<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Heaven Net | J_47-2 | Activity</title>
	<link>https://heavennet.net/members/j_47-2/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://heavennet.net/members/j_47-2/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for J_47-2.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 01:25:37 +1200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">70988e6143070c8db5b83ce814f4f63e</guid>
				<title>J_47-2 replied to the topic J_47-2 in the forum The Hot Seat</title>
				<link>http://www.heavennet.net/forums/topic/j_47-2/#post-313836</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 22:47:57 +1200</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/bookstore/e-books/gzqp.pdfThis" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/bookstore/e-books/gzqp.pdfThis</a> is an interesting interperetation of Genesis for those who don&#039;t outright dismiss science.Parts of it are &#8220;hoakey&#8221;, but it does shed some light on the Jewish understanding of ancient Hebrew.Not to be considered &#8220;TRUTH&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">31fb2b82c44d9362205b8792882ee041</guid>
				<title>J_47-2 replied to the topic J_47-2 in the forum The Hot Seat</title>
				<link>http://www.heavennet.net/forums/topic/j_47-2/#post-313831</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 22:33:57 +1200</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. John 1:1 -1:18 is a Pythagorean (or Neo-Pythagorean) hymn that was added in mid-100&#039;s AD2. John actually began with a one or two sentence intro. immediately preceeding verse 1:193. John is primarily a theological work meant to counter millenarism hysteria (i.e. &#8220;Apocolypse of John&#8221;, &#8220;Apocolypse of Peter&#8221;, etc.)4. John was the last canonical&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-44199"><a href="http://www.heavennet.net/forums/topic/j_47-2/#post-313831" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b9d7c69114751f643c3cc3f974da4017</guid>
				<title>J_47-2 replied to the topic The FIRST EPISTLE of CLEMENT to the CORINTHIANS. in the forum Exta-biblical Writings</title>
				<link>http://www.heavennet.net/forums/topic/the-first-epistle-of-clement-to-the-corinthians/page/2/#post-312763</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 17:13:50 +1200</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed J,I should have used a better (as opposed to &#8220;better&#8221;) adjective.The trans. you&#039;re using is fine; I just like being  able to see the alternate renderings and places where translator(s) diverted from the literal.Agape,J</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a6efb3912874f08dd5ca7b24a6173184</guid>
				<title>J_47-2 replied to the topic The FIRST EPISTLE of CLEMENT to the CORINTHIANS. in the forum Exta-biblical Writings</title>
				<link>http://www.heavennet.net/forums/topic/the-first-epistle-of-clement-to-the-corinthians/page/2/#post-311960</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 10:52:39 +1200</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a &#8220;better&#8221; translation in KJV English with footnotes. (vol 1)<a href="http://www.ccel.org/fathers.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.ccel.org/fathers.html</a>God bless,J</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bddc2112a3dd61ddc0d1e9840643b66a</guid>
				<title>J_47-2 replied to the topic J_47-2 in the forum The Hot Seat</title>
				<link>http://www.heavennet.net/forums/topic/j_47-2/#post-311829</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 14:01:55 +1200</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>terraricca,Easy enough,First the Roman Catholic Church considers St. Peter to be the first Pope, however according to the Orthodox Catholic Apostolic Church the title Episcopos (Bishop) only applies to those leaders who oversaw the churches in the absence of the Apostles. Using this standard, the first Bishop of Rome is most likely Linus. The&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-44196"><a href="http://www.heavennet.net/forums/topic/j_47-2/#post-311829" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8a31a3fd63c087fc12adbc35459369e6</guid>
				<title>J_47-2 replied to the topic Kerwin in the forum The Hot Seat</title>
				<link>http://www.heavennet.net/forums/topic/kerwin/page/6/#post-311810</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 05:52:01 +1200</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kerwin,I think you sort of answered what I was getting at, THANX.As for Theophilus, I would NOT reccomend his extant writings. All Eng. translations (3) I&#039;ve found are skewed toward modern tastes and the Greek doesn&#039;t seem to be available online. Also he was considered a heretic in his own lifetime. I however, am not truly worthy to give advice on&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-63897"><a href="http://www.heavennet.net/forums/topic/kerwin/page/6/#post-311810" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">01f54216c1950531b0d3c05ad29ffb12</guid>
				<title>J_47-2 replied to the topic Kerwin in the forum The Hot Seat</title>
				<link>http://www.heavennet.net/forums/topic/kerwin/page/6/#post-311806</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 04:59:17 +1200</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kerwin,I&#039;m new to this site and I haven&#039;t read this entire thread (just skimming).Your last comments sound odd to me. They are in keeping with the teachings of Theophilus in mid-second century. Do you believe Sophia (Wisdom) to be the same as Pneuma (Spirit)? Is she twin of Logos? Mother of Christ?Just curious.May God shine His Light on us&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-63895"><a href="http://www.heavennet.net/forums/topic/kerwin/page/6/#post-311806" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">24caf8a5d458b940a178cc169cb28710</guid>
				<title>J_47-2 replied to the topic Pre-Nicene Writings - The Trinity Doctrine in the forum Truth or Tradition</title>
				<link>http://www.heavennet.net/forums/topic/pre-nicene-writings-the-trinity-doctrine/#post-782116</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 23:35:25 +1200</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quoting The Shepherd is not to quote Hermas the Elder (d. ca. 113- 118). The Shepherd was known to be written by the grandson of Hermas, also called Hermas, ca. 145, during the papacy of Pius I who was the elder brother (in the flesh as they say) of Hermas the Younger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fb1f58c4e0618dd2222da8dbd75b1580</guid>
				<title>J_47-2 replied to the topic An Apostasy - The Trinity Doctrine in the forum Truth or Tradition</title>
				<link>http://www.heavennet.net/forums/topic/an-apostasy-the-trinity-doctrine/#post-782226</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:55:16 +1200</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luther did not use Revelations as a proof-text because he thought it was not canonical. The book is last in our Bibles because that&#8217;s where Luther&#8217;s German translation placed it. No printer would publish his Bible without the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>