Trinity Debate Zechariah 12:10

Subject:  Zechariah 12:10 proves the Trinity Doctrine
Date: April 22 2007
Debaters:  Is 1: 18 & t8

 


Is 1:18

Okay short and sweet this time….

In the below passage Zechariah records a quite amazing prophecy:

Zechariah 12:10
“I will pour out on the house of David and on the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the Spirit of grace and of supplication, so that they will look on Me whom they have pierced; and they will mourn for Him, as one mourns for an only son, and they will weep bitterly over Him like the bitter weeping over a firstborn.

What’s significant (in the context of this debate submission) about the highlighted statement above is that the preceding verses (1, 4, 6 and 9) unmistakably bear out that it was a prophecy made by YHWH, and would be fulfilled by YHWH. YHWH foretold that they (the inhabitants of Jerusalem) will look upon “Me” whom they (the inhabitants of Jerusalem) pierced.

Zechariah 12:1-9
1The burden of the word of the LORD [YHWH] concerning Israel. Thus declares the LORD [YHWH] who stretches out the heavens, lays the foundation of the earth, and forms the spirit of man within him, 2″Behold, I am going to make Jerusalem a cup that causes reeling to all the peoples around; and when the siege is against Jerusalem, it will also be against Judah. 3″It will come about in that day that I will make Jerusalem a heavy stone for all the peoples; all who lift it will be severely injured And all the nations of the earth will be gathered against it. 4″In that day,” declares the LORD [YHWH], “I will strike every horse with bewilderment and his rider with madness. But I will watch over the house of Judah, while I strike every horse of the peoples with blindness. 5″Then the clans of Judah will say in their hearts, ‘A strong support for us are the inhabitants of Jerusalem through the LORD of hosts, their God.’ 6″In that day I [YHWH] will make the clans of Judah like a firepot among pieces of wood and a flaming torch among sheaves, so they will consume on the right hand and on the left all the surrounding peoples, while the inhabitants of Jerusalem again dwell on their own sites in Jerusalem. 7″The LORD also will save the tents of Judah first, so that the glory of the house of David and the glory of the inhabitants of Jerusalem will not be magnified above Judah. 8″In that day the LORD will defend the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and the one who is feeble among them in that day will be like David, and the house of David will be like God, like the angel of the LORD before them. 9″And in that day I [YHWH] will set about to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem.

There is no mention of a secondary identity in the Zechariah’s predictive prophecy. The “me” in “they will look on Me whom they have pierced” is YHWH. In the immediately-preceding verse YHWH affirmed “I will set about to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem”, which of course only the Almighty could accomplish. With that in mind, please consider Who it was that John taught fulfilled this prophecy:

John 19:33-37
33but coming to Jesus, when they saw that He was already dead, they did not break His legs. 34But one of the soldiers pierced His side with a spear, and immediately blood and water came out. 35And he who has seen has testified, and his testimony is true; and he knows that he is telling the truth, so that you also may believe. 36For these things came to pass to fulfill the Scripture, “NOT A BONE OF HIM SHALL BE BROKEN.” 37And again another Scripture says, “THEY SHALL LOOK ON HIM WHOM THEY PIERCED.

According to John, Zechariah 10:12 is a predictive reference to the piercing (vs 34) incurred by Yeshua during His crucifixion (“For these things came to pass to fulfill the Scripture” – v 36). Let me be as clear as I can here t8: Only YHWH could fulfill this prophecy, because it was made specifically by YHWH (through Zechariah) and of YHWH. It cannot be fulfilled by proxy, the piercing was to be incurred by YHWH and it is YHWH that would be looked upon. No one else, the language in the Zechariah text is unambiguous and does not allow for it. John unequivocally tells us that Yeshua literally fulfilled the Zech 12:10 prophecy at Calvary, but crucially He fulfilled it after His body had expired (v 33). The Roman soldiers and other bystanders (the inhabitants of Jerusalem) looked upon His lifeless body, but John and Zechariah tell us that this was the body of YHWH. So, the obvious implication here is: even His dead body was considered utterly divine, it was the body of YHWH. So any argument linking Yeshua’s deity with His indwelling by the Holy Spirit is vaporised in this verse.

