Trinity Debate Zechariah 12:10

Subject:  Zechariah 12:10 proves the Trinity Doctrine
Date: April 22 2007
Debaters:  Is 1: 18 & t8

 


Is 1:18

Okay short and sweet this time….

In the below passage Zechariah records a quite amazing prophecy:

Zechariah 12:10
“I will pour out on the house of David and on the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the Spirit of grace and of supplication, so that they will look on Me whom they have pierced; and they will mourn for Him, as one mourns for an only son, and they will weep bitterly over Him like the bitter weeping over a firstborn.

What’s significant (in the context of this debate submission) about the highlighted statement above is that the preceding verses (1, 4, 6 and 9) unmistakably bear out that it was a prophecy made by YHWH, and would be fulfilled by YHWH. YHWH foretold that they (the inhabitants of Jerusalem) will look upon “Me” whom they (the inhabitants of Jerusalem) pierced.

Zechariah 12:1-9
1The burden of the word of the LORD [YHWH] concerning Israel. Thus declares the LORD [YHWH] who stretches out the heavens, lays the foundation of the earth, and forms the spirit of man within him, 2″Behold, I am going to make Jerusalem a cup that causes reeling to all the peoples around; and when the siege is against Jerusalem, it will also be against Judah. 3″It will come about in that day that I will make Jerusalem a heavy stone for all the peoples; all who lift it will be severely injured And all the nations of the earth will be gathered against it. 4″In that day,” declares the LORD [YHWH], “I will strike every horse with bewilderment and his rider with madness. But I will watch over the house of Judah, while I strike every horse of the peoples with blindness. 5″Then the clans of Judah will say in their hearts, ‘A strong support for us are the inhabitants of Jerusalem through the LORD of hosts, their God.’ 6″In that day I [YHWH] will make the clans of Judah like a firepot among pieces of wood and a flaming torch among sheaves, so they will consume on the right hand and on the left all the surrounding peoples, while the inhabitants of Jerusalem again dwell on their own sites in Jerusalem. 7″The LORD also will save the tents of Judah first, so that the glory of the house of David and the glory of the inhabitants of Jerusalem will not be magnified above Judah. 8″In that day the LORD will defend the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and the one who is feeble among them in that day will be like David, and the house of David will be like God, like the angel of the LORD before them. 9″And in that day I [YHWH] will set about to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem.

There is no mention of a secondary identity in the Zechariah’s predictive prophecy. The “me” in “they will look on Me whom they have pierced” is YHWH. In the immediately-preceding verse YHWH affirmed “I will set about to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem”, which of course only the Almighty could accomplish. With that in mind, please consider Who it was that John taught fulfilled this prophecy:

John 19:33-37
33but coming to Jesus, when they saw that He was already dead, they did not break His legs. 34But one of the soldiers pierced His side with a spear, and immediately blood and water came out. 35And he who has seen has testified, and his testimony is true; and he knows that he is telling the truth, so that you also may believe. 36For these things came to pass to fulfill the Scripture, “NOT A BONE OF HIM SHALL BE BROKEN.” 37And again another Scripture says, “THEY SHALL LOOK ON HIM WHOM THEY PIERCED.

According to John, Zechariah 10:12 is a predictive reference to the piercing (vs 34) incurred by Yeshua during His crucifixion (“For these things came to pass to fulfill the Scripture” – v 36). Let me be as clear as I can here t8: Only YHWH could fulfill this prophecy, because it was made specifically by YHWH (through Zechariah) and of YHWH. It cannot be fulfilled by proxy, the piercing was to be incurred by YHWH and it is YHWH that would be looked upon. No one else, the language in the Zechariah text is unambiguous and does not allow for it. John unequivocally tells us that Yeshua literally fulfilled the Zech 12:10 prophecy at Calvary, but crucially He fulfilled it after His body had expired (v 33). The Roman soldiers and other bystanders (the inhabitants of Jerusalem) looked upon His lifeless body, but John and Zechariah tell us that this was the body of YHWH. So, the obvious implication here is: even His dead body was considered utterly divine, it was the body of YHWH. So any argument linking Yeshua’s deity with His indwelling by the Holy Spirit is vaporised in this verse.

If YHWH makes a prophecy that only YHWH can fulfill, and Yahshua fulfills it, then He is YHWH. There is no other acceptable conclusion.

