Trinity Debate Zechariah 12:10

Subject:  Zechariah 12:10 proves the Trinity Doctrine
Date: April 22 2007
Debaters:  Is 1: 18 & t8

 


Is 1:18

Okay short and sweet this time….

In the below passage Zechariah records a quite amazing prophecy:

Zechariah 12:10
“I will pour out on the house of David and on the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the Spirit of grace and of supplication, so that they will look on Me whom they have pierced; and they will mourn for Him, as one mourns for an only son, and they will weep bitterly over Him like the bitter weeping over a firstborn.

What’s significant (in the context of this debate submission) about the highlighted statement above is that the preceding verses (1, 4, 6 and 9) unmistakably bear out that it was a prophecy made by YHWH, and would be fulfilled by YHWH. YHWH foretold that they (the inhabitants of Jerusalem) will look upon “Me” whom they (the inhabitants of Jerusalem) pierced.

Zechariah 12:1-9
1The burden of the word of the LORD [YHWH] concerning Israel. Thus declares the LORD [YHWH] who stretches out the heavens, lays the foundation of the earth, and forms the spirit of man within him, 2″Behold, I am going to make Jerusalem a cup that causes reeling to all the peoples around; and when the siege is against Jerusalem, it will also be against Judah. 3″It will come about in that day that I will make Jerusalem a heavy stone for all the peoples; all who lift it will be severely injured And all the nations of the earth will be gathered against it. 4″In that day,” declares the LORD [YHWH], “I will strike every horse with bewilderment and his rider with madness. But I will watch over the house of Judah, while I strike every horse of the peoples with blindness. 5″Then the clans of Judah will say in their hearts, ‘A strong support for us are the inhabitants of Jerusalem through the LORD of hosts, their God.’ 6″In that day I [YHWH] will make the clans of Judah like a firepot among pieces of wood and a flaming torch among sheaves, so they will consume on the right hand and on the left all the surrounding peoples, while the inhabitants of Jerusalem again dwell on their own sites in Jerusalem. 7″The LORD also will save the tents of Judah first, so that the glory of the house of David and the glory of the inhabitants of Jerusalem will not be magnified above Judah. 8″In that day the LORD will defend the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and the one who is feeble among them in that day will be like David, and the house of David will be like God, like the angel of the LORD before them. 9″And in that day I [YHWH] will set about to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem.

There is no mention of a secondary identity in the Zechariah’s predictive prophecy. The “me” in “they will look on Me whom they have pierced” is YHWH. In the immediately-preceding verse YHWH affirmed “I will set about to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem”, which of course only the Almighty could accomplish. With that in mind, please consider Who it was that John taught fulfilled this prophecy:

John 19:33-37
33but coming to Jesus, when they saw that He was already dead, they did not break His legs. 34But one of the soldiers pierced His side with a spear, and immediately blood and water came out. 35And he who has seen has testified, and his testimony is true; and he knows that he is telling the truth, so that you also may believe. 36For these things came to pass to fulfill the Scripture, “NOT A BONE OF HIM SHALL BE BROKEN.” 37And again another Scripture says, “THEY SHALL LOOK ON HIM WHOM THEY PIERCED.

According to John, Zechariah 10:12 is a predictive reference to the piercing (vs 34) incurred by Yeshua during His crucifixion (“For these things came to pass to fulfill the Scripture” – v 36). Let me be as clear as I can here t8: Only YHWH could fulfill this prophecy, because it was made specifically by YHWH (through Zechariah) and of YHWH. It cannot be fulfilled by proxy, the piercing was to be incurred by YHWH and it is YHWH that would be looked upon. No one else, the language in the Zechariah text is unambiguous and does not allow for it. John unequivocally tells us that Yeshua literally fulfilled the Zech 12:10 prophecy at Calvary, but crucially He fulfilled it after His body had expired (v 33). The Roman soldiers and other bystanders (the inhabitants of Jerusalem) looked upon His lifeless body, but John and Zechariah tell us that this was the body of YHWH. So, the obvious implication here is: even His dead body was considered utterly divine, it was the body of YHWH. So any argument linking Yeshua’s deity with His indwelling by the Holy Spirit is vaporised in this verse.

If YHWH makes a prophecy that only YHWH can fulfill, and Yahshua fulfills it, then He is YHWH. There is no other acceptable conclusion.

Now some questions for you t8:

Q1) Was the “me” that was foretold to be pierced and looked upon by the inhabitant of Jerusalem in Zech 12:10 a refererence to YHWH? If not, please provide lexical evidence to the contrary.