If YHWH makes a prophecy that only YHWH can fulfill, and Yahshua fulfills it, then He is YHWH. There is no other acceptable conclusion.

Now some questions for you t8:

Q1) Was the “me” that was foretold to be pierced and looked upon by the inhabitant of Jerusalem in Zech 12:10 a refererence to YHWH? If not, please provide lexical evidence to the contrary.

Q2) According to John’s inspired-understanding, was Yeshua in fact the “me” in the Zech 12:10 prophecy (John 19:37)? If not, please explain.

Q3) If YHWH makes a prophecy that only YHWH can fulfill, and Yeshua fulfills it, is it reasonable to conclude that Yeshua is YHWH? If not why not?

Blessings



t8

Q1) Was the “me” that was foretold to be pierced and looked upon by the inhabitant of Jerusalem in Zech 12:10 a refererence to YHWH? If not, please provide lexical evidence to the contrary.

I think the ME is YHWH. The one who is to be pierced (HIM) is Yeshua.

It says “…They will look on me, the one they have pierced, and they will mourn for him as one mourns for an only child,…”

Grammatically, the “Me” and the “him” cannot refer to the same individual can it.

It is clearly talking about 2, not 1. Otherwise it would say: “They will look on me, the one they have pierced, and they will mourn for ME as one mourns for an only child,”. Of course it doesn’t say that, so the “him” is obviously different to the “me”.

Q2) According to John’s inspired-understanding, was Yeshua in fact the “me” in the Zech 12:10 prophecy (John 19:37)? If not, please explain.

Is Yeshua the ME or the HIM? I say he is the HIM. If Yeshua was both, then the language would use ME or HIM, but not both.

Q3) If YHWH makes a prophecy that only YHWH can fulfill, and Yeshua fulfills it, is it reasonable to conclude that Yeshua is YHWH? If not why not?

YHWH didn’t make this prophecy about himself from what I can see. We know that YHWH is not a man and he doesn’t have bones and blood. It is rediculous to believe that God whom the universe cannot contain squeezed himself into a human body. Rather, it was the Word that became flesh and the apostles beheld his glory as the son of God. Even if YHWH did make the prophecy about himself, we know that YHWH sent his son and it was YHWH’s will that his son drink the cup that was prepared for him. So if YHWH was in Christ, then to that degree was YHWH the one being punished. But Christ did say “My God My God, why hast thou forsaken me”.

But the way it appears to me on the outset is that they would look to YHWH, because of the HIM who was pierced.

NOTE: My rebuttal is based on the English version of these verses. It is possible that the English version may not be that clear or even accurate. If this is the case, then a more accurate version of the Zechariah verse could change what I have written.

Anyway, it is interesting to note that John 19:33-37 also refers to another prophecy i.e., NOT A BONE OF HIM SHALL BE BROKEN.”
When we look at that prophecy, we see clearly that the YHWH (LORD) is one and the one whom not a bone shall be broken is another.

It is obvious to all that the bolded verses below are either or both Yeshua and YHWH. But the interesting part is that we cannot confuse Yeshua with actually being YHWH.

Psalm 22:1-19
My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?
Why are you so far from saving me,
so far from the words of my groaning?

2 O my God, I cry out by day, but you do not answer,
by night, and am not silent.

3 Yet you are enthroned as the Holy One;
you are the praise of Israel.

4 In you our fathers put their trust;
they trusted and you delivered them.

5 They cried to you and were saved;
in you they trusted and were not disappointed.

6 But I am a worm and not a man,
scorned by men and despised by the people.

7 All who see me mock me;
they hurl insults, shaking their heads:

“He trusts in the LORD;
let the LORD rescue him.
Let him deliver him,
since he delights in him.”

9 Yet you brought me out of the womb;
you made me trust in you
even at my mother’s breast.

10 From birth I was cast upon you;
from my mother’s womb you have been my God.

11 Do not be far from me,
for trouble is near
and there is no one to help.

12 Many bulls surround me;
strong bulls of Bashan encircle me.

13 Roaring lions tearing their prey
open their mouths wide against me.

14 I am poured out like water,
and all my bones are out of joint.
My heart has turned to wax;
it has melted away within me.

