Trinity Debate Zechariah 12:10

Subject:  Zechariah 12:10 proves the Trinity Doctrine
Date: April 22 2007
Debaters:  Is 1: 18 & t8

 


Is 1:18

Okay short and sweet this time….

In the below passage Zechariah records a quite amazing prophecy:

Zechariah 12:10
“I will pour out on the house of David and on the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the Spirit of grace and of supplication, so that they will look on Me whom they have pierced; and they will mourn for Him, as one mourns for an only son, and they will weep bitterly over Him like the bitter weeping over a firstborn.

What’s significant (in the context of this debate submission) about the highlighted statement above is that the preceding verses (1, 4, 6 and 9) unmistakably bear out that it was a prophecy made by YHWH, and would be fulfilled by YHWH. YHWH foretold that they (the inhabitants of Jerusalem) will look upon “Me” whom they (the inhabitants of Jerusalem) pierced.

Zechariah 12:1-9
1The burden of the word of the LORD [YHWH] concerning Israel. Thus declares the LORD [YHWH] who stretches out the heavens, lays the foundation of the earth, and forms the spirit of man within him, 2″Behold, I am going to make Jerusalem a cup that causes reeling to all the peoples around; and when the siege is against Jerusalem, it will also be against Judah. 3″It will come about in that day that I will make Jerusalem a heavy stone for all the peoples; all who lift it will be severely injured And all the nations of the earth will be gathered against it. 4″In that day,” declares the LORD [YHWH], “I will strike every horse with bewilderment and his rider with madness. But I will watch over the house of Judah, while I strike every horse of the peoples with blindness. 5″Then the clans of Judah will say in their hearts, ‘A strong support for us are the inhabitants of Jerusalem through the LORD of hosts, their God.’ 6″In that day I [YHWH] will make the clans of Judah like a firepot among pieces of wood and a flaming torch among sheaves, so they will consume on the right hand and on the left all the surrounding peoples, while the inhabitants of Jerusalem again dwell on their own sites in Jerusalem. 7″The LORD also will save the tents of Judah first, so that the glory of the house of David and the glory of the inhabitants of Jerusalem will not be magnified above Judah. 8″In that day the LORD will defend the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and the one who is feeble among them in that day will be like David, and the house of David will be like God, like the angel of the LORD before them. 9″And in that day I [YHWH] will set about to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem.

There is no mention of a secondary identity in the Zechariah’s predictive prophecy. The “me” in “they will look on Me whom they have pierced” is YHWH. In the immediately-preceding verse YHWH affirmed “I will set about to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem”, which of course only the Almighty could accomplish. With that in mind, please consider Who it was that John taught fulfilled this prophecy:

John 19:33-37
33but coming to Jesus, when they saw that He was already dead, they did not break His legs. 34But one of the soldiers pierced His side with a spear, and immediately blood and water came out. 35And he who has seen has testified, and his testimony is true; and he knows that he is telling the truth, so that you also may believe. 36For these things came to pass to fulfill the Scripture, “NOT A BONE OF HIM SHALL BE BROKEN.” 37And again another Scripture says, “THEY SHALL LOOK ON HIM WHOM THEY PIERCED.

According to John, Zechariah 10:12 is a predictive reference to the piercing (vs 34) incurred by Yeshua during His crucifixion (“For these things came to pass to fulfill the Scripture” – v 36). Let me be as clear as I can here t8: Only YHWH could fulfill this prophecy, because it was made specifically by YHWH (through Zechariah) and of YHWH. It cannot be fulfilled by proxy, the piercing was to be incurred by YHWH and it is YHWH that would be looked upon. No one else, the language in the Zechariah text is unambiguous and does not allow for it. John unequivocally tells us that Yeshua literally fulfilled the Zech 12:10 prophecy at Calvary, but crucially He fulfilled it after His body had expired (v 33). The Roman soldiers and other bystanders (the inhabitants of Jerusalem) looked upon His lifeless body, but John and Zechariah tell us that this was the body of YHWH. So, the obvious implication here is: even His dead body was considered utterly divine, it was the body of YHWH. So any argument linking Yeshua’s deity with His indwelling by the Holy Spirit is vaporised in this verse.

If YHWH makes a prophecy that only YHWH can fulfill, and Yahshua fulfills it, then He is YHWH. There is no other acceptable conclusion.

Now some questions for you t8:

Q1) Was the “me” that was foretold to be pierced and looked upon by the inhabitant of Jerusalem in Zech 12:10 a refererence to YHWH? If not, please provide lexical evidence to the contrary.

Q2) According to John’s inspired-understanding, was Yeshua in fact the “me” in the Zech 12:10 prophecy (John 19:37)? If not, please explain.

Q3) If YHWH makes a prophecy that only YHWH can fulfill, and Yeshua fulfills it, is it reasonable to conclude that Yeshua is YHWH? If not why not?

Blessings



t8

Q1) Was the “me” that was foretold to be pierced and looked upon by the inhabitant of Jerusalem in Zech 12:10 a refererence to YHWH? If not, please provide lexical evidence to the contrary.

I think the ME is YHWH. The one who is to be pierced (HIM) is Yeshua.

It says “…They will look on me, the one they have pierced, and they will mourn for him as one mourns for an only child,…”

Grammatically, the “Me” and the “him” cannot refer to the same individual can it.

It is clearly talking about 2, not 1. Otherwise it would say: “They will look on me, the one they have pierced, and they will mourn for ME as one mourns for an only child,”. Of course it doesn’t say that, so the “him” is obviously different to the “me”.

Q2) According to John’s inspired-understanding, was Yeshua in fact the “me” in the Zech 12:10 prophecy (John 19:37)? If not, please explain.

Is Yeshua the ME or the HIM? I say he is the HIM. If Yeshua was both, then the language would use ME or HIM, but not both.

Q3) If YHWH makes a prophecy that only YHWH can fulfill, and Yeshua fulfills it, is it reasonable to conclude that Yeshua is YHWH? If not why not?

YHWH didn’t make this prophecy about himself from what I can see. We know that YHWH is not a man and he doesn’t have bones and blood. It is rediculous to believe that God whom the universe cannot contain squeezed himself into a human body. Rather, it was the Word that became flesh and the apostles beheld his glory as the son of God. Even if YHWH did make the prophecy about himself, we know that YHWH sent his son and it was YHWH’s will that his son drink the cup that was prepared for him. So if YHWH was in Christ, then to that degree was YHWH the one being punished. But Christ did say “My God My God, why hast thou forsaken me”.