Now some questions for you t8:

Q1) Was the “me” that was foretold to be pierced and looked upon by the inhabitant of Jerusalem in Zech 12:10 a refererence to YHWH? If not, please provide lexical evidence to the contrary.

Q2) According to John’s inspired-understanding, was Yeshua in fact the “me” in the Zech 12:10 prophecy (John 19:37)? If not, please explain.

Q3) If YHWH makes a prophecy that only YHWH can fulfill, and Yeshua fulfills it, is it reasonable to conclude that Yeshua is YHWH? If not why not?

Blessings



t8

Q1) Was the “me” that was foretold to be pierced and looked upon by the inhabitant of Jerusalem in Zech 12:10 a refererence to YHWH? If not, please provide lexical evidence to the contrary.

I think the ME is YHWH. The one who is to be pierced (HIM) is Yeshua.

It says “…They will look on me, the one they have pierced, and they will mourn for him as one mourns for an only child,…”

Grammatically, the “Me” and the “him” cannot refer to the same individual can it.

It is clearly talking about 2, not 1. Otherwise it would say: “They will look on me, the one they have pierced, and they will mourn for ME as one mourns for an only child,”. Of course it doesn’t say that, so the “him” is obviously different to the “me”.

Q2) According to John’s inspired-understanding, was Yeshua in fact the “me” in the Zech 12:10 prophecy (John 19:37)? If not, please explain.

Is Yeshua the ME or the HIM? I say he is the HIM. If Yeshua was both, then the language would use ME or HIM, but not both.

Q3) If YHWH makes a prophecy that only YHWH can fulfill, and Yeshua fulfills it, is it reasonable to conclude that Yeshua is YHWH? If not why not?

YHWH didn’t make this prophecy about himself from what I can see. We know that YHWH is not a man and he doesn’t have bones and blood. It is rediculous to believe that God whom the universe cannot contain squeezed himself into a human body. Rather, it was the Word that became flesh and the apostles beheld his glory as the son of God. Even if YHWH did make the prophecy about himself, we know that YHWH sent his son and it was YHWH’s will that his son drink the cup that was prepared for him. So if YHWH was in Christ, then to that degree was YHWH the one being punished. But Christ did say “My God My God, why hast thou forsaken me”.

But the way it appears to me on the outset is that they would look to YHWH, because of the HIM who was pierced.

NOTE: My rebuttal is based on the English version of these verses. It is possible that the English version may not be that clear or even accurate. If this is the case, then a more accurate version of the Zechariah verse could change what I have written.

Anyway, it is interesting to note that John 19:33-37 also refers to another prophecy i.e., NOT A BONE OF HIM SHALL BE BROKEN.”
When we look at that prophecy, we see clearly that the YHWH (LORD) is one and the one whom not a bone shall be broken is another.

It is obvious to all that the bolded verses below are either or both Yeshua and YHWH. But the interesting part is that we cannot confuse Yeshua with actually being YHWH.

Psalm 22:1-19
My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?
Why are you so far from saving me,
so far from the words of my groaning?

2 O my God, I cry out by day, but you do not answer,
by night, and am not silent.

3 Yet you are enthroned as the Holy One;
you are the praise of Israel.

4 In you our fathers put their trust;
they trusted and you delivered them.

5 They cried to you and were saved;
in you they trusted and were not disappointed.

6 But I am a worm and not a man,
scorned by men and despised by the people.

7 All who see me mock me;
they hurl insults, shaking their heads:

“He trusts in the LORD;
let the LORD rescue him.
Let him deliver him,
since he delights in him.”

9 Yet you brought me out of the womb;
you made me trust in you
even at my mother’s breast.

10 From birth I was cast upon you;
from my mother’s womb you have been my God.

11 Do not be far from me,
for trouble is near
and there is no one to help.

12 Many bulls surround me;
strong bulls of Bashan encircle me.

13 Roaring lions tearing their prey
open their mouths wide against me.

14 I am poured out like water,
and all my bones are out of joint.
My heart has turned to wax;
it has melted away within me.

15 My strength is dried up like a potsherd,
and my tongue sticks to the roof of my mouth;
you lay me in the dust of death.