15 My strength is dried up like a potsherd,
and my tongue sticks to the roof of my mouth;
you lay me in the dust of death.

16 Dogs have surrounded me;
a band of evil men has encircled me,
they have pierced my hands and my feet.

17 I can count all my bones;
people stare and gloat over me.

18 They divide my garments among them
and cast lots for my clothing.

19 But you, O LORD, be not far off;
O my Strength, come quickly to help me.

So we have 3 reasons why YHWH cannot be Yeshua in Zech 12:10.

  1. Me and Him cannot be the same individual grammatically speaking.
  2. Psalm 22:1-19 the other quoted scripture by John, clearly indentifies Yeshua and YHWH as different identities.
  3. There is no contradiction in truth.
 

So an explanation that fits with John, Zechariah, and David (or Psalm writer) is that YHWH and Yeshua are 2 different identities and because of him who was pierced (Yeshua), people would look to YHWH (his God). This has come to pass as many now look to YHWH because of Yeshua’s sacrifice. See the below verse as an immediate example of fulfillment.

Acts 2:36-39
36 “Therefore let all Israel be assured of this: God has made this Jesus, whom you crucified, both Lord and Christ.”
37 When the people heard this, they were cut to the heart and said to Peter and the other apostles, “Brothers, what shall we do?”
38 Peter replied, “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
39 The promise is for you and your children and for all who are far off—for all whom the Lord our God will call.”


Discussion

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 20 posts - 61 through 80 (of 518 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #53215
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Theos {theh’-os}1) a god or goddess, a general name of deities or divinities2) the Godhead3) spoken of the only and true God3a) refers to the things of God3b) his counsels, interests, things due to him4) whatever can in any respect be likened unto God, or resemble him in any way4a) God’s representative or viceregent4a1) of magistrates and judgesI honestly do not know exactly what Thomas meant, as you can see there are varied usages for the word “theos”.Here are some possibilities as to what Thomas actually meant:

    • He was YHWH. (This contradicts scripture big time)
    • He was addressing Christ and then addressed YHWH. (No contradictions as I could also say my Lord as referring to Christ and then my God as referring to his and my Father)
    • He was in effect saying, my lord (boss) and theos (one in authority).
    • He was THEOS quoted in similar fashion as Jesus calling us theos, i.e, son(s) of the Most High. (No contradiction) see both John 10:34 Jesus answered them, “Is it not written in your Law, I have said you are gods (theos)'</span>which is a quote from Psalms 82:6 <span style="color: red;">"I said,You are “gods” (Elohim); you are all sons of the Most High.’

    You have to also remember that the gospel/s, unlike a lot of Paul’s letters are not all teachings but recorded events and of what people said. Jesus said to Peter “Get behind me Satan”. Jesus wasn’t enforcing a teaching about Peter was he? Even more extreme could be denying Christ like Peter did. It was a true event, but not a model for us to follow. I think you can see what I am getting at.

    You need to be wise in your understanding. If a person just gropes at anything that might fit his theology, then such a man is not searching for the truth, rather he is defining it from his own understanding and therefore he is proving only that he is carnal.

    Given the wide possibilities of what Thomas said, it seems rather arrogant to say that he was teaching or in line with the Trinity doctrine. Thomas adoring exclamation “my Lord and my god” (John 20:28 is still not quite the same as an address to Christ as being without qualification [limitation] God, and it must be balanced by the words of the risen Christ himself to Mary Magdalene (verse. 17)

    “Go unto my brethren and say to them, I ascend unto my Father and your Father, and my God and your God.”

    Another balancing scripture to gain clear understanding is:John 1:18

    No man hath seen God at any time, the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.

    Notice that God is invisible but quoted below, the very scriptures you are talking about show that Jesus was visible.

    John 20:28-29

     Thomas said to him, “My Lord and my God!” Then Jesus told him, “Because you have seen me, you have believed; blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.”

