the Greek.

2 Corinthians 3:13
We are not like Moses, who would put a veil over his face to keep the Israelites from gazing at it while the radiance was fading away.

Hebrews 1:3
The Son is the radiance of God's glory and the exact representation of his being, sustaining all things by his powerful word. After he had provided purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty in heaven.

Notice the words “radiance of the glory of God”.

Again, he is OF God. He is the glory of God. NOTE: the woman is the glory of man. Woman is not the man himself but she is part of mankind.

John 16:27
No, the Father himself loves you because you have loved me and have believed that I came from God.

Do you believe this?
You can't have it both ways, he is either from God or God himself.

You can't have both pagan philosophy and the truth.

People should teach one or the other. But mixing them together is deceptive. (I say this as a general statement and is not meant to be pointed at anyone in particular.)

#54220
Tim2
Participant

Hi t8,

Quote
You can't have it both ways, he is either from God or God himself.

I think you are conflating the nature/substance of God with the personality of God. You are starting from the assumption that God is one person. But that is the issue we're discussing. You can't offer an assumption as evidence when the assumption is disputed.

Now being from God and being God are not mutually exclusive. For we know that God is Light. And we agree that light radiates, and that this is the case with God. So by no means is it impossible for the Light radiating from God to not be God as well. And we are told time and again that this Light radiating from the Father is Jesus. God of God, Light of Light.

tim

#54224

Quote (t8 @ May 31 2007,12:55)
To WJ.

The image of man is the woman. If you took away Eve, would Adam have ceased to exist?

The answer of course contradicts your statement that you cannot separate the source and image.

Again, Jesus the image of God took the sins of the world upon himself. When God forsook him, was Jesus still the image of God?

Can you see how scripture corrected you?


t8

Not at all t8.

We are not talking about the image of a man and a woman.

But if we were, is Eve the exact representation of Adam?

Not at all!

If someone looks at you face to face are they seeing your wife? or visa versa.

No they are seeing “your image”. The point is you cant seperate your image from yourself!

You are trying to make Yeshua into a mirror reflection of God.

Where as he is the “Express Image of the Invisible God”, “The exact representation of his substance”.

Jn 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

Col 1
Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:

Heb 1:3
And He is the radiance of His glory and the exact representation of His nature (substance), and upholds all things by the word of His power. When He had made purification of sins, He sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high,

You should believe all the scriptures t8!

:O

#54225

Quote (Tim2 @ May 31 2007,15:37)
Where does it say that Jesus reflects God?  It says that Jesus is the Radiance of God's glory.  The radiance comes directly from the source.  A reflection bounces off of another object.


True tim!

Bad choice of words on my part.

I was meaning when you look at Jesus “Face to Face” you see God!

:)

#54226
Cult Buster
Participant

It is evident that in Heb 1:3 Christ is being described as a divine Being. He is of the same substance as God. The express image of God's essence.

How many of you arians will claim to be of the same substance as God? Have you looked in the mirror lately :O

Heb 1:3

(ASV)  who being the effulgence of his glory, and the the very image of his substance, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had made purification of sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high;

(KJV)  Who being the brightness of his glory, and the the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high;

(LITV)  who being the shining splendor of His glory, and the express image of His essence, and upholding all things by the Word of His power, having made purification of our sins through Himself, He sat down on the right of the Majesty on high, Psa. 110:1

(MKJV)  who being the shining splendor of His glory, and the express image of His essence, and upholding all things by the word of His power, through Himself cleansing of our sins, He sat down on the right of the Majesty on high,

(YLT)  who being the brightness of the glory, and the impress of His subsistence, bearing up also the all things by the saying of his might–through himself having made a cleansing of our sins, sat down at the right hand of the greatness in the highest,

Some of you folk need to think seriously before you continue to blaspheme the name of Christ Jehovah.

Isa 6:5  Then said I, Woe is me! for I am undone; because I am a man of unclean lips, and I dwell in the midst of a people of unclean lips: for mine eyes have seen the King, the LORD (Jehovah) of hosts.

2Ti 3:2  For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy,  :O

#54227

Quote (Not3in1 @ May 31 2007,09:44)

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ May 31 2007,06:33)
*Somebody please tell me how God who is infinite in Power, Wisdom, Strength, Love, who fills all things, who is from everlasting to everlasting, who is bigger than the heavens, can have an image that is an exact representation of all he is, apart from himself?


Finally, I get to push the “easy” button!

Answer:  He beget a Son  :)


Not3

So you think Yeshua is infinite in Power, Wisdom, Strength, Love, and fills all things, and is from everlasting to everlasting, and is bigger than the heavens, and is an exact representation of all God is, and he is just a mere man?

HMMM?
???  ???  ???

I think you need to buy a new “easy button”!  :)

Viewing 20 posts - 81 through 100 (of 518 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2024 Heaven Net

Navigation

© 1999 - 2023 - Heaven Net
or

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

or

Create Account