16 Dogs have surrounded me;
a band of evil men has encircled me,
they have pierced my hands and my feet.

17 I can count all my bones;
people stare and gloat over me.

18 They divide my garments among them
and cast lots for my clothing.

19 But you, O LORD, be not far off;
O my Strength, come quickly to help me.

So we have 3 reasons why YHWH cannot be Yeshua in Zech 12:10.

  1. Me and Him cannot be the same individual grammatically speaking.
  2. Psalm 22:1-19 the other quoted scripture by John, clearly indentifies Yeshua and YHWH as different identities.
  3. There is no contradiction in truth.
 

So an explanation that fits with John, Zechariah, and David (or Psalm writer) is that YHWH and Yeshua are 2 different identities and because of him who was pierced (Yeshua), people would look to YHWH (his God). This has come to pass as many now look to YHWH because of Yeshua’s sacrifice. See the below verse as an immediate example of fulfillment.

Acts 2:36-39
36 “Therefore let all Israel be assured of this: God has made this Jesus, whom you crucified, both Lord and Christ.”
37 When the people heard this, they were cut to the heart and said to Peter and the other apostles, “Brothers, what shall we do?”
38 Peter replied, “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
39 The promise is for you and your children and for all who are far off—for all whom the Lord our God will call.”


Discussion

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 20 posts - 401 through 420 (of 518 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #161499
    Tim Kraft
    Participant

    To all: I would like to get some feedback from this site on the subject of “being born again”! Jesus clearly said we must be but he never told us how to be. Please let me know. Thanks, With love, TK

    #240893
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Nov. 04 2009,02:41)
    God sent his Spirit into the world too, didn’t he?


    WJ.

    If you could send your spirit, then think about how that would differ from sending your son.

    #240894
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Nov. 04 2009,02:41)
    If you really knew me“, you would know my Father (God) as well“. From now on, “you do know him (God) and have seen him (God)“.” John 14:7

    Here we see Jesus saying “me and him” are “One” God!


    WJ this is not Jesus teaching that he is one God with the Father. That is your own imagination at work.

    Rather it is a teaching that is likewise described in Colossians 1:15:
    He is the image of the invisible God…

    God is still invisible WJ. Jesus is his visible image and the greatest revelation of what God is like.

    #240895
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Nov. 04 2009,02:41)
    The foolish logic of man puts God into a box and makes him after his own image when he determines that an infinite God can be fully comprehended by the finite mind of man!


    I agree that people try to put God into a box (as if they could). But surely your comment goes for triangles too right?

    #240970
    Wispring
    Participant

    That diagram would not work even with object-oriented programming logic

    #240978

    Quote (t8 @ Mar. 27 2011,18:09)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Nov. 04 2009,02:41)
    If you really knew me“, you would know my Father (God) as well“. From now on, “you do know him (God) and have seen him (God)“.” John 14:7

    Here we see Jesus saying “me and him” are “One” God!


    WJ this is not Jesus teaching that he is one God with the Father. That is your own imagination at work.

    Rather it is a teaching that is likewise described in Colossians 1:15:
    He is the image of the invisible God…

    God is still invisible WJ. Jesus is his visible image and the greatest revelation of what God is like.


    t8

    If that is all Jesus is saying then lets hear you say it.

    Jesus is invisible to us also t8. It takes God Spirit to see Jesus.

    Anyway who is it that John saw sitting on the Throne then t8 if God cannot be seen?

    And immediately I was in the spirit: and, behold, a throne was set in heaven, and [one] sat on the throne. And he that sat was to look upon like a jasper and a sardine stone: and [there was] a rainbow round about the throne, in sight like unto an emerald. Rev 4:3

    If you say God cannot be seen then that must mean Jesus is the One that John saw in the Throne of God, right?

    The Spirit of revelation reveals that Jesus is the “visible image of the invisible God”.

    No other being is that right t8?

    No other being is “the radiance of God's glory and the exact representation of his being” is there?

    Your view that Jesus is not God is clearly evidence that you see Jesus as “less” than the “Image of God”, you see him as “less” than 'the radiance of God's glory and the exact representation of his being”.

    That is why Jesus said if you have seen me you have seen God. If you do not see Jesus as God then how can you say the Jesus you see is 'the radiance of God's glory and the exact representation of his being” or the image of the invisible God? Your image of God is not God.