But the way it appears to me on the outset is that they would look to YHWH, because of the HIM who was pierced.

NOTE: My rebuttal is based on the English version of these verses. It is possible that the English version may not be that clear or even accurate. If this is the case, then a more accurate version of the Zechariah verse could change what I have written.

Anyway, it is interesting to note that John 19:33-37 also refers to another prophecy i.e., NOT A BONE OF HIM SHALL BE BROKEN.”
When we look at that prophecy, we see clearly that the YHWH (LORD) is one and the one whom not a bone shall be broken is another.

It is obvious to all that the bolded verses below are either or both Yeshua and YHWH. But the interesting part is that we cannot confuse Yeshua with actually being YHWH.

Psalm 22:1-19
My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?
Why are you so far from saving me,
so far from the words of my groaning?

2 O my God, I cry out by day, but you do not answer,
by night, and am not silent.

3 Yet you are enthroned as the Holy One;
you are the praise of Israel.

4 In you our fathers put their trust;
they trusted and you delivered them.

5 They cried to you and were saved;
in you they trusted and were not disappointed.

6 But I am a worm and not a man,
scorned by men and despised by the people.

7 All who see me mock me;
they hurl insults, shaking their heads:

“He trusts in the LORD;
let the LORD rescue him.
Let him deliver him,
since he delights in him.”

9 Yet you brought me out of the womb;
you made me trust in you
even at my mother’s breast.

10 From birth I was cast upon you;
from my mother’s womb you have been my God.

11 Do not be far from me,
for trouble is near
and there is no one to help.

12 Many bulls surround me;
strong bulls of Bashan encircle me.

13 Roaring lions tearing their prey
open their mouths wide against me.

14 I am poured out like water,
and all my bones are out of joint.
My heart has turned to wax;
it has melted away within me.

15 My strength is dried up like a potsherd,
and my tongue sticks to the roof of my mouth;
you lay me in the dust of death.

16 Dogs have surrounded me;
a band of evil men has encircled me,
they have pierced my hands and my feet.

17 I can count all my bones;
people stare and gloat over me.

18 They divide my garments among them
and cast lots for my clothing.

19 But you, O LORD, be not far off;
O my Strength, come quickly to help me.

So we have 3 reasons why YHWH cannot be Yeshua in Zech 12:10.

  1. Me and Him cannot be the same individual grammatically speaking.
  2. Psalm 22:1-19 the other quoted scripture by John, clearly indentifies Yeshua and YHWH as different identities.
  3. There is no contradiction in truth.
 

So an explanation that fits with John, Zechariah, and David (or Psalm writer) is that YHWH and Yeshua are 2 different identities and because of him who was pierced (Yeshua), people would look to YHWH (his God). This has come to pass as many now look to YHWH because of Yeshua’s sacrifice. See the below verse as an immediate example of fulfillment.

Acts 2:36-39
36 “Therefore let all Israel be assured of this: God has made this Jesus, whom you crucified, both Lord and Christ.”
37 When the people heard this, they were cut to the heart and said to Peter and the other apostles, “Brothers, what shall we do?”
38 Peter replied, “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
39 The promise is for you and your children and for all who are far off—for all whom the Lord our God will call.”


Discussion

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 20 posts - 341 through 360 (of 518 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #71181
    IM4Truth
    Participant

    I would like to ask a question. You have gone around and around about who is God. What does Scripture say?
    John 1:1 says In the beginning was the Word and the with God and the Word was God.
    So the Word has a beginning. It is not just a Plan in God's mind. That is not what it says.
    John 1:2 He was with God in the beginning, since we know that the Almighty God had no beginning, the beginning is speaking of the Word, who later became Jesus. If something comes from God, would that not have the same name. My Son has the same name, doesn't yours?
    John 1:3 All things was made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made.
    John 1:14 And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth.
    This is all clear scriptures and some of us want to deny that, but why. It does not establishes the trinity, because we have other scriptures that tell us that the Father is greater then the Son.
    Ephesians 4:4 “There is one body and one Spirit, just as we are called in the hope of your calling.
    verse 5 “one Lord, one faith, one baptism;
    verse 6 ” ONE GOD AND FATHER OF ALL, WHO IS ABOVE ALL, AND THROUGH US ALL AND IN US ALL.

    We have to take all of this in contact, not to get to confused. When you know that God is a title like any other name like ours, it becomes clear in our minds. The trouble with those that were taught the trinity Doctrine they can not see, this. I do not know why. And some do not belief that Jesus last name is God and that one day ours is going to be God also, it you want to believe the scriptures.
    Jesus Christ God is not the Almighty Jehovah God. Christ is our mediator so that we are able to come to the throne of the Almighty God. Why is it that the Fathers name is not written in the new Testament.? Because the translators at the time had so much respect for the Almighty God and fear to pronounce it wrong , that they used God instead.
    Jesus or the Word at the time was the only one that came from the Father God, nobody ever did again. All else was created by and through Jesus by the power of the Father. That is why it says 'Let us make man in our image.”
    I have proven to myself that Jesus did preexisted as the Word. And left His Glory behind and became man, that is what it says in
    John 17:5 ” And now O Father Glorify me together with Yourself, with the Glory which I had with you before the world was.” Ask yourself what was that Glory, it was that He was a Spirit Being before, not only did the Father that, but He also raised Him to the highest position available. He now sits with the Father on His Throne until He will come to rain for a thousand years. After that He will give the Kingdom back to the Father so God can be all in all.
    1 Corinth. 15:28 ” Now when all things are made subject to Him, then the Son Himself will also be subject to Him who put all things under Him, that God may be all in all.
    Peace and Love Mrs. :) :)

    #71204
    kenrch
    Participant

    Quote (IM4Truth @ Nov. 10 2007,22:56)
    I would like to ask a question. You have gone around and around about who is God. What does Scripture say?
    John 1:1 says In the beginning was the Word and the with God and the Word was God.
    So the Word has a beginning. It is not just a Plan in God's mind. That is not what it says.
    John 1:2 He was with God in the beginning, since we know that the Almighty God had no beginning, the beginning is speaking of the Word, who later became Jesus. If something comes from God, would that not have the same name. My Son has the same name, doesn't yours?
    John 1:3 All things was made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made.
    John 1:14 And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth.
    This is all clear scriptures and some of us want to deny that, but why. It does not establishes the trinity, because we have other scriptures that tell us that the Father is greater then the Son.
    Ephesians 4:4 “There is one body and one Spirit, just as we are called in the hope of your calling.
    verse 5 “one Lord, one faith, one baptism;
    verse 6 ” ONE GOD AND FATHER OF ALL, WHO IS ABOVE ALL, AND THROUGH US ALL AND IN US ALL.

