<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Heaven Net | Trinityisheresy | Activity</title>
	<link>https://heavennet.net/members/Trinityisheresy/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://heavennet.net/members/Trinityisheresy/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Trinityisheresy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 03:02:33 +1200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ba6a7aa80e9ee19afd5c1a24482a1422</guid>
				<title>Trinityisheresy replied to the topic Logos in the forum Scriptural Teachings</title>
				<link>http://www.heavennet.net/forums/topic/logos/#post-3699</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2003 14:57:35 +1200</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it says that in the beginning was the comprehension, or word, and that the word was to God, or with God, or for God, it is impossible to go on and say that it was God. If it was God, it could stand in no relation to GodCertainly the apostle John was not so unreasonable as to say that someone (“the Word”) was with some other individual (“G&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-24028"><a href="http://www.heavennet.net/forums/topic/logos/#post-3699" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>