    WJ

    #240981

    Quote (t8 @ Mar. 27 2011,18:02)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Nov. 04 2009,02:41)
    God sent his Spirit into the world too, didn’t he?


    WJ.

    If you could send your spirit, then think about how that would differ from sending your son.


    Did Jesus send the Father t8?

    Why did Jesus pray to the Father to send “another”?

    Does the Father have to hear what he speaks?

    Can the Father speak on his own?

    Does the Father take from Jesus and give to us?

    These are all activities of the Holy Spirit t8.

    Is the Holy Spirit the Father t8?

    WJ

    #241005
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    WJ.

    The Holy Spirit is the spirit of God.

    #241006
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 29 2011,02:15)
    t8

    If that is all Jesus is saying then lets hear you say it.

    Jesus is invisible to us also t8. It takes God Spirit to see Jesus.

    Anyway who is it that John saw sitting on the Throne then t8 if God cannot be seen?


    WJ.

    You can see Jesus because he has bodily form.
    You can see the glory of God because everything lights up in his presence.

    But you cannot see God himself.

    Remember that Jesus sits on the Fathers throne and he is the image of the invisible God.

    BTW, Jesus is not invisible to us, rather he is in a different place. Paul is not invisible either. He is not where we are now.

    #241009
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 29 2011,02:15)
    That is why Jesus said if you have seen me you have seen God. If you do not see Jesus as God then how can you say the Jesus you see is 'the radiance of God's glory and the exact representation of his being” or the image of the invisible God? Your image of God is not God.


    Jesus is the image of God. That means that he is not God.

    The woman is the image of the man. Female is not male, even though they share the same nature.

    An image by its very definition excludes you from being the source that you are the image of.

    #241011

    Quote (t8 @ Mar. 28 2011,16:20)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 29 2011,02:15)
    That is why Jesus said if you have seen me you have seen God. If you do not see Jesus as God then how can you say the Jesus you see is 'the radiance of God's glory and the exact representation of his being” or the image of the invisible God? Your image of God is not God.


    Jesus is the image of God. That means that he is not God.

    The woman is the image of the man. Female is not male, even though they share the same nature.

    An image by its very definition excludes you from being the source that you are the image of.


    t8

    More play on words. Do you have an “image”? If not what is it that others see when they look at you?

    If you want to look at the “exact image” of anything you look at the source of the “Image”. If the “Image” is different than the source in any way then it is not the “exact Image” of the source is it?

    If not then what is it that others see when they look at you? They see a live image of you, right. Now if they see you in a picture they see a lifeless reflection of you, right?

    Jesus is not some “lifeless reflection” of God as in a picture but when we look at him we see God for he is not merely a reflection but is “the visible image of God”.

    When someone looks at you what they see is the “visible image” of a human being with all the essence, substance, or that which makes a human, human.

    They don't see the image of a dog, or cat or any other creature, do they?

    If you see Jesus then he says you have seen (God) just as when they see you they see the exact image of a human.

    You can't have it both ways t8. You can't say he is the “image of the invisible God” and then say “he is not God who is visible”. If the “visible image” you see is not God then you are not seeing the “image of the invisible God” but something “less” than God.

    You can't say he is merely “a reflection” of God because like the rays of the Sun are part of the Son and in fact are “One with” the Sun, so is Jesus to the Father.

    This is basic stuff t8 that either you do not accept or you do not comprehend.

    WJ

    #241012
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 29 2011,09:07)
    t8

    More play on words. Do you have an “image”? If not what is it that others see when they look at you?


    WJ.

    You are playing with the words.

    You are trying to make no distinction between a source and image.

    If you think Jesus is the Father looking in the mirror, then you give Jesus no identity of his own from the Father. The implication of that is more in line with what Oneness Doctrine teaches.

    But for US, there is one God the Father and one Lord, the Lord Jesus Christ. We identify the Father as God and Jesus as the one that God made both Lord and Christ.

    You seem to be trying very hard to blur Jesus into a God substance blob being thingy.

    But scripture is putting down the stops to the direction you are trying to push. Be careful WJ, God hands people over to things that they consistently push toward.

    To understand what an image is, just think of the fact that the woman is the image of the man.