    We have to take all of this in contact, not to get to confused. When you know that God is a title like any other name like ours, it becomes clear in our minds. The trouble with those that were taught the trinity Doctrine they can not see, this. I do not know why. And some do not belief that Jesus last name is God and that one day ours is going to be God also, it you want to believe the scriptures.
    Jesus Christ God is not the Almighty Jehovah God. Christ is our mediator so that we are able to come to the throne of the Almighty God. Why is it that the Fathers name is not written in the new Testament.? Because the translators at the time had so much respect for the Almighty God and fear to pronounce it wrong , that they used God instead.
    Jesus or the Word at the time was the only one that came from the Father God, nobody ever did again. All else was created by and through Jesus by the power of the Father. That is why it says 'Let us make man in our image.”
    I have proven to myself that Jesus did preexisted as the Word. And left His Glory behind and became man, that is what it says in
    John 17:5 ” And now O Father Glorify me together with Yourself, with the Glory which I had with you before the world was.” Ask yourself what was that Glory, it was that He was a Spirit Being before, not only did the Father that, but He also raised Him to the highest position available. He now sits with the Father on His Throne until He will come to rain for a thousand years. After that He will give the Kingdom back to the Father so God can be all in all.
    1 Corinth. 15:28 ” Now when all things are made subject to Him, then the Son Himself will also be subject to Him who put all things under Him, that God may be all in all.
    Peace and Love Mrs. :) :)


    He is the beginning of the creation of God. Rev3:14

    Created all things. 1Cor. 1:16

    He was sent by God. John 5:3, 30, 36, 37

    Came from heaven. John 3:13

    Was given a body. Heb. 10:5

    Scriptures and scriptures only…..He preexisted!

    But was HE “begotten” while in heaven? First born? Was Mary already in heaven. All other spirit beings were created SONS of God. Was the Spirit that became Jesus a “born” Son different from the other angels. Was He already “GOD?

    Heb 1:9 Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity; therefore God, even thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows.

    :laugh: :D :)

    #71211

    Quote (IM4Truth @ Nov. 10 2007,22:56)
    I would like to ask a question. You have gone around and around about who is God. What does Scripture say?
    John 1:1 says In the beginning was the Word and the with God and the Word was God.
    So the Word has a beginning. It is not just a Plan in God's mind. That is not what it says.
    John 1:2 He was with God in the beginning, since we know that the Almighty God had no beginning, the beginning is speaking of the Word, who later became Jesus. If something comes from God, would that not have the same name. My Son has the same name, doesn't yours?
    John 1:3 All things was made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made.
    John 1:14 And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth.
    This is all clear scriptures and some of us want to deny that, but why. It does not establishes the trinity, because we have other scriptures that tell us that the Father is greater then the Son.
    Ephesians 4:4 “There is one body and one Spirit, just as we are called in the hope of your calling.
    verse 5 “one Lord, one faith, one baptism;
    verse 6 ” ONE GOD AND FATHER OF ALL, WHO IS ABOVE ALL, AND THROUGH US ALL AND IN US ALL.

    We have to take all of this in contact, not to get to confused. When you know that God is a title like any other name like ours, it becomes clear in our minds. The trouble with those that were taught the trinity Doctrine they can not see, this. I do not know why. And some do not belief that Jesus last name is God and that one day ours is going to be God also, it you want to believe the scriptures.
    Jesus Christ God is not the Almighty Jehovah God. Christ is our mediator so that we are able to come to the throne of the Almighty God. Why is it that the Fathers name is not written in the new Testament.? Because the translators at the time had so much respect for the Almighty God and fear to pronounce it wrong , that they used God instead.
    Jesus or the Word at the time was the only one that came from the Father God, nobody ever did again. All else was created by and  through Jesus by the power of the Father. That is why it says 'Let us make man in our image.”
    I have proven to myself that Jesus did preexisted    as the Word. And left His Glory behind and became man, that is what it says in
    John 17:5 ” And now O Father Glorify me together with Yourself, with the Glory which I had with you before the world was.”                                                                                                        Ask yourself what was that Glory, it was that He was a Spirit Being before, not only did the Father that, but He also raised Him to the highest position available. He now sits with the Father on His Throne until He will come to rain for a thousand years. After that He will give the Kingdom back to the Father so God can be all in all.
    1 Corinth. 15:28 ” Now when all things are made subject to Him, then the Son Himself will also be subject to Him who put all things under Him, that God may be all in all.
    Peace and Love Mrs. :) :)


    Im4truth

    You say…

    Quote

    I would like to ask a question. You have gone around and around about who is God.

    I think I have been very clear who God is.

    God is the Father, Son and Holy Spirit!

    You say…

    Quote

    What does Scripture say?

    John 1:1 says In the beginning was the Word and the with God and the Word was God.

    Now unless you believe the eternal “Word” can change then the Word is still God!

    Say no more!

    Many believe in more than one true God, but this is not found in scriptures!

    :O

    #71213
    IM4Truth
    Participant

    Ken Does it not say that God gave us His only begotten Son, that soever believeth, believeth in Him should not perish, should not perish but have everlasting Life.
    John 1;1 says that He was God. So He was according to scripture.
    Hebrew 1:9 Thou has loved rightness is easy, but why it says hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness… was done after the Word had become Jesus. He had emptied Himself it says. So He became like us. No Maria was never in Heaven, She had nothing to do with the creation of the Word/Jesus. She was a vessel to give Jesus a Human Body. I just see these scriptures and I must say, what else can these scriptures say? The scriptures you quoted, also line up really nicely with what John is saying and with others. Did you know that the Catholic Church at one time wanted to take John out of the Bible? I wonder why?

