Heaven Net | Constitutionalist | Activity

Constitutionalist replied to the topic What is the soul? in the forum Truth or Tradition

Wed, 19 May 2010 04:51:42 +1200

Quote (kerwin @ May 18 2010,20:01)Constitutionalist,Thank you for your comments. I will use Leviticus 17:11 in a thread about the crusifiction of the Anointed One.Did you miss me?

Constitutionalist replied to the topic What is the soul? in the forum Truth or Tradition

Wed, 19 May 2010 02:52:52 +1200

Quote (kerwin @ May 18 2010,02:32)Nick,I believe the spirit and soul are seperate elements of an individual. I also believe but am not certain that it is the spirit that gives life to a person.It is possible, though I have my doubts, that the breath of life and the spirit are not the same element of a human being.For the life of the flesh in the…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic Proof that yeshua taught and practiced oral torah in the forum Scriptural Teachings

Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:23:10 +1300

Quote (kerwin @ Jan. 31 2010,12:09)ashermoshehthreepointonefour,I have a question. In Acts 10:27 Peter tells Cornelius that it is against Jewish Law to associate with or visit Gentiles. I do not remember that being in the Writings. Is it in the oral Torah?Jewish law mandates it is against Torah to assaociate with any unclean thing, and the ge…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic Does hell last for eternity? in the forum Truth or Tradition

Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:21:48 +1300

Quote (Everlasting father Jesus @ Jan. 21 2010,16:18)Hell is eternal one way or the other, it sounds like a terrible placeIt is not a place, it is destruction, and that destruction is eternal. And it is terrible, for the wicked, but only until they are destroyed. 'Elohim is merciful!

Constitutionalist replied to the topic Does hell last for eternity? in the forum Truth or Tradition

Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:17:04 +1300

Gen. 37:35 “I will go down into the grave unto my son.”Gen. 42:38 “Then shall ye bring down my gray hairs with sorrow to the grave.” See also the same expression in 44:29,31 The translators did not like to send 'Elohim’s servant, Jacob, to hell simply because his sons were evil.1 Sam. 2:6 “The Lord killeth, and maketh alive: he bringeth down to t…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic Does hell last for eternity? in the forum Truth or Tradition

Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:37:45 +1300

Amos 9:2 “Though they dig into hell, thence shall mine hand take them.” A figurative expression; but certainly pits of the earth are the only hells men can dig into.Psa. 16:10 “Thou wilt not leave my soul in hell; neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption.” This refers to our Lord’s three days in the tomb. Acts 2:31; 3:15Psa. 1…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic Does hell last for eternity? in the forum Truth or Tradition

Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:12:20 +1300

The last things that will be DESTROYED is DEATH and the HELL (GRAVE)!

Constitutionalist replied to the topic Does hell last for eternity? in the forum Truth or Tradition

Thu, 21 Jan 2010 23:09:24 +1300

“Hell” is the English rendering of two different Greek words in the New Testament The English word is from the Anglo-Saxon hel, Genitive case helle = a hidden place, from the Anglo-Saxon helan = to hide. It is in the New Testament used as the translation of two Greek words:Gehenna. Greek geenna. This is the transliteration of the Hebrew Gai'…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic Does hell last for eternity? in the forum Truth or Tradition

Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:49:13 +1300

Hell = Grave, Pit, Abyss

Constitutionalist replied to the topic A personal oppology! in the forum Inspirational writings & sermons

Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:26:45 +1300

Quote (Ed J @ Jan. 21 2010,10:44)Quote (Elizabeth @ Jan. 22 2010,05:12)Quote (terraricca @ Jan. 22 2010,01:46)Ed JChrist said: blessed are the ones who listen to their(the Apostles) messages; he was referring to the messages of the Apostles and to our messages. NOT YOUR MESSAGE, SO LEAVE IT TO THE SCRIPTURES AND THE SPIRIT OF CHRIST TO GIVE THE…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic I know we can eat meat but can we eat pork? in the forum Scriptural Teachings

Sat, 16 Jan 2010 01:33:01 +1300

Quote (Gene @ Jan. 13 2010,08:50)con…….I was going to bring up the scriptures the Terraricca brought up but no need to he already brought them up , but here is another one to think about. Luke 10.8…> And into whatever city ye enter and they recieve you, eat such things as are set before you: I have known men who have eaten pork all their…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic I know we can eat meat but can we eat pork? in the forum Scriptural Teachings

Wed, 13 Jan 2010 04:32:47 +1300

Yahuweh Created us to be HealthyWe had perfect health before the fall. Ge 1:26,31 compare Mt 5:48Yahuweh's will for each of us today is that we be healthy. Ps 67:1,2, Jer 29:11, Jer 30:17,22, Jn 10:10We will be restored to perfect health in Heaven. Rev 21:4, Rev 22:2,3True Health is HolisticOur being has physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic I know we can eat meat but can we eat pork? in the forum Scriptural Teachings