Q2) According to John’s inspired-understanding, was Yeshua in fact the “me” in the Zech 12:10 prophecy (John 19:37)? If not, please explain.

Q3) If YHWH makes a prophecy that only YHWH can fulfill, and Yeshua fulfills it, is it reasonable to conclude that Yeshua is YHWH? If not why not?

Blessings



t8

Q1) Was the “me” that was foretold to be pierced and looked upon by the inhabitant of Jerusalem in Zech 12:10 a refererence to YHWH? If not, please provide lexical evidence to the contrary.

I think the ME is YHWH. The one who is to be pierced (HIM) is Yeshua.

It says “…They will look on me, the one they have pierced, and they will mourn for him as one mourns for an only child,…”

Grammatically, the “Me” and the “him” cannot refer to the same individual can it.

It is clearly talking about 2, not 1. Otherwise it would say: “They will look on me, the one they have pierced, and they will mourn for ME as one mourns for an only child,”. Of course it doesn’t say that, so the “him” is obviously different to the “me”.

Q2) According to John’s inspired-understanding, was Yeshua in fact the “me” in the Zech 12:10 prophecy (John 19:37)? If not, please explain.

Is Yeshua the ME or the HIM? I say he is the HIM. If Yeshua was both, then the language would use ME or HIM, but not both.

Q3) If YHWH makes a prophecy that only YHWH can fulfill, and Yeshua fulfills it, is it reasonable to conclude that Yeshua is YHWH? If not why not?

YHWH didn’t make this prophecy about himself from what I can see. We know that YHWH is not a man and he doesn’t have bones and blood. It is rediculous to believe that God whom the universe cannot contain squeezed himself into a human body. Rather, it was the Word that became flesh and the apostles beheld his glory as the son of God. Even if YHWH did make the prophecy about himself, we know that YHWH sent his son and it was YHWH’s will that his son drink the cup that was prepared for him. So if YHWH was in Christ, then to that degree was YHWH the one being punished. But Christ did say “My God My God, why hast thou forsaken me”.

But the way it appears to me on the outset is that they would look to YHWH, because of the HIM who was pierced.

NOTE: My rebuttal is based on the English version of these verses. It is possible that the English version may not be that clear or even accurate. If this is the case, then a more accurate version of the Zechariah verse could change what I have written.

Anyway, it is interesting to note that John 19:33-37 also refers to another prophecy i.e., NOT A BONE OF HIM SHALL BE BROKEN.”
When we look at that prophecy, we see clearly that the YHWH (LORD) is one and the one whom not a bone shall be broken is another.

It is obvious to all that the bolded verses below are either or both Yeshua and YHWH. But the interesting part is that we cannot confuse Yeshua with actually being YHWH.

Psalm 22:1-19
My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?
Why are you so far from saving me,
so far from the words of my groaning?

2 O my God, I cry out by day, but you do not answer,
by night, and am not silent.

3 Yet you are enthroned as the Holy One;
you are the praise of Israel.

4 In you our fathers put their trust;
they trusted and you delivered them.

5 They cried to you and were saved;
in you they trusted and were not disappointed.

6 But I am a worm and not a man,
scorned by men and despised by the people.

7 All who see me mock me;
they hurl insults, shaking their heads:

“He trusts in the LORD;
let the LORD rescue him.
Let him deliver him,
since he delights in him.”

9 Yet you brought me out of the womb;
you made me trust in you
even at my mother’s breast.

10 From birth I was cast upon you;
from my mother’s womb you have been my God.

11 Do not be far from me,
for trouble is near
and there is no one to help.

12 Many bulls surround me;
strong bulls of Bashan encircle me.

13 Roaring lions tearing their prey
open their mouths wide against me.

14 I am poured out like water,
and all my bones are out of joint.
My heart has turned to wax;
it has melted away within me.

15 My strength is dried up like a potsherd,
and my tongue sticks to the roof of my mouth;
you lay me in the dust of death.

16 Dogs have surrounded me;
a band of evil men has encircled me,
they have pierced my hands and my feet.

17 I can count all my bones;
people stare and gloat over me.

18 They divide my garments among them
and cast lots for my clothing.

19 But you, O LORD, be not far off;
O my Strength, come quickly to help me.

So we have 3 reasons why YHWH cannot be Yeshua in Zech 12:10.

  1. Me and Him cannot be the same individual grammatically speaking.
  2. Psalm 22:1-19 the other quoted scripture by John, clearly indentifies Yeshua and YHWH as different identities.
  3. There is no contradiction in truth.
 