    Peace and Love Mrs. :D :D :D

    #71214
    IM4Truth
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Nov. 11 2007,04:53)

    Quote (IM4Truth @ Nov. 10 2007,22:56)
    I would like to ask a question. You have gone around and around about who is God. What does Scripture say?
    John 1:1 says In the beginning was the Word and the with God and the Word was God.
    So the Word has a beginning. It is not just a Plan in God's mind. That is not what it says.
    John 1:2 He was with God in the beginning, since we know that the Almighty God had no beginning, the beginning is speaking of the Word, who later became Jesus. If something comes from God, would that not have the same name. My Son has the same name, doesn't yours?
    John 1:3 All things was made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made.
    John 1:14 And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth.
    This is all clear scriptures and some of us want to deny that, but why. It does not establishes the trinity, because we have other scriptures that tell us that the Father is greater then the Son.
    Ephesians 4:4 “There is one body and one Spirit, just as we are called in the hope of your calling.
    verse 5 “one Lord, one faith, one baptism;
    verse 6 ” ONE GOD AND FATHER OF ALL, WHO IS ABOVE ALL, AND THROUGH US ALL AND IN US ALL.

    We have to take all of this in contact, not to get to confused. When you know that God is a title like any other name like ours, it becomes clear in our minds. The trouble with those that were taught the trinity Doctrine they can not see, this. I do not know why. And some do not belief that Jesus last name is God and that one day ours is going to be God also, it you want to believe the scriptures.
    Jesus Christ God is not the Almighty Jehovah God. Christ is our mediator so that we are able to come to the throne of the Almighty God. Why is it that the Fathers name is not written in the new Testament.? Because the translators at the time had so much respect for the Almighty God and fear to pronounce it wrong , that they used God instead.
    Jesus or the Word at the time was the only one that came from the Father God, nobody ever did again. All else was created by and  through Jesus by the power of the Father. That is why it says 'Let us make man in our image.”
    I have proven to myself that Jesus did preexisted    as the Word. And left His Glory behind and became man, that is what it says in
    John 17:5 ” And now O Father Glorify me together with Yourself, with the Glory which I had with you before the world was.”                                                                                                        Ask yourself what was that Glory, it was that He was a Spirit Being before, not only did the Father that, but He also raised Him to the highest position available. He now sits with the Father on His Throne until He will come to rain for a thousand years. After that He will give the Kingdom back to the Father so God can be all in all.
    1 Corinth. 15:28 ” Now when all things are made subject to Him, then the Son Himself will also be subject to Him who put all things under Him, that God may be all in all.
    Peace and Love Mrs. :) :)


    Im4truth

    You say…

    Quote

    I would like to ask a question. You have gone around and around about who is God.

    I think I have been very clear who God is.

    God is the Father, Son and Holy Spirit!

    You say…

    Quote

    What does Scripture say?

    John 1:1 says In the beginning was the Word and the with God and the Word was God.

    Now unless you believe the eternal “Word” can change then the Word is still God!

    Say no more!

    Many believe in more than one true God, but this is not found in scriptures!

    :O


    W.J. There is no trinity otherwise a lot of other scriptures woud contradict. The Father is greater then I. The Father is above all and others. No trinity in my Book.

    Peace ands Love Mrs.

    #71216

    Im4truth

    You say…

    Quote

    W.J.  There is no trinity otherwise a lot of other scriptures woud contradict. The Father is greater then I. The Father is above all and others. No trinity in my Book.

    You say there is no trinity that is your belief.

    Because the scriptures say The Father is greater than Yeshua does not speak of his nature as God.

    For your Father may be greater than you, but are you any less human than him.

    Besides if you believe the Father is greater than Yeshua in nature then that would mean Jesus is less than the “Image of God”. To be the Image of God and the Express image of his person/substance he would have to be God or you do not have Gods exact image do you.

    We have his image but we are not “The Image of the invisible God” neither are we the exact representation of who God is. Col 1:15 and Heb 1:3.

    Heb 1:3 NASB
    And He is the radiance of His glory and the exact representation of His nature, and upholds all things by the word of His power. When He had made purification of sins, He sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high,

    The Greek word for 'exact representation or KJV says 'express image' is..'charaktēr' whcih means…

    The exact expression (the image) of any person or thing, marked likeness, precise reproduction in every respect, i.e facsimile.

    This word is used only of Yeshua in describing his very nature as being like the Fathers in every way. Every thing that makes the Father God, Yeshua is.

    Besides if you believe that Jesus is the Word that was God and preexisted and that he is a lessor being than God, then you contradict scriptures by saying God through him made all things, for the Hebrew scriptures clearly teach that God “alone” “By himself” “None  Other” made all things.

    To reconcile all scriptures the Trinitarian view is the only view that does without changing the translations or the text by interpreting them in another way than they are written.

    2 Peter 1:20
    Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.

    :O

    #71220

    kejonn,Nov. wrote:

    [/quote]
    Hey kejonn.

    Hope you are doing well.

    You say…

    Quote

    I have only one thing to add to this discussion.

      Gen 1:26  Then God said, “Let us make humankind in our image, in the likeness of ourselves; and let them rule over the fish in the sea, the birds in the air, the animals, and over all the earth, and over every crawling creature that crawls on the earth.”
      Gen 1:27  So God created humankind in his own image; in the image of God he created him: male and female he created them.

    What translation is that? No matter, you can call man humankind if you want, but the Hebrew word for man in verse 26 is the same Hebrew word for man in verse 27. “Adam” which means: man, mankind.

    You say…

    Quote

    So God spoke with someone it seems and and said “Let us make humankind in our image” and in the next verse He made man in his own image.

    Yes and the key is that he made man in “his own image” and the “Us” he was speaking of is the one who made man with him.

    Gen 1:26
    And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness:…

    27 “SO GOD” created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

    Notice the scriptures say “Let us make man”, then it says “So God created”.

    Also notice the “in our image” and “after our likenes” in verse 26, but yet in verse 27 it says “In his own image” “in the image of God”.

    You say…

    Quote

    Now look to another passage

      Jdg 13:3  The angel of ADONAI appeared to the woman and said to her, “Listen! You are barren, you haven't had a child, but you will conceive and bear a son.

      Jdg 13:6  The woman came and told her husband; she said, “A man of God came to me; his face was fearsome, like that of the angel of God. I didn't ask him where he came from, and he didn't tell me his name.

      Jdg 13:10  The woman hurried and ran to tell her husband, “Here! That man, the one who came to me the other day, he's come again!”
      Jdg 13:11  Manoach got up, followed his wife, went to the man and said to him, “Are you the man who spoke to the woman?” He answered, “I am.”

      Jdg 13:13  The angel of ADONAI said to Manoach, “The woman should take care to do everything I said to her.

