• Ed J replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 2 days, 22 hours ago

    Hi Ed,

    So LIGHT and the DAY were created before the two great lights.

    Did you think the DAY needed the two lights created first?

    Nick,

    you’re not making sense

  • Ed J replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 2 days, 22 hours ago

    You cannot use one verse to dogmatically snuff out another verse

  • Ed J replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 2 days, 22 hours ago

    T8, do you agree that Genesis says God MADE the sun, moon, and stars on day FOUR? Yes or No, please?

    Hi Mike, NO

    “And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day” (Gen 1:16)

    The light he called “Day” happened on DAY 1 Mike…

    And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night.
    And the evening and the morning were…[Read more]

  • Ed J replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 2 days, 23 hours ago

    Here’s a debate on flat earth…

  • Ed J replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 6 days, 4 hours ago

    The point was how you could have a wind that is going against a 1,000 mph rotation. It would seem that all winds would have to follow or lag behind the spin of the globe.

    Hi Dig.

    That is what I have always thought as well – that would mean Weather from East to West, but we see the opposite.

    ____________
    God bless
    Ed J

  • Ed J replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 1 week ago

    He called the light “Day”

  • Ed J replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 1 week, 1 day ago

    With the creation of the sun and rotation of the earth you can have THE FIRST day

    Both aspects are mentioned as being created ON DAY ONE

  • Ed J replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 1 week, 1 day ago

    Please explain why you think the night is the focus.

    Because the stars and moon are seen at NIGHT (day 4)

    and because you need the sun to have the first DAY (day 1)

  • Ed J replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 1 week, 1 day ago

    Thank’s T8

  • Ed J replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 1 week, 1 day ago

    I could probably add this HTML code to artificially create line spacing but why should I have to?

    (color=white)……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………[(/color)

  • Ed J replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 1 week, 1 day ago

    T8 The last part of my Last post seems to losing the LINE spacing.

    This has happened before as well – What can be done about it?

  • Ed J replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 1 week, 1 day ago

    Ed: “You need the sun and rotation of the Earth for a Day and Night – according to the Heliocentric model of course That means the first 3 DAYS …and what is said in DAY 1 seems to fit the bill”

    Hi Ed, (1)you don’t need the rotation of the earth for a day if the sun is revolving over a stationary earth. (2)You also don’t need the sun for a day i…

    [Read more]

  • Ed J replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 1 week, 1 day ago

    Ed: How do you boys explain the first three days with no sun?

    Surely not by correcting God about which day He made the sun. 🙂 I can’t answer that, Eddy. I can only go by what we’ve been told in God’s written word. There was somehow light and 3 evenings and mornings before He created the sun. How that could be, I couldn’t say.
    [Read more]

  • Ed J replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 1 week, 1 day ago

    Hi Dig4,

    And if the day can be 1000 years long what of your personal interpretation of morning and evening?

    Hi Nick,

    The 1,000 year reference could be a ref to in the day you eateth it you shall surly die…

    Methuselah lived the longest – 969 years

  • Ed J replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 1 week, 1 day ago

    Obviously if the word “day” is used with “evening and morning” it is in a literal sense. If it includes “day 1, 2, 3”, etc. it also is in a literal sense. If ANYONE has a problem with this reasoning please speak up.

    Hi DigforTruth,

    You need the sun and rotation of the Earth
    for a Day and Night – according to the Heliocentric model of course…[Read more]

  • Ed J replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 1 week, 2 days ago

    Hey all. I’ve been gone for a year or so. I was on the international space station, helping canadarm2 to get up and running. What have I missed?

    Hi David,

    Glad to see you back.

    _______________
    Your brother
    in Christ
    Ed J

  • Ed J replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 1 week, 2 days ago

    D4T: Ed, I don’t see how something said to be made on day 4 could be made on day 1. That would be a clear contradiction.

    I believe we must let Scripture speak for itself. If it says the sun was made on day 4 then that must mean what it says.

    Amen. The sun, moon and all the stars on day four. The earth on day one.

    How do you b…[Read more]

  • Ed J replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 1 week, 2 days ago

    T8: …isn’t the point that the third well proves the sphere earth and thus Sagan was right about the sphere earth?

    If a third well could prove a sphere (it can’t), then why in 2000 years has nobody done it?

    Hi Mike,

    One well two wells three wells all the same.

    The sunlight coming through the clouds at different angles sugge…[Read more]

  • Ed J replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 1 week, 4 days ago

    Both of these ideas mentioned in day 4 refer BACK to the Earth’s rotation
    as it correlates to the Heliocentric model of our solar-system as mentioned in day 1.

    Please address this point

  • Ed J replied to the topic Flat Earth? in the forum View Points 1 week, 4 days ago

    Ed, I don’t see how something said to be made on day 4 could be made on day 1. That would be a clear contradiction.

    Hi Dig4thruth,

    You appear to be addressing the sun mention
    by your presupposed doubts as some kind of evidence,
    while at the same time ignoring an even clearer reference:

    “And God divided the light from the darkness” <-…[Read more]

  • Load More