    Now you can see that the woman is not the man and nor is the woman the result of the image when a man looks in a mirror.

    Try again WJ.

    #241013
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 29 2011,09:07)
    You can't have it both ways t8. You can't say he is the “image of the invisible God” and then say “he is not God who is visible”.


    This is silly WJ.

    To be an image of something invisible is to be like that which is invisible.

    If God is light and love, then Jesus is the express image of this. Think of God's nature and put a face to it.

    Jesus has a body, so the fullness and beauty of the invisible God is expressed in the face of Christ.

    #241014

    t8

    If you want to look at the “exact image” of anything you look at the source of the “Image”. If the “Image” is different than the source in any way then it is not the “exact Image” of the source is it?

    You see a difference in the source t8. So your Jesus is not the Jesus of the Bible.

    We reflect the “Image of God” t8, and who is that “Image”?

    WJ

    #241019
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    WJ.

    You can't wiggle away from the fact that an image is not the source. No matter how identical or the same the image is, its irrelevant in this sense.

    i.e., no matter how much you argue that the woman is in nature man and is fully man(kind), she is not THE man.

    Likewise Jesus is not the only true God of whom he is the image of.

    Also, we are made in the image of God, so be careful how you define image, because even though we are 'made', you have to apply your same rules if you want to be consistent and taken more seriously.

    i.e., I don't see you making the same argument that we are made gods for example because we are made in the image God.

    #241138

    Quote (t8 @ Mar. 28 2011,18:05)
    WJ.

    You can't wiggle away from the fact that an image is not the source. No matter how identical or the same the image is, its irrelevant in this sense.


    Ha Ha!

    And you can't argue that the source cannot exist without an image! Doesn't God have a “form” t8? Remember?

    If Jesus is not God and we are being made into his “image” then according to you we are being made into the “Image” of someone less than God. Isn't that right? It seems like according to you that we are being changed into an “invisible image” that is less than God, is that right?

    Your logic is flawed because it is like the “steel” that is used to make 2 hammers.

    According to your logic the one hammer is not steel nor is it a hammer because it is not the original Hammer. :D

    WJ

    #241544
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    You err in this WJ.

    The Father is the one true God.
    Jesus is THE image of God.
    We are made in the image of God and are being perfected and will be like Christ.

    So, if Jesus is the image and we are images, then that shows that we are like him and God is still the source.

    In the words of Jesus himself, (not my words):

    “Do not hold on to me, for I have not yet returned to the Father. Go instead to my brothers and tell them, 'I am returning to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God.'”

    #241545
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Your point about the source not being able to exist without its image is unscientific and not logical either.

    And your point about the hammer shows you have learned nothing.

    You should give this subject up. It is way above your understanding as proven by your last post.

    #241560

    Quote (t8 @ April 01 2011,17:19)
    You err in this WJ.

    The Father is the one true God.
    Jesus is THE image of God.
    We are made in the image of God and are being perfected and will be like Christ.

    So, if Jesus is the image and we are images, then that shows that we are like him and God is still the source.

    In the words of Jesus himself, (not my words):

    “Do not hold on to me, for I have not yet returned to the Father. Go instead to my brothers and tell them, 'I am returning to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God.'”


    No t8

    You are the one that errs for the Father has an image which is his own image and that image is God.

    But you deny the Father can be seen or has his own image and that Jesus is the visible image of God.

    You deny that we are being made in Gods image because you say Jesus is not God and we know it is his (Jesus) Image that we are being made into.

    You should give up the false teaching that Jesus is less God than the Father t8, because you give the impression that Jesus is not supreme ruler over all things at this time or that he is not the visible image of God which belongs to God alone.

    WJ

    #241561

    Quote (t8 @ April 01 2011,17:21)
    Your point about the source not being able to exist without its image is unscientific and not logical either.

    And your point about the hammer shows you have learned nothing.

    You should give this subject up. It is way above your understanding as proven by your last post.


    t8

    I think everyone can see who it is that needs to give it up.

    My analogy of the hammer is true and everyone can see that t8.

    It is you that denys the reality of Jesus being God in every way the Father is.

    WJ

Viewing 20 posts - 401 through 420 (of 518 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2024 Heaven Net

Navigation

© 1999 - 2023 - Heaven Net
or

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

or

Create Account