So an explanation that fits with John, Zechariah, and David (or Psalm writer) is that YHWH and Yeshua are 2 different identities and because of him who was pierced (Yeshua), people would look to YHWH (his God). This has come to pass as many now look to YHWH because of Yeshua’s sacrifice. See the below verse as an immediate example of fulfillment.

Acts 2:36-39
36 “Therefore let all Israel be assured of this: God has made this Jesus, whom you crucified, both Lord and Christ.”
37 When the people heard this, they were cut to the heart and said to Peter and the other apostles, “Brothers, what shall we do?”
38 Peter replied, “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
39 The promise is for you and your children and for all who are far off—for all whom the Lord our God will call.”


Discussion

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 20 posts - 261 through 280 (of 518 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #63465
    Mr. Steve
    Participant

    WJ;

    The first page of the sight you referred me to states that Christ is the Almighty God of the old testament. There must be more than one trinitarian doctrine if you believe in the trinity as I understand it. I'll check out your site in more detail.

    Take Care

    Steven

    #63473
    kejonn
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 07 2007,16:15)

    Quote (kejonn @ Aug. 07 2007,16:21)
    Check out this guy :P. From Prototokos

    Colossians 1:15 describes Jesus Christ: “He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.” Lately, some have said that firstborn here means “preeminent.” Undoubtedly it can be used as such, but its more natural meaning is “the first to open the womb.”

    Creation (ktisis) “denotes a particular created thing” (Spiros Zodhiates, The Complete Word Study Dictionary New Testament, p. 897), meaning in this case, “humans” or “humanity.” This phrase, then, could be translated: “the first born of humanity.” But was not Adam (or more technically, Cain) the firstborn of humanity? This does not seem to fit Jesus Christ. He was the firstborn of Mary, but He came four thousand years after Adam and Cain! What does Paul mean here?

    He is not discussing preeminence, especially when he links it to “the image of the invisible God.” Man was created in the image of God (Genesis 1:26). Paul is writing about humanity being born into the Family of God! Jesus Christ is indeed first! He is the first of all humanity to be born as God. Three verses later he writes, “He is the head of the body, the church, who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead” (Colossians 1:18). It is so obvious! He is writing about a resurrection, a birth from physical to spiritual, from humanity to God!

    Lest you think this guy is supporting the Trinity, he is actually supporting the idea that we will all be God! Yeow.


    kejonn

    You say…

    Quote

    Lest you think this guy is supporting the Trinity, he is actually supporting the idea that we will all be God! Yeow.

    Misrepresentation is a sign of weakness, I dont expect that from you.

    :(


    Shall I prove this one to you? Ok, sorry to disabuse you :cool:.

    The person who wrote this commentary John W. Ritenbaugh. He has a series called “We shall be God!”. Here are some quotes from his first part found here.

    This is what I believe has happened to us. First we were told clearly, we were going to be very God. Now we are told we are going to be children of God.

    God is showing us in simple terminology that He is reproducing Himself! He is God! He is not reproducing somebody who is slightly greater than angels, but less than God. He is reproducing that which is the same as what He is, because He is our Father.

    Man is not going to be a greater man. He is not going to be an angel. He is going to be God!

    Brethren, this is what we are being formed into—greater than angels, fully God! This is what we are going to share, as His brethren.

    Let me ask WJ, when we become God, what happens to the Trinity?

    Please take the time to read things before you accuse me of misrepresenting.

    #63474
    kejonn
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 07 2007,16:18)

    Quote (kejonn @ Aug. 07 2007,15:56)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 06 2007,18:56)

    Mr steve

    You have never seen me say the “logos” is eternally begotten.

    I believe the 'Logos” which was with God and was God is not the spoken logos. The Logos that was God took on the likeness of sinfull flesh without diminishing his nature as the Word/God, for God can not change and neither could the “Logos”.

    Jesus became the Only Begotten Son of God when he came in the flesh and was born a man. There is no scripture that says Yeshua was begotten before his natural birth.

    :O


    Except Col 1:15, which the commentators of bible.cc disagree with you. See my last post.


    kejonn

    Where is the scripture that says Yeshua was the begotten Son of God before his birth?

    ???


    It doesn't. So then what do we have…again, why bother calling Yeshua “firstborn of all creation”? Do you know of any other “firstborn” in the Bible that did not apply to something that was not begotten in some fashion? Is God “firstborn” anything? It says Yeshua is…so how then can he be God since God cannot be “firstborn”?

    #63475
    kejonn
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 07 2007,17:43)
    Dont waste your time. The word “Begotten” is not found in scriptures referring to the Son before his natural birth.