    #53241
    Cult Buster
    Participant

    t8. All the above makes no sense at all. Christ divinity was veiled by His humanity. People on earth saw Him only in His humanity, His divine glory was covered for a time. You deny the incarnation, that God (Christ) temporarily laid aside His divine power and took the form of a man.

    Phi 2:5  Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus:
    Phi 2:6  Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God
    Phi 2:7  But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:
    Phi 2:8  And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.
     

    Thomas understood who Christ was.

    Joh 20:28  And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord and my God.

    Stephen knelt down, prayed to, and worshiped Jesus.

    Act 7:59  And they stoned Stephen, calling upon God, and saying, Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.
    Act 7:60  And he kneeled down, and cried with a loud voice, Lord, lay not this sin to their charge. And when he had said this, he fell asleep.

    Phi 2:10  that in the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven and things on earth and things under the earth,

    Rev 19:10 tells us to worship only God.

    Jesus was worshiped both in heaven and on earth, therefore He is Jehovah God. :O

    t8. You select only portions of scripture to try to prove Arianism. How can you honestly deny the rest?

    #53281
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi CB,
    If you have seen and heard the message of Scripture to worship only our God,
    why do you not obey scripture and worship only our God?

    #53943
    Tim2
    Participant

    Quote (942767 @ May 25 2007,13:18)

    Quote (Tim2 @ May 25 2007,12:53)
    Hey 94,

    I'm glad you believe that Jesus is the image of God.  Why don't you think that the image of God actually is God?

    Tim


    Hi Tim2:

    Do you have any children?  If so, are your children you or are they a different person?

    Does the scripture say that Jesus is God or does it say that he is the Son of God?


    Hi 94,

    If you would please read the ecumenical creeds, http://www.reformed.org/documents/index.html you would see that they confess the Son to be a different person than the Father.

    Now, don't children have the same nature as their parents? How then could the Son be different than the Father?

    Tim

    #53945
    Tim2
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ May 25 2007,17:03)
    Hi Tim2.

    Quote (Tim2 @ May 26 2007,07:53)
    Hey 94,

    I'm glad you believe that Jesus is the image of God.  Why don't you think that the image of God actually is God?

    Tim


    An image comes from the source. An image by definition cannot be the source.

    God is the Original. Christ the son, is his image.

    Then we come next. i.e., God > Christ > Man

    This is not human logic. It is scriptural.

    1 Corinthians 11:3
    Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

    John 15:1-2
    1 “I am the true vine, and my Father is the gardener.
    2 He cuts off every branch in me that bears no fruit, while every branch that does bear fruit he prunes so that it will be even more fruitful.

    Jesus Christ is the prototype son and we are sons.
    He is of God and we are of God. But neither of us are God.

    Our God is the Father and God of our Lord Jesus Christ.

    John 20:17
    Jesus said, “Do not hold on to me, for I have not yet returned to the Father. Go instead to my brothers and tell them, 'I am returning to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God.' “


    t8,

    Looks like I get to cheat and answer your third debate post in advance.

    You say that the Father is invisible. But Jesus is His Image, such that when we see Jesus, we see the Father. John 14:9. You are right to say that an image is not its source, but you are wrong to infer that the Image of the Father is something less than the Father. Does the Radiance of the Father's glory diminish as it goes out from Him? Is the exact representation of His person not exact?

    No, the Son is the image of the Father because He is equal to the Father, very God and Son of God, consubstantial with the Father.

    Tim

    #53946
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi Tim2,
    My kids all have different natures.
    O you mean they are all human?

    So Gods cannot beget sons but must beget equal Gods?
    Not only that they cannot ever beget separate beings?

    Who are you to tell God how to work?

    #53947
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Tim2 @ May 29 2007,18:09)
    Now, don't children have the same nature as their parents? How then could the Son be different than the Father?


    The son of a human father is human, but let's not forget he is a different human from his father. Do Trinitarians want to claim Jesus is a different God from his Father?

    “Son of God” would mean Jesus has the same nature as God? If this is true it would still be a weak argument for Jesus being God because others are also called God's sons and those who are God's sons are also told they will have God's nature. See 2 Peter 1:4

    It appears having divine nature does not make Jesus God anymore than it makes anointed Christians God.