Wed, 13 Jan 2010 04:29:07 +1300

Choose to Leave Apostasy”To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.” Isa 8:20″And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.” Rev 18:4

Constitutionalist replied to the topic I know we can eat meat but can we eat pork? in the forum Scriptural Teachings

Wed, 13 Jan 2010 04:27:29 +1300

“Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic I know we can eat meat but can we eat pork? in the forum Scriptural Teachings

Wed, 13 Jan 2010 04:16:53 +1300

Calling Yahuweh's People Out of Babylon”And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand, The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of Yahuweh, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic I know we can eat meat but can we eat pork? in the forum Scriptural Teachings

Wed, 13 Jan 2010 04:07:40 +1300

Quote (princess of the king @ Jan. 12 2010,18:51)terraricca, please excuse the intrusion, i will tell you right now, ron has love.do not judge him, his practice is just, as you quote paul to him, he could quote the same to you. if you feel the need, you could pass judgement on me also, for i do the same. you were created by him, he would know what…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic I know we can eat meat but can we eat pork? in the forum Scriptural Teachings

Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:17:34 +1300

Does the Bible say that concern over diet is insignificant? (Heb 13:8,9) NoVerse 9 clearly indicates the concern to be with “divers” and “strange” doctrines. These are the teachings of men, not the commandments of Yahuweh.Verse 8 emphsizes that Yahuweh does not change. Therefore, His laws do not change. His ceremonial law was a foreshadowing, a…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic I know we can eat meat but can we eat pork? in the forum Scriptural Teachings

Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:16:23 +1300

Does Yahuweh say that everything He created is good to be eaten? (1Ti 4:1-5) NoSanctification by the word of Yahuweh clearly indicates food which Yahuweh has set apart as clean.Celibacy and abstinence as a form of penance are condemned as apostate teachings.

Constitutionalist replied to the topic I know we can eat meat but can we eat pork? in the forum Scriptural Teachings

Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:15:36 +1300

Did Paul tell the Colossians that the health laws are part of the ceremonial law and, therefore, obsolete? (Col 2:20-23) No Some commands to “Touch not” and “handle not” were part of the ceremonial law. (Nu 19:11-22 note the salvation symbolism in verse 17)However, verse 22 clearly identifies the context as being about man made additions that were…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic I know we can eat meat but can we eat pork? in the forum Scriptural Teachings

Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:14:47 +1300

Did Paul tell the Colossians they could eat and drink whatever they want? (Col 2:16) NoNote that the verse does NOT say “what you eat” or “what you drink”.The food and drink refer to the various meal and drink offerings of the ceremonial law. (compare Lev 23:37)Context: “a shadow of the things that were to come” (Col 2:17)

Constitutionalist replied to the topic I know we can eat meat but can we eat pork? in the forum Scriptural Teachings

Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:14:07 +1300

Is all food and drink clean? (Ro 14:2,3,14,17,20-23) NoPaul's statement that there is nothing unclean of itself (Ro 14:14) does not mean that there are no unclean things.In another letter, he states Yahuweh's clear command to abstain from unclean things. (2Co 6:17)The distinction made in Ro 14:14 centers on the phrase “of itself”.Anything that…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic I know we can eat meat but can we eat pork? in the forum Scriptural Teachings

Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:12:03 +1300

Did the controversy over circumcision declare that unclean food was allowed to be eaten? (Ac 15:1,2,19,20,28,29) NoThe controversy was about circumcision.The disciples were led by the Holy Spirit to immediately correct certain widespread, Gentile violations of Yahuweh's laws (eating food offered to idols, eating strangled animals, eating blood,…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic I know we can eat meat but can we eat pork? in the forum Scriptural Teachings

Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:10:28 +1300

Did Yahuweh tell Peter that all animals were allowed to be killed and eaten? (Ac 10:12-15) NoThe interpretation of the vision shows that its real subject was the Gentiles, not animals. (see Ac 10:28)

Constitutionalist replied to the topic I know we can eat meat but can we eat pork? in the forum Scriptural Teachings

Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:09:43 +1300

Did Yashuw'ah say that it does not matter what we eat? (Mt 15:11) NoThe context is eating without first washing the hands (see Mt 15:2 and Mt 15:20).Yashuw'ah refuted the Pharisees' claim that ceremonial washings affect our purity.