      Jdg 13:16  The angel of ADONAI said to Manoach, “Even if I do stay, I won't eat your food; and if you prepare a burnt offering, you must offer it to ADONAI.” For Manoach did not know that he was the angel of ADONAI.

      Jdg 13:19  Manoach took the kid and the grain offering and offered them on the rock to ADONAI. Then, with Manoach and his wife looking on, the angel did something wonderful –
      Jdg 13:20  as the flame went up toward the sky from the altar, the angel of ADONAI went up in the flame from the altar. When Manoach and his wife saw it, they fell to the ground on their faces.
      Jdg 13:21  But the angel of ADONAI did not appear again to Manoach or his wife. Then Manoach realized it had been the angel of ADONAI.
      Jdg 13:22  Manoach said to his wife, “We will surely die, because we have seen God!

    There are several elements to this story. First that the angel of YHWH looked like a man. Man is the image of God. Second they did not realize it was an angel until it did a miracle. Third, they associated seeing the angel, who they thought was a man, to seeing God. From this one can logically deduce that perhaps angels are also in the image of God just as men are but may have been the prototype for man's physical appearance. That is why God could say to the heavenly host “Let US make man in our image”.

    I have already respnded to this and as you know kejonn, Trinitarians and some Henotheist believe that many times in the scriptures when you see a “Messenger” appear to the patriots that it was the pre-incarnate Yeshua, the “Word” that was with God and was God, appearing to them.

    What makes you think that seeing an ordinary man that they would equate that to seeing God. For if the “angel, messenger” looked just like a man then how would they know he wasnt?

    So we see there was something different about the messenger than that he looked like a man. Besides looking like a man who was created in the image of God does not equate to looking like God.

    Jdg 13:6  The woman came and told her husband; she said, “A man of God came to me; his face was fearsome, like that of the angel of God. I didn't ask him where he came from, and he didn't tell me his name.

    That looks like Yeshua to me.

    Besides kejonn. Man being created in the image of God is not just his body or flesh and blood what we see with the natural eye. Man is Spirit. God is Spirit. So man being in his image is more than flesh and blood.

    There is no scripture found in the bible that says angels are created in the image of God. Just because an angel or messenger can appear as a man dosnt mean they have Gods image or nature. Satan can appear as an angel of light.

    You say…

    Quote

    Besides this, most scholars believe the “us” in Genesis 1:26 is plurals of majesty like when a queen or king says “Let us” when they are only referring to themselves.

    Most scholars?

    How can you make this statement. Over 600 scholars translated the scriptures on biblegateway.com and blueletterbible.com.

    And there are many commentators who would disagree with that assesment of the verse.

    You say…

    Quote

    Just a conjecture at this point. You can also see this ideal in other places where angels were called men (Gen 18).

    Yes I agree it is just a conjecture at this point.

    Because angels or messengers can appear in the form of men does not mean they were created in the image of God.

    Man is a unique species. I believe what makes us unique is the fact that we unlike any other being are created in his image and likeness.

    Ps 8:4
    What is man, that thou art mindful of him? and the son of man, that thou visitest him?
    5 For thou hast made him a little lower than the angels (for a time), and hast crowned him with glory and honour.
    6 Thou madest him to have dominion over the works of thy hands; thou hast put all things under his feet:

    What makes men greater than angels. Is it power?

    No, I believe it is in Nature, for man was made better than the angels.

    Heb 1:4
    Being made so much better than the angels, as he hath by inheritance obtained a more excellent name than they.

    13 But to which of the angels said he at any time, Sit on my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool?
    14 Are they not all ministering spirits, sent forth to minister for them who shall be heirs of salvation?

    :)

    #71222
    kenrch
    Participant

    Quote (IM4Truth @ Nov. 11 2007,05:11)
    Ken Does it not say that God gave us His only begotten Son, that soever believeth, believeth in Him should not perish, should not perish but have everlasting Life.
    John 1;1 says that He was God. So He was according to scripture.
    Hebrew 1:9 Thou has loved rightness is easy, but why it says hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness… was done after the Word had become Jesus. He had emptied Himself it says. So He became like us. No Maria was never in Heaven, She had nothing to do with the creation of the Word/Jesus. She was a vessel to give Jesus a Human Body. I just see these scriptures and I must say, what else can these scriptures say? The scriptures you quoted, also line up really nicely with what John is saying and with others. Did you know that the Catholic Church at one time wanted to take John out of the Bible? I wonder why?

    Peace and Love Mrs. :D :D :D


    If Jesus was begotten while up in heaven then God the Father has a God the Wife and Mother of God the Son who has a playmate God the Holy Spirit :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

    Jesus was begotten in the flesh BUT THAT'S MY OPINION AND REALLY DOESN'T MATTER ONE WAY OR ANOTHER BECAUSE HE GAVE HIMSELF FOR ME WEATHER BEGOTTEN IN HEAVEN OR ON EARTH WEATHER THE FATHER HAS A WIFE AND MOTHER OF JESUS OR NOT…..HE STILL DIED FOR ME SO THAT I “MIGHT” LIVE. EVERYONE WHO BELIEVES MIGHT HAVE A “RIGHT” TO BE BORN AGAIN. John1:12.
    :D

    #71244
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Nov. 10 2007,18:56)
    t8

    And yet you say that Yeshua according to John 1:1 John 10 is a god.

    :D And your believing in a True God and other true gods, (of which you claim Jesus is one), makes sense?

    So why dont you practice what you preach and say to your “Gods” plural, the Father and Yeshua, you are my saviours and you are my gods and my Lords!

    This is what you believe is it not t8?


    Um, err, once again WJ, there is no “a” in Greek.

    theos can be used as an adjective, but as a noun, or name, there is one (who is the true God).

    Likewise, Adam was the name of the first man, but mankind is adam and there are billions who are adam.

    I think you have run out of arguments WJ.

    You say the same things even though the explanation has been given. Or perhaps you just don't read other people's posts? You have been given the answer many times, but I think the reason you repeat the same accusation is because you are hard of hearing.

    There is one Adam (OK, a second Adam too) and there is one God. So I believe in one God and Adam. But Adam is not a being of 3 people and nor is God. In quality there are billions of adam, and many are also called theos. It is a fact and it is written.