    #53949
    Tim2
    Participant

    See my last response to David in the dualism thread.

    #53952
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Will do; thanks Tim.

    #54075
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    To Tim2.

    Quote (Tim2 @ May 30 2007,13:20)
    t8,

    Looks like I get to cheat and answer your third debate post in advance.

    You say that the Father is invisible. But Jesus is His Image, such that when we see Jesus, we see the Father. John 14:9. You are right to say that an image is not its source, but you are wrong to infer that the Image of the Father is something less than the Father. Does the Radiance of the Father's glory diminish as it goes out from Him? Is the exact representation of His person not exact?

    No, the Son is the image of the Father because He is equal to the Father, very God and Son of God, consubstantial with the Father.

    Tim


    Yes he is the glory of God and the exact representation of his being.

    He is all this, but he is not God himself whom he reflects.

    How do you reflect God? Well one thing needed is that you don't look to yourself.

    Yeshua speaks only what he hears his father saying. He has his own will, but he chooses to do the will of God.

    “Not my will, but your will.”

    To say that Christ is an image but is also God himself, is to say that he is the image and source. It is the same as saying that he is the vine and the gardener. It is the same as saying that he is both the son and the one true God, the Father.

    I have taught the following from the beginning of this websites inception and I stand by it.

    God > Christ/son of God > Man.

    Not
    Trinity > Man

    We too are made in the image of God. Except that we each reflect God in part. But even if all redeemed men reflect all the attributes of God together, we will never be God himself.

    #54121
    Tim2
    Participant

    t8,

    You say that men reflect the image and glory of God, and you are right. But Jesus is not said to be the “reflection” of God's glory, He is said to be the Radiance. The reflection is something altogether separate and different from the Light, but the Radiance is the Light itself, as Jesus is the true Light. John 1:9.

    I don't believe it says that all redeemed men reflect all the attributes of God together.

    But when we see Jesus we see the Father. It doesn't say we see a reflection of the Father, or part of the Father, or anything less. It says we see the Father.

    Tim

    #54122
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Radiance = glowing; transmitted by radiation.

    Radiation = issue rays; spread from a center.

    Radiance is not the light itself. It comes from a source and that source is God, himself.

    Having a dictionary can be dangerous sometimes :)

    #54125

    Quote (Tim2 @ May 31 2007,04:41)
    t8,

    You say that men reflect the image and glory of God, and you are right.  But Jesus is not said to be the “reflection” of God's glory, He is said to be the Radiance.  The reflection is something altogether separate and different from the Light, but the Radiance is the Light itself, as Jesus is the true Light.  John 1:9.  

    I don't believe it says that all redeemed men reflect all the attributes of God together.

    But when we see Jesus we see the Father.  It doesn't say we see a reflection of the Father, or part of the Father, or anything less.  It says we see the Father.

    Tim


    Tim

    True!

    You cannot seperate the “Image”, from its source!

    You take away the mans Image then the man has no Image and therefore does not exist.

    If you take away the image of God, then God has no Image.

    Jesus is not “an” Image of God, he is the exact representation of Gods substance.

    He is “the” Image of God.

    The Sun and the rays are “ONE”, without the sun there is no rays, and without the rays there is no sun!

    God and “The Son” are One!

    *Somebody please tell me how God who is infinite in Power, Wisdom, Strength, Love, who fills all things, who is from everlasting to everlasting, who is bigger than the heavens, can have an image that is an exact representation of all he is, apart from himself? ???*

    ???

    #54127
    Tim2
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ May 31 2007,05:05)
    Radiance = glowing; transmitted by radiation.

    Radiation = issue rays; spread from a center.

    Radiance is not the light itself.  It comes from a source and that source is God, himself.

    Having a dictionary can be dangerous sometimes  :)


    An English dictionary, Not3in1?

    But it doesn't matter, because as I said in my post, Jesus is the true Light. John 1:9.