    So wait…if they call the Father the unbegotten God, and the Son the begotten God, don't we have 2 Gods? Because obviously one is not the same as the other.

    Hey, didn't God say he does not change (Mal 3:6)? So where in the OT does it say that YHWH will send a part of Himself down to take on flesh and die on a cruel cross for man's salvation. I think that would be a pretty big change.

    Quote
    Heb 1:5
    For unto which of the angels said he at any time, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee? And again, I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son?

    This is post ressurection.

    Begotten only relates to his natural birth. He was the “Word that was God” before taking on the likeness of sinfull flesh. There is no scripture that says he was a Son before he was born a Son.

    He is YHWH in the flesh.


    There it is again. Hmmmm….the Bible says “God is spirit” yet Yeshua was flesh and spirit, and Mal 3:6 says YHWH does not change. Woops, seems you have an change there.

    #63505

    Quote (kejonn @ Aug. 08 2007,12:11)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 07 2007,16:15)

    Quote (kejonn @ Aug. 07 2007,16:21)
    Check out this guy :P. From Prototokos

    Colossians 1:15 describes Jesus Christ: “He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.” Lately, some have said that firstborn here means “preeminent.” Undoubtedly it can be used as such, but its more natural meaning is “the first to open the womb.”

    Creation (ktisis) “denotes a particular created thing” (Spiros Zodhiates, The Complete Word Study Dictionary New Testament, p. 897), meaning in this case, “humans” or “humanity.” This phrase, then, could be translated: “the first born of humanity.” But was not Adam (or more technically, Cain) the firstborn of humanity? This does not seem to fit Jesus Christ. He was the firstborn of Mary, but He came four thousand years after Adam and Cain! What does Paul mean here?

    He is not discussing preeminence, especially when he links it to “the image of the invisible God.” Man was created in the image of God (Genesis 1:26). Paul is writing about humanity being born into the Family of God! Jesus Christ is indeed first! He is the first of all humanity to be born as God. Three verses later he writes, “He is the head of the body, the church, who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead” (Colossians 1:18). It is so obvious! He is writing about a resurrection, a birth from physical to spiritual, from humanity to God!

    Lest you think this guy is supporting the Trinity, he is actually supporting the idea that we will all be God! Yeow.


    kejonn

    You say…

    Quote

    Lest you think this guy is supporting the Trinity, he is actually supporting the idea that we will all be God! Yeow.

    Misrepresentation is a sign of weakness, I dont expect that from you.

    :(


    Shall I prove this one to you? Ok, sorry to disabuse you  :cool:.

    The person who wrote this commentary John W. Ritenbaugh. He has a series called “We shall be God!”. Here are some quotes from his first part found here.

    This is what I believe has happened to us. First we were told clearly, we were going to be very God. Now we are told we are going to be children of God.

    God is showing us in simple terminology that He is reproducing Himself! He is God! He is not reproducing somebody who is slightly greater than angels, but less than God. He is reproducing that which is the same as what He is, because He is our Father.

    Man is not going to be a greater man. He is not going to be an angel. He is going to be God!

    Brethren, this is what we are being formed into—greater than angels, fully God! This is what we are going to share, as His brethren.

    Let me ask WJ, when we become God, what happens to the Trinity?

    Please take the time to read things before you accuse me of misrepresenting.


    kejonn

    OK I see. I think I misunderstood you.

    You were saying the other guy dosnt suport the Trinity! Correct. DAH!

    Sorry. No I dont believe we are gonna be gods. Just confirms my gut feeling about you, that you do not misrepresent as some do.

    Again… Humbly opologise!

    Blessings

    :)

    #63525

    Quote (kejonn @ Aug. 08 2007,12:24)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 07 2007,17:43)
    Dont waste your time. The word “Begotten” is not found in scriptures referring to the Son before his natural birth.


    So wait…if they call the Father the unbegotten God, and the Son the begotten God, don't we have 2 Gods? Because obviously one is not the same as the other.

    Hey, didn't God say he does not change (Mal 3:6)? So where in the OT does it say that YHWH will send a part of Himself down to take on flesh and die on a cruel cross for man's salvation. I think that would be a pretty big change.

    Quote
    Heb 1:5
    For unto which of the angels said he at any time, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee? And again, I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son?

    This is post ressurection.

    Begotten only relates to his natural birth. He was the “Word that was God” before taking on the likeness of sinfull flesh. There is no scripture that says he was a Son before he was born a Son.

    He is YHWH in the flesh.