    It is you who believes that the ONE true God is three. So if I were your English teacher, I would be telling you to use plural language when referring to God, because it is normal to refer to people/persons, and you believe that there are 3 persons as God, so plurality is the correct format for your doctrine. Whereas those who believe that the Father is the one true God, then they have the right to call God a “him”, “he”.

    So how confident are you of your own doctrine? Well if you cannot use plural language when referring to your God, then I would say that you are not that confident.

    #71301

    Quote (t8 @ Nov. 11 2007,10:56)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Nov. 10 2007,18:56)
    t8

    And yet you say that Yeshua according to John 1:1 John 10 is a god.

    :D And your believing in a True God and other true gods, (of which you claim Jesus is one), makes sense?

    So why dont you practice what you preach and say to your “Gods” plural, the Father and Yeshua, you are my saviours and you are my gods and my Lords!

    This is what you believe is it not t8?


    Um, err, once again WJ, there is no “a” in Greek.

    theos can be used as an adjective, but as a noun, or name, there is one (who is the true God).

    Likewise, Adam was the name of the first man, but mankind is adam and there are billions who are adam.

    I think you have run out of arguments WJ.

    You say the same things even though the explanation has been given. Or perhaps you just don't read other people's posts? You have been given the answer many times, but I think the reason you repeat the same accusation is because you are hard of hearing.

    There is one Adam (OK, a second Adam too) and there is one God. So I believe in one God and Adam. But Adam is not a being of 3 people and nor is God. In quality there are billions of adam, and many are also called theos. It is a fact and it is written.

    It is you who believes that the ONE true God is three. So if I were your English teacher, I would be telling you to use plural language when referring to God, because it is normal to refer to people/persons, and you believe that there are 3 persons as God, so plurality is the correct format for your doctrine. Whereas those who believe that the Father is the one true God, then they have the right to call God a “him”, “he”.

    So how confident are you of your own doctrine? Well if you cannot use plural language when referring to your God, then I would say that you are not that confident.


    t8

    You say…

    Quote

    It is you who believes that the ONE true God is three. So if I were your English teacher, I would be telling you to use plural language when referring to God, because it is normal to refer to people/persons, and you believe that there are 3 persons as God, so plurality is the correct format for your doctrine. Whereas those who believe that the Father is the one true God, then they have the right to call God a “him”, “he”.

    Then you disagree with Moses who uses the plural word “Elohim” in a singular way.

    Gen 1:26
    And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness:…

    27 “SO GOD” created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

    Notice the scriptures say “Let us make man”, then it says “So God created”.

    Also notice the “in our image” and “after our likenes” in verse 26, but yet in verse 27 it says “In his own image” “in the image of God”.

    Plural yet singular!

    Can you see it?

    It looks like this…

    Jn 1:1
    In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

    Or this…

    1 Jn 5:20
    And we know that the Son of God is come, and hath given us an understanding, that we may know him that is true, and we are in him that is true, even in his Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God, and eternal life.

    All creation reveals the Glory of God, for the building blocks of creation shows plurality in oneness!

    You say…

    Quote

    Whereas those who believe that the Father is the one true God, then they have the right to call God a “him”, “he”.

    Which god are you talking about? With your viewpoint, if you refer to God as a he or him without a name you could be talking about any god right?

    For you dont believe the Father is the only ONE true God!

    For you also believe that Yeshua, men and angels are true gods also dont you?

    ???

    #71309
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    OK, WJ.

    You cannot understand it for whatever reason.

    I will ask you a question.

    How many adams are there?
    adam as in the Hebrew sense of the word in Genesis.

    #71329
    kenrch
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ Nov. 11 2007,20:19)
    OK, WJ.

    You cannot understand it for whatever reason.

    I will ask you a question.

    How many adams are there?
    adam as in the Hebrew sense of the word in Genesis.


    TWO :laugh:
    Two Adams :laugh:
    Their are two of you. The first and the second “being born again” :laugh:

    #71349
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    What's WJ's answer?

    #71369

    Quote (t8 @ Nov. 11 2007,20:19)
    OK, WJ.

    You cannot understand it for whatever reason.

    I will ask you a question.

    How many adams are there?
    adam as in the Hebrew sense of the word in Genesis.


    t8

    :D

    Why should I answer your question?

    You say you have answered mine but you have not.

    I have already seen your distorted twist of Adam and Eve and you interpretation of Identity and nature and its false application to the Godhead.

    Tell you what t8, answer this and I will answer you.

    How many Gods or gods created all things in light of the following scriptures…

    Jn 1:
    1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
    2 The same was in the beginning with God.
    3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

    He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not.

    Col 1:
    16 For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:
    17 And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.

    Heb 1:
    2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds;
    10 And, Thou, Lord, in the beginning hast laid the foundation of the earth; and the heavens are the works of thine hands:

    Isa 43:10
    Ye are my witnesses, saith the LORD, and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I am he: before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me.

    Isa 44:6
    Thus saith the LORD the King of Israel, and his redeemer the LORD of hosts; I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no God.

    Isa 44:8
    Fear ye not, neither be afraid: have not I told thee from that time, and have declared it? ye are even my witnesses. Is there a God beside me? yea, there is no God; I know not any.

    Isa 45:5
    I am the LORD, and there is none else, there is no God beside me: I girded thee, though thou hast not known me:

    Isa 45:21
    Tell ye, and bring them near; yea, let them take counsel together: who hath declared this from ancient time? who hath told it from that time? have not I the LORD? and there is no God else beside me; a just God and a Saviour; there is none beside me.

    Hsa 13:4
    Yet I am the LORD thy God from the land of Egypt, and thou shalt know no god but me: for there is no saviour beside me.

    Isa 44:24
    Thus saith the LORD, thy redeemer, and he that formed thee from the womb, I am the LORD that maketh all things; that stretcheth forth the heavens alone; that spreadeth abroad the earth by myself;

    ???  ???  ???

    #71396
    kenrch
    Participant

    Quote (kenrch @ Nov. 12 2007,04:27)

    Quote (t8 @ Nov. 11 2007,20:19)
    OK, WJ.

    You cannot understand it for whatever reason.

    I will ask you a question.

    How many adams are there?
    adam as in the Hebrew sense of the word in Genesis.


    TWO :laugh:
    Two Adams :laugh:
    Their are two of you. The first and the second “being born again” :laugh:


    In the beginning there was the Word that's ONE
    The Word was with God That's TWO.:)

    Where is the third Person? ???

    Two Adams. The first brought death. The second brought life.

