<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Heaven Net | LodeRunner | Activity</title>
	<link>https://heavennet.net/members/LodeRunner/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://heavennet.net/members/LodeRunner/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for LodeRunner.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 06:36:29 +1200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4cfb7101c7ce91997cc21f6eac59ca0e</guid>
				<title>LodeRunner replied to the topic The Book of Enoch in the forum Exta-biblical Writings</title>
				<link>http://www.heavennet.net/forums/topic/enoch-17/#post-4201</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2002 07:00:56 +1200</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I simply used the information presented by Daniel to construct a logical hypothesis:1.  The book is claimed by some to have been written by Enoch, but it is aproxiamtely dated between the 2nd century BC and the first century AD.  &#060;&#8211;Conflicting times:  Enoch lived very near to Adam, working from genologues in Genesis, we can guess that Enoch was&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4147"><a href="http://www.heavennet.net/forums/topic/enoch-17/#post-4201" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">45163b943a9a44ef81e6a0e08d904c25</guid>
				<title>LodeRunner replied to the topic  in the forum The Trinity Doctrine</title>
				<link>http://www.heavennet.net/forums/topic/trinity-part-1/page/29/#post-15540</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2002 05:19:22 +1200</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose my wording was not clear.  I sometimes forget not to run on assumptions I make when talking with others.True, God the Father did NOT become flesh.  The Word, the only begotten Son, took on the flesh of man via the virgin birth.  Have you read the Apostle&#039;s Creed (yes, I know a misnomer, but oh well) or the Nicean Creed?  They are bot&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-23940"><a href="http://www.heavennet.net/forums/topic/trinity-part-1/page/29/#post-15540" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7b3971226bbf4b0de5a782d28e546869</guid>
				<title>LodeRunner replied to the topic  in the forum The Trinity Doctrine</title>
				<link>http://www.heavennet.net/forums/topic/trinity-part-1/page/22/#post-15433</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2002 00:34:35 +1200</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh Ok.  No probs then:  I believe the Trinity too.As to forums, usually, if you&#8217;re aiming for one person, just address it like a letter:&#034;whateverperson&#8217;snameis,         yak-yak-yak.&#034;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5e3086ba1a211323e3ad9a6b047db0f9</guid>
				<title>LodeRunner replied to the topic  in the forum The Trinity Doctrine</title>
				<link>http://www.heavennet.net/forums/topic/trinity-part-1/page/24/#post-15468</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2002 22:33:47 +1200</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you may be drawing inferences from what I said, and if my choice of words led you to understand it like that, I apologize.My core argument is that the doctrine of the Trinity is integral to any belief that salvation can come by believing on Christ.Central to the argument is a chain of logic based on Biblical law regardin susbsitution and&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-23936"><a href="http://www.heavennet.net/forums/topic/trinity-part-1/page/24/#post-15468" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f78da07b75ff566501f8212e2d544024</guid>
				<title>LodeRunner replied to the topic love one in the forum Faith</title>
				<link>http://www.heavennet.net/forums/topic/love-one/#post-4027</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2002 06:25:51 +1200</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My condolences.  As a death is an occasion for sadness, it is one for joy:  your loved one is no longer suffering from a painful disease but is in the joyous presence of the Lord.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">db6eaea08de8a8ddabc9dc3e81621ebc</guid>
				<title>LodeRunner replied to the topic magic.. in the forum Faith</title>
				<link>http://www.heavennet.net/forums/topic/magic/#post-4032</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2002 06:24:22 +1200</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, God is not &#8216;magic.&#8217;  Magic is generally a term applied to unexplaneable, spurematural events.  Of course, just because an event is labeled &#8216;supernatural&#8217; does not make it an act of god, rather the prefix &#8216;super-&#8216; denotes that it is not normal occurence.Generally, in history, the practice of &#8216;magic&#8217; as such is generally applied to divining&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-50670"><a href="http://www.heavennet.net/forums/topic/magic/#post-4032" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">87516d01710be717e31ce2fd1d054434</guid>
				<title>LodeRunner replied to the topic The Book of Enoch in the forum Exta-biblical Writings</title>
				<link>http://www.heavennet.net/forums/topic/enoch-17/#post-4199</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2002 06:14:09 +1200</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest argument against the &#034;Book of Enoch&#034; being actually true scripture is the language it is written in and the date it was located.  Given that it was writtend in Aramaic, and found c. AD 200, when Enoch lived somewhere between 3000 and 4000 BC, the language it was written in testifies that it was not written by Enoch.  Therefore the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4144"><a href="http://www.heavennet.net/forums/topic/enoch-17/#post-4199" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3763664ff44e3135d0721a68bcf8ffac</guid>
				<title>LodeRunner replied to the topic  in the forum The Trinity Doctrine</title>
				<link>http://www.heavennet.net/forums/topic/trinity-part-1/page/30/#post-15557</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2002 06:01:10 +1200</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, now that all of your different opionions on the translation (most of which I disagree with, but I digress) are in the field, let&#039;s debate the logic, in terms of Biblical Law.My Thesis:  Regardless of an actual text that says it, Jesus Christ must, not might be or can be, but <i>must</i> be fully man and fully God.My logical proof, from Biblical laws&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-23934"><a href="http://www.heavennet.net/forums/topic/trinity-part-1/page/30/#post-15557" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>