    There it is again. Hmmmm….the Bible says “God is spirit” yet Yeshua was flesh and spirit, and Mal 3:6 says YHWH does not change. Woops, seems you have an change there.


    kejonn

    You say…

    Quote

    So wait…if they call the Father the unbegotten God, and the Son the begotten God, don't we have 2 Gods? Because obviously one is not the same as the other.

    No it dosnt make two Gods. Again, the Word/God who is and was Spirit came in the flesh without diminishing his diety. Phil 2.

    The “Word” the Eternal life that was with the Father from everlasting, Yeshua, who is and was Spirit can not change.

    For if he was the express representation of his substance, Heb 1:3, and if he changed when he came in the flesh, then he would no longer be the express image of the Invisible God would he?

    If he changed then he wouldnt be the One who preexisted.

    Jn 1:1
    The Word was with God and the Word was God

    Mal 3:6
    For I am the LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed.

    Yeshua is the “Lord from heaven”.

    1 Cor 15:47
    The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second man is the Lord from heaven.

    The same Spirit of Jesus did not die. How could he? He was and is the “Eternal Life” that was with the Father, 1Jn 1:1,2, and he was and is the ressurection and the life.

    Jesus gave the life of his flesh, his Body for our sins. This was all the demands of God required for sin.

    Lev 17:11
    For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul.

    The life of the flesh is in the blood. It was his body and blood that saved us. And when we eat of his flesh and drink of his blood which is now one with the Word and Spirit, then we have his “Eternal Life in us”.

    Jesus said he that liveth and believeth on me shall never die.

    Jn 6:50,51
    This is the bread which cometh down from heaven, that a man may eat thereof, and not die.
    I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.

    Heb 10:
    5 Wherefore when he cometh into the world, he saith, Sacrifice and offering thou wouldest not, but a body hast thou prepared me:
    6 In burnt offerings and [sacrifices] for sin thou hast had no pleasure.
    7 Then said I, Lo, I come (in the volume of the book it is written of me,) to do thy will, O God.

    Jesus Spirit that lived in the tabernacle of the flesh that died, this same Jesus who is and was the Word/God went into the belly of the earth for three days and three nights to preach to the Spirits in prison (Matt 12:40, 1 Peter 3:18-20)and led captivity captive (Ehp 4:7-10).

    Yeshua the Word/God came in the flesh and gave his Body and blood for the life of all mankind.

    God did not die. For the body without the Spirit is dead. James 2:26

    Acts 20:28
    Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, *which he hath purchased with his own blood*.

    Truly the Father, Son and Holy Spirit are One God.

    Only God could be our Saviour, and Only God is!

    :)

    #63545
    kejonn
    Participant

    Hey WJ,

    Will reply later, but wanted to point out one verse. I hate to say it, but many times we see that many Trinitarian supporting verses have issues. Acts 20:28 is one of them. The ASV says “church of the Lord” and many Bibles make notes that “many manuscripts say 'church of the Lord'” (NIV, HCSB, AMP, ESV, NCV). So one has to wonder who tampered? Could be either “side” depending on how you want to view it! But you have to honest and admit that the RCC has been found guilty of tampering with the manuscripts…and we know the RCC view!

    #63547
    kejonn
    Participant

    Hey WJ,

    For clarity on Acts 20:28, let's see what one of the early church fathers, Irenaeus, quoted in Against Heresies, Book III

    “I know that ye shall see my face no more. Therefore I take you to record this day, that I am pure from the blood of all. For I have not shunned to declare unto you all the counsel of God. Take heed, therefore, both to yourselves, and to all the flock over which the Holy Ghost has placed you as bishops, to rule the Church of the Lord, which He has acquired for Himself through His own blood.”

    Seems he clarifies what the original text said.

    #63558

    Quote (kejonn @ Aug. 09 2007,00:32)
    Hey WJ,

    For clarity on Acts 20:28, let's see what one of the early church fathers, Irenaeus, quoted in Against Heresies, Book III

    “I know that ye shall see my face no more. Therefore I take you to record this day, that I am pure from the blood of all. For I have not shunned to declare unto you all the counsel of God. Take heed, therefore, both to yourselves, and to all the flock over which the Holy Ghost has placed you as bishops, to rule the Church of the Lord, which He has acquired for Himself through His own blood.”

    Seems he clarifies what the original text said.


    kejonn

    No contradictions there. For you see most of the early Fathers believed Lord also means God.