    Each of us consist of two. The old man (Adam) and the second man (Jesus the second Adam).

    Their was Cain and Able. Bad and Good.

    The tree had knowledge of (1) good (2) evil.

    One~Old Testament~Two~ New testament.

    Male and female. :)

    Sorry male and male or female and female is ONE :)

    Two, Two, Two in one.

    Behold TWO have become ONE! :D

    Do you see it? :laugh:

    #71411

    Quote (kenrch @ Nov. 13 2007,03:04)

    Quote (kenrch @ Nov. 12 2007,04:27)

    Quote (t8 @ Nov. 11 2007,20:19)
    OK, WJ.

    You cannot understand it for whatever reason.

    I will ask you a question.

    How many adams are there?
    adam as in the Hebrew sense of the word in Genesis.


    TWO :laugh:
    Two Adams  
    Their are two of you.  The first and the second “being born again”


    In the beginning there was the Word that's ONE
    The Word was with God That's TWO.:)

    Where is the third Person?  

    Two Adams.  The first brought death.  The second brought life.

    Each of us consist of two.  The old man (Adam) and the second man (Jesus the second Adam).

    Their was Cain and Able.  Bad and Good.

    The tree had knowledge of (1) good (2) evil.

    One~Old Testament~Two~ New testament.

    Male and female. :)

    Sorry male and male or female and female is ONE :)

    Two, Two, Two in one.  

    Behold TWO have become ONE! :D

    Do you see it?


    kenrch

    So then who is this…

    Jn 16:13
    Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.
    14 He shall glorify me: for he shall receive of mine, and shall shew it unto you.
    15 All things that the Father hath are mine: therefore said I, that he shall take of mine, and shall shew it unto you.

    Cant be the Father…

  • for he shall not speak of himself
  • but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak:
  • that he shall take of mine, and shall shew it unto you.

    Cant be Yeshua…

  • He shall glorify me:
  •  for he shall receive of mine, and shall shew it unto you.
  • that he shall take of mine, and shall shew it unto you.

    Who is he kenrch? Do you see it? ???

#71444
Proclaimer
Participant

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Nov. 12 2007,17:46)
Why should I answer your question?


OK, fair enough.

I will answer it for you then.

Ignoring the second Adam, there was one Adam, but there are also billions of adams.

So if you said that billions of adams conflicts with the fact that there is one Adam or original, then I could easily show you that there is indeed no conflict, because the difference is identity and nature/quality. Likewise your accusations regarding me believing in one true Theos, and acknowledging other beings who are referred to as theos should now be understandable to your intellect. Besides that, I am only acknowledging the truth that we read in scripture. That “theos” is applied to more than the one true God.

There is one God in identity and many in nature or quality who are called “theos”. That is how the bible uses the word “theos”.

The trouble for you is that in identity you state that there are 3 who are the one true “theos”. That makes you a polytheist, the very charge you have brought against me in the past. Funny what happens when you point the finger.

But I believe that there is one theos in identity, namely the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. So I believe in one God.

Do you see that? As I have said many times in the past, you are utterly confused by the difference between identity and nature/quality.

Apart from Adam/adam, Devil/devil is also a title that can be used to identity or speak of many regarding nature/quality.

Thank you for listening and hopefully that wraps it up for you.

This post was brought to you by the letter T (for theos).

:)

#71447
kenrch
Participant

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Nov. 13 2007,09:46)

Quote (kenrch @ Nov. 13 2007,03:04)

Quote (kenrch @ Nov. 12 2007,04:27)

Quote (t8 @ Nov. 11 2007,20:19)
OK, WJ.

You cannot understand it for whatever reason.

I will ask you a question.

How many adams are there?
adam as in the Hebrew sense of the word in Genesis.


TWO :laugh:
Two Adams
Their are two of you. The first and the second “being born again”


In the beginning there was the Word that's ONE
The Word was with God That's TWO.:)

Where is the third Person?

Two Adams. The first brought death. The second brought life.

Each of us consist of two. The old man (Adam) and the second man (Jesus the second Adam).

Their was Cain and Able. Bad and Good.

The tree had knowledge of (1) good (2) evil.

One~Old Testament~Two~ New testament.

Male and female. :)

Sorry male and male or female and female is ONE :)

Two, Two, Two in one.

Behold TWO have become ONE! :D

Do you see it?


kenrch

So then who is this…

Jn 16:13
Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.
14 He shall glorify me: for he shall receive of mine, and shall shew it unto you.
15 All things that the Father hath are mine: therefore said I, that he shall take of mine, and shall shew it unto you.

Cant be the Father…

  • for he shall not speak of himself
  • but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak:
  • that he shall take of mine, and shall shew it unto you.

    Cant be Yeshua…

  • He shall glorify me:
  • for he shall receive of mine, and shall shew it unto you.
  • that he shall take of mine, and shall shew it unto you.

    Who is he kenrch? Do you see it? ???


  • You know I wanted to ask you why is it this third person (part of God) unlike the Son Speak? Does this third person “think”. have any authority at all? Seems the third person is as a mocking bird.

    If the third person doesn't speak or think then why is it a person? Is this person deaf and dumb?

    I believe the Holy Spirit is part of God because God is Spirit. But how does God's Spirit make him a third separate person?

    The Son on the other hand is a person with His own spirit just as you and I. Does the Holy Spirit have a spirit of His own?

    Is your spirit a separate person? We are created in His image.

    No matter God is one! Weather two in one, three in one OR one in one. God is still ONE :)

    Will we be of God? Children of the Most high brethren of Jesus as scripture says? God will be all in all. How many will God be?
    :laugh:

    #71453
    kejonn
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Nov. 10 2007,15:00)

    Quote (kejonn @ Nov. 10 2007,09:23)


    Hey kejonn.

    Hope you are doing well.

    You say…

    Quote

    I have only one thing to add to this discussion.

      Gen 1:26 Then God said, “Let us make humankind in our image, in the likeness of ourselves; and let them rule over the fish in the sea, the birds in the air, the animals, and over all the earth, and over every crawling creature that crawls on the earth.”
      Gen 1:27 So God created humankind in his own image; in the image of God he created him: male and female he created them.

    What translation is that? No matter, you can call man humankind if you want, but the Hebrew word for man in verse 26 is the same Hebrew word for man in verse 27. “Adam” which means: man, mankind.

    Its CJB, sorry. I found it on the web as an e-sword module. It was translated by a Messianic Jew.

