Who carried the cross? Jesus was not crucified!

This topic contains 20 replies, has 6 voices, and was last updated by  bodhitharta 1 year, 11 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #816510
     AndrewAD 
    Participant
    • Topics started 1
    • Total replies 791

    “The practice of animal sacrifices was really to show that there was no way to cover sin, until a man who was sinless ended that” But the OT seems to think they did cover sin upon God’s command;and of course it all supported the priests and made them wealthy.

    And just how did a sinless man end it? was it not that he became a sacrifice for sin? It’s really not a western idea but a biblical idea.And does not the eastern church practice the Eucharist at every service? The difference is they’re not quite as dogmatic on the specifics as the Roman church and most protestants for that matter.But yes they do believe Christ was a sacrifice for our sin.

    #816511
     AndrewAD 
    Participant
    • Topics started 1
    • Total replies 791

    “Has anyone ever thought why it went from animal to human sacrifice?” perhaps because a human is actually a greater sacrifice than an animal,especially a firstborn son which the Canaanites,including the Hebrews all practiced to seek the blessings of God.

    #816890
     bodhitharta 
    Participant
    • Topics started 150
    • Total replies 10,911

    When Adam and Eve “realized their shame” they covered them selves with fig leaves. When God came along he covered them with animal skins. So the official first sacrifice of an animal for sin was done by God himself. Then it become the norm.

    Has anyone ever thought why it went from animal to human sacrifice?

    God says two things that prohibit the idea of Jesus dying for the sins of people 1. God hates Human sacrifice God calls it an abomination and 2. God calls shedding the blood of the innocent an abomination

    #816891
     bodhitharta 
    Participant
    • Topics started 150
    • Total replies 10,911

    “Has anyone ever thought why it went from animal to human sacrifice?” perhaps because a human is actually a greater sacrifice than an animal,especially a firstborn son which the Canaanites,including the Hebrews all practiced to seek the blessings of God.

    It is unlawful to sacrifice a firstborn son they were to all be redeemed

     

    #816904
     t8 
    Participant
    • Topics started 890
    • Total replies 18,348

    Shedding innocent blood is a terrible thing. But God paid the ultimate price (a terrible price) in order to bring many sons to glory. But your religion teaches that God has no son at all, thus you are not a son as your religion states. If you are a son, then you cannot hold to the views of Mohammed.

    #817614
     bodhitharta 
    Participant
    • Topics started 150
    • Total replies 10,911

    OH THE HUMANITY!

    These Christians want you to believe that not only God NEEDED a Human Blood Sacrifice of an innocent person. that right there would be enough but these people want you to believe that it was necessary to TORTURE the SACRIFICE.

    Plus they believe God doesn’t care about His own laws

    Exodus 13:13–16 Every firstborn of man among your sons, you shall redeem.

    Leviticus 22:24 KJ21
    Ye shall not offer unto the Lord that which is bruised, or crushed, or broken, or cut; neither shall ye make any offering thereof in your land.

    Now there is no escaping these facts these are God’s Law so you cannot fulfill the Law if you break the Law.

    This look like a serious issue that you people should consider

     

Viewing 6 posts - 16 through 21 (of 21 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2018 Heaven Net

or

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

or

Create Account