    Deut 6:4
    Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD:

    Zech 14:
    [3] Then shall the LORD (YHWH) go forth, and fight against those nations, as when he fought in the day of battle.
    [4] And his feet shall stand in that day upon the mount of Olives, which is before Jerusalem on the east, and the mount of Olives shall cleave in the midst thereof toward the east and toward the west, and there shall be a very great valley; and half of the mountain shall remove toward the north, and half of it toward the south.
    [5] And ye shall flee to the valley of the mountains; for the valley of the mountains shall reach unto Azal: yea, ye shall flee, like as ye fled from before the earthquake in the days of Uzziah king of Judah: and the LORD (YHWH) my God shall *come*, and all the saints with thee.
    [6] And it shall come to pass in that day, that the light shall not be clear, nor dark:
    [7] But it shall be one day which shall be known to the LORD (YHWH), not day, nor night: but it shall come to pass, that at evening time it shall be light.
    [8] And it shall be in that day, that living waters shall go out from Jerusalem; half of them toward the former sea, and half of them toward the hinder sea: in summer and in winter shall it be.
    [9] And the LORD (YHWH) shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall there be one LORD, and his name one.

    The above is a clear picture of YWHW, coming and standing on the mount of Olives. In that day there shall be “ONE LORD (YWHW)”.

    The question one has to ask is, “will there be a day that Yeshua will not be “Lord?

    The above is witness to Yeshua being YHWH in the flesh for he shall come with his saints.

    No where in New Testament scriptures is there evidence that the Father is coming to earth.

    Yeshua is returning in the Glory of his Father with the Holy Angels.

    :)

    #63562
    kejonn
    Participant

    WJ,

    I don't know about the “Lord means God” scenario for the early fathers. Do you have a reference? I will say that I do believe that the early fathers used the Septuagint though, and the best I can tell, YHWH did not make it over into the Septuagint. I think then YHWH was replaced with “Lord” in the Greek OT. Can you then imagine the confusion that came from this?

    I asked Is 1:18 to explain Zech 14 for me since I don't see it as a prophecy for Yeshua, but I can see where you get your idea. Are you saying though that this is a prophecy that has yet to come? It would seem so. Yeshua did step foot onto the Mount of Olives, but the rest of Zech 14:4 has not taken place. Not unless we haven't been informed :p.

    There is one problem with your post, and here it is:

    Quote
    The question one has to ask is, “will there be a day that Yeshua will not be “Lord?


    The wording is not quite there, but if one is subject to another, then the “person” who is above is Lord. Therefore, you must contend with the following passage:

    1Cr 15:24   then comes the end, when He hands over the kingdom to the God and Father, when He has abolished all rule and all authority and power.  
    1Cr 15:25   For He must reign until He has put all His enemies under His feet.  
    1Cr 15:26   The last enemy that will be abolished is death.  
    1Cr 15:27   For HE HAS PUT ALL THINGS IN SUBJECTION UNDER HIS FEET. But when He says, “All things are put in subjection,” it is evident that He is excepted who put all things in subjection to Him.  
    1Cr 15:28   When all things are subjected to Him, then the Son Himself also will be subjected to the One who subjected all things to Him, so that God may be all in all.

    “He hands over the kingdom to the God and Father” matches rather nicely with “And the LORD will be king over all the earth; in that day the LORD will be the only one, and His name the only one.”

    So, yes, in the end Yeshua will hand over the kingdom to the One who sent him: God the Father. And in that day, the Father will be “king over all the earth”.

    Its amazing how scripture backs up scripture the way it does.

    #63569
    Mr. Steve
    Participant

    WJ;

    You don't believe that the Son of God existed before coming to earth so explain how Christ turns over the Kingdom to the One who sent him? How can one be sent if he does not exist?

    Mr. Steve

    #63576
    kejonn
    Participant

    Quote (Mr. Steve @ Aug. 08 2007,12:46)
    WJ;

    You don't believe that the Son of God existed before coming to earth so explain how Christ turns over the Kingdom to the One who sent him?  How can one be sent if he does not exist?  

    Mr. Steve


    Was that meant for me or WJ? WJ believes Yeshua has eternally existed with the Father as God.

    And I also believe that Yeshua had some form of prior existence. So who are you addressing?

    #63578
    kejonn
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 08 2007,01:19)

    No it dosnt make two Gods. Again, the Word/God who is and was Spirit came in the flesh without diminishing his diety. Phil 2.

    The “Word” the Eternal life that was with the Father from everlasting, Yeshua, who is and was Spirit can not change.

    For if he was the express representation of his substance, Heb 1:3, and if he changed when he came in the flesh, then he would no longer be the express image of the Invisible God would he?