    Quote
    You say…

    Quote

    So God spoke with someone it seems and and said “Let us make humankind in our image” and in the next verse He made man in his own image.

    Yes and the key is that he made man in “his own image” and the “Us” he was speaking of is the one who made man with him.

    But while He said “Let us” the next verse says He (alone) created man.

    Quote
    Gen 1:26
    And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness:…

    27 “SO GOD” created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

    Notice the scriptures say “Let us make man”, then it says “So God created”.

    Also notice the “in our image” and “after our likenes” in verse 26, but yet in verse 27 it says “In his own image” “in the image of God”.

    Yes but what does this prove?

    Quote
    You say…

    Quote

    Now look to another passage

      Jdg 13:3 The angel of ADONAI appeared to the woman and said to her, “Listen! You are barren, you haven't had a child, but you will conceive and bear a son.

      Jdg 13:6 The woman came and told her husband; she said, “A man of God came to me; his face was fearsome, like that of the angel of God. I didn't ask him where he came from, and he didn't tell me his name.

      Jdg 13:10 The woman hurried and ran to tell her husband, “Here! That man, the one who came to me the other day, he's come again!”
      Jdg 13:11 Manoach got up, followed his wife, went to the man and said to him, “Are you the man who spoke to the woman?” He answered, “I am.”

      Jdg 13:13 The angel of ADONAI said to Manoach, “The woman should take care to do everything I said to her.

      Jdg 13:16 The angel of ADONAI said to Manoach, “Even if I do stay, I won't eat your food; and if you prepare a burnt offering, you must offer it to ADONAI.” For Manoach did not know that he was the angel of ADONAI.

      Jdg 13:19 Manoach took the kid and the grain offering and offered them on the rock to ADONAI. Then, with Manoach and his wife looking on, the angel did something wonderful –
      Jdg 13:20 as the flame went up toward the sky from the altar, the angel of ADONAI went up in the flame from the altar. When Manoach and his wife saw it, they fell to the ground on their faces.
      Jdg 13:21 But the angel of ADONAI did not appear again to Manoach or his wife. Then Manoach realized it had been the angel of ADONAI.
      Jdg 13:22 Manoach said to his wife, “We will surely die, because we have seen God!

    There are several elements to this story. First that the angel of YHWH looked like a man. Man is the image of God. Second they did not realize it was an angel until it did a miracle. Third, they associated seeing the angel, who they thought was a man, to seeing God. From this one can logically deduce that perhaps angels are also in the image of God just as men are but may have been the prototype for man's physical appearance. That is why God could say to the heavenly host “Let US make man in our image”.

    I have already respnded to this and as you know kejonn, Trinitarians and some Henotheist believe that many times in the scriptures when you see a “Messenger” appear to the patriots that it was the pre-incarnate Yeshua, the “Word” that was with God and was God, appearing to them.

    Yet there is not a shred of evidence for this — all assumption and reading into the scriptures. It never once says a thing about Yeshua or “the Word”.

    Quote
    What makes you think that seeing an ordinary man that they would equate that to seeing God. For if the “angel, messenger” looked just like a man then how would they know he wasnt?

    They did not know until he did something miraculous. That is when they said they had seen God.

    Quote
    So we see there was something different about the messenger than that he looked like a man. Besides looking like a man who was created in the image of God does not equate to looking like God.

    No because God is spirit! But where does the actual physical appearance of man come from if not God? Could it be angels?

    Quote
    Jdg 13:6 The woman came and told her husband; she said, “A man of God came to me; his face was fearsome, like that of the angel of God. I didn't ask him where he came from, and he didn't tell me his name.

    That looks like Yeshua to me.

    Why? Are you going to believe as JWs do and say Yeshua is/was an angel?

    Quote
    Besides kejonn. Man being created in the image of Go
    d is not just his body or flesh and blood what we see with the natural eye. Man is Spirit. God is Spirit. So man being in his image is more than flesh and blood.

    Righto! Could it be our spirit and perhaps soul is in the image of God and our physical body is the image of angels?

    Quote
    There is no scripture found in the bible that says angels are created in the image of God. Just because an angel or messenger can appear as a man dosnt mean they have Gods image or nature. Satan can appear as an angel of light.

    Yes but I wonder if angels have the three components we have: body, spirit, and soul? Perhaps we are a composite of God and His angels!

    Quote
    You say…

    Quote

    Besides this, most scholars believe the “us” in Genesis 1:26 is plurals of majesty like when a queen or king says “Let us” when they are only referring to themselves.

    Most scholars?

    How can you make this statement. Over 600 scholars translated the scriptures on biblegateway.com and blueletterbible.com.

    And there are many commentators who would disagree with that assesment of the verse.

    I know my Ryrie study bible says that. You won't find too many scholars supporting this verse as proof of the trinity anymore. Most trinitarians gave up on Gen 1:26 as a “proof text” long ago.

    Quote
    You say…

    Quote

    Just a conjecture at this point. You can also see this ideal in other places where angels were called men (Gen 18).

    Yes I agree it is just a conjecture at this point.

    Because angels or messengers can appear in the form of men does not mean they were created in the image of God.

    Man is a unique species. I believe what makes us unique is the fact that we unlike any other being are created in his image and likeness.

    Ps 8:4
    What is man, that thou art mindful of him? and the son of man, that thou visitest him?
    5 For thou hast made him a little lower than the angels (for a time), and hast crowned him with glory and honour.
    6 Thou madest him to have dominion over the works of thy hands; thou hast put all things under his feet:

    What makes men greater than angels. Is it power?

    No, I believe it is in Nature, for man was made better than the angels.

    Heb 1:4
    Being made so much better than the angels, as he hath by inheritance obtained a more excellent name than they.

    13 But to which of the angels said he at any time, Sit on my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool?
    14 Are they not all ministering spirits, sent forth to minister for them who shall be heirs of salvation?

    :)


    Again, I think that perhaps we can be greater than angels because we have the spirit created in the image of God but the physical appearance of angels. We are the ultimate composite being!

    #71693
    acertainchap
    Participant

    Does Scripture say that we are composites of his angels? I never saw that there. :)

    Viewing 20 posts - 341 through 360 (of 518 total)
    • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

    © 1999 - 2024 Heaven Net

    Navigation

    © 1999 - 2023 - Heaven Net
    or

    Log in with your credentials

    or    

    Forgot your details?

    or

    Create Account