Constitutionalist replied to the topic I know we can eat meat but can we eat pork? in the forum Scriptural Teachings

Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:08:53 +1300

After the flood, did Yahuweh allow all living things to be eaten? (Ge 9:3) NoThe distinction between clean and unclean animals was already known. (Ge 8:20)There was a mutual understanding that unclean animals were not candidates for food.Consider, as an analogy, that people live and move, but cannibalism is obviously not being sanctioned.Consider…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic I know we can eat meat but can we eat pork? in the forum Scriptural Teachings

Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:07:39 +1300

In Eden, animals were not eaten by humans nor by other animals. (Ge 1:29,30)Yahuweh cares about animals. (Dt 25:4, Jnh 4:11, Ps 145:9, Mt 6:26, Mt 10:29)The righteous are kind to animals, but the wicked are not. (Pr 12:10)Thou shalt not kill. (Ex 20:13)The primary application is toward man (Mt 7:12, Mt 22:37-40), but the 6th commandment also…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic I know we can eat meat but can we eat pork? in the forum Scriptural Teachings

Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:06:24 +1300

The diet in Heaven will be vegetarian. (Isa 65:17,21,22, Rev 22:2)

Constitutionalist replied to the topic I know we can eat meat but can we eat pork? in the forum Scriptural Teachings

Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:05:48 +1300

In the end-time destruction of the wicked, the wicked are described as “eating swine's flesh” and other “abominations”. (Isa 66:16-18,22-24 compare Isa 65:1-5)Modern Babylon is described as “a cage of every unclean and hateful bird”. (Rev 18:1,2)

Constitutionalist replied to the topic I know we can eat meat but can we eat pork? in the forum Scriptural Teachings

Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:05:17 +1300

The disciples followed the same, Biblical diet laws. (Ac 10:11-14)The vision was about the Gentiles, not about eating unclean food.Peter's statement reveals his adherence to the diet laws.”But Hegesippus, who lived immediately after the apostles, gives the most accurate account in the fifth book of his Memoirs. He writes as follows: “James, the…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic I know we can eat meat but can we eat pork? in the forum Scriptural Teachings

Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:03:54 +1300

Noah was aware of the distinction between clean and unclean animals. (Ge 7:1-3)The clean animals were used for sacrifice. (Ge 8:20)The flood temporarily destroyed the vegetation, making the eating of meat necessary. (Ge 7:19-24, Ge 8:3-5, Ge 9:1-3)It was understood that only the clean animals were allowed to be eaten.Eating an unclean animal would…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic I know we can eat meat but can we eat pork? in the forum Scriptural Teachings

Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:00:36 +1300

After the fall, our diet became more focused around herbs of the field. (Ge 3:17,18)The tree of life and other trees of the graden of Eden were no longer available. (Ge 3:22-24 compare Ge 2:16,17)Eating the fruit of trees is convenient and requires little effort.Eating herbs of the field requires an annual cycle of hard labor, which was one of the…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic I know we can eat meat but can we eat pork? in the forum Scriptural Teachings

Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:59:51 +1300

The original diet for humankind consisted of seed-bearing plants, fruits, and nuts. (Ge 1:29)Herb – “A plant or vegetable with a soft or succulent stalk or stem, which dies to the root every year, and is thus distinguished from a tree and a shrub, which have ligneous or hard woody stems. … The word herb comprehends all the grasses, and numerous…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic in the forum The Trinity Doctrine

Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:57:46 +1300

Quote (thethinker @ Jan. 12 2010,12:52)Quote (Constitutionalist @ Jan. 13 2010,07:39)Quote (thethinker @ Jan. 12 2010,12:24)JustAskin said:Quote Ihave been doing a little Web Surfing about the trinity and am amazed at the amount of information that 'attest' to the doctrine BUT never mention the Holy Spirit – In other words, they 'attest' to a…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic in the forum The Trinity Doctrine

Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:57:46 +1300

Constitutionalist replied to the topic I know we can eat meat but can we eat pork? in the forum Scriptural Teachings

Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:53:13 +1300

The first test of humankind was the food test. (Ge 2:15,17)The first test of Daniel in Babylon was the food test. (Da 1:8)The first test after Yashuw'ah began His ministry was the food test. (Mt 4:1-4)Only those who are faithful in seemingly small matters will pass the greater tests. (Jer 12:5, Mt 25:22,23) (Smaller test example: Da 1:11-20)…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic in the forum The Trinity Doctrine

Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:39:48 +1300

Quote (thethinker @ Jan. 12 2010,12:24)JustAskin said:Quote Ihave been doing a little Web Surfing about the trinity and am amazed at the amount of information that 'attest' to the doctrine BUT never mention the Holy Spirit – In other words, they 'attest' to a 'Bi-une' God and only by happenstance is the Holy spirit mentioned with the usual quotes…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic I know we can eat meat but can we eat pork? in the forum Scriptural Teachings

Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:24:13 +1300

Matthew 15:2-3, 6, 8-12, 15-18, 20 Why do thy disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? for they wash not their hands when they eat bread. But he answered and said unto them, Why do ye also transgress the commandment of Yahuweh by your tradition? . . Thus have ye made the commandment of Yahuweh of none effect by your tradition. . . This…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic I know we can eat meat but can we eat pork? in the forum Scriptural Teachings

Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:11:00 +1300

Quote (Gene @ Jan. 12 2010,09:50)asher……….the whole concept of clean and unclean meats had little to do with physical health, as it did with spiritual health, God presenting the Principle of distinguishing the difference between what is Spiritually acceptable and what is Not Spiritually acceptable. Remember GOD was dealing with CARNAL MINDED…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic I know we can eat meat but can we eat pork? in the forum Scriptural Teachings

Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:06:35 +1300

Constitutionalist replied to the topic The arian dissenters in the forum Truth or Tradition

Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:02:08 +1300

Quote (t8 @ Jan. 11 2010,22:02)Quote (thethinker @ Jan. 12 2010,06:38)In order to stop others from posting, you need to actually set up a debate in the debates forum in Believers Area.Otherwise all are free to post in any topic outside of that forum if they have posting rights.Sorry, I can only guarantee it if you post it in the Debates…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic in the forum The Trinity Doctrine

Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:01:29 +1300

In the language of the Old Testament there are two distinct forms of the word “lord.” One means G-d, the other a superior who is not G-d. The oracle which predicts the Messiah, the Lord Yashuw'ah (Ps. 110:1) gives him the title “lord,” which refers to a person who is not G-d. To distinguish Deity from non-Deity, the Hebrew Old Testament speaks of…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic in the forum The Trinity Doctrine

Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:01:29 +1300

Constitutionalist replied to the topic In jesus' name in the forum Truth or Tradition

Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:58:23 +1300

Constitutionalist replied to the topic in the forum The Trinity Doctrine

Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:32:42 +1300

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Jan. 11 2010,09:59)Hi JustQuote (JustAskin @ Jan. 11 2010,11:58)Personal names in the Bible are very important especially to prominent individuals and no two names mean the same thing. God (Jehovah) certainly has HIS NAME in Jesus as scripture tells us (Do I have to qoute it?) as in Yah-weh (God) and Yah-shua (Jesus).You…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic in the forum The Trinity Doctrine

Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:31:08 +1300

Quote (JustAskin @ Jan. 11 2010,10:06)WJ, on page 312 you stated and asked:Quote Jesus answered them, “Have not I chosen you twelve”, and one of you is a devil? John 6:70″Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you, and ordained you”, that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and your fruit should remain: that whatsoever ye shall ask of the…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic I know we can eat meat but can we eat pork? in the forum Scriptural Teachings

Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:50:36 +1300

Quote (ashermoshehthreepointonefour @ Jan. 11 2010,07:26)Quote (terraricca @ Jan. 12 2010,02:12)hi ASHno it is not forbidden to eat pork ,only if you follow the law and believed that you are saved by the law then you can not eat pork and many other things.if you follow the law you are not a Christian you are a Jew according to the flesh.Hello.The…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic in the forum The Trinity Doctrine

Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:19:34 +1300

Quote (banana @ Jan. 10 2010,22:13)Quote (Constitutionalist @ Jan. 11 2010,13:04)Quote (banana @ Jan. 10 2010,17:58)Quote (JustAskin @ Jan. 11 2010,12:32)Con, Thanks for the support. I will await responses from others before replying further to this.Hello and Welcome!! The trinity doctrine is not of God, but a man made doctrine. It was Quintus S…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic Father in the forum Scriptural Teachings

Mon, 11 Jan 2010 02:39:28 +1300

Matthew 5:16 Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven.Matthew 5:45 That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.Matthew 5:48 Be ye therefore perfect,…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic in the forum The Trinity Doctrine

Mon, 11 Jan 2010 02:06:21 +1300

Quote (JustAskin @ Jan. 10 2010,15:33)Thank you to all those who have welcomed me to this site in Jesus' name.Can I ask: – What is the Trinity guidance on Worship? – Does the scripture teach us to worship Jesus or just the Father (God)?Looking through the Scriptures I find the following: LUKE 4:8 Jesus answered, “It is written: '…[Read more]

Constitutionalist replied to the topic in the forum The Trinity Doctrine

Mon, 11 Jan 2010 02:04:57 +1300

Quote (banana @ Jan. 10 2010,17:58)Quote (JustAskin @ Jan. 11 2010,12:32)Con, Thanks for the support. I will await responses from others before replying further to this.Hello and Welcome!! The trinity doctrine is not of God, but a man made doctrine. It was Quintus Septimus Florens Tertullian who first came up with it. In 155 He was born to Pa…[Read more]