    “Express” image? Where did that word come from? He obviously had to change if you want to apply Phil 2 to him. After all, the basis says he had the form of God. Is God flesh? No God is spirit and without form, so his form cannot be God's. But since he is called the image of God, its time to go back to Genesis 1. Whose image are we created in? God. Yeshua was a man. The word for “form” in Phil 2:8 is “morphe” and every other instance the word is used in the NT and OT Septuagint, it means outward appearance. So it seems that he was in the same form as all of us: man.

    But then it goes on to say that he did not think that equality with God was something to be grasped. So here, Paul is saying that Yeshua did not think himself as equal with God. Finally, he took on the form of a bond-servant, and that signifies a man who humbles himself and serves. So as Messiah he could have been a great and powerful King, but instead, he was chosen to be a humble servant, even to the death on the cross.

    Quote
    If he changed then he wouldnt be the One who preexisted.


    And why is that so important? It only is if you say he is God, who does not change.  Are you saying that he was flesh before he came?

    Quote
    Jn 1:1
    The Word was with God and the Word was God


    This verse has become your mantra!

    Quote
    Yeshua is the “Lord from heaven”.

    1 Cor 15:47
    The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second man is the Lord from heaven.


    If you use the KJV he is! Most others read “man from heaven” which signifies our spiritual side, our rebirth. That's the context too.

    Quote
    The same Spirit of Jesus did not die. How could he? He was and is the “Eternal Life” that was with the Father, 1Jn 1:1,2, and he was and is the ressurection and the life.

    Jesus gave the life of his flesh, his Body for our sins. This was all the demands of God required for sin.

    Lev 17:11
    For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul.

    The life of the flesh is in the blood. It was his body and blood that saved us. And when we eat of his flesh and drink of his blood which is now one with the Word and Spirit, then we have his “Eternal Life in us”.

    Jesus said he that liveth and believeth on me shall never die.

    Jn 6:50,51
    This is the bread which cometh down from heaven, that a man may eat thereof, and not die.
    I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.

    Heb 10:
    5 Wherefore when he cometh into the world, he saith, Sacrifice and offering thou wouldest not, but a body hast thou prepared me:
    6 In burnt offerings and [sacrifices] for sin thou hast had no pleasure.
    7 Then said I, Lo, I come (in the volume of the book it is written of me,) to do thy will, O God.

    Jesus Spirit that lived in the tabernacle of the flesh that died, this same Jesus who is and was the Word/God went into the belly of the earth for three days and three nights to preach to the Spirits in prison (Matt 12:40, 1 Peter 3:18-20)and led captivity captive (Ehp 4:7-10).

    Yeshua the Word/God came in the flesh and gave his Body and blood for the life of all mankind.

    God did not die. For the body without the Spirit is dead. James 2:26


    So what died on the cross then? Was it all for nought? Was it good enough that the fleshly tent perished, but yet was raised again? After all, Lazarus was raised as well, and yet there was little value in that beyond that God was glorified.

    Quote
    Truly the Father, Son and Holy Spirit are One God.

    Only God could be our Saviour, and Only God is!


    God is Savior because He is the source of salvation. Yet He can send a Savior as well:

    Isa 19:20  It will become a sign and a witness to the LORD of hosts in the land of Egypt; for they will cry to the LORD because of oppressors, and He will send them a Savior and a Champion, and He will deliver them.

    Now, why would God “send” a Savior if God IS the Savior? Is YHWH saying He will send Himself here?

    #63589
    Mr. Steve
    Participant

    Kejonn;

    Where are the threads?

    Steven

    #64022
    Cult Buster
    Participant

    quote Worshipping Jesus.

    Quote
    kejonn

    No contradictions there. For you see most of the early Fathers believed Lord also means God.

    Thomas certainly believed it.

    Joh 20:28  And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord and my God.

    Rom 16:17  Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them.
    Rom 16:18  For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple.
    :O

    #64056
    Mr. Steve
    Participant

    Kejonn;

    WJ is short for WorshippingJesus. He does not believe that Christ was the Son of God prior to coming to earth. He believes he was the Word and was God. I contend that if Christ was not the Son of God prior he did not exist prior. You cannot have a “Will” as Christ had and not be a person. A word does not have a Will. There are a good many Christians in WJs camp, without realizing what they believe contradicts what Christ taught. Christ prayers also reveal a prior relationship with the Father as the Son of God. Naturally, WJ can correct me if I've unintentionally misinterpreted what he believes.

    Mr. Steve

    #64093
    Cult Buster
    Participant

    Mr Steve. WJ means Worshipping Jesus. And that is exactly what Stephen was doing.

    Stephen was kneeling and praying directly to Jesus.
    Look!