    #54135
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ May 31 2007,06:33)

    Quote (Tim2 @ May 31 2007,04:41)
    t8,

    You say that men reflect the image and glory of God, and you are right.  But Jesus is not said to be the “reflection” of God's glory, He is said to be the Radiance.  The reflection is something altogether separate and different from the Light, but the Radiance is the Light itself, as Jesus is the true Light.  John 1:9.  

    I don't believe it says that all redeemed men reflect all the attributes of God together.

    But when we see Jesus we see the Father.  It doesn't say we see a reflection of the Father, or part of the Father, or anything less.  It says we see the Father.

    Tim


    Tim

    True!

    You cannot seperate the “Image”, from its source!

    You take away the mans Image then the man has no Image and therefore does not exist.

    If you take away the image of God, then God has no Image.

    Jesus is not “an” Image of God, he is the exact representation of Gods substance.

    He is “the” Image of God.

    The Sun and the rays are “ONE”, without the sun there is no rays, and without the rays there is no sun!

    God and “The Son” are One!

    *Somebody please tell me how God who is infinite in Power, Wisdom, Strength, Love, who fills all things, who is from everlasting to everlasting, who is bigger than the heavens, can have an image that is an exact representation of all he is, apart from himself? ???*

    ???


    Hi w,
    Having established that you cannot separate the image from the source you then attempt to do the reverse and show the image is the source thus denying the whole point of your example.

    #54137

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ May 31 2007,07:17)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ May 31 2007,06:33)

    Quote (Tim2 @ May 31 2007,04:41)
    t8,

    You say that men reflect the image and glory of God, and you are right.  But Jesus is not said to be the “reflection” of God's glory, He is said to be the Radiance.  The reflection is something altogether separate and different from the Light, but the Radiance is the Light itself, as Jesus is the true Light.  John 1:9.  

    I don't believe it says that all redeemed men reflect all the attributes of God together.

    But when we see Jesus we see the Father.  It doesn't say we see a reflection of the Father, or part of the Father, or anything less.  It says we see the Father.

    Tim


    Tim

    True!

    You cannot seperate the “Image”, from its source!

    You take away the mans Image then the man has no Image and therefore does not exist.

    If you take away the image of God, then God has no Image.

    Jesus is not “an” Image of God, he is the exact representation of Gods substance.

    He is “the” Image of God.

    The Sun and the rays are “ONE”, without the sun there is no rays, and without the rays there is no sun!

    God and “The Son” are One!

    *Somebody please tell me how God who is infinite in Power, Wisdom, Strength, Love, who fills all things, who is from everlasting to everlasting, who is bigger than the heavens, can have an image that is an exact representation of all he is, apart from himself? ???*

    ???


    Hi w,
    Having established that you cannot separate the image from the source you then attempt to do the reverse and show the image is the source thus denying the whole point of your example.


    NH

    Not at all NH!

    Thats the whole point, the Father and the Son and the Spirit is One God and of One substance!

    The sunlight and the sunrays have the same molecular structure.

    The bone marrow and the bone also have the same molecular structure.

    Get over NH! All creation reveals the Glory of God.

    There is nothing in existance that is not plural and yet one!

    One Spirit, Three Persons, One God!

    :)

    #54138
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi W,
    The sunlight is not the sun.
    The sun is more than that which it expresses.

    #54144

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ May 31 2007,08:20)
    Hi W,
    The sunlight is not the sun.
    The sun is more than that which it expresses.


    Nh

    Yes the Father is not the Son!

    But they are one God!

    One Spirit, Three Presons. One God!

    :)

    #54145
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ May 31 2007,06:33)
    *Somebody please tell me how God who is infinite in Power, Wisdom, Strength, Love, who fills all things, who is from everlasting to everlasting, who is bigger than the heavens, can have an image that is an exact representation of all he is, apart from himself?


    Finally, I get to push the “easy” button!

    Answer: He beget a Son :)

    #54146
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ May 31 2007,09:30)
    Yes the Father is not the Son!


    OK, exactly what is the incarnation again?

Viewing 20 posts - 61 through 80 (of 518 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2024 Heaven Net

Navigation

© 1999 - 2023 - Heaven Net
or

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

or

Create Account