    Act 7:59  And they stoned Stephen, who was calling on God and saying, Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.
    Act 7:60  And kneeling down, he cried with a loud voice, Lord, do not lay this sin to their charge. And when he had said this, he fell asleep.

    From the Literal Translation Bible. (LITV)

    Act 7:59  And they stoned Stephen, invoking and saying, Lord Jesus, receive my spirit. .
    Act 7:60  And placing the knees, he cried out with a loud voice, Lord, do not make stand this sin to them. And having said this, he fell asleep.

    See also from the YLT (1898 Young's Literal Translation)

    Act 7:59  and they were stoning Stephen, calling and saying, `Lord Jesus, receive my spirit;'
    Act 7:60  and having bowed the knees, he cried with a loud voice, `Lord, mayest thou not lay to them this sin;' and this having said, he fell asleep.
     

    Stephen was kneeling and praying directly to Jesus. Stephen was worshiping Jesus.

    Rev 19:10  tells us to worship only God:

    Jesus is Yahweh God    :O

    Rom 16:17  Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them.
    Rom 16:18  For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple.
    :O

    #64125
    Mr. Steve
    Participant

    CB;

    I worship Christ as the Son of God, not as God the Father. I believe Christ was sent by the Father he was not the Father. However, I believe that the Fullness of the Godhead bodily dwells in Christ so when you worship Christ you are also glorifying and worshipping the Father simultaneously.

    Steven

    #64129
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (Cult Buster @ Aug. 15 2007,23:29)
    Stephen was kneeling and praying directly to Jesus.
    Look!

    Act 7:59 And they stoned Stephen, who was calling on God and saying, Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.
    Act 7:60 And kneeling down, he cried with a loud voice, Lord, do not lay this sin to their charge


    Context please.

    It is deceptive to paint a different context. This type of deception is from the Father of Lies.

    Here is the true context:

    Acts 7:56
    Look,” he said, “I see heaven open and the Son of Man standing at the right hand of God.”

    So he is at God's right hand side. It is written.

    You knew about this verse but chose not to include it, so as to strengthen your inaccurate argument. That is wrong and no good can come of it.

    #64611
    Cult Buster
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ Aug. 16 2007,14:19)

    Quote (Cult Buster @ Aug. 15 2007,23:29)
    Stephen was kneeling and praying directly to Jesus.
    Look!

    Act 7:59  And they stoned Stephen, who was calling on God and saying, Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.
    Act 7:60  And kneeling down, he cried with a loud voice, Lord, do not lay this sin to their charge


    Context please.

    It is deceptive to paint a different context. This type of deception is from the Father of Lies.

    Here is the true context:

    Acts 7:56
    Look,” he said, “I see heaven open and the Son of Man standing at the right hand of God.”

    So he is at God's right hand side. It is written.

    You knew about this verse but chose not to include it, so as to strengthen your inaccurate argument. That is wrong and no good can come of it.


    You've still got a problem t8.

    Stephen was kneeling and worshipping Jesus.

    No amount of your “twisting” can change the Bible truth.

    Stephen was kneeling and praying directly to Jesus. There is no evidence that he was praying to Jesus in the Fathers name, or that he was praying to the Father in Jesus' name.
    Stephen was kneeling in prayer to Jesus.

    Look again!

    Act 7:59  And they stoned Stephen, who was calling on God and saying, Lord Jesus, receive my spirit.
    Act 7:60  And kneeling down, he cried with a loud voice, Lord, do not lay this sin to their charge. And when he had said this, he fell asleep.

    From the Literal Translation Bible. (LITV)

    Act 7:59  And they stoned Stephen, invoking and saying, Lord Jesus, receive my spirit. .
    Act 7:60  And placing the knees, he cried out with a loud voice, Lord, do not make stand this sin to them. And having said this, he fell asleep.

    See also from the YLT (1898 Young's Literal Translation)

    Act 7:59  and they were stoning Stephen, calling and saying, `Lord Jesus, receive my spirit;'
    Act 7:60  and having bowed the knees, he cried with a loud voice, `Lord, mayest thou not lay to them this sin;' and this having said, he fell asleep.
     

    Stephen was kneeling and praying directly to Jesus. Stephen was worshiping Jesus.

    Rev 19:10  tells us to worship only God:

    Jesus is Yahweh God    :O

    T8. Carefully read the following.

    2Pe 3:16  as also in all his letters, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which the unlearned and unstable pervert, as also they do the rest of the Scriptures, to their own destruction).
    :O

Viewing 20 posts - 261 through 280 (of 518 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2024 Heaven Net

Navigation

© 1999 - 2023 - Heaven Net
or